© 2026 NeckPinch · www.neckpinch.com · All rights reserved.
Course 5Book 5A: Complex Analysis and Conformal GeometryChapter 4
Harmonic Functions and Conformal Mapping
The Dirichlet problem, Poisson’s kernel and the Riemann mapping theorem.
Read with Stein and Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, chapter 8, "Conformal Mappings" (conformal equivalence and examples, the Schwarz lemma and automorphisms of the disc and upper half-plane, the Riemann mapping theorem, conformal mappings onto polygons). The Poisson kernel is in their Fourier Analysis, chapter 2, section 5, and in chapter 3, section 7 of Complex Analysis.
The real part of a holomorphic function is harmonic (5A.1 Holomorphic Functions Are Conformal), and in a simply connected region every harmonic function arises this way. So the whole machinery of the last two chapters applies to the Laplace equation in the plane. Two consequences make this chapter. First, harmonic functions can be transplanted by conformal maps: if you can solve the Laplace equation on a disc, you can solve it on any region that is conformally equivalent to the disc. Second, by the Riemann mapping theorem, that is every simply connected region other than the plane itself. Steady temperatures, electrostatic potentials and ideal flows in any such region reduce to a formula on the disc: the Poisson integral.
The Riemann mapping theorem is also the first uniformization theorem: it says that, up to conformal equivalence, there is only one simply connected proper region of the plane. 5A.5 Uniformization and the Two-Dimensional Ricci Flow extends it to all surfaces, and that is where curvature enters.
By the end of this chapter you will be able to:
- find a harmonic conjugate, and use conformal invariance to move harmonic functions between regions;
- solve the Dirichlet problem on the disc with the Poisson kernel, and explain the kernel as an approximate identity;
- state and prove the Schwarz lemma, and use it to find all conformal self-maps of the disc;
- state the Riemann mapping theorem and follow its proof by normal families;
- recognise a Schwarz–Christoffel map, and say what conformal flattening of the brain's surface does and does not claim.
Steady temperature in a plate
A thin metal plate is held at fixed temperatures along its edge and left until nothing changes. The temperature then satisfies the heat equation with , which is the Laplace equation , with prescribed on the boundary: the Dirichlet problem. The same problem describes the electrostatic potential in a region bounded by conductors held at fixed voltages, and the velocity potential of an ideal flow (5A.2 Cauchy’s Theorem and Its Consequences).
Take the upper half-plane, with the negative real axis held at temperature and the positive real axis at . The function , with values in , is the imaginary part of the holomorphic function , hence harmonic; it equals on the negative axis and on the positive one. So
is the temperature, and the isotherms are the rays from . Now take a disc whose upper boundary semicircle is held at and lower at . The Möbius map sends the unit disc conformally onto the upper half-plane, the upper semicircle onto the negative real axis and the lower onto the positive one (Exercise 4.8). So the temperature in the disc is
and the isotherms are the images of rays: arcs of circles through the two points where the boundary temperature jumps (Figure 4.1, right). At the centre the temperature is , the average of the boundary values, as the mean value property says it must be.
This is the method in general: map the region conformally to one where the answer is known, solve there, and map back. Engineers used it for a century to compute fields around conductors, flows around obstacles and stresses around holes, and it still underlies some numerical methods. Its limits are that it works only in two dimensions, only for the Laplace equation and its relatives, and only when a conformal map can be found.
Harmonic functions are real parts
Let be a harmonic function on a simply connected open set . Then for a holomorphic on , unique up to adding an imaginary constant. Its imaginary part is a harmonic conjugate of .
Proof. The function satisfies the Cauchy–Riemann equations because is harmonic and (the computation in the last exercise of 5A.2 Cauchy’s Theorem and Its Consequences). On a simply connected set it has a primitive (5A.2 Cauchy’s Theorem and Its Consequences), and forces .
On a region with a hole this can fail: is harmonic on , but its conjugate would be , which is not single-valued. Even so, every harmonic function is locally a real part, which is enough for local properties. In particular harmonic functions are smooth, even real-analytic, and satisfy the mean value property and the maximum principle (5A.2 Cauchy’s Theorem and Its Consequences). 6A.2 Harmonic Functions proves all of these again in any dimension, where there is no complex structure to lean on.
If is holomorphic and is harmonic on , then is harmonic on .
Proof. Locally , so , the real part of a holomorphic function.
In fact (Exercise 4.9): the Laplacian changes only by the conformal factor. This identity is the seed of the formula for the curvature of a conformal metric in 5A.5 Uniformization and the Two-Dimensional Ricci Flow.
The Poisson kernel
Let be continuous on the unit circle. Then
is harmonic in the open disc and extends continuously to the closed disc with on the circle. It is the only such function.
Proof. The kernel. For , summing two geometric series (2A.7 Series),
The second form shows is the real part of at , so it is harmonic in ; so is , by differentiating under the integral (3A.3 The Lebesgue Integral).
An approximate identity. is positive, its average over is (only the term survives integration), and for every , uniformly on as , since there the denominator is at least while the numerator tends to . These are the three properties of an approximate identity (3A.8 Convolution and Mollifiers), so uniformly as , exactly as Gaussian blur converges to the original image.
Uniqueness. The difference of two solutions is harmonic, continuous on the closed disc and zero on the circle; by the maximum principle applied to it and its negative, it is zero.
In Fourier terms (2B.7 Fourier Series and the First Heat Equation): if , then . Each Fourier mode is extended inward as , which is or , and high frequencies die off fast towards the centre. Compare the heat equation on the ring in 2B.7 Fourier Series and the First Heat Equation, which multiplies the -th mode by : in both cases high frequencies are damped, which is why both equations smooth. At only survives, the mean value property again.
The Schwarz lemma
Let be holomorphic from the unit disc to itself with . Then for all , and . If for some , or , then is a rotation, .
Proof. Since , has a removable singularity at , with (5A.3 Residues and Fourier Transforms). On the circle , ; by the maximum modulus principle (5A.2 Cauchy’s Theorem and Its Consequences) on the whole disc . Let : , which is both inequalities. If equality holds at an interior point, has an interior maximum, so is a constant of modulus .
The conformal bijections of onto itself are exactly the maps
Proof. These maps are bijections of the disc (an exercise in 5A.1 Holomorphic Functions Are Conformal). Conversely, let be a conformal bijection with , and compose with to get , a bijection fixing . The Schwarz lemma applied to and to gives and , so and is a rotation.
The Schwarz lemma has a geometric form, due to Georg Pick: a holomorphic map of the disc to itself does not increase distances in the hyperbolic metric , which has curvature (5A.5 Uniformization and the Two-Dimensional Ricci Flow). Lars Ahlfors (1938) turned it into a statement about curvature alone: a conformal metric on the disc with curvature at most is everywhere at most the hyperbolic one. His proof is a maximum principle argument applied to the logarithm of the ratio of the two metrics. Comparison by curvature, proved with a maximum principle, is exactly the method of Hamilton's Ricci flow estimates (11A.4 Maximum Principles under Ricci Flow), and Schwarz–Ahlfors-type lemmas are a standard tool in the Kähler–Ricci flow (5A.6 Where This Track Leads).
The Riemann mapping theorem
Two open sets are conformally equivalent if there is a holomorphic bijection between them (its inverse is then automatically holomorphic). The plane is not conformally equivalent to the disc: a holomorphic map is bounded and entire, hence constant (Liouville). That is the only exception.
Let be a non-empty simply connected open subset of the plane, and . There is a unique conformal bijection with and .
The proof finds as the solution of an extremal problem: among all injective holomorphic maps sending to , take one that stretches most at . It needs one more fact, which follows from the argument principle (Exercise 4.13).
If injective holomorphic functions on a connected open set converge uniformly on compact sets to , then is injective or constant.
Hurwitz's theorem is proved in Exercise 4.13. We now prove Theorem 4.6.
Proof. Uniqueness. If , both work, is an automorphism of the disc fixing with positive derivative there, hence the identity by Corollary 4.5.
Step 1: the family is not empty. Let be the set of injective holomorphic with . Pick . Since is simply connected and on it, there is a holomorphic square root on (5A.2 Cauchy’s Theorem and Its Consequences), and is injective. It cannot take both values and , so misses a whole disc around , since it contains a disc around by the open mapping property. A Möbius map sending the complement of that disc into , followed by a disc automorphism, gives an element of .
Step 2: an extremal map exists. Let ; it is finite by the Cauchy estimates, since all are bounded by , and positive by step 1. Take with . The family is bounded by , so by Montel's theorem (5A.2 Cauchy’s Theorem and Its Consequences) a subsequence converges uniformly on compact sets to a holomorphic , with (derivatives converge too, by the Cauchy formula). So is not constant, hence injective by Hurwitz, and with by the maximum modulus principle. So .
Step 3: the extremal map is onto. Suppose misses a point . Then misses , and on the simply connected it has an injective square root , mapping into . Let . Unwinding, , where with ; maps to itself, fixes , and is not injective (because of the squaring), so it is not a rotation. By the Schwarz lemma , and , contradicting the maximality of . Finally, rotate so that .
The proof is a model of the direct method (4A.6 Weak Convergence and the Direct Method): define the quantity to optimise, use compactness (here Montel) to get an optimiser, then show by a variation (here the square-root trick and Schwarz) that the optimiser has the property you want. Riemann's own argument in 1851 went through the Dirichlet principle, minimising energy, which is the same strategy with a different compactness theorem; it was only made rigorous once that compactness was understood.
The theorem says nothing about how to find . For polygons there is a formula: a conformal map from the disc onto a polygon with interior angles is
the Schwarz–Christoffel formula, for suitable points on the unit circle (the prevertices) and constants , . Each factor turns the boundary direction by the right amount at and keeps it straight elsewhere. For a square, by symmetry the prevertices are , , and (Figure 4.2). For general polygons the prevertices must be found numerically; Toby Driscoll's Schwarz–Christoffel Toolbox is a widely used implementation.
The cerebral cortex is a folded sheet, and most of it is hidden in the folds. To display activity on it, or to compare brains with each other, neuroscientists flatten it: map the cortical surface, extracted from an MRI scan as a triangulated surface, onto a plane, a sphere or a disc. No flattening can preserve both angles and areas (Gauss again, 5A.1 Holomorphic Functions Are Conformal), so one has to choose, and a conformal map is a natural choice because it keeps local shapes. For a surface of the topological type of a disc or sphere, the uniformization theorem (5A.5 Uniformization and the Two-Dimensional Ricci Flow, with the Riemann mapping theorem as its planar case) guarantees that such a map exists, and fixes it up to a Möbius transformation.
Two research groups made this practical around 2004. Monica Hurdal and Ken Stephenson used circle packings, a discrete version of conformal maps in which circles packed on the surface are rearranged into a packing in the plane with the same tangencies ("Cortical cartography using the discrete conformal approach of circle packings", NeuroImage, 2004; "Discrete conformal methods for cortical brain flattening", NeuroImage, 2009). Xianfeng Gu, Yalin Wang, Tony Chan, Paul Thompson and Shing-Tung Yau computed conformal maps of the cortex onto the sphere by minimising a harmonic energy ("Genus zero surface conformal mapping and its application to brain surface mapping", IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2004). These are research tools for visualisation and for registering surfaces to each other, used in brain-mapping studies; this guide makes no claim about routine clinical use. A later method from the same school, discrete surface Ricci flow, appears in 5A.5 Uniformization and the Two-Dimensional Ricci Flow.
History
Siméon Denis Poisson wrote down his integral formula in the 1820s, in work on heat and potentials. Riemann stated the mapping theorem in his 1851 thesis, with a proof based on the Dirichlet principle; after Weierstrass showed in 1870 that the principle needed justification (4A.6 Weak Convergence and the Direct Method), William Fogg Osgood gave the first rigorous proof in 1900, by potential theory. Constantin Carathéodory's 1912 proof was the first to use only function theory, with Montel's normal families, and was soon simplified by Paul Koebe. The extremal proof given here, maximising , is due to Leopold Fejér and Frigyes Riesz and was published by Tibor Radó in 1923. The lemma is named after Hermann Amandus Schwarz, who used a form of it in his work on conformal mapping; Georg Pick's metric form dates from the 1910s and Ahlfors's curvature version from 1938. Elwin Bruno Christoffel (1867) and Schwarz (1869) found the polygon formula independently.
On simply connected regions harmonic functions are real parts of holomorphic ones, and conformal maps carry harmonic functions to harmonic functions. On the disc the Dirichlet problem is solved by the Poisson kernel, an approximate identity that damps each Fourier mode by . The Schwarz lemma says self-maps of the disc fixing don't stretch at , and identifies the disc's automorphisms as Möbius maps. The Riemann mapping theorem, proved by maximising over a normal family, says every simply connected proper subregion of the plane is conformally a disc. 5A.5 Uniformization and the Two-Dimensional Ricci Flow extends this to every surface, and turns it into a statement about curvature and the Ricci flow.
Exercises
Show that maps the unit disc onto the upper half-plane, that , and hence that the upper semicircle goes to the negative real axis and the lower to the positive real axis. Check that the temperature equals at .
Solution
, real; for it is negative, for positive. , which is in the upper half-plane, so by connectedness the disc goes into the upper half-plane, and the inverse (the Cayley map) shows it is onto. , so .
Let be holomorphic and a function. Show that . (Write , where and , and use .)
Sum for and show it equals . Check that its average over is , and find its maximum and minimum values in .
Solution
; over the common denominator the numerator is . Maximum at , minimum at .
Let be harmonic on a neighbourhood of the closed unit disc. Using the bounds on from Exercise 4.10, show that
This is the Harnack inequality: a positive harmonic function cannot be much larger at one point than at another nearby. Deduce again that a positive harmonic function on is constant (5A.2 Cauchy’s Theorem and Its Consequences).
(a) Let be holomorphic with and . Show . (b) Show that if is holomorphic with , then . (Compose with a disc automorphism.)
Solution
(a) Equality in at , so is a rotation fixing : the identity. (b) fixes , so ; , so .
(a) Let uniformly on compact sets, not identically zero, and let be a small circle around on which . Show that , and conclude that for large , and have the same number of zeros inside . (b) Deduce Lemma 4.7: if took a value twice, apply (a) to near both points.
Show that the annulus is not conformally equivalent to the disc. (A conformal bijection is a homeomorphism; use the fundamental group, 7A.4 The Fundamental Group, or show directly that the disc's property "every loop can be shrunk to a point" is preserved by homeomorphisms.) In fact two annuli and are conformally equivalent only if , which you can try to prove with the Schwarz reflection principle: conformal geometry is much more rigid than topology.
On the disc, the mean value property followed from Cauchy's formula. In 6A.2 Harmonic Functions it is proved without complex numbers: for harmonic on , the average of over the sphere of radius about a point has . Prove the two-dimensional case this way: with , show , apply the divergence theorem (1A.10 Divergence, Curl and the Integral Theorems), and conclude .
Solution
, since and is the outward normal derivative. By the divergence theorem the boundary integral is . So is constant, and as by continuity.
© 2026 NeckPinch (www.neckpinch.com). All content in the guidebook (text, mathematics, figures and exercises) is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. No part may be copied, republished or redistributed without written permission.