© 2026 NeckPinch · www.neckpinch.com · All rights reserved.
Course 5Book 5A: Complex Analysis and Conformal GeometryChapter 2
Cauchy’s Theorem and Its Consequences
Cauchy’s integral formula, Liouville, and the maximum modulus principle.
Read with Stein and Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, chapter 2, "Cauchy's Theorem and Its Applications" (Goursat's theorem, Cauchy's integral formulas, Liouville, the identity theorem, Morera, sequences of holomorphic functions). The maximum modulus principle is in their chapter 3, section 4, and Montel's theorem in chapter 8, section 3.
A real function can be differentiable once and not twice, smooth but not analytic, bounded and non-constant on the whole line. None of this can happen for holomorphic functions. Integrate one around a closed loop and you get zero (Cauchy's theorem); its values inside a disc are determined by its values on the boundary circle (Cauchy's integral formula); and from that formula everything follows at once: holomorphic functions are infinitely differentiable and equal to their power series, bounded entire functions are constant, the maximum of is on the boundary, and a bounded family of holomorphic functions has a convergent subsequence.
Each of these is the first instance of a theme that runs through the rest of the guide: interior estimates (bounds on derivatives from bounds on the function), Liouville theorems (global solutions are rigid), maximum principles and compactness. In the main line these come back for harmonic functions (6A.2 Harmonic Functions), for the heat equation (6A.4 Maximum Principles, 6A.6 Parabolic Regularity) and finally for the Ricci flow itself.
By the end of this chapter you will be able to:
- compute integrals along curves, and explain why around the origin;
- state and use Cauchy's theorem and its form for deformed contours;
- derive Cauchy's integral formula and the Cauchy estimates, and deduce that holomorphic functions are analytic;
- prove Liouville's theorem, the fundamental theorem of algebra and the maximum modulus principle;
- state Montel's theorem and explain it as Arzelà–Ascoli plus Cauchy estimates;
- describe two-dimensional ideal flow by a complex potential, and read circulation off a contour integral.
Flow around an obstacle
Consider a steady flow of an incompressible fluid in a region of the plane, with velocity . Incompressibility says the divergence vanishes, ; if the flow is also irrotational, the curl vanishes, (1A.10 Divergence, Curl and the Integral Theorems). These two equations are exactly the Cauchy–Riemann equations for the complex velocity
so an ideal planar flow is the same thing as a holomorphic function. Writing , the function is the complex potential: is the velocity potential and the stream function, whose level curves are the streamlines.
Two physical quantities are contour integrals. Around a closed curve ,
the circulation plus times the flux out of the curve (Exercise 2.9). In a region with no obstacle, Cauchy's theorem below says both are zero. Around an obstacle they need not be, but they are the same for every loop around it: the circulation is a property of the obstacle, not of the loop.
For a uniform stream of speed past a cylinder of radius with clockwise circulation , the complex potential is
On the stream function is constant, so the circle is a streamline, as a solid wall must be (Figure 2.1). Without circulation the flow is symmetric and there is no lift. With circulation the fluid is faster above the cylinder than below, and by Bernoulli's principle the pressure is lower above: the cylinder is pushed upwards with force per unit length, the Kutta–Joukowski law of 5A.1 Holomorphic Functions Are Conformal, which we derive by residues in 5A.3 Residues and Fourier Transforms. Through the Joukowsky map this becomes flow around a wing.
Integrals along curves
Let be a piecewise curve. The contour integral of a continuous along is
It doesn't depend on how is parametrised, only on its route and direction. It satisfies the length estimate
If has a primitive, a holomorphic with , then by the fundamental theorem of calculus (2A.11 The Riemann Integral), and the integral around any closed curve is zero. So for every closed curve when , and for curves avoiding when . The exception is : around the circle , ,
This single computation is behind most of the chapter. It says has no primitive on , which is the fact from 5A.1 Holomorphic Functions Are Conformal that there is no continuous logarithm there: the integral measures how much changes once around.
Cauchy's theorem
Let be holomorphic on an open set containing a closed region whose boundary is a piecewise closed curve, traversed counterclockwise. Then
More generally, for every closed curve in a simply connected open set on which is holomorphic.
Proof. We give the proof when is continuous, which is all we need, since Theorem 2.2 below shows that is in fact always continuous. (Goursat's argument, in Stein–Shakarchi, avoids the assumption by subdividing triangles.) Write and :
By Green's theorem (1A.10 Divergence, Curl and the Integral Theorems) these are and , and both integrands vanish by the Cauchy–Riemann equations. For a general simply connected region one shows that has a primitive, by integrating along paths from a fixed point; the integral is path-independent because any two paths with the same ends can be deformed into each other (7A.4 The Fundamental Group).
The same proof applies to a region with holes, as long as its boundary is traversed with the region on the left: outer boundary counterclockwise, inner boundaries clockwise. This gives the deformation principle: if and are two loops around a hole, and is holomorphic in the region between them, then
(Figure 2.2). You can move a contour freely across any region where the function is holomorphic. That is the circulation statement of the flow example, and it is the main computational tool of 5A.3 Residues and Fourier Transforms.
Cauchy's integral formula
Let be holomorphic on an open set containing the closed disc of radius about , and let counterclockwise. For every inside ,
Moreover has derivatives of all orders in , given by
Proof. The function is holomorphic except at , so by the deformation principle we may replace by a small circle of radius about . There
The first term is , by the computation . The second is bounded by , which tends to as by continuity. For the derivatives, differentiate under the integral sign in : the integrand is smooth in for on , uniformly, so this is allowed (3A.3 The Lebesgue Integral), and each differentiation produces one more factor of and one more factor in the factorial.
This formula is the heart of the subject. It says that the values of inside the disc are an average of its values on the boundary, with an explicit kernel. Three consequences follow immediately.
Holomorphic implies analytic. Expand as a geometric series (2A.7 Series), which converges uniformly for when , and integrate term by term:
The power series converges on every disc about that fits inside the domain. Compare the real line, where is smooth but not analytic and is analytic on all of but its Taylor series at has radius (2B.6 Power Series, Exponentials and Bump Functions). Complex analysis explains the second fact: has poles at , at distance from .
Cauchy estimates. If on the circle of radius about , then
by the length estimate applied to the derivative formula. A bound on the function on a disc bounds all its derivatives at the centre, with the -th derivative scaling like . This is the prototype of an interior estimate.
Mean value property. Taking and in the formula gives
Taking real parts, the same holds for harmonic functions, which 6A.2 Harmonic Functions proves in every dimension.
The Cauchy estimates turn a bound on into bounds on every derivative, on a smaller region, with constants that scale correctly. The heat equation has the same feature (6A.3 The Heat Equation on ℝⁿ, 6A.6 Parabolic Regularity): a bounded solution is automatically smooth at later times, with . For the Ricci flow, the corresponding result is Shi's derivative estimates (11A.3 Short-Time Existence and Uniqueness): a bound on the curvature gives bounds on all its derivatives a short time later. Shi's estimates are why bounding the curvature is enough to control everything else, and they are what make Hamilton's compactness theorem (11B.3 Compactness of Ricci Flows) work.
Liouville, algebra and the maximum modulus
A function holomorphic on all of is called entire.
A bounded entire function is constant.
Proof. If everywhere, the Cauchy estimate with on a circle of radius gives for every . Let : , so is constant.
Compare , bounded and non-constant on : on it is unbounded, since .
Every non-constant polynomial has a complex root.
Proof. If had no root, would be entire. Since as , is bounded, hence constant by Liouville, so is constant.
Let be holomorphic on a connected open set . If attains its maximum at a point of , then is constant. Consequently, if is bounded and is continuous on , then is attained on .
Proof. Suppose is the maximum. By the mean value property on every small circle about ,
so equality holds throughout, and on the whole circle (a continuous function at most with average is identically ). So is constant near , and then is constant near (Exercise 2.11). The set where is therefore open; it is closed by continuity, so it is all of by connectedness (2B.4 Connectedness).
The same argument, run for a real harmonic function, is the strong maximum principle of 6A.4 Maximum Principles. It is a cousin of the first maximum principle of 2A.9 Continuous Functions: an interior maximum forces something to be degenerate.
Two further consequences round out the picture. The identity theorem: if two holomorphic functions on a connected open set agree on a set with a limit point (for instance on a small segment), they agree everywhere, because their difference has a power series with all coefficients zero at that limit point, and the set where all derivatives vanish is open and closed. So a holomorphic function is determined by its values on any tiny piece of its domain, which is why the complex extensions of , and are unique. Morera's theorem is the converse of Cauchy's: a continuous whose integral around every triangle is zero is holomorphic, because it has a primitive , which is holomorphic, and is then holomorphic by Theorem 2.2. Since uniform limits preserve integrals, it follows that a locally uniform limit of holomorphic functions is holomorphic, which fails badly for differentiable real functions (Weierstrass's continuous nowhere-differentiable function is a uniform limit of polynomials, 2B.5 Uniform Convergence and Arzelà–Ascoli).
Montel's theorem: compactness for free
A family of holomorphic functions on is normal if every sequence in has a subsequence that converges uniformly on every compact subset of .
A family of holomorphic functions on that is uniformly bounded on each compact subset of is normal.
Proof. Let be compact, and choose so that the closed -neighbourhood of lies in . If on for all , the Cauchy estimate on circles of radius gives on . So the family is uniformly Lipschitz on (convex pieces of) , hence equicontinuous, and it is uniformly bounded. By Arzelà–Ascoli (2B.5 Uniform Convergence and Arzelà–Ascoli), every sequence has a subsequence converging uniformly on . Exhaust by an increasing sequence of compact sets and take a diagonal subsequence (2A.8 Infinite Sets); the limit is holomorphic by Morera.
For real functions a uniform bound gives no compactness at all: is bounded on and has no uniformly convergent subsequence. For holomorphic functions the bound on the function is a bound on the derivative, and compactness comes for free. This is the pattern of every compactness theorem in geometric analysis: an a priori bound, plus an interior estimate upgrading it to derivatives, plus Arzelà–Ascoli. In 5A.4 Harmonic Functions and Conformal Mapping, Montel's theorem produces the Riemann map as the extremal member of a normal family; in Hamilton's compactness theorem (11B.3 Compactness of Ricci Flows) a curvature bound, Shi's estimates and an injectivity radius bound play the same three roles.
Liouville's theorem says that a solution defined on all of and satisfying a bound must be trivial. Results of this shape, classifying global solutions under a bound, appear all through PDE: bounded harmonic functions on are constant (6A.2 Harmonic Functions), and Perelman's analysis of singularities rests on classifying ancient solutions of the Ricci flow, those defined for all negative times, under curvature and noncollapsing conditions (12B.1 κ-Solutions, 12B.2 The Structure of κ-Solutions). The analogy is in spirit, not in proof, but the role is the same: blow up near a singularity, get a global solution, and use a Liouville-type theorem to say what it must be.
History
Cauchy communicated the first general form of his integral theorem to the Paris Academy in 1825, assuming a continuous derivative throughout; the integral formula followed in 1831. Édouard Goursat gave a proof in 1884 by subdividing the region into small squares, and in 1900 removed the assumption that is continuous, giving the statement now called the Cauchy–Goursat theorem. The theorem on bounded entire functions was published by Cauchy in 1844; it carries Joseph Liouville's name because he presented it, in connection with doubly periodic functions, in his Paris lectures of 1847. Giacinto Morera's converse dates from 1886. Paul Montel began the study of what he later called normal families in his 1907 thesis, and introduced the name in 1912. The use of complex functions for planar ideal flow goes back to d'Alembert and Euler (5A.1 Holomorphic Functions Are Conformal); the cylinder with circulation is the model from which Kutta and Joukowsky derived lift.
Integrals of holomorphic functions around closed curves vanish, and contours can be deformed across any region where the function is holomorphic; is the basic non-zero integral. Cauchy's integral formula expresses inside a disc as an average of its boundary values, and implies that holomorphic functions are analytic, satisfy the Cauchy estimates and the mean value property, are bounded only if constant when entire (Liouville), and attain on the boundary. Bounded families are normal (Montel), by Cauchy estimates and Arzelà–Ascoli. 5A.3 Residues and Fourier Transforms turns contour integrals into a calculating machine: residues.
Exercises
Let be the circle of radius about , counterclockwise. Compute for every integer , directly from the definition.
Solution
With , the integral is , which is for and otherwise.
With and , expand and check that . Explain why the first integral is the circulation and the second the outward flux, for a counterclockwise curve. Then compute both for the cylinder potential of the flow example, around any circle .
Solution
. The first is the velocity dotted with the tangent; for a counterclockwise curve, is the outward normal times arc length, so the second is the flux. For the cylinder, ; the first term integrates to and the second to . So the counterclockwise circulation is , that is, a clockwise circulation , and the flux is .
Compute, for the circle counterclockwise: (a) ; (b) ; (c) .
Solution
(a) . (b) . (c) , so the integral is .
Show that a holomorphic on a connected open set with constant is constant. (Differentiate in and and use the Cauchy–Riemann equations.)
Show that an entire function with is a polynomial of degree at most .
Hint
Use the Cauchy estimate for on circles of radius .
For the cylinder potential with , show that the stagnation points satisfy . Show they lie on the cylinder, at , when , and describe what happens for .
Solution
; multiply by . On , becomes , i.e. , which has solutions when ; the product of the two roots is , so for both have modulus . For the roots are , purely imaginary with product : one lies outside the cylinder, below it, and the fluid near the cylinder circulates around it on closed streamlines.
(a) Show that is a normal family on the open unit disc but not on any open set meeting the unit circle. (b) Show that is not normal on the disc, and say which hypothesis of Montel's theorem fails.
Let be a harmonic function on . (a) Show that satisfies the Cauchy–Riemann equations, so it is entire; let be a primitive with . (b) Since , show that is entire with , and conclude that is constant. This is the two-dimensional case of the Liouville theorem for positive harmonic functions, which 6A.2 Harmonic Functions proves in every dimension with the Harnack inequality; the Harnack inequality, in Li–Yau's parabolic form (6A.10 Entropy, Information and Diffusion) and Hamilton's form for the Ricci flow (11B.2 Ancient Solutions and the Harnack Inequality), is one of the main tools of the subject.
Solution
(a) and . An entire function has a primitive (integrate along segments from ), and adjusting by a constant, with ; so and , and after adjusting the real constant. (b) For , is closer to than to , so and . By Liouville is constant, so is constant, and so is .
© 2026 NeckPinch (www.neckpinch.com). All content in the guidebook (text, mathematics, figures and exercises) is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. No part may be copied, republished or redistributed without written permission.