Hölder estimates for the Newtonian potential, interior and global Schauder estimates, and existence by continuity.
59 min read · Updated Oct 20, 2026
Read with Jost, Partial Differential Equations, chapter 13 ("The regularity theory of Schauder and the continuity method": Cα-regularity for the Poisson equation, the Schauder estimates, existence by continuity); Gilbarg and Trudinger, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, chapters 4 and 6, is the classic reference and the source of several proofs below; Taylor III, §13.8 (Hölder spaces) and §14.4 (interior elliptic regularity). This chapter proves the Hölder estimate for the Newtonian potential and the interior Schauder estimate in full, and the continuity method; the boundary estimates are stated.
6A.7 Parabolic Regularity stated the Schauder estimates and called them the estimates quoted in every short-time existence proof. This chapter proves them, for elliptic equations, which is where the ideas are clearest; the parabolic estimates of 6A.7 Parabolic Regularity are proved by the same scheme with the heat kernel in place of the Newtonian kernel (Lieberman, chapter 4; Krylov's lectures).
The question is the one 4A.14 Hölder Spaces raised: if Δu=f and f is continuous, is u twice continuously differentiable? Not always: there is a continuous f whose solution has unbounded second derivatives. But if f is Hölder continuous, then the second derivatives of u are Hölder continuous with the same exponent, with an estimate. The proof has two halves. First, an explicit computation with the fundamental solution shows that the Newtonian potential∫Φ(x−y)f(y)dy of a Hölder function has Hölder second derivatives: the singular integral converges because Hölder continuity supplies just enough cancellation. Second, freezing the coefficients: an equation with variable Hölder coefficients looks, on a small ball, like an equation with constant coefficients plus a small error, and the error can be absorbed. The second half is the most reusable technique in the chapter: it is how almost every estimate for variable-coefficient and nonlinear equations is proved.
With the estimates in hand, the method of continuity solves the Dirichlet problem for general elliptic operators: deform the operator to the Laplacian, and show that the set of parameters where the problem is solvable is both open and closed. Openness is linear algebra in Banach spaces; closedness is exactly the a priori estimate. The same open-and-closed argument proves the Calabi conjecture (Yau, 1978) and is the standard way geometric existence theorems are organised.
By the end of this chapter you will be able to:
explain why Hölder continuity, and not continuity, is the right hypothesis, in terms of the cancellation in the singular kernel D2Φ;
prove that the Newtonian potential of a Cα function is C2,α, with an estimate;
prove the interior Schauder estimate for variable-coefficient elliptic equations, by freezing coefficients, an interpolation inequality, and an absorption lemma;
state the global Schauder estimate and prove the method of continuity;
use the method to solve the Dirichlet problem for general elliptic operators, and recognise the open-closed structure of geometric existence proofs.
7.1How smooth is the gravitational field inside the Earth?
In the worldModelDensity jumps and the smoothness of potentials
The gravitational potential V of a planet satisfies ΔV=4πGρ, where ρ is the mass density and G the gravitational constant. Inside the Earth the density is far from smooth. At the core–mantle boundary, about 2900 km down, it almost doubles: in the Preliminary Reference Earth Model of Adam Dziewonski and Don Anderson (1981), it jumps from about 5.6 g/cm³ at the base of the mantle to about 9.9 g/cm³ at the top of the liquid outer core.
What does this do to the potential and to the gravitational field −∇V? Across the interface, the second derivatives of V must jump, because ΔV jumps; so V is not C2. But the field itself is continuous (Gauss's law: the flux through a small pillbox straddling the interface is determined by the enclosed mass, which goes to zero with the box), and in fact ∇V is Hölder continuous with every exponent less than 1. Away from the interface, inside each layer where the density varies smoothly, V is as smooth as ρ allows, plus two derivatives. Schauder theory makes these statements precise and quantitative: Hölder continuity of the source within a region gives Hölder continuity of all second derivatives of the potential in that region, with estimates, and the loss of regularity is confined to where the source is rough. It is also why geophysicists can model the gravity field of a layered Earth by solving Poisson's equation layer by layer and matching the potential and its normal derivative across interfaces.
and in general ∣∂βΦ(z)∣≤C∣z∣2−n−∣β∣ for ∣β∣≥1. The first derivatives are integrable near 0 (they behave like ∣z∣1−n), so ∇w=∫∇Φ(x−y)f(y)dy for merely bounded f. The second derivatives behave like ∣z∣−n, which is not integrable near 0: ∫∣z∣<1∣z∣−ndz=∞ (3A.5 Product Measures and Change of Variables). So ∂ijw cannot be computed by putting ∂ijΦ under the integral sign.
What saves the day is cancellation. The kernel ∂ijΦ has average zero over every sphere centred at 0 (Exercise 7.11): it is positive in some directions and negative in others, in balance. So ∫ε<∣z∣<1∂ijΦ(z)dz is bounded independently of ε, although the integral of its absolute value is not. Integrated against a function f, the cancellation helps if f is nearly constant near the singularity: write f(y)=f(x)+(f(y)−f(x)). The constant part is handled by cancellation, and the rest by the smallness of f(y)−f(x). If ∣f(y)−f(x)∣≤[f]α∣y−x∣α, the integrand becomes O(∣x−y∣α−n), which is integrable. Hölder continuity buys exactly the integrability that the kernel lacks. Mere continuity gives ∣f(y)−f(x)∣≤ω(∣x−y∣) for a modulus of continuity ω, and ω(r)r−n is integrable near 0 only if ∫0rω(r)dr<∞ (a "Dini" condition); for ω(r)=log(1/r)1 it is not, and 4A.14 Hölder Spaces's example lives exactly there.
Notation for the rest of the chapter: for a function g on a set E, ∣g∣0;E=supE∣g∣ and [g]α;E=supx=y∈E∣x−y∣α∣g(x)−g(y)∣ (4A.14 Hölder Spaces). Throughout, 0<α<1; the case α=1 fails, for the same reason that continuity fails at α=0 (Exercise 7.12).
Lemma 7.1First derivatives of the Newtonian potential
If f is bounded and integrable on a bounded set B, then w∈C1(Rn) and ∂iw(x)=∫B∂iΦ(x−y)f(y)dy.
Proof. Let v(x)=∫B∂iΦ(x−y)f(y)dy, which converges since ∣∂iΦ(z)∣≤C∣z∣1−n is locally integrable. Fix a smooth cut-off η(t) with η=0 for t≤1, η=1 for t≥2, 0≤η≤1, ∣η′∣≤2, and let ηε(z)=η(∣z∣/ε). The function wε(x)=∫BΦ(x−y)ηε(x−y)f(y)dy has a smooth kernel, so ∂iwε=∫∂i(Φηε)(x−y)f(y)dy. The kernels of v and ∂iwε agree where ∣x−y∣≥2ε, so
(the log only for n=2), and similarly ∣w−wε∣≤C∣f∣0ε2∣logε∣. Both tend to 0 uniformly in x, so wε→w and ∂iwε→v uniformly; hence w∈C1 with ∂iw=v (2B.5 Uniform Convergence and Arzelà–Ascoli).
Lemma 7.2Second derivatives of the Newtonian potential
Let B be a ball and f∈Cα(B). Then w∈C2(B), −Δw=f in B, and for x∈B,
Proof. Let v(x) be the right side; the first integral converges because its integrand is at most C[f]α∣x−y∣α−n. Let uε(x)=∫B∂iΦ(x−y)ηε(x−y)f(y)dy, a smooth function of x, which converges uniformly to ∂iw by the previous proof. For x∈B and 2ε<dist(x,∂B), differentiate under the integral and split f(y)=(f(y)−f(x))+f(x):
In the last integral, ∂xj of a function of x−y is −∂yj of it, so by the divergence theorem it equals −∫∂B(∂iΦηε)(x−y)νj(y)dS(y), and ηε=1 on ∂B by the choice of ε. So ∂juε(x) differs from v(x) only through the first integral, over ∣x−y∣≤2ε:
This tends to 0 uniformly on compact subsets of B, so ∂iw∈C1(B) with ∂j∂iw=v.
For the equation, sum over i=j. Since ∑i∂iiΦ=ΔΦ=0 away from 0, the first integral contributes nothing. In the second, ∑i∂iΦ(x−y)νi(y)=−∇y[Φ(x−y)]⋅ν, and the flux of ∇yΦ(⋅−x) out of any domain containing x is −1 (6A.2 Harmonic Functions). So Δw(x)=−f(x)⋅(−1)⋅(−1)=−f(x).
Theorem 7.3Hölder estimate for the Newtonian potential
Let B1=B(x0,R) and B2=B(x0,2R), f∈Cα(B2), and w the Newtonian potential of f over B2. Then w∈C2,α(B1) and
Proof. Throughout, C depends only on n and α, and we use the formula of Lemma 7.2 on B=B2. Write J(x)=∫∂B2∂iΦ(x−y)νj(y)dS(y) and V(x)=∫B2∂ijΦ(x−y)(f(y)−f(x))dy, so ∂ijw=V−fJ.
Sup bound. For x∈B1 and y∈∂B2, ∣x−y∣≥R, so ∣J(x)∣≤CR1−n⋅Rn−1=C. And ∣V(x)∣≤[f]α∫∣z∣≤3RC∣z∣α−ndz=C[f]αRα. So ∣D2w∣0;B1≤C(∣f∣0+Rα[f]α).
Hölder bound, boundary term. Let x,xˉ∈B1, δ=∣x−xˉ∣≤2R. Then f(x)J(x)−f(xˉ)J(xˉ)=f(x)(J(x)−J(xˉ))+(f(x)−f(xˉ))J(xˉ). By the mean value theorem, ∣J(x)−J(xˉ)∣≤δsup∣D2Φ∣⋅∣∂B2∣≤CRδ≤C(Rδ)α (as Rδ≤2). So this part is at most C(∣f∣0R−α+[f]α)δα.
Hölder bound, volume term. Let ξ=2x+xˉ and split B2 into B(ξ,δ)∩B2 (near) and the rest (far).
Near part: B(ξ,δ)⊂B(x,23δ), so ∫near∂ijΦ(x−y)(f(y)−f(x))dy≤C[f]α∫∣z∣≤23δ∣z∣α−ndz=C[f]αδα, and the same for xˉ.
For the first piece: for y outside B(ξ,δ) and x^ on the segment [x,xˉ], ∣x^−y∣≥∣ξ−y∣−2δ≥21∣ξ−y∣, so the mean value theorem and ∣D3Φ(z)∣≤C∣z∣−n−1 give ∣∂ijΦ(x−y)−∂ijΦ(xˉ−y)∣≤Cδ∣ξ−y∣−n−1. Also ∣f(y)−f(xˉ)∣≤[f]α(∣y−ξ∣+2δ)α≤C[f]α∣y−ξ∣α. So the first piece contributes at most
with ν the outward normals of the two spheres (the region's boundary is ∂B2 outward and ∂B(ξ,δ) inward, and ∂xj=−∂yj supplies the signs). On ∂B(ξ,δ), ∣x−y∣≥2δ, so the first boundary integral is at most Cδ1−n⋅δn−1=C; the second is at most C as before. This cancellation, the kernel integrating to something bounded over an annulus, is the one described in the previous section.
Adding everything, ∣∂ijw(x)−∂ijw(xˉ)∣≤C(∣f∣0;B2R−α+[f]α;B2)δα, which is the claim after multiplying by Rα.
The estimate is scale-invariant: replacing f(x) by f(λx) and R by R/λ changes both sides by the same factor. That is why the weights Rα appear, and it is how one checks that an estimate is correctly stated (4A.14 Hölder Spaces's rehearsal).
Proof. Let w be the Newtonian potential of −f over B2R, so Δw=f in B2R, and h=u−w, harmonic in B2R. By Theorem 7.3, with the balls BR⊂B2R, w satisfies the estimate. For h, use the derivative estimates for harmonic functions (6A.2 Harmonic Functions): on B3R/2, ∣Dkh∣≤CkR−k∣h∣0;B2R for k=2,3. Then for x,y∈BR: if ∣x−y∣≤2R the segment lies in B3R/2 and ∣D2h(x)−D2h(y)∣≤CR3∣h∣0∣x−y∣≤CR2+α∣h∣0∣x−y∣α; if ∣x−y∣>2R, then ∣D2h(x)−D2h(y)∣≤2CR2∣h∣0≤C′R2+α∣h∣0∣x−y∣α. So R2∣D2h∣0;BR+R2+α[D2h]α;BR≤C∣h∣0;B2R. Finally ∣h∣0≤∣u∣0+∣w∣0 and ∣w∣0;B2R≤∣f∣0supx∫B2R∣Φ(x−y)∣dy≤CR2∣f∣0 (with a logR correction when n=2, which is removed by scaling to R=1 first). Add the estimates for w and h.
Constant coefficients. If L0u=∑i,jaij∂iju with a constant symmetric matrix A=(aij), λ∣ξ∣2≤Aξ⋅ξ≤Λ∣ξ∣2, the linear change of variables x=A1/2y turns L0 into the Laplacian: if v(y)=u(A1/2y), then Δv(y)=(L0u)(A1/2y) (6A.1 What a PDE Is's transformation rule B=JAJT with J=A−1/2). Balls become ellipsoids whose axes are between λ and Λ times the radius, so Theorem 7.4 holds for L0 with balls BR⊂B2R replaced by BR⊂BκR, κ=2Λ/λ, and C depending also on λ and Λ. Covering a ball by smaller balls (the usual trick) gives the version with BR and B2R again, with a larger constant. We use it in this form:
on B1=B(0,1), with aij=aji, uniform ellipticity λ∣ξ∣2≤aijξiξj≤Λ∣ξ∣2, and Hölder coefficients: ∣aij∣0+[aij]α, ∣bi∣0+[bi]α, ∣c∣0+[c]α all at most Λ on B1. Two tools come first, both elementary.
Lemma 7.5Interpolation
Let u∈C2,α(Bs) for a ball Bs of radius s, and 0<η≤s. Then
Proof. Let x∈Bs and e a unit vector. Move x towards the centre by 2η (or to the centre, if it is closer): the new point y satisfies ∣x−y∣≤2η and B(y,2η)⊂Bs. With h=2η, Taylor's theorem gives a point θ on the segment from y−he to y+he with
u(y+he)−2u(y)+u(y−he)=h2D2u(θ)(e,e),
so ∣D2u(θ)(e,e)∣≤h24∣u∣0=η216∣u∣0. And ∣x−θ∣≤η, so ∣D2u(x)(e,e)∣≤∣D2u(θ)(e,e)∣+[D2u]αηα. The norm of a symmetric matrix is max∣e∣=1∣M(e,e)∣ (1A.6 Symmetric Matrices and the Spectral Theorem), which gives the first inequality. The second is the same with the first difference u(y+he)−u(y−he)=2hDu(θ)⋅e and ∣x−θ∣≤η.
Lemma 7.6Absorption
Let φ≥0 be bounded on [21,1], and suppose there are θ<1 and constants A,B,β≥0 with
φ(r)≤θφ(s)+(s−r)βA+Bwhenever 21≤r<s≤1.
Then φ(21)≤c(θ,β)(A+B).
Proof. Choose τ∈(0,1) with θτ−β<1, and points r0=21, rk+1=rk+(1−τ)τk⋅21, which increase to 1. Applying the hypothesis with r=rk, s=rk+1 and iterating m times,
Let m→∞: the first term tends to 0 because φ is bounded, and both series converge.
The lemma turns an inequality that controls a quantity on a smaller ball by a fraction of the same quantity on a larger ball into an honest bound. It is the device that makes freezing work: the frozen-coefficient error is small, but it is measured on a slightly larger ball.
Theorem 7.7Interior Schauder estimate
Under the hypotheses above, every u∈C2,α(B1) satisfies
Proof. Let φ(r)=[D2u]α;Br for 21≤r≤1, bounded because u∈C2,α(B1). Fix 21≤r<s≤1 and let ρ=σ(s−r), where σ∈(0,21] will be chosen small. Throughout, C denotes constants depending only on n, α, λ, Λ, and all sup norms and seminorms without a subscript are over Bs.
Freezing. Fix x0∈Br; then B(x0,ρ)⊂Bs. Let L0=aij(x0)∂ij, so that on B(x0,ρ)
L0u=F:=(aij(x0)−aij(x))∂iju−bi∂iu−cu+f.
The point is that the first term is small on a small ball: ∣aij(x0)−aij(x)∣≤Λρα there.
Estimating F. Using [gh]α≤∣g∣0[h]α+[g]α∣h∣0 and, on a ball of radius ρ, [g]α≤(2ρ)1−α∣Dg∣0 for g=∂iu and g=u,
From small balls to Br. For x,y∈Br: if ∣x−y∣<2ρ, then y∈B(x,2ρ) and the quotient ∣x−y∣α∣D2u(x)−D2u(y)∣ is bounded by the left side above (with x0=x); if ∣x−y∣≥2ρ, it is at most 2∣D2u∣0(2ρ)−α. So
Interpolating away the lower derivatives. By Lemma 7.5 on Bs with η=ερ (note η≤s): ρ−α∣D2u∣0≤εαφ(s)+16ε−2ρ−2−α∣u∣0, and ρ−α∣Du∣0≤ρ−α(ρ∣D2u∣0+4ρ−1∣u∣0), which is bounded the same way. Hence
Choosing the constants and absorbing. Choose ε with Cεα≤41, and then σ with Cσα≤41, so that C(ρα+εα)≤21 (recall ρ=σ(s−r)≤σ). With ρ−2−α=σ−2−α(s−r)−2−α,
φ(r)≤21φ(s)+(s−r)2+αC(∣u∣0+∣f∣0+[f]α).
Lemma 7.6 gives [D2u]α;B1/2=φ(21)≤C(∣u∣0;B1+∣f∣0;B1+[f]α;B1). The bounds for ∣D2u∣0 and ∣Du∣0 on B1/2 follow from Lemma 7.5.
The structure is worth memorising: freeze (compare with constant coefficients at a point), estimate the error (small because the coefficients are Hölder and the ball is small), pass from small balls to the whole ball (near pairs and far pairs), interpolate (lower derivatives cost a little of the top seminorm and a lot of the sup norm), absorb (iterate over nested balls). By scaling, the estimate on B1/2 gives estimates on BR/2 with the usual powers of R.
Higher regularity. If the coefficients and f are in Ck,α, differentiate the equation: each derivative ∂lu satisfies an equation of the same form whose right side involves derivatives of the coefficients times derivatives of u of order at most two, which are Cα by what has been proved. So ∂lu∈C2,α, that is, u∈C3,α, and by induction u∈Ck+2,α (this needs u∈C3 first, which a difference-quotient version of the argument supplies: Gilbarg–Trudinger, Theorem 6.17). Smooth coefficients and data give smooth solutions: the Hölder-space bootstrap, parallel to the Sobolev bootstrap of 6A.6 Weak Solutions and Elliptic Regularity.
Up to the boundary, the same freezing argument works, with the half-space in place of the whole space as the model, after flattening the boundary by a C2,α change of coordinates. The model estimate for the half-space comes from the Green's function with images (6B.4 Green’s Functions, Separation of Variables and Transforms). The result:
Theorem 7.8Global Schauder estimate (statement)
Let Ω be a bounded domain with C2,α boundary, L as above with coefficients in Cα(Ω), and u∈C2,α(Ω) with u=φ on ∂Ω, φ∈C2,α(Ω). Then
∣u∣C2,α(Ω)≤C(∣u∣0;Ω+∣Lu∣Cα(Ω)+∣φ∣C2,α(Ω)),
with C depending on n, α, λ, Λ and Ω (Gilbarg–Trudinger, Theorem 6.6).
If c≤0 (with the sign convention of this chapter, where L has +aij∂ij), the maximum principle bounds the ∣u∣0 term: ∣u∣0;Ω≤∣φ∣0;∂Ω+C∣Lu∣0;Ω, with C depending on λ, Λ and the diameter of Ω (Gilbarg–Trudinger, Theorem 3.7; the proof compares u with sup∣φ∣+(eγd−eγx1)λsup∣Lu∣ for large γ, as in 6A.5 Maximum Principles's elliptic weak maximum principle). Combining, for c≤0,
∣u∣C2,α(Ω)≤C(∣Lu∣Cα(Ω)+∣φ∣C2,α(Ω)).(∗∗)
This is an a priori estimate: it bounds any solution that happens to exist. The continuity method converts it into existence.
Theorem 7.9The method of continuity
Let X be a Banach space, Y a normed space, and L0,L1:X→Y bounded linear operators. For t∈[0,1] let Lt=(1−t)L0+tL1, and suppose there is a constant C with
∥x∥X≤C∥Ltx∥Yfor all x∈X and t∈[0,1].
Then L1 is onto if and only if L0 is.
Proof. Let S={t∈[0,1]:Lt is onto}. For t∈S, Lt is one-to-one (by the estimate) and onto, with inverse bounded by C. Let t∈S and τ∈[0,1]. To solve Lτx=y, rewrite it as
The right side is a contraction of X in x when ∣τ−t∣C(∥L0∥+∥L1∥)<1, so by Banach's fixed point theorem (2B.2 Completeness and Contraction) it has a fixed point. So S contains every τ within δ=2C(∥L0∥+∥L1∥)1 of each of its points, and δ does not depend on t. If 0∈S, then [0,δ]⊂S, then [0,2δ]⊂S, and after finitely many steps 1∈S. The converse is the same with 0 and 1 exchanged.
The uniformity of C over the whole path is the whole point: it makes the step size δ uniform, so that the steps reach 1. In geometric applications one usually phrases it as openness (the solvable set is open, by an implicit function theorem) and closedness (it is closed, because a priori estimates and Arzelà–Ascoli let limits of solutions be solutions). Here, with a linear problem, both are packaged in one contraction.
Theorem 7.10The Dirichlet problem in Hölder spaces
Let Ω be a bounded domain with C2,α boundary, and L uniformly elliptic with coefficients in Cα(Ω) and c≤0. Then for every f∈Cα(Ω) and φ∈C2,α(Ω) there is a unique u∈C2,α(Ω) with Lu=f in Ω and u=φ on ∂Ω.
Proof. Subtracting φ, it suffices to treat φ=0. Let X={u∈C2,α(Ω):u=0 on ∂Ω}, a closed subspace of C2,α and so a Banach space, Y=Cα(Ω), L0=Δ and L1=L. Each Lt=(1−t)Δ+tL is uniformly elliptic with ellipticity constants between min(1,λ) and max(1,Λ), Hölder coefficients bounded uniformly in t, and zero-order coefficient tc≤0; so (∗∗) holds for all Lt with one constant C. By Theorem 7.9 it suffices that Δ:X→Y is onto: for every f∈Cα(Ω), the problem Δu=f, u=0 on ∂Ω, has a solution in C2,α(Ω). This is Kellogg's theorem: subtract the Newtonian potential of an extension of f (which is C2,α by Theorem 7.3) to reduce to the Dirichlet problem for harmonic functions with C2,α boundary data, which Perron's method solves (6B.6 Perron’s Method and Barriers, the C2 boundary has exterior spheres), and the boundary Schauder estimate shows the solution is C2,α up to the boundary (Gilbarg–Trudinger, Theorems 6.14 and 4.3). Uniqueness is the maximum principle.
Where this goesSchauder and continuity in geometry
The parabolic Schauder estimates (6A.7 Parabolic Regularity), proved by the same freezing scheme, make the linearised Ricci–DeTurck operator an isomorphism between parabolic Hölder spaces, which is step 3 of the short-time existence scheme of 6A.8 Nonlinear Parabolic Equations and 6C.12 Quasilinear Parabolic Systems. The continuity method is how Shing-Tung Yau proved the Calabi conjecture (1978): to solve a complex Monge–Ampère equation det(gijˉ+∂i∂jˉφ)=etFdet(gijˉ), deform t from 0 to 1; openness is the implicit function theorem with the Laplacian as linearisation, and closedness is a chain of a priori estimates ending with a C2,α estimate of Schauder type (6C.10 Fully Nonlinear Equations and Monge–Ampère). Hamilton's 1982 Ricci flow paper used the Nash–Moser implicit function theorem, a continuity-type argument for operators that lose derivatives, before DeTurck's simplification made Schauder theory enough.
Juliusz Schauder proved his estimates in 1934, building on work of Otto Hölder (1882) on the Newtonian potential of Hölder densities, of Arthur Korn, and of Leon Lichtenstein. Oliver Kellogg proved the boundary regularity of potentials in 1929–31. The method of continuity goes back to Sergei Bernstein's work on nonlinear elliptic equations in the early 1900s and was put in its modern form by Schauder and by Jean Leray and Schauder in 1934. Gilbarg and Trudinger's book (1977) became the standard reference. The modern proof by freezing and an absorption lemma, presented here, is in the tradition of Sergio Campanato's and Mariano Giaquinta's work from the 1960s onward; Leon Simon gave a short proof by blow-up and compactness in 1997. Yau's proof of the Calabi conjecture appeared in 1978.
RecallWhere we stand
Second derivatives of the fundamental solution are not integrable, but they cancel on spheres, and Hölder continuity of f supplies the missing integrability: the Newtonian potential of a Cα function is C2,α, with a scale-invariant estimate, for 0<α<1. Adding harmonic derivative bounds gives the interior Schauder estimate for Δu=f, and a linear change of variables gives it for constant coefficients. For variable Hölder coefficients, freeze at a point, estimate the error on a small ball, interpolate lower derivatives, and absorb with an iteration lemma: ∣u∣C2,α(B1/2)≤C(∣u∣0+∣f∣Cα). With the global estimate and the maximum principle, the method of continuity deforms L to Δ and solves the Dirichlet problem in C2,α for any uniformly elliptic L with Hölder coefficients and c≤0. 6B.8 Lᵖ Theory and Strong Solutions proves the corresponding estimates in Lp, where the cancellation of the kernel is exploited by the Calderón–Zygmund theory.
Exercise 7.11The kernel averages to zero on spheres
Show that ∫∂B(0,r)∂ijΦdS=0 for every r>0 and all i,j. (For i=j use the symmetry zi↦−zi; for i=j use ∫∂Bzi2dS=nr2∣∂B∣ by symmetry among coordinates.) Deduce that ∫ε<∣z∣<1∂ijΦ(z)dz=0, although ∫ε<∣z∣<1∣∂ijΦ∣→∞ as ε→0.
Solution
For i=j, ∂ijΦ=α(n)∣z∣n+2zizj is odd in zi, and the sphere is symmetric under zi↦−zi. For i=j, ∂iiΦ=nα(n)1(∣z∣n+2nzi2−∣z∣n1), and on ∣z∣=r, ∫nzi2=r2∣∂B∣, so the integral is nα(n)1r−n(r2∣∂B∣r−2−∣∂B∣)=0. Integrating over r∈(ε,1) in polar coordinates gives 0. But ∣∂ijΦ∣≥c∣z∣−n on a set of directions of positive measure, so ∫ε<∣z∣<1∣∂ijΦ∣≥clogε1.
Exercise 7.12The endpoints fail
(a) For u=xylog(x2+y2) in the plane, show that Δu=x2+y28xy, which is bounded but discontinuous at the origin. (b) Show that uxy=log(x2+y2)+2−(x2+y2)24x2y2, which is unbounded near the origin. So a bounded Δu does not give bounded second derivatives: the estimate fails at α=0. The same phenomenon one derivative higher shows that a Lipschitz Δu does not give Lipschitz second derivatives, which is why the theory needs 0<α<1.
Solution
(a) With ℓ=log(x2+y2) and r2=x2+y2: ux=yℓ+r22x2y, uxx=r22xy+r24xy−r44x3y, and by symmetry uyy=r26xy−r44xy3. Adding, Δu=r212xy−r44xy(x2+y2)=r28xy, bounded (by 4) and discontinuous at 0 (it is 4sin2θ). (b) uxy=∂y(yℓ+r22x2y)=ℓ+r22y2+r22x2−r44x2y2=ℓ+2−r44x2y2, and ℓ=logr2→−∞. So D2u is unbounded while Δu is bounded.
Exercise 7.13Checking scale invariance
Let uλ(x)=u(λx) and fλ(x)=λ2f(λx), so Δuλ=fλ when Δu=f. Show that each term of the estimate in Theorem 7.4 for uλ on BR/λ equals the corresponding term for u on BR. Conclude that it suffices to prove the estimate for R=1.
Solution
D2uλ(x)=λ2D2u(λx), so (R/λ)2∣D2uλ∣0;BR/λ=R2∣D2u∣0;BR; Hölder quotients pick up λα from ∣x−y∣α, so (R/λ)2+α[D2uλ]α=R2+α[D2u]α; similarly for fλ with its extra λ2. Every term is unchanged, so the estimate for R=1 implies it for all R.
Exercise 7.14The continuity method for matrices
Let A0, A1 be n×n matrices with ∣x∣≤C∣Atx∣ for all x and all t∈[0,1], where At=(1−t)A0+tA1. Show directly that detAt never vanishes, so detA0 and detA1 have the same sign. Conversely, show that if every At is invertible then a uniform C exists, and explain why in infinite dimensions the estimate is the real content.
Solution
If detAt=0, some x=0 has Atx=0, contradicting ∣x∣≤C∣Atx∣. The determinant is a continuous non-vanishing function of t, so its sign is constant. Conversely, if every At is invertible, t↦∥At−1∥ is continuous on the compact interval, hence bounded, which gives C. In infinite dimensions an injective bounded operator need not have a bounded inverse, nor be onto, so the uniform estimate is an extra piece of information, and it is exactly what Schauder theory supplies.
Exercise 7.15Liouville from Schauder
Let u be harmonic on Rn with ∣u(x)∣≤C(1+∣x∣)2+β for some β<α. Use Theorem 7.4 on BR with R→∞ to show [D2u]α=0, hence D2u is constant and u is a quadratic polynomial.
Solution
With f=0, R2+α[D2u]α;BR≤C∣u∣0;B2R≤C(1+2R)2+β, so [D2u]α;BR≤CRβ−α→0. Hence D2u is constant on Rn, and u is a polynomial of degree at most 2.
Exercise 7.16Rehearsal: the continuity method for a nonlinear equation
On the flat torus Tn, consider Δu−u−u3=f for a given f∈Cα(Tn). Run the continuity method along the path Δu−u−u3=tf, t∈[0,1], starting from u=0 at t=0. (a) Openness. The linearisation at a solution u is v↦Δv−(1+3u2)v. Show by the maximum principle that it is injective on C2,α, and (granting the Fredholm theory of 6A.6 Weak Solutions and Elliptic Regularity in Hölder spaces) invertible; conclude by the implicit function theorem in Banach spaces (2B.9 The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems) that the set of solvable t is open. (b) Closedness. At a maximum of u, Δu≤0, so u+u3≤−tf≤∣f∣0 there; deduce ∣u∣0≤∣f∣0. Then use the Schauder estimate (with Δu=u+u3+tf as the right side, after a first step bounding its Hölder norm) to bound ∣u∣C2,α uniformly in t, and conclude with Arzelà–Ascoli that the solvable set is closed. (c) Hence the equation has a solution for every f. Yau's proof of the Calabi conjecture has exactly this shape, with the complex Monge–Ampère equation in place of this semilinear one and much harder a priori estimates (6C.10 Fully Nonlinear Equations and Monge–Ampère).
Solution
(a) If Δv=(1+3u2)v and v has a positive maximum, then at that point Δv≤0<(1+3u2)v, a contradiction; likewise for a negative minimum. So v=0. (b) At a maximum point of u, u+u3=Δu−tf≤∣f∣0; since s+s3≥s for s≥0, maxu≤∣f∣0, and similarly minu≥−∣f∣0. Then Δu=u+u3+tf is bounded; Lp or C1,β estimates (or interpolation) make u Lipschitz with a uniform bound, so the right side is uniformly Cα, and the Schauder estimate gives a uniform C2,α bound. If tk→t with solutions uk, a subsequence converges in C2 (by Arzelà–Ascoli, uniform C2,α bounds give C2 convergence) to a solution at t. (c) The solvable set contains 0, is open and closed in [0,1], hence is all of [0,1].
Free resources for this chapter
Chosen for what this chapter covers, and all free to read. Links checked Oct 20, 2026.