Book 5A

© 2026 NeckPinch · www.neckpinch.com · All rights reserved.

Course 5Book 5A: Complex Analysis and Conformal GeometryChapter 2

Cauchy’s Theorem and Its Consequences

Cauchy’s integral formula, Liouville, and the maximum modulus principle.

28 min read · Updated Oct 2, 2026

Read with Stein and Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, chapter 2, "Cauchy's Theorem and Its Applications" (Goursat's theorem, Cauchy's integral formulas, Liouville, the identity theorem, Morera, sequences of holomorphic functions). The maximum modulus principle is in their chapter 3, section 4, and Montel's theorem in chapter 8, section 3.

In this chapter · 8 sections
  1. 2.1Flow around an obstacle
  2. 2.2Integrals along curves
  3. 2.3Cauchy's theorem
  4. 2.4Cauchy's integral formula
  5. 2.5Liouville, algebra and the maximum modulus
  6. 2.6Montel's theorem: compactness for free
  7. 2.7History
  8. 2.8Exercises

A real function can be differentiable once and not twice, smooth but not analytic, bounded and non-constant on the whole line. None of this can happen for holomorphic functions. Integrate one around a closed loop and you get zero (Cauchy's theorem); its values inside a disc are determined by its values on the boundary circle (Cauchy's integral formula); and from that formula everything follows at once: holomorphic functions are infinitely differentiable and equal to their power series, bounded entire functions are constant, the maximum of ∣f∣|f| is on the boundary, and a bounded family of holomorphic functions has a convergent subsequence.

Each of these is the first instance of a theme that runs through the rest of the guide: interior estimates (bounds on derivatives from bounds on the function), Liouville theorems (global solutions are rigid), maximum principles and compactness. In the main line these come back for harmonic functions (6A.2 Harmonic Functions), for the heat equation (6A.4 Maximum Principles, 6A.6 Parabolic Regularity) and finally for the Ricci flow itself.

By the end of this chapter you will be able to:

  • compute integrals along curves, and explain why ∮dzz=2πi\oint \frac{dz}{z} = 2\pi i around the origin;
  • state and use Cauchy's theorem and its form for deformed contours;
  • derive Cauchy's integral formula and the Cauchy estimates, and deduce that holomorphic functions are analytic;
  • prove Liouville's theorem, the fundamental theorem of algebra and the maximum modulus principle;
  • state Montel's theorem and explain it as Arzelà–Ascoli plus Cauchy estimates;
  • describe two-dimensional ideal flow by a complex potential, and read circulation off a contour integral.

Flow around an obstacle

In the world Model Ideal flow in the plane

Consider a steady flow of an incompressible fluid in a region of the plane, with velocity (u,v)(u, v). Incompressibility says the divergence vanishes, ux+vy=0u_x + v_y = 0; if the flow is also irrotational, the curl vanishes, vx−uy=0v_x - u_y = 0 (1A.10 Divergence, Curl and the Integral Theorems). These two equations are exactly the Cauchy–Riemann equations for the complex velocity

w(z)=u−iv,w(z) = u - iv,

so an ideal planar flow is the same thing as a holomorphic function. Writing w=F′w = F', the function F=φ+iψF = \varphi + i\psi is the complex potential: φ\varphi is the velocity potential and ψ\psi the stream function, whose level curves are the streamlines.

Two physical quantities are contour integrals. Around a closed curve γ\gamma,

∮γw dz=∮γ(u dx+v dy)+i∮γ(u dy−v dx)=Γ+iQ,\oint_\gamma w\,dz = \oint_\gamma (u\,dx + v\,dy) + i\oint_\gamma(u\,dy - v\,dx) = \Gamma + iQ,

the circulation Γ\Gamma plus ii times the flux QQ out of the curve (Exercise 2.9). In a region with no obstacle, Cauchy's theorem below says both are zero. Around an obstacle they need not be, but they are the same for every loop around it: the circulation is a property of the obstacle, not of the loop.

For a uniform stream of speed VV past a cylinder of radius aa with clockwise circulation Γ\Gamma, the complex potential is

F(z)=V(z+a2z)+iΓ2πlog⁡z.F(z) = V\Big(z + \frac{a^2}{z}\Big) + \frac{i\Gamma}{2\pi}\log z.

On ∣z∣=a|z| = a the stream function is constant, so the circle is a streamline, as a solid wall must be (Figure 2.1). Without circulation the flow is symmetric and there is no lift. With circulation the fluid is faster above the cylinder than below, and by Bernoulli's principle the pressure is lower above: the cylinder is pushed upwards with force ρVΓ\rho V\Gamma per unit length, the Kutta–Joukowski law of 5A.1 Holomorphic Functions Are Conformal, which we derive by residues in 5A.3 Residues and Fourier Transforms. Through the Joukowsky map this becomes flow around a wing.

Figure 2.1. Streamlines (level curves of Im⁡F\operatorname{Im}F, computed) for a stream past a cylinder of radius 11 at speed V=1V = 1. Left: no circulation. Right: clockwise circulation Γ=2π\Gamma = 2\pi, which moves the stagnation points (dots) to 30°30° below the horizontal on either side. Crowded streamlines mean faster flow.

Integrals along curves

Let γ:[a,b]→C\gamma : [a, b] \to \mathbb{C} be a piecewise C1C^1 curve. The contour integral of a continuous ff along γ\gamma is

∫γf(z) dz=∫abf(γ(t)) γ′(t) dt.\int_\gamma f(z)\,dz = \int_a^b f(\gamma(t))\,\gamma'(t)\,dt.

It doesn't depend on how γ\gamma is parametrised, only on its route and direction. It satisfies the length estimate

∣∫γf dz∣≤sup⁡γ∣f∣⋅length⁡(γ).\Big|\int_\gamma f\,dz\Big| \leq \sup_\gamma|f| \cdot \operatorname{length}(\gamma).

If ff has a primitive, a holomorphic FF with F′=fF' = f, then ∫γf dz=F(γ(b))−F(γ(a))\int_\gamma f\,dz = F(\gamma(b)) - F(\gamma(a)) by the fundamental theorem of calculus (2A.11 The Riemann Integral), and the integral around any closed curve is zero. So ∮zn dz=0\oint z^n\,dz = 0 for every closed curve when n≥0n \geq 0, and for curves avoiding 00 when n≤−2n \leq -2. The exception is n=−1n = -1: around the circle z=eitz = e^{it}, 0≤t≤2π0 \leq t \leq 2\pi,

∮∣z∣=1dzz=∫02πieiteit dt=2πi.\oint_{|z|=1}\frac{dz}{z} = \int_0^{2\pi}\frac{ie^{it}}{e^{it}}\,dt = 2\pi i.

This single computation is behind most of the chapter. It says 1z\frac1z has no primitive on C∖{0}\mathbb{C}\setminus\{0\}, which is the fact from 5A.1 Holomorphic Functions Are Conformal that there is no continuous logarithm there: the integral measures how much log⁡z\log z changes once around.

Cauchy's theorem

Theorem 2.1 Cauchy's theorem

Let ff be holomorphic on an open set containing a closed region DD whose boundary ∂D\partial D is a piecewise C1C^1 closed curve, traversed counterclockwise. Then

∮∂Df(z) dz=0.\oint_{\partial D} f(z)\,dz = 0.

More generally, ∮γf dz=0\oint_\gamma f\,dz = 0 for every closed curve γ\gamma in a simply connected open set on which ff is holomorphic.

Proof. We give the proof when f′f' is continuous, which is all we need, since Theorem 2.2 below shows that f′f' is in fact always continuous. (Goursat's argument, in Stein–Shakarchi, avoids the assumption by subdividing triangles.) Write f=u+ivf = u + iv and dz=dx+i dydz = dx + i\,dy:

∮∂Df dz=∮∂D(u dx−v dy)+i∮∂D(v dx+u dy).\oint_{\partial D}f\,dz = \oint_{\partial D}(u\,dx - v\,dy) + i\oint_{\partial D}(v\,dx + u\,dy).

By Green's theorem (1A.10 Divergence, Curl and the Integral Theorems) these are ∬D(−vx−uy) dA\iint_D(-v_x - u_y)\,dA and ∬D(ux−vy) dA\iint_D(u_x - v_y)\,dA, and both integrands vanish by the Cauchy–Riemann equations. For a general simply connected region one shows that ff has a primitive, by integrating along paths from a fixed point; the integral is path-independent because any two paths with the same ends can be deformed into each other (7A.4 The Fundamental Group).

The same proof applies to a region with holes, as long as its boundary is traversed with the region on the left: outer boundary counterclockwise, inner boundaries clockwise. This gives the deformation principle: if γ1\gamma_1 and γ2\gamma_2 are two loops around a hole, and ff is holomorphic in the region between them, then

∮γ1f dz=∮γ2f dz\oint_{\gamma_1}f\,dz = \oint_{\gamma_2}f\,dz

(Figure 2.2). You can move a contour freely across any region where the function is holomorphic. That is the circulation statement of the flow example, and it is the main computational tool of 5A.3 Residues and Fourier Transforms.

Figure 2.2. Deforming a contour. ff is holomorphic everywhere except in the dark region. The integrals over γ1\gamma_1 and γ2\gamma_2 agree, since ff is holomorphic in the shaded region between them; the integral over γ3\gamma_3, which encloses no singularity, is zero.

Cauchy's integral formula

Theorem 2.2 Cauchy's integral formula

Let ff be holomorphic on an open set containing the closed disc B‾\overline{B} of radius RR about z0z_0, and let C=∂BC = \partial B counterclockwise. For every zz inside BB,

f(z)=12πi∮Cf(ζ)ζ−z dζ.f(z) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint_C\frac{f(\zeta)}{\zeta - z}\,d\zeta.

Moreover ff has derivatives of all orders in BB, given by

f(n)(z)=n!2πi∮Cf(ζ)(ζ−z)n+1 dζ.f^{(n)}(z) = \frac{n!}{2\pi i}\oint_C\frac{f(\zeta)}{(\zeta - z)^{n+1}}\,d\zeta.

Proof. The function ζ↦f(ζ)ζ−z\zeta \mapsto \frac{f(\zeta)}{\zeta - z} is holomorphic except at ζ=z\zeta = z, so by the deformation principle we may replace CC by a small circle CεC_\varepsilon of radius ε\varepsilon about zz. There

12πi∮Cεf(ζ)ζ−z dζ=f(z)2πi∮Cεdζζ−z+12πi∮Cεf(ζ)−f(z)ζ−z dζ.\frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint_{C_\varepsilon}\frac{f(\zeta)}{\zeta - z}\,d\zeta = \frac{f(z)}{2\pi i}\oint_{C_\varepsilon}\frac{d\zeta}{\zeta - z} + \frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint_{C_\varepsilon}\frac{f(\zeta) - f(z)}{\zeta - z}\,d\zeta.

The first term is f(z)f(z), by the computation ∮dζζ−z=2πi\oint\frac{d\zeta}{\zeta - z} = 2\pi i. The second is bounded by 12π⋅sup⁡Cε∣f(ζ)−f(z)∣ε⋅2πε\frac{1}{2\pi}\cdot\sup_{C_\varepsilon}\frac{|f(\zeta) - f(z)|}{\varepsilon}\cdot2\pi\varepsilon, which tends to 00 as ε→0\varepsilon \to 0 by continuity. For the derivatives, differentiate under the integral sign in zz: the integrand is smooth in zz for ζ\zeta on CC, uniformly, so this is allowed (3A.3 The Lebesgue Integral), and each differentiation produces one more factor of 1ζ−z\frac{1}{\zeta - z} and one more factor in the factorial.

This formula is the heart of the subject. It says that the values of ff inside the disc are an average of its values on the boundary, with an explicit kernel. Three consequences follow immediately.

Holomorphic implies analytic. Expand 1ζ−z=1ζ−z0⋅11−z−z0ζ−z0\frac{1}{\zeta - z} = \frac{1}{\zeta - z_0}\cdot\frac{1}{1 - \frac{z - z_0}{\zeta - z_0}} as a geometric series (2A.7 Series), which converges uniformly for ζ∈C\zeta \in C when ∣z−z0∣<R|z - z_0| < R, and integrate term by term:

f(z)=∑n=0∞an(z−z0)n,an=f(n)(z0)n!=12πi∮Cf(ζ)(ζ−z0)n+1 dζ.f(z) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n(z - z_0)^n, \qquad a_n = \frac{f^{(n)}(z_0)}{n!} = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint_C\frac{f(\zeta)}{(\zeta - z_0)^{n+1}}\,d\zeta.

The power series converges on every disc about z0z_0 that fits inside the domain. Compare the real line, where e−1/x2e^{-1/x^2} is smooth but not analytic and 11+x2\frac{1}{1 + x^2} is analytic on all of R\mathbb{R} but its Taylor series at 00 has radius 11 (2B.6 Power Series, Exponentials and Bump Functions). Complex analysis explains the second fact: 11+z2\frac{1}{1 + z^2} has poles at ±i\pm i, at distance 11 from 00.

Cauchy estimates. If ∣f∣≤M|f| \leq M on the circle of radius RR about z0z_0, then

∣f(n)(z0)∣≤n! MRn,|f^{(n)}(z_0)| \leq \frac{n!\,M}{R^n},

by the length estimate applied to the derivative formula. A bound on the function on a disc bounds all its derivatives at the centre, with the nn-th derivative scaling like R−nR^{-n}. This is the prototype of an interior estimate.

Mean value property. Taking z=z0z = z_0 and ζ=z0+Reiθ\zeta = z_0 + Re^{i\theta} in the formula gives

f(z0)=12π∫02πf(z0+Reiθ) dθ.f(z_0) = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}f(z_0 + Re^{i\theta})\,d\theta.

Taking real parts, the same holds for harmonic functions, which 6A.2 Harmonic Functions proves in every dimension.

Where this goes Interior estimates for the Ricci flow

The Cauchy estimates turn a bound on ff into bounds on every derivative, on a smaller region, with constants that scale correctly. The heat equation has the same feature (6A.3 The Heat Equation on ℝⁿ, 6A.6 Parabolic Regularity): a bounded solution is automatically smooth at later times, with ∣∇ku∣≲t−k/2|\nabla^k u| \lesssim t^{-k/2}. For the Ricci flow, the corresponding result is Shi's derivative estimates (11A.3 Short-Time Existence and Uniqueness): a bound on the curvature gives bounds on all its derivatives a short time later. Shi's estimates are why bounding the curvature is enough to control everything else, and they are what make Hamilton's compactness theorem (11B.3 Compactness of Ricci Flows) work.

Liouville, algebra and the maximum modulus

A function holomorphic on all of C\mathbb{C} is called entire.

Theorem 2.3 Liouville's theorem

A bounded entire function is constant.

Proof. If ∣f∣≤M|f| \leq M everywhere, the Cauchy estimate with n=1n = 1 on a circle of radius RR gives ∣f′(z0)∣≤M/R|f'(z_0)| \leq M/R for every RR. Let R→∞R \to \infty: f′≡0f' \equiv 0, so ff is constant.

Compare sin⁡x\sin x, bounded and non-constant on R\mathbb{R}: on C\mathbb{C} it is unbounded, since sin⁡(iy)=isinh⁡y\sin(iy) = i\sinh y.

Corollary 2.4 The fundamental theorem of algebra

Every non-constant polynomial pp has a complex root.

Proof. If pp had no root, 1/p1/p would be entire. Since ∣p(z)∣→∞|p(z)| \to \infty as ∣z∣→∞|z| \to \infty, 1/p1/p is bounded, hence constant by Liouville, so pp is constant.

Theorem 2.5 Maximum modulus principle

Let ff be holomorphic on a connected open set Ω\Omega. If ∣f∣|f| attains its maximum at a point of Ω\Omega, then ff is constant. Consequently, if Ω\Omega is bounded and ff is continuous on Ω‾\overline\Omega, then max⁡Ω‾∣f∣\max_{\overline\Omega}|f| is attained on ∂Ω\partial\Omega.

Proof. Suppose ∣f(z0)∣=M|f(z_0)| = M is the maximum. By the mean value property on every small circle about z0z_0,

M=∣f(z0)∣≤12π∫02π∣f(z0+reiθ)∣ dθ≤M,M = |f(z_0)| \leq \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}|f(z_0 + re^{i\theta})|\,d\theta \leq M,

so equality holds throughout, and ∣f∣=M|f| = M on the whole circle (a continuous function at most MM with average MM is identically MM). So ∣f∣|f| is constant near z0z_0, and then ff is constant near z0z_0 (Exercise 2.11). The set where f=f(z0)f = f(z_0) is therefore open; it is closed by continuity, so it is all of Ω\Omega by connectedness (2B.4 Connectedness).

The same argument, run for a real harmonic function, is the strong maximum principle of 6A.4 Maximum Principles. It is a cousin of the first maximum principle of 2A.9 Continuous Functions: an interior maximum forces something to be degenerate.

Two further consequences round out the picture. The identity theorem: if two holomorphic functions on a connected open set agree on a set with a limit point (for instance on a small segment), they agree everywhere, because their difference has a power series with all coefficients zero at that limit point, and the set where all derivatives vanish is open and closed. So a holomorphic function is determined by its values on any tiny piece of its domain, which is why the complex extensions of exe^x, sin⁡x\sin x and 11+x2\frac{1}{1 + x^2} are unique. Morera's theorem is the converse of Cauchy's: a continuous ff whose integral around every triangle is zero is holomorphic, because it has a primitive FF, which is holomorphic, and f=F′f = F' is then holomorphic by Theorem 2.2. Since uniform limits preserve integrals, it follows that a locally uniform limit of holomorphic functions is holomorphic, which fails badly for differentiable real functions (Weierstrass's continuous nowhere-differentiable function is a uniform limit of polynomials, 2B.5 Uniform Convergence and Arzelà–Ascoli).

Montel's theorem: compactness for free

Definition 2.6 Normal family

A family F\mathcal F of holomorphic functions on Ω\Omega is normal if every sequence in F\mathcal F has a subsequence that converges uniformly on every compact subset of Ω\Omega.

Theorem 2.7 Montel's theorem

A family of holomorphic functions on Ω\Omega that is uniformly bounded on each compact subset of Ω\Omega is normal.

Proof. Let K⊂ΩK \subset \Omega be compact, and choose r>0r > 0 so that the closed 2r2r-neighbourhood K′K' of KK lies in Ω\Omega. If ∣f∣≤M|f| \leq M on K′K' for all f∈Ff \in \mathcal F, the Cauchy estimate on circles of radius rr gives ∣f′∣≤M/r|f'| \leq M/r on KK. So the family is uniformly Lipschitz on (convex pieces of) KK, hence equicontinuous, and it is uniformly bounded. By Arzelà–Ascoli (2B.5 Uniform Convergence and Arzelà–Ascoli), every sequence has a subsequence converging uniformly on KK. Exhaust Ω\Omega by an increasing sequence of compact sets and take a diagonal subsequence (2A.8 Infinite Sets); the limit is holomorphic by Morera.

For real functions a uniform bound gives no compactness at all: sin⁡(nx)\sin(nx) is bounded on [0,2π][0, 2\pi] and has no uniformly convergent subsequence. For holomorphic functions the bound on the function is a bound on the derivative, and compactness comes for free. This is the pattern of every compactness theorem in geometric analysis: an a priori bound, plus an interior estimate upgrading it to derivatives, plus Arzelà–Ascoli. In 5A.4 Harmonic Functions and Conformal Mapping, Montel's theorem produces the Riemann map as the extremal member of a normal family; in Hamilton's compactness theorem (11B.3 Compactness of Ricci Flows) a curvature bound, Shi's estimates and an injectivity radius bound play the same three roles.

Where this goes Liouville theorems for flows

Liouville's theorem says that a solution defined on all of C\mathbb{C} and satisfying a bound must be trivial. Results of this shape, classifying global solutions under a bound, appear all through PDE: bounded harmonic functions on Rn\mathbb{R}^n are constant (6A.2 Harmonic Functions), and Perelman's analysis of singularities rests on classifying ancient solutions of the Ricci flow, those defined for all negative times, under curvature and noncollapsing conditions (12B.1 κ-Solutions, 12B.2 The Structure of κ-Solutions). The analogy is in spirit, not in proof, but the role is the same: blow up near a singularity, get a global solution, and use a Liouville-type theorem to say what it must be.

History

Cauchy communicated the first general form of his integral theorem to the Paris Academy in 1825, assuming a continuous derivative throughout; the integral formula followed in 1831. Édouard Goursat gave a proof in 1884 by subdividing the region into small squares, and in 1900 removed the assumption that f′f' is continuous, giving the statement now called the Cauchy–Goursat theorem. The theorem on bounded entire functions was published by Cauchy in 1844; it carries Joseph Liouville's name because he presented it, in connection with doubly periodic functions, in his Paris lectures of 1847. Giacinto Morera's converse dates from 1886. Paul Montel began the study of what he later called normal families in his 1907 thesis, and introduced the name in 1912. The use of complex functions for planar ideal flow goes back to d'Alembert and Euler (5A.1 Holomorphic Functions Are Conformal); the cylinder with circulation is the model from which Kutta and Joukowsky derived lift.

Recall Where we stand

Integrals of holomorphic functions around closed curves vanish, and contours can be deformed across any region where the function is holomorphic; ∮dzz=2πi\oint\frac{dz}{z} = 2\pi i is the basic non-zero integral. Cauchy's integral formula expresses ff inside a disc as an average of its boundary values, and implies that holomorphic functions are analytic, satisfy the Cauchy estimates and the mean value property, are bounded only if constant when entire (Liouville), and attain max⁡∣f∣\max|f| on the boundary. Bounded families are normal (Montel), by Cauchy estimates and Arzelà–Ascoli. 5A.3 Residues and Fourier Transforms turns contour integrals into a calculating machine: residues.

Exercises

Exercise 2.8 Integrating powers

Let CC be the circle of radius rr about aa, counterclockwise. Compute ∮C(z−a)n dz\oint_C(z - a)^n\,dz for every integer nn, directly from the definition.

Solution

With z=a+reitz = a + re^{it}, the integral is ∫02πrneint⋅ireit dt=irn+1∫02πei(n+1)t dt\int_0^{2\pi}r^ne^{int}\cdot ire^{it}\,dt = ir^{n+1}\int_0^{2\pi}e^{i(n+1)t}\,dt, which is 2πi2\pi i for n=−1n = -1 and 00 otherwise.

Exercise 2.9 Circulation and flux

With w=u−ivw = u - iv and dz=dx+i dydz = dx + i\,dy, expand w dzw\,dz and check that ∮w dz=∮(u dx+v dy)+i∮(u dy−v dx)\oint w\,dz = \oint(u\,dx + v\,dy) + i\oint(u\,dy - v\,dx). Explain why the first integral is the circulation and the second the outward flux, for a counterclockwise curve. Then compute both for the cylinder potential FF of the flow example, around any circle ∣z∣=R>a|z| = R > a.

Solution

(u−iv)(dx+i dy)=u dx+v dy+i(u dy−v dx)(u - iv)(dx + i\,dy) = u\,dx + v\,dy + i(u\,dy - v\,dx). The first is the velocity dotted with the tangent; for a counterclockwise curve, (dy,−dx)(dy, -dx) is the outward normal times arc length, so the second is the flux. For the cylinder, w=F′=V(1−a2/z2)+iΓ2πzw = F' = V(1 - a^2/z^2) + \frac{i\Gamma}{2\pi z}; the first term integrates to 00 and the second to iΓ2π⋅2πi=−Γ\frac{i\Gamma}{2\pi}\cdot2\pi i = -\Gamma. So the counterclockwise circulation is −Γ-\Gamma, that is, a clockwise circulation Γ\Gamma, and the flux is 00.

Exercise 2.10 Using the integral formula

Compute, for the circle ∣z∣=2|z| = 2 counterclockwise: (a) ∮ezz−1 dz\oint\frac{e^z}{z - 1}\,dz; (b) ∮cos⁡zz3 dz\oint\frac{\cos z}{z^3}\,dz; (c) ∮dzz2+1\oint\frac{dz}{z^2 + 1}.

Solution

(a) 2πie2\pi ie. (b) 2πi2!cos⁡′′(0)=−πi\frac{2\pi i}{2!}\cos''(0) = -\pi i. (c) 1z2+1=12i(1z−i−1z+i)\frac{1}{z^2 + 1} = \frac{1}{2i}\big(\frac{1}{z - i} - \frac{1}{z + i}\big), so the integral is 12i(2πi−2πi)=0\frac{1}{2i}(2\pi i - 2\pi i) = 0.

Exercise 2.11 Constant modulus

Show that a holomorphic ff on a connected open set with ∣f∣|f| constant is constant. (Differentiate u2+v2=cu^2 + v^2 = c in xx and yy and use the Cauchy–Riemann equations.)

Exercise 2.12 A Liouville theorem with growth

Show that an entire function with ∣f(z)∣≤C(1+∣z∣)k|f(z)| \leq C(1 + |z|)^k is a polynomial of degree at most kk.

Hint

Use the Cauchy estimate for f(k+1)f^{(k+1)} on circles of radius R→∞R \to \infty.

Exercise 2.13 Stagnation points

For the cylinder potential with a=V=1a = V = 1, show that the stagnation points F′(z)=0F'(z) = 0 satisfy z2+iΓ2πz−1=0z^2 + \frac{i\Gamma}{2\pi}z - 1 = 0. Show they lie on the cylinder, at sin⁡θ=−Γ4π\sin\theta = -\frac{\Gamma}{4\pi}, when 0≤Γ≤4π0 \leq \Gamma \leq 4\pi, and describe what happens for Γ>4π\Gamma > 4\pi.

Solution

F′(z)=1−z−2+iΓ2πzF'(z) = 1 - z^{-2} + \frac{i\Gamma}{2\pi z}; multiply by z2z^2. On z=eiθz = e^{i\theta}, F′=0F' = 0 becomes eiθ−e−iθ=−iΓ2πe^{i\theta} - e^{-i\theta} = -\frac{i\Gamma}{2\pi}, i.e. 2isin⁡θ=−iΓ2π2i\sin\theta = -\frac{i\Gamma}{2\pi}, which has solutions when Γ4π≤1\frac{\Gamma}{4\pi} \leq 1; the product of the two roots is −1-1, so for Γ<4π\Gamma < 4\pi both have modulus 11. For Γ>4π\Gamma > 4\pi the roots are z=−i(Γ4π±Γ216π2−1)z = -i\big(\frac{\Gamma}{4\pi} \pm \sqrt{\frac{\Gamma^2}{16\pi^2} - 1}\big), purely imaginary with product −1-1: one lies outside the cylinder, below it, and the fluid near the cylinder circulates around it on closed streamlines.

Exercise 2.14 Where compactness fails

(a) Show that fn(z)=znf_n(z) = z^n is a normal family on the open unit disc but not on any open set meeting the unit circle. (b) Show that fn(z)=nzf_n(z) = nz is not normal on the disc, and say which hypothesis of Montel's theorem fails.

Exercise 2.15 Rehearsal: positive harmonic functions on the plane are constant

Let u>0u > 0 be a C2C^2 harmonic function on C\mathbb{C}. (a) Show that g=ux−iuyg = u_x - iu_y satisfies the Cauchy–Riemann equations, so it is entire; let ff be a primitive with Re⁡f=u\operatorname{Re}f = u. (b) Since Re⁡f>0\operatorname{Re}f > 0, show that h=f−1f+1h = \frac{f - 1}{f + 1} is entire with ∣h∣<1|h| < 1, and conclude that uu is constant. This is the two-dimensional case of the Liouville theorem for positive harmonic functions, which 6A.2 Harmonic Functions proves in every dimension with the Harnack inequality; the Harnack inequality, in Li–Yau's parabolic form (6A.10 Entropy, Information and Diffusion) and Hamilton's form for the Ricci flow (11B.2 Ancient Solutions and the Harnack Inequality), is one of the main tools of the subject.

Solution

(a) (ux)x=uxx=−uyy=(−uy)y(u_x)_x = u_{xx} = -u_{yy} = (-u_y)_y and (ux)y=uxy=−(−uy)x(u_x)_y = u_{xy} = -(-u_y)_x. An entire function has a primitive (integrate along segments from 00), and adjusting by a constant, f=u~+iv~f = \tilde u + i\tilde v with f′=u~x−iu~y=gf' = \tilde u_x - i\tilde u_y = g; so u~x=ux\tilde u_x = u_x and u~y=uy\tilde u_y = u_y, and u~=u\tilde u = u after adjusting the real constant. (b) For Re⁡f>0\operatorname{Re}f > 0, ff is closer to 11 than to −1-1, so ∣f−1∣<∣f+1∣|f - 1| < |f + 1| and f+1≠0f + 1 \neq 0. By Liouville hh is constant, so f=1+h1−hf = \frac{1 + h}{1 - h} is constant, and so is uu.

© 2026 NeckPinch (www.neckpinch.com). All content in the guidebook (text, mathematics, figures and exercises) is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. No part may be copied, republished or redistributed without written permission.