<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel>
<title>Zhonggan Huang — Neckpinch</title><link>https://neckpinch.com/authors/zhonggan-huang/</link><description>New arXiv papers by Zhonggan Huang, from Neckpinch</description>
<atom:link href="https://neckpinch.com/authors/zhonggan-huang/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2026 08:41:12 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<item><title>Is Mean Curvature Flow a Gradient Flow?</title><link>https://neckpinch.com/papers/2212.03701/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">arxiv:2212.03701</guid><pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Zhonggan Huang — It is well-known that the mean curvature flow is a formal gradient flow of the perimeter functional. However, by the work of Michor and Mumford [7,8], the formal Riemannian structure that is compatible with the gradient flow structure induces a degenerate metric on the space of hypersurfaces. It is then natural to ask whether there is a nondegenerate metric space of hypersurfaces, on which the mean curvature flow admits a gradient flow structure. In this paper we study the mean curvature flow on two nondegenerate metric spaces of simple closed plane curves: the uniformness-preserving metric structure proposed by Shi and Vorotnikov [11] and the curvature-weighted structure proposed by Michor and Mumford [8], and prove that the mean curvature flow is not a gradient flow in either of the spaces.</description><category>Mean curvature flow</category></item>
</channel></rss>