© 2026 NeckPinch · www.neckpinch.com · All rights reserved.
Course 2Book 2B: Spaces, Functions and ChangeChapter 6
Power Series, Exponentials and Bump Functions
Analytic functions, exp and log, the matrix exponential, and smooth functions that are not analytic.
Read with Tao, Analysis II, chapter "Power series": formal power series, real analytic functions, Abel's theorem, multiplication of power series, the exponential and logarithm functions, the digression on complex numbers, and trigonometric functions. The matrix exponential and bump functions are not in Tao; this chapter covers them.
In this chapter · 8 sections
A power series is a polynomial that never stops: . Power series are where the functions of school mathematics, , , and , finally get definitions rather than descriptions. In Book 2A we used them on trust, and every property assumed there is proved here, using the uniform convergence of 2B.5 Uniform Convergence and Arzelà–Ascoli.
The chapter then goes in two directions that the rest of the guidebook needs. First, the exponential makes sense for matrices, and solves every linear system of differential equations (2B.10 Ordinary Differential Equations). Second, there are functions that are infinitely differentiable but are not given by their power series. The simplest, , is so flat at that every derivative vanishes there. From it we build bump functions and smooth cutoffs: smooth functions that are on one region and outside a slightly larger one. They are humble objects, and they are indispensable. Every local estimate in geometric analysis, including the one at the heart of Perelman's noncollapsing theorem, multiplies by a cutoff function.
By the end of this chapter you will be able to:
- find the radius of convergence of a power series, and differentiate and integrate one term by term;
- define , , real powers, and from scratch and prove their main properties;
- explain why the real power series of stops converging at ;
- compute matrix exponentials and use them to solve ;
- prove that is smooth and not analytic, and build smooth bumps and cutoffs with prescribed properties.
Dating by decay
Living organisms take in carbon from the atmosphere, including a small, nearly constant fraction of radioactive carbon-14. After death the intake stops, and the carbon-14 decays. The number of carbon-14 atoms remaining after time satisfies
because each atom decays independently at a constant rate. The half-life , the time for half to decay, is . Its best value, determined in the early 1960s and agreed at a 1962 conference in Cambridge, is years.
If a sample of wood retains of the carbon-14 of living wood, its age is
The -year uncertainty in the half-life alone moves this by about years.
Two facts keep this honest. First, laboratories by convention report a conventional radiocarbon age, computed with the original half-life measured by Willard Libby, years, as standardised by Stuiver and Polach in 1977; with it the same sample is about "radiocarbon years" old. Second, the carbon-14 content of the atmosphere has not been perfectly constant, so radiocarbon ages are converted into calendar ages using calibration curves built from tree rings and other records of known age. The exponential law is exact for the decay. The input it is fed, the starting fraction, is what needs calibrating.
The example uses three facts we haven't yet proved: that a function equal to its own derivative (up to a constant factor) must be an exponential, that has an inverse , and that turns sums into products, which is why a half-life is the same at every age. All three are proved below.
Power series
A power series centred at is a series with real (or complex) coefficients . Its radius of convergence is
with the conventions and .
Let have radius of convergence .
- For the series diverges.
- For it converges absolutely, and on every closed interval with it converges uniformly. So its sum is continuous on .
- is differentiable on , and its derivative is the series differentiated term by term, , which has the same radius of convergence. Hence is infinitely differentiable, and .
Proof. (1) and absolute convergence in (2) are the root test of 2A.7 Series applied to , since . For uniform convergence, pick . Then for large , so on we have , a convergent geometric series; the M-test (2B.5 Uniform Convergence and Arzelà–Ascoli) applies.
(3) Since , the differentiated series has the same , hence the same radius. By (2) it converges uniformly on each , and the partial sums of the original series converge at . So 2B.5 Uniform Convergence and Arzelà–Ascoli's theorem on derivatives of limits gives . Repeating, .
At anything can happen: diverges at both ends of , converges at but not at , and converges at both.
A function on an open interval is real analytic if near every point it equals a power series centred at with positive radius of convergence. By Theorem 6.2, that series must be its Taylor series, .
Analytic functions are rigid. If an analytic function on an interval vanishes on some small subinterval, it vanishes on the whole interval (Exercise 6.13). This rigidity is why analytic functions are not enough for geometry, and why the smooth non-analytic functions at the end of the chapter are needed.
Abel's theorem. If converges, then as : the sum is continuous at the endpoint, from inside, whenever the series converges there. For example for (integrate term by term), and the alternating harmonic series converges (2A.7 Series), so Abel's theorem gives
Tao proves the theorem by summation by parts; the proof is worth reading once.
The exponential and the logarithm
Since (for instance by the ratio test), the radius of convergence is infinite, and is defined, continuous and infinitely differentiable on all of . Differentiating term by term, , and . Everything else follows from these two facts.
- (Uniqueness) If on an interval containing , then there.
- for all real .
- , and is a strictly increasing bijection from onto .
Proof. First, . The function has , so it is constant (2A.10 Derivatives), equal to . In particular never vanishes.
(1) Let . By the product and chain rules, , so . Multiplying by and using gives .
(2) Fix and let . Then , so . Multiply by .
(3) For , from the series; for , . Since , is strictly increasing. It is unbounded above () and tends to as , so by the intermediate value theorem its image is .
Part 1 is the uniqueness of solutions of the simplest differential equation, . It answers the radiocarbon question: decay at a rate proportional to the amount present must be exponential. Part 2 explains why a half-life makes sense: , so waiting a further time multiplies what is left by the same factor , whatever is.
The number agrees with the limit from 2A.6 Sequences (Exercise 6.12). By part 2, for every rational , so is the real power in the sense of 2A.6 Sequences, and we write from now on.
The natural logarithm is the inverse of . For and real , .
The inverse function theorem of one variable (2A.10 Derivatives) gives . With and the fundamental theorem, : the logarithm of 2A.11 The Riemann Integral, defined as an area, is the same function. The rules , and follow from part 2 of the proposition. (Mathematicians write for the natural logarithm, and so does the guidebook from here on; means the same.)
Complex exponentials and trigonometry
Tao's "digression on complex numbers" is the shortest route to and . Complex numbers , with and , form a complete metric space with (it is with the Euclidean metric). All of Theorem 6.2 works for complex power series, with "interval" replaced by "disc" . So
converges for every complex , and the proof of goes through (or multiply the series, using the binomial theorem; Tao's section on multiplication of power series justifies the rearrangement).
For real , and are the real and imaginary parts of :
Everything about trigonometry follows. Since , we get , that is, . Differentiating the series, and . The addition formulas are the real and imaginary parts of . And can be defined as twice the smallest positive zero of ; one shows it exists (by the intermediate value theorem, since and ) and that and have period . So goes once around the unit circle at unit speed as runs over , which is the connection with angles.
Why the series for stops at
The function is perfectly smooth on the whole real line. Its Taylor series at is the geometric series
which has radius of convergence and diverges for (Figure 6.1). Nothing happens to at , so why should the series stop there?
The answer is in the complex plane. As a function of a complex variable, blows up at , where . A complex power series converges on a disc, and the disc centred at can't extend past the nearest point where the function misbehaves. That point, , is at distance . The real interval of convergence is just the disc's shadow on the real line.
This is the seam to complex analysis (Book 5A, optional), where it becomes a theorem: the radius of convergence of the Taylor series of a complex-differentiable function at a point is the distance to the nearest singularity.
The matrix exponential
The exponential series makes sense whenever we can multiply, add and take limits. For a square matrix ,
To see that it converges, measure matrices by the operator norm . It satisfies , so , and the series converges absolutely by the M-test, in the complete space of matrices (, any norm, 2B.3 Compactness). Moreover .
- .
- For every , is the unique solution of with .
- If , then . In particular is invertible, with inverse .
Proof. (1) Each entry of is a power series in with infinite radius of convergence, so it can be differentiated term by term: . (2) Existence is (1). For uniqueness, if , then (using that commutes with ), so , and once we know . (3) As for real numbers: both and solve , (this uses to move past ), so they agree by the uniqueness in (2) applied column by column. With this gives .
The hypothesis is essential: for most pairs of matrices . That failure is the beginning of Lie theory (8A.5 Lie Groups and Group Actions).
Let . Then , so the powers of cycle like the powers of , and splitting the series into even and odd terms gives
the rotation by angle . The solution of , a velocity always perpendicular to the position, is uniform motion around a circle. is the matrix of multiplication by on , and this is Euler's formula again.
Robots, cameras and spacecraft need to represent rotations in space, and a convenient way is by a rotation vector : rotate by angle about the unit axis . The rotation matrix is the exponential of the skew-symmetric matrix with . Because , the series collapses, just as in Example 6.9, to Rodrigues' formula
Computer-vision libraries convert between rotation vectors and matrices with exactly this formula (OpenCV calls the function Rodrigues), and estimation methods in robotics often work with the rotation vector, which lives in a vector space and can be averaged and differentiated, and only exponentiate at the end.
The matrix exponential solves linear ODEs (2B.10 Ordinary Differential Equations), where the eigenvalues of decide whether solutions grow, decay or rotate. Its infinite-dimensional version is the heat semigroup: in 2B.7 Fourier Series and the First Heat Equation the heat equation on a ring is solved by multiplying the -th Fourier coefficient by , which is acting diagonally (6A.3 The Heat Equation on ℝⁿ). On a Lie group, traces out one-parameter subgroups (8A.5 Lie Groups and Group Actions), and the exponential map of a Riemannian manifold, which sends a tangent vector to the endpoint of the geodesic it generates, is named after it (9A.3 Geodesics and the Exponential Map).
Smooth functions that are not analytic
Let for and . Then is infinitely differentiable on , and for every . So its Taylor series at is identically , while for : is smooth but not analytic at .
Proof. Away from , by induction, for some polynomial : differentiating gives , again of this form.
At , the key fact is that beats every power: for each , as . (With , this is as , which follows from for .) So for every polynomial . Now suppose . Then
since is again a polynomial in . By induction, all derivatives at vanish.
Cauchy gave this example in 1823 to show that a function is not determined by its Taylor series. For analysis it is a gift: it lets us build smooth functions that are exactly zero in one place and positive in another, which no analytic function can do.
Bumps and cutoffs
Use the one-sided version: for and for . The same proof shows is smooth, with all derivatives at . From :
- A bump. is smooth, positive on , and zero outside. In , is a smooth bump on the unit ball (smooth even at , because is a polynomial in the coordinates).
- A smooth step. is smooth (the denominator is never ), equal to for , to for , and increasing in between (Exercise 6.14).
- A cutoff. equals on , outside , and is smooth everywhere: near it is constant, so the corner of doesn't matter.
Rescaling gives cutoffs adapted to any scale: is on the ball of radius and outside radius , and its derivatives scale like and for the second derivative (Exercise 6.17). That scaling is the whole art of localising an estimate: the cost of cutting off at radius is a factor per derivative.
- Mollifiers (3A.8 Convolution and Mollifiers): convolving with a rescaled bump (normalised to integral ) smooths any integrable function, an approximate identity as in 2B.5 Uniform Convergence and Arzelà–Ascoli.
- Partitions of unity (8A.2 Partitions of Unity): on a manifold, smooth functions that sum to and are each supported in one coordinate chart. They are how anything defined in charts, from integrals to Riemannian metrics, is glued into a global object. Without non-analytic smooth functions there would be no partitions of unity.
- Localised estimates: to prove a bound near a point, multiply by a cutoff, prove the bound for the product, and pay for the cutoff's derivatives. In 12A.4 κ-Noncollapsing, Perelman proves κ-noncollapsing by testing his -entropy against a function built from a cutoff of the distance, of the form scaled to a ball of radius , and the factors of from its derivative are exactly what the scale-invariant estimate absorbs.
History
Newton found the binomial series and power series for sine and cosine in the 1660s; Euler, in his Introductio in analysin infinitorum (1748), made the exponential function central and wrote down . Cauchy's 1821 Cours d'analyse gave the radius of convergence via what is now the root test, and Hadamard rediscovered the formula in 1888. Abel's theorem dates from 1826. Cauchy's flat function appeared in 1823. The matrix exponential is implicit in 19th-century work on linear differential equations and in Sophus Lie's theory of continuous groups (1870s onwards).
A power series converges on an interval (in , a disc) determined by the root test, uniformly on smaller closed intervals, and can be differentiated term by term. The exponential is defined by its series; forces to be exponential; turns sums into products and has the logarithm as its inverse; and gives all of trigonometry. The radius of convergence is governed by singularities in the complex plane. The matrix exponential solves linear systems. Finally, is smooth but flat at , and from it come bumps and cutoffs, the tools for localising. 2B.7 Fourier Series and the First Heat Equation uses complex exponentials as building blocks for periodic functions, and solves the heat equation with them.
Exercises
Find the radius of convergence of: (a) ; (b) ; (c) ; (d) ; (e) .
Solution
(a) . (b) , since . (c) . (d) (this is ). (e) : the coefficients are at perfect squares and elsewhere, so .
Show that for every real , by showing (use , or the mean value theorem for ). Deduce that , so the of 2A.6 Sequences is the of this chapter.
Let be real analytic on an open interval , and suppose on some subinterval . Show that on . (Let be the set of points of near which vanishes identically. Show is open, non-empty and closed in , the last because at a limit point of all derivatives of vanish, so its Taylor series there is . Then use 2B.4 Connectedness.) Explain why this means no analytic function can be a bump.
Solution
is open by definition and contains . If is a limit of points , then each is continuous and vanishes at the , so for all . Near , equals its Taylor series at , which is ; so . Thus is clopen in the connected interval , and . A bump vanishes on an interval but not everywhere, so it can't be analytic.
With for and otherwise, show that is smooth on , for , for , and increasing on .
Hint
For monotonicity, write on and check that is decreasing.
Compute for (a) ; (b) ; (c) . Describe the solutions of in each case. Then check that for and (compute using ).
Solution
(a) : growth along the first axis, decay along the second (a saddle). (b) , so : shear, growing only linearly. (c) with and commuting, so : spirals, outward if , inward if . Finally, , while .
Show that when is diagonalisable (write and note ). Deduce that always has positive determinant when is diagonalisable. (It holds for every , by the density of diagonalisable matrices; compare 2B.4 Connectedness's exercise on .)
Let be the cutoff of this chapter, with and . For , let on . (a) Show that on the ball of radius , outside radius , and that its first and second partial derivatives are bounded by and for constants not depending on . (b) If is a function with , show that . This trade, a cutoff at scale costing a factor on the lower-order term, is exactly the bookkeeping in the localised log-Sobolev and noncollapsing arguments of 12A.4 κ-Noncollapsing, where is the scale at which the curvature is controlled.
Solution
(a) when and when . The function is smooth: near it is identically , and away from , is smooth. By the chain rule, , bounded by ; the second derivatives involve and , and the latter is only non-zero for , so it is at most . (b) , and , with supported in .
© 2026 NeckPinch (www.neckpinch.com). All content in the guidebook (text, mathematics, figures and exercises) is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. No part may be copied, republished or redistributed without written permission.