Book 6B

© 2026 NeckPinch · www.neckpinch.com · All rights reserved.

Course 6Book 6B: Linear PDE: Characteristics, Waves and RegularityChapter 4

Green’s Functions, Separation of Variables and Transforms

Green’s functions and images, Poisson kernels, separation of variables, Bessel functions and the Laplace transform.

48 min read · Updated Oct 20, 2026

Read with Evans, Partial Differential Equations, section 2.2.4 (Green's function, the half-space and the ball) and sections 4.1–4.3 (separation of variables, similarity solutions, transform methods); Jost, section 2.1 (the representation formula and the Dirichlet problem on the ball); Taylor I, §3.5 ("The classical evolution equations"), §3.6 (radial distributions and Bessel functions) and §3.7 ("The method of images and Poisson's summation formula"). This chapter proves the representation formula, the symmetry of Green's function and the half-space Poisson formula in full.

In this chapter · 9 sections
  1. 4.1Temperature waves in the ground
  2. 4.2Green's representation formula
  3. 4.3Green's function
  4. 4.4The half-space and the ball: images
  5. 4.5Separation of variables
  6. 4.6Transforms
  7. 4.7Similarity and travelling waves
  8. 4.8History
  9. 4.9Exercises
  10. ↗Free resources

The theorems of Book 6A say that solutions exist, are unique and are smooth. Engineers, physicists and quantitative analysts usually need more: a formula, or at least a recipe that a computer can follow. This chapter collects the classical recipes, each of which turns a PDE into something simpler.

Green's functions turn a boundary-value problem into an integral: the solution is the data integrated against a kernel that depends only on the domain. Separation of variables turns a PDE into a family of ODEs, one for each eigenfunction, which is the spectral theorem of 4A.8 Compact Operators and Spectra made concrete. Transforms (Fourier in space, Laplace in time) turn derivatives into multiplications. And similarity and travelling-wave solutions use the symmetries of an equation to reduce the number of variables. None of these works for every equation, and each has a precise domain of validity; together they produce almost every explicit solution in the literature, and the Gaussian, the Poisson kernel and the Bessel function that appear throughout the guide all come from here.

By the end of this chapter you will be able to:

  • prove Green's representation formula, define the Green's function of a domain, and prove that it is symmetric;
  • construct Green's functions for the half-space and the ball by reflection, and prove that the Poisson integral solves the Dirichlet problem on a half-space;
  • solve the Laplace, heat and wave equations on rectangles and discs by separation of variables, and recognise Bessel's equation;
  • use the Laplace transform to solve the heat equation with time-dependent boundary data, and recognise Duhamel's principle in the result;
  • find travelling-wave and soliton solutions, and compute the damping depth of temperature waves in the ground.

Temperature waves in the ground

In the world Data How deep does winter reach?

The temperature at the surface of the ground rises and falls with the day and with the year. Below the surface, the soil conducts heat by the heat equation ut=κuzzu_t = \kappa u_{zz}, with zz the depth and κ\kappa the soil's thermal diffusivity, typically a few times 10−710^{-7} m²/s for moist soil. If the surface temperature oscillates as Acos⁡(ωt)A\cos(\omega t) about its mean, separation in the complex form eiωte^{i\omega t} (Exercise 4.7) gives the solution that stays bounded with depth:

u(z,t)=Ae−z/dcos⁡(ωt−zd),d=2κω.u(z, t) = Ae^{-z/d}\cos\Big(\omega t - \frac zd\Big), \qquad d = \sqrt{\frac{2\kappa}{\omega}}.

The oscillation is a damped wave travelling downward: its amplitude falls by a factor ee every damping depth dd, and its phase lags by one radian per dd.

With κ=5×10−7\kappa = 5 \times 10^{-7} m²/s, the daily cycle (ω=2π/day\omega = 2\pi/\text{day}) has d≈12d \approx 12 cm: a few tens of centimetres down, day and night are indistinguishable. The annual cycle has d≈2.2d \approx 2.2 m: at 22 m the annual swing is about 40%40\% of the surface swing and lags by about seven weeks, and at about 77 m it is reduced to a few percent and is half a year out of phase, so the ground there is slightly warmest in winter. This is why cellars keep an even temperature, why water pipes are buried below the frost line (a depth set by local building codes from such calculations and experience), and why ground-source heat pumps draw on a nearly constant temperature a few metres down. The analysis goes back to Fourier's own work on terrestrial temperatures in the 1820s. The numbers depend on the soil, its moisture and snow cover, so the formula gives the scale and the shape, not a guarantee.

Green's representation formula

Let U⊂RnU \subset \mathbb{R}^n be bounded with C1C^1 boundary and outward normal ν\nu, and let Φ\Phi be the fundamental solution of the Laplacian (6A.2 Harmonic Functions), so that −ΔΦ=δ0-\Delta\Phi = \delta_0 and ∇Φ(z)=−znα(n)∣z∣n\nabla\Phi(z) = -\frac{z}{n\alpha(n)|z|^n}.

Theorem 4.1 Green's representation formula

For u∈C2(U‾)u \in C^2(\overline U) and x∈Ux \in U,

u(x)=∫∂U(Φ(y−x) ∂u∂ν(y)−u(y) ∂Φ∂ν(y−x))dS(y)−∫UΦ(y−x) Δu(y) dy.u(x) = \int_{\partial U}\Big(\Phi(y - x)\,\frac{\partial u}{\partial\nu}(y) - u(y)\,\frac{\partial\Phi}{\partial\nu}(y - x)\Big)dS(y) - \int_U\Phi(y - x)\,\Delta u(y)\,dy.

Proof. Fix xx and a small ε>0\varepsilon > 0, and let Vε=U∖B(x,ε)‾V_\varepsilon = U\setminus\overline{B(x, \varepsilon)}. On VεV_\varepsilon the function y↦Φ(y−x)y \mapsto \Phi(y - x) is smooth and harmonic. Green's second identity (1A.10 Divergence, Curl and the Integral Theorems), ∫V(uΔw−wΔu)=∫∂V(u ∂νw−w ∂νu) dS\int_V(u\Delta w - w\Delta u) = \int_{\partial V}(u\,\partial_\nu w - w\,\partial_\nu u)\,dS, with w=Φ(⋅−x)w = \Phi(\cdot - x), gives

−∫VεΦ(y−x)Δu dy=∫∂U(u ∂νΦ−Φ ∂νu)dS+∫∂B(x,ε)(u ∂νΦ−Φ ∂νu)dS,-\int_{V_\varepsilon}\Phi(y - x)\Delta u\,dy = \int_{\partial U}\big(u\,\partial_\nu\Phi - \Phi\,\partial_\nu u\big)dS + \int_{\partial B(x,\varepsilon)}\big(u\,\partial_\nu\Phi - \Phi\,\partial_\nu u\big)dS,

where on the small sphere ν\nu is the normal pointing out of VεV_\varepsilon, that is, towards xx: ν=−y−xε\nu = -\frac{y - x}{\varepsilon}. On that sphere:

  • ∣∫Φ ∂νu dS∣≤sup⁡∣∇u∣⋅∣Φ(ε)∣⋅nα(n)εn−1→0\big|\int\Phi\,\partial_\nu u\,dS\big| \leq \sup|\nabla u|\cdot|\Phi(\varepsilon)|\cdot n\alpha(n)\varepsilon^{n-1} \to 0, since εn−1∣Φ(ε)∣\varepsilon^{n-1}|\Phi(\varepsilon)| is O(ε∣log⁡ε∣)O(\varepsilon|\log\varepsilon|) for n=2n = 2 and O(ε)O(\varepsilon) for n≥3n \geq 3;
  • ∂νΦ=∇Φ(y−x)⋅ν=1nα(n)εn−1\partial_\nu\Phi = \nabla\Phi(y - x)\cdot\nu = \frac{1}{n\alpha(n)\varepsilon^{n-1}}, so ∫u ∂νΦ dS\int u\,\partial_\nu\Phi\,dS is the average of uu over the sphere, which tends to u(x)u(x).

And Φ\Phi is integrable near xx, so ∫VεΦΔu→∫UΦΔu\int_{V_\varepsilon}\Phi\Delta u \to \int_U\Phi\Delta u. Letting ε→0\varepsilon \to 0 and rearranging gives the formula.

The formula expresses uu inside UU through three things: Δu\Delta u inside, and both uu and ∂νu\partial_\nu u on the boundary. But for the Dirichlet problem only uu is given on the boundary, and ∂νu\partial_\nu u is unknown; prescribing both would overdetermine the problem (Hadamard's example, 6A.1 What a PDE Is). The way out is to subtract a correction that removes the ∂νu\partial_\nu u term.

Green's function

For each x∈Ux \in U, let ϕx\phi^x be the corrector: the harmonic function on UU with boundary values ϕx(y)=Φ(y−x)\phi^x(y) = \Phi(y - x) for y∈∂Uy \in \partial U. (It exists for reasonable UU, by 6B.6 Perron’s Method and Barriers or by the weak theory of 6A.6 Weak Solutions and Elliptic Regularity applied to ϕx−Φ(⋅−x)ζ\phi^x - \Phi(\cdot - x)\zeta for a cut-off ζ\zeta; for the half-space and the ball it is written down below.)

Definition 4.2 Green's function

The Green's function of UU is

G(x,y)=Φ(y−x)−ϕx(y)(x,y∈U, x≠y).G(x, y) = \Phi(y - x) - \phi^x(y) \qquad (x, y \in U,\ x \neq y).

So −ΔyG(x,⋅)=δx-\Delta_yG(x, \cdot) = \delta_x in UU and G(x,⋅)=0G(x, \cdot) = 0 on ∂U\partial U: G(x,y)G(x, y) is the potential at yy of a unit charge at xx inside a grounded conductor ∂U\partial U, or the steady temperature at yy from a unit heat source at xx in a body whose surface is held at 00.

Theorem 4.3 Solution by Green's function

If u∈C2(U‾)u \in C^2(\overline U) solves −Δu=f-\Delta u = f in UU and u=gu = g on ∂U\partial U, then

u(x)=−∫∂Ug(y) ∂G∂νy(x,y) dS(y)+∫UG(x,y)f(y) dy.u(x) = -\int_{\partial U}g(y)\,\frac{\partial G}{\partial\nu_y}(x, y)\,dS(y) + \int_UG(x, y)f(y)\,dy.

Proof. Apply Green's second identity on UU to uu and the smooth harmonic function ϕx\phi^x: −∫UϕxΔu=∫∂U(u ∂νϕx−ϕx ∂νu)dS-\int_U\phi^x\Delta u = \int_{\partial U}\big(u\,\partial_\nu\phi^x - \phi^x\,\partial_\nu u\big)dS. On ∂U\partial U, ϕx=Φ(⋅−x)\phi^x = \Phi(\cdot - x). Add this to the representation formula: the terms ±∫∂UΦ ∂νu\pm\int_{\partial U}\Phi\,\partial_\nu u cancel, leaving u(x)=−∫∂Uu ∂ν(Φ−ϕx) dS−∫U(Φ−ϕx)Δuu(x) = -\int_{\partial U}u\,\partial_\nu(\Phi - \phi^x)\,dS - \int_U(\Phi - \phi^x)\Delta u. Substitute u=gu = g on ∂U\partial U and Δu=−f\Delta u = -f.

The kernel K(x,y)=−∂G∂νy(x,y)K(x, y) = -\frac{\partial G}{\partial\nu_y}(x, y) on ∂U\partial U is the Poisson kernel of UU: it solves the problem with f=0f = 0, and it is the density of harmonic measure, the distribution of the point where a Brownian motion from xx first leaves UU (6A.3 The Heat Equation on ℝⁿ, 6D.1 Brownian Motion). The kernel GG solves the problem with g=0g = 0, and as an integral operator it is the inverse of −Δ-\Delta with Dirichlet conditions, the compact self-adjoint operator of 4A.8 Compact Operators and Spectra. Self-adjointness corresponds to a symmetry of the kernel.

Theorem 4.4 Green's function is symmetric

G(x,y)=G(y,x)G(x, y) = G(y, x) for all x≠yx \neq y in UU.

Proof. Fix x≠yx \neq y and let v(z)=G(x,z)v(z) = G(x, z), w(z)=G(y,z)w(z) = G(y, z). Both are harmonic in zz except at xx and yy respectively, and both vanish on ∂U\partial U. Let V=U∖(B(x,ε)‾∪B(y,ε)‾)V = U\setminus\big(\overline{B(x, \varepsilon)}\cup\overline{B(y, \varepsilon)}\big) for small ε\varepsilon. Green's second identity on VV, with Δv=Δw=0\Delta v = \Delta w = 0 there and v=w=0v = w = 0 on ∂U\partial U, gives

∫∂B(x,ε)(v ∂νw−w ∂νv)dS=∫∂B(y,ε)(w ∂νv−v ∂νw)dS,\int_{\partial B(x,\varepsilon)}\big(v\,\partial_\nu w - w\,\partial_\nu v\big)dS = \int_{\partial B(y,\varepsilon)}\big(w\,\partial_\nu v - v\,\partial_\nu w\big)dS,

with ν\nu pointing into each small ball. Near xx, ww is smooth, and v=Φ(z−x)−ϕx(z)v = \Phi(z - x) - \phi^x(z) behaves like Φ\Phi. As in the representation formula, ∫∂B(x,ε)v ∂νw→0\int_{\partial B(x,\varepsilon)}v\,\partial_\nu w \to 0 (since εn−1∣Φ(ε)∣→0\varepsilon^{n-1}|\Phi(\varepsilon)| \to 0) and ∫∂B(x,ε)w ∂νv→w(x)\int_{\partial B(x,\varepsilon)}w\,\partial_\nu v \to w(x) (the Φ\Phi part gives the average of ww; the smooth ϕx\phi^x part gives O(εn−1)O(\varepsilon^{n-1})). So the left side tends to −w(x)-w(x), and by the same computation the right side tends to −v(y)-v(y). Hence w(x)=v(y)w(x) = v(y), that is, G(y,x)=G(x,y)G(y, x) = G(x, y).

Physically: the potential at yy due to a unit charge at xx equals the potential at xx due to a unit charge at yy, a reciprocity principle (Green, 1828; in acoustics and elasticity it goes by the names of Helmholtz and Maxwell–Betti).

The half-space and the ball: images

For a few domains the corrector can be guessed by reflection, the method of images: put a fictitious opposite charge outside UU, placed so that the two potentials cancel on ∂U\partial U.

The half-space. Let R+n={xn>0}\mathbb{R}^n_+ = \{x_n > 0\} and, for x∈R+nx \in \mathbb{R}^n_+, let x~=(x1,…,xn−1,−xn)\tilde x = (x_1, \ldots, x_{n-1}, -x_n) be its mirror image. For yy on the boundary {yn=0}\{y_n = 0\}, ∣y−x∣=∣y−x~∣|y - x| = |y - \tilde x|, so Φ(y−x~)=Φ(y−x)\Phi(y - \tilde x) = \Phi(y - x) there, and y↦Φ(y−x~)y \mapsto \Phi(y - \tilde x) is harmonic in R+n\mathbb{R}^n_+ (its singularity is outside). So ϕx(y)=Φ(y−x~)\phi^x(y) = \Phi(y - \tilde x), and

G(x,y)=Φ(y−x)−Φ(y−x~).G(x, y) = \Phi(y - x) - \Phi(y - \tilde x).

Differentiating, with ∂ynΦ(y−x)=−yn−xnnα(n)∣y−x∣n\partial_{y_n}\Phi(y - x) = -\frac{y_n - x_n}{n\alpha(n)|y - x|^n}, at yn=0y_n = 0

∂G∂yn=xnnα(n)∣y−x∣n+xnnα(n)∣y−x∣n,K(x,y)=−∂G∂νy=∂G∂yn=2xnnα(n)∣x−y∣n,\frac{\partial G}{\partial y_n} = \frac{x_n}{n\alpha(n)|y - x|^n} + \frac{x_n}{n\alpha(n)|y - x|^n}, \qquad K(x, y) = -\frac{\partial G}{\partial\nu_y} = \frac{\partial G}{\partial y_n} = \frac{2x_n}{n\alpha(n)|x - y|^n},

since the outward normal of the half-space is −en-e_n. This suggests the Poisson formula for the half-space

u(x)=2xnnα(n)∫∂R+ng(y)∣x−y∣n dy.u(x) = \frac{2x_n}{n\alpha(n)}\int_{\partial\mathbb{R}^n_+}\frac{g(y)}{|x - y|^n}\,dy.

The half-space is unbounded, so Theorem 4.3 does not apply as stated; instead we verify directly.

Theorem 4.5 The Dirichlet problem on a half-space

Let gg be bounded and continuous on Rn−1=∂R+n\mathbb{R}^{n-1} = \partial\mathbb{R}^n_+, and define uu by the Poisson formula. Then uu is smooth and bounded in R+n\mathbb{R}^n_+, harmonic, and u(x)→g(x0)u(x) \to g(x^0) as x→x0∈∂R+nx \to x^0 \in \partial\mathbb{R}^n_+.

Proof. Harmonic. For fixed yy on the boundary, x↦K(x,y)x \mapsto K(x, y) is harmonic in R+n\mathbb{R}^n_+: it equals ∂G∂yn(x,y)\frac{\partial G}{\partial y_n}(x, y), and G(x,y)=G(y,x)G(x, y) = G(y, x) is harmonic in xx away from yy (or compute directly, Exercise 4.9). Derivatives of KK in xx are bounded by C∣x−y∣−nC|x - y|^{-n} times powers, integrable in yy uniformly for xx in compact subsets of R+n\mathbb{R}^n_+, so uu is smooth and Δu=∫ΔxK g=0\Delta u = \int\Delta_xK\,g = 0.

Total mass one. ∫∂R+nK(x,y) dy=1\int_{\partial\mathbb{R}^n_+}K(x, y)\,dy = 1 for every xx (Exercise 4.8), and K>0K > 0. So uu is an average of gg: inf⁡g≤u≤sup⁡g\inf g \leq u \leq \sup g.

Boundary values. Fix x0x^0 on the boundary and ε>0\varepsilon > 0; choose δ\delta with ∣g(y)−g(x0)∣<ε|g(y) - g(x^0)| < \varepsilon for ∣y−x0∣<δ|y - x^0| < \delta. For ∣x−x0∣<δ2|x - x^0| < \frac\delta2,

∣u(x)−g(x0)∣≤∫∣y−x0∣<δK∣g−g(x0)∣ dy+∫∣y−x0∣≥δK∣g−g(x0)∣ dy≤ε+2sup⁡∣g∣∫∣y−x0∣≥δK(x,y) dy.|u(x) - g(x^0)| \leq \int_{|y-x^0|<\delta}K|g - g(x^0)|\,dy + \int_{|y-x^0|\geq\delta}K|g - g(x^0)|\,dy \leq \varepsilon + 2\sup|g|\int_{|y-x^0|\geq\delta}K(x, y)\,dy.

For ∣y−x0∣≥δ|y - x^0| \geq \delta and ∣x−x0∣<δ2|x - x^0| < \frac\delta2, ∣y−x∣≥∣y−x0∣−δ2≥12∣y−x0∣|y - x| \geq |y - x^0| - \frac\delta2 \geq \frac12|y - x^0|, so K(x,y)≤2n+1xnnα(n)∣y−x0∣nK(x, y) \leq \frac{2^{n+1}x_n}{n\alpha(n)|y - x^0|^n}, and

∫∣y−x0∣≥δK(x,y) dy≤2n+1xnnα(n)∫∣y−x0∣≥δdy∣y−x0∣n=Cxnδ−1→0(xn→0),\int_{|y-x^0|\geq\delta}K(x, y)\,dy \leq \frac{2^{n+1}x_n}{n\alpha(n)}\int_{|y - x^0|\geq\delta}\frac{dy}{|y - x^0|^n} = Cx_n\delta^{-1} \to 0 \quad (x_n \to 0),

the last integral being over Rn−1\mathbb{R}^{n-1}, convergent because the exponent nn exceeds the dimension n−1n - 1.

The structure is that of an approximate identity (3A.8 Convolution and Mollifiers): positive kernels of mass one that concentrate at x0x^0 as x→x0x \to x^0. The heat kernel as t→0t \to 0 (6A.3 The Heat Equation on ℝⁿ) and the Poisson kernel as xn→0x_n \to 0 are the two most important examples, and the proofs are the same.

The ball. For the unit ball BB, reflection in the sphere is inversion, x↦x~=x∣x∣2x \mapsto \tilde x = \frac{x}{|x|^2}. For ∣y∣=1|y| = 1 one checks ∣x∣ ∣y−x~∣=∣y−x∣|x|\,|y - \tilde x| = |y - x| (Exercise 4.10), so the function y↦Φ(∣x∣(y−x~))y \mapsto \Phi\big(|x|(y - \tilde x)\big), which is harmonic in BB (its singularity x~\tilde x is outside), agrees with Φ(y−x)\Phi(y - x) on the sphere. Hence

G(x,y)=Φ(y−x)−Φ(∣x∣(y−x~)),G(x, y) = \Phi(y - x) - \Phi\big(|x|(y - \tilde x)\big),

and a computation like the one for the half-space gives the Poisson kernel and Poisson's formula for the ball

u(x)=1−∣x∣2nα(n)∫∂Bg(y)∣x−y∣n dS(y),u(x) = \frac{1 - |x|^2}{n\alpha(n)}\int_{\partial B}\frac{g(y)}{|x - y|^n}\,dS(y),

which 6A.2 Harmonic Functions quoted, and which solves the Dirichlet problem on the ball by the same approximate-identity argument (Evans, section 2.2.4, Theorem 15). In the plane, writing x=reiθx = re^{i\theta} and y=eiφy = e^{i\varphi}, it is

u(reiθ)=12π∫02π1−r21−2rcos⁡(θ−φ)+r2 g(φ) dφ,u(re^{i\theta}) = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\frac{1 - r^2}{1 - 2r\cos(\theta - \varphi) + r^2}\,g(\varphi)\,d\varphi,

which separation of variables recovers below.

Separation of variables

Separation of variables looks for solutions that are products of functions of one variable, and builds general solutions as sums of them. It works when the domain is a product in some coordinate system (a rectangle, a disc in polar coordinates, a cylinder) and the operator respects that product. Its justification is the spectral theorem: the products are eigenfunctions, and they form a basis (4A.8 Compact Operators and Spectra).

Laplace's equation on a rectangle. On R=(0,a)×(0,b)R = (0, a)\times(0, b), solve Δu=0\Delta u = 0 with u(x,b)=f(x)u(x, b) = f(x) and u=0u = 0 on the other three sides. Try u=X(x)Y(y)u = X(x)Y(y): then X′′Y+XY′′=0X''Y + XY'' = 0, so X′′X=−Y′′Y\frac{X''}{X} = -\frac{Y''}{Y}, a function of xx equal to a function of yy, hence a constant −μ-\mu. The boundary conditions X(0)=X(a)=0X(0) = X(a) = 0 force X=sin⁡kπxaX = \sin\frac{k\pi x}{a} with μ=(kπa)2\mu = (\frac{k\pi}{a})^2, and then Y′′=μYY'' = \mu Y with Y(0)=0Y(0) = 0 gives Y=sinh⁡kπyaY = \sinh\frac{k\pi y}{a}. So

u(x,y)=∑k=1∞fksinh⁡(kπy/a)sinh⁡(kπb/a)sin⁡kπxa,fk=2a∫0af(x)sin⁡kπxa dx.u(x, y) = \sum_{k=1}^\infty f_k\frac{\sinh(k\pi y/a)}{\sinh(k\pi b/a)}\sin\frac{k\pi x}{a}, \qquad f_k = \frac2a\int_0^af(x)\sin\frac{k\pi x}{a}\,dx.

At y=by = b this is the sine series of ff (2B.7 Fourier Series and the First Heat Equation). Below the top, the kk-th term is damped by roughly e−kπ(b−y)/ae^{-k\pi(b - y)/a}: fine detail in the boundary data dies off within a distance comparable to its wavelength, the elliptic counterpart of the heat equation's smoothing.

Laplace's equation on the disc. In polar coordinates Δu=urr+1rur+1r2uθθ\Delta u = u_{rr} + \frac1ru_r + \frac{1}{r^2}u_{\theta\theta} (6A.2 Harmonic Functions). Separating, u=R(r)Θ(θ)u = R(r)\Theta(\theta) with Θ′′=−m2Θ\Theta'' = -m^2\Theta (periodicity forces integer mm), so Θ=eimθ\Theta = e^{im\theta}, and r2R′′+rR′−m2R=0r^2R'' + rR' - m^2R = 0, an Euler equation with solutions r±mr^{\pm m} (and 11, log⁡r\log r for m=0m = 0). Boundedness at the centre keeps r∣m∣r^{|m|}. So

u(reiθ)=∑m∈Zg^m r∣m∣eimθ,g^m=12π∫02πg(φ)e−imφ dφ.u(re^{i\theta}) = \sum_{m\in\mathbb{Z}}\hat g_m\,r^{|m|}e^{im\theta}, \qquad \hat g_m = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}g(\varphi)e^{-im\varphi}\,d\varphi.

Substituting the formula for g^m\hat g_m and summing the two geometric series ∑m≥0(rei(θ−φ))m\sum_{m\geq0}(re^{i(\theta-\varphi)})^m and ∑m≥1(re−i(θ−φ))m\sum_{m\geq1}(re^{-i(\theta-\varphi)})^m gives exactly the planar Poisson kernel above (Exercise 4.11). Two methods, one answer.

The heat equation on an interval. On (0,π)(0, \pi) with u=0u = 0 at both ends, separation gives u=∑kbke−k2tsin⁡kxu = \sum_kb_ke^{-k^2t}\sin kx (2B.7 Fourier Series and the First Heat Equation, 6A.7 Parabolic Regularity). The same problem can be solved by images: extend the data to be odd and 2π2\pi-periodic and convolve with the heat kernel on the line (6A.3 The Heat Equation on ℝⁿ, Exercise 4.13). So the Green's function (heat kernel) of the interval has two expressions,

p(t,x,y)=2π∑k≥1e−k2tsin⁡kxsin⁡ky=∑m∈Z(Φ(x−y+2πm,t)−Φ(x+y+2πm,t)),p(t, x, y) = \frac2\pi\sum_{k\geq1}e^{-k^2t}\sin kx\sin ky = \sum_{m\in\mathbb{Z}}\big(\Phi(x - y + 2\pi m, t) - \Phi(x + y + 2\pi m, t)\big),

the first converging fast for large tt and the second for small tt. That they are equal is the Poisson summation formula of 4A.6 The Fourier Transform: the eigenfunction expansion and the image sum are Fourier duals.

Bessel functions. Separating the heat or wave equation on a disc of radius aa in polar coordinates, u=e−λtR(r)eimθu = e^{-\lambda t}R(r)e^{im\theta} (or with cos⁡(λt)\cos(\sqrt\lambda t)), leads to

R′′+1rR′+(λ−m2r2)R=0,R'' + \frac1rR' + \Big(\lambda - \frac{m^2}{r^2}\Big)R = 0,

Bessel's equation after the substitution s=λrs = \sqrt\lambda r. Its solution bounded at r=0r = 0 is the Bessel function Jm(λ r)J_m(\sqrt\lambda\,r), where

Jm(s)=∑j=0∞(−1)jj! (j+m)!(s2)2j+mJ_m(s) = \sum_{j=0}^\infty\frac{(-1)^j}{j!\,(j + m)!}\Big(\frac s2\Big)^{2j+m}

(a power series solution, as in 6B.5 Power Series and the Cauchy–Kovalevskaya Theorem). The boundary condition R(a)=0R(a) = 0 forces λ a\sqrt\lambda\,a to be a zero jm,kj_{m,k} of JmJ_m, so the Dirichlet eigenvalues of the disc are jm,k2/a2j_{m,k}^2/a^2 (6B.3 The Wave Equation's drum, 4A.8 Compact Operators and Spectra). Bessel functions behave like damped cosines for large ss, Jm(s)≈2πscos⁡(s−mπ2−π4)J_m(s) \approx \sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi s}}\cos\big(s - \frac{m\pi}{2} - \frac\pi4\big), which is why the zeros become nearly equally spaced (Taylor I, §3.6).

Transforms

A transform replaces a derivative by multiplication. The Fourier transform in space did this for the heat equation on Rn\mathbb{R}^n (4A.6 The Fourier Transform, 6A.3 The Heat Equation on ℝⁿ). In time, on a half-line t>0t > 0, the natural tool is the Laplace transform

uˉ(s)=∫0∞e−stu(t) dt(s>0),\bar u(s) = \int_0^\infty e^{-st}u(t)\,dt \qquad (s > 0),

defined when uu grows at most exponentially. Integrating by parts, u′‾(s)=suˉ(s)−u(0)\overline{u'}(s) = s\bar u(s) - u(0): a derivative becomes multiplication by ss, and the initial value appears automatically. The transform of a convolution in time, (f⋆g)(t)=∫0tf(t−τ)g(τ) dτ(f \star g)(t) = \int_0^tf(t - \tau)g(\tau)\,d\tau, is the product fˉgˉ\bar f\bar g (Evans, section 4.3.2).

Example 4.6 Heat flow into a half-line with varying boundary temperature

Solve ut=uxxu_t = u_{xx} for x>0x > 0, t>0t > 0, with u(x,0)=0u(x, 0) = 0 and boundary temperature u(0,t)=h(t)u(0, t) = h(t). Take the Laplace transform in tt: since u(x,0)=0u(x, 0) = 0, the equation becomes the ODE

suˉ(x,s)=uˉxx(x,s),uˉ(0,s)=hˉ(s),s\bar u(x, s) = \bar u_{xx}(x, s), \qquad \bar u(0, s) = \bar h(s),

whose solution bounded as x→∞x \to \infty is uˉ(x,s)=hˉ(s)e−xs\bar u(x, s) = \bar h(s)e^{-x\sqrt s}. The function whose Laplace transform is e−xse^{-x\sqrt s} is

k(x,t)=x2π t3/2e−x2/4tk(x, t) = \frac{x}{2\sqrt\pi\,t^{3/2}}e^{-x^2/4t}

(Exercise 4.14), so by the convolution rule

u(x,t)=∫0th(t−τ) k(x,τ) dτ.u(x, t) = \int_0^th(t - \tau)\,k(x, \tau)\,d\tau.

For h≡1h \equiv 1 this is ∫0tk(x,τ) dτ=erfc⁡(x2t)\int_0^tk(x, \tau)\,d\tau = \operatorname{erfc}\big(\frac{x}{2\sqrt t}\big), the suddenly heated wall of 6A.1 What a PDE Is. For general hh it is a superposition of such responses, one for each increment of boundary temperature: Duhamel's principle for boundary data. The kernel k=−2∂xΦ(x,t)k = -2\partial_x\Phi(x, t) is the heat flux that a unit point source at the boundary produces, and it is the half-line Poisson kernel for the heat equation.

The temperature waves in the ground are the same computation with h(t)=Acos⁡ωth(t) = A\cos\omega t, run for a long time: replacing ss by iωi\omega, the factor e−xiω=e−xω/2(1+i)e^{-x\sqrt{i\omega}} = e^{-x\sqrt{\omega/2}(1 + i)} is exactly the damped, delayed wave e−x/de−ix/de^{-x/d}e^{-ix/d} with d=2/ωd = \sqrt{2/\omega}.

Similarity and travelling waves

6A.1 What a PDE Is found the heat kernel and the error function by looking for solutions unchanged by the scaling symmetry of the heat equation. Two other symmetries give two other families.

Travelling waves, u(x,t)=v(x−ct)u(x, t) = v(x - ct), use the symmetry under translation in space and time together. They reduce a PDE to an ODE for vv. 6A.5 Maximum Principles used them for the Fisher–KPP front and 6B.2 Conservation Laws and Shocks for viscous shocks.

Solitons. The Korteweg–de Vries equation

ut+6uux+uxxx=0u_t + 6uu_x + u_{xxx} = 0

models long waves in shallow water: the nonlinear term steepens waves (as in Burgers' equation) and the third-derivative term disperses them (different wavelengths travel at different speeds). A travelling wave u=v(x−ct)u = v(x - ct) must satisfy −cv′+6vv′+v′′′=0-cv' + 6vv' + v''' = 0; integrating twice with decay at infinity gives

v(ξ)=c2sech⁡2(c2 ξ)v(\xi) = \frac c2\operatorname{sech}^2\Big(\frac{\sqrt c}{2}\,\xi\Big)

(Exercise 4.15). Steepening and dispersion balance exactly, and the hump travels without changing shape, faster the taller it is. John Scott Russell watched such a "wave of translation" travel along the Union Canal near Edinburgh in 1834, followed it on horseback, and reported it in 1844; Korteweg and de Vries derived the equation in 1895. In 1965 Norman Zabusky and Martin Kruskal found numerically that two such waves pass through each other and emerge with their shapes intact, and named them solitons; the explanation, the inverse scattering transform (Gardner, Greene, Kruskal and Miura, 1967), turned KdV into a linear problem, a transform method of a far more sophisticated kind.

Converting nonlinear to linear. The Hopf–Cole transformation of 6B.2 Conservation Laws and Shocks turned viscous Burgers into the heat equation. It is the prototype of a family of tricks (Evans, section 4.4): potential functions, the hodograph and Legendre transforms, all of which exchange dependent and independent variables or take logarithms so that a nonlinear equation becomes linear. They are rare, but when they apply they give complete information.

Where this goes Kernels in the rest of the guide

Green's functions and heat kernels are the explicit side of the operators studied abstractly elsewhere. The Dirichlet heat kernel of a domain, p(t,x,y)=∑ke−λktϕk(x)ϕk(y)p(t, x, y) = \sum_ke^{-\lambda_kt}\phi_k(x)\phi_k(y), is the starting point of 6B.15 Spectral Theory and Heat Trace Asymptotics, where its trace ∑e−λkt\sum e^{-\lambda_kt} is shown to know the volume of the domain. On a closed manifold the same expansion defines the heat kernel (9B.7 The Heat Equation on a Manifold), and Perelman's conjugate heat kernel is its analogue along a Ricci flow (12A.9 Pseudolocality). In probability, the Poisson kernel is the exit distribution of Brownian motion and the Green's function its expected occupation density (6D.1 Brownian Motion); in finance, the Black–Scholes formula is the Laplace-and-Fourier solution of a heat equation (6D.6 Black–Scholes).

History

George Green's Essay on the Application of Mathematical Analysis to the Theories of Electricity and Magnetism (1828) introduced the representation formula, the Green's function and the reciprocity principle, and was largely ignored until William Thomson (Lord Kelvin) found it in 1845 and arranged its republication in Crelle's journal from 1850; Thomson also introduced the method of images, in the 1840s. Siméon Denis Poisson's formula for the ball dates from 1820. Separation of variables is Fourier's method (1807, 1822). Friedrich Bessel studied the functions named after him in 1824, in work on planetary perturbations, though Daniel Bernoulli and Euler had met them earlier in problems about hanging chains and membranes. Pierre-Simon Laplace introduced his transform in work on probability around 1780–1812, and its use for differential equations was made systematic by Oliver Heaviside's operational calculus in the 1890s. Russell's wave of translation, Korteweg–de Vries and Zabusky–Kruskal date from 1834, 1895 and 1965.

Recall Where we stand

Green's representation formula writes a C2C^2 function through its Laplacian and its boundary values and normal derivatives; subtracting the harmonic corrector removes the normal derivatives and defines the Green's function G(x,y)G(x, y), which is symmetric and solves −Δu=f-\Delta u = f, u=gu = g by integration. For the half-space and the ball, GG comes from images (reflection and inversion), and the Poisson kernels 2xnnα(n)∣x−y∣n\frac{2x_n}{n\alpha(n)|x - y|^n} and 1−∣x∣2nα(n)∣x−y∣n\frac{1 - |x|^2}{n\alpha(n)|x - y|^n} are approximate identities that solve the Dirichlet problem. Separation of variables expands in eigenfunctions: sines on rectangles, r∣m∣eimθr^{|m|}e^{im\theta} on discs, Bessel functions for drums; image sums and eigenfunction sums are Fourier duals. The Laplace transform solves the heat equation with time-dependent boundary data as a Duhamel convolution with x2πt3/2e−x2/4t\frac{x}{2\sqrt\pi t^{3/2}}e^{-x^2/4t}, and gives temperature waves of damping depth 2κ/ω\sqrt{2\kappa/\omega}. Symmetries give self-similar solutions, travelling waves and the KdV soliton. 6B.5 Power Series and the Cauchy–Kovalevskaya Theorem asks when power series solve a PDE, and why that is not enough.

Exercises

Exercise 4.7 Temperature waves

(a) Look for a solution of ut=κuzzu_t = \kappa u_{zz} of the form Re⁡(AeiωtZ(z))\operatorname{Re}\big(Ae^{i\omega t}Z(z)\big), and show Z′′=iωκZZ'' = \frac{i\omega}{\kappa}Z. (b) Using i=1+i2\sqrt i = \frac{1 + i}{\sqrt2}, show that the solution bounded as z→∞z \to \infty with Z(0)=1Z(0) = 1 is Z=e−(1+i)z/dZ = e^{-(1+i)z/d}, d=2κ/ωd = \sqrt{2\kappa/\omega}, and deduce the formula in the opening box. (c) With κ=5×10−7\kappa = 5 \times 10^{-7} m²/s, compute dd for the daily and annual cycles, the amplitude ratio and lag at 22 m for the annual cycle, and the depth at which the annual cycle is half a year out of phase.

Solution

(a) iωZ=κZ′′i\omega Z = \kappa Z''. (b) Z=e±iω/κ zZ = e^{\pm\sqrt{i\omega/\kappa}\,z} with iω/κ=1+i2ω/κ=1+id\sqrt{i\omega/\kappa} = \frac{1 + i}{\sqrt2}\sqrt{\omega/\kappa} = \frac{1 + i}{d}; boundedness picks the minus sign. Re⁡(Aeiωte−z/de−iz/d)=Ae−z/dcos⁡(ωt−z/d)\operatorname{Re}\big(Ae^{i\omega t}e^{-z/d}e^{-iz/d}\big) = Ae^{-z/d}\cos(\omega t - z/d). (c) Daily: ω=2π/86400≈7.27×10−5\omega = 2\pi/86400 \approx 7.27 \times 10^{-5} s⁻¹, d=10−6/7.27×10−5≈0.117d = \sqrt{10^{-6}/7.27 \times 10^{-5}} \approx 0.117 m. Annual: ω≈1.99×10−7\omega \approx 1.99 \times 10^{-7} s⁻¹, d≈2.24d \approx 2.24 m. At 22 m: amplitude e−0.89≈0.41e^{-0.89} \approx 0.41, lag 0.890.89 rad, which is 0.89/2π0.89/2\pi of a year, about 5252 days. Half a year out of phase when z/d=πz/d = \pi, at z≈7.0z \approx 7.0 m, where the amplitude is e−π≈4%e^{-\pi} \approx 4\%.

Exercise 4.8 The half-space kernel has mass one

Show that ∫Rn−12xnnα(n)(∣y′∣2+xn2)n/2 dy′=1\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n-1}}\frac{2x_n}{n\alpha(n)(|y'|^2 + x_n^2)^{n/2}}\,dy' = 1. (Substitute y′=xnzy' = x_nz to remove xnx_n; then use polar coordinates in Rn−1\mathbb{R}^{n-1} and, for the remaining one-dimensional integral, the substitution r=tan⁡θr = \tan\theta. For n=2n = 2 it is ∫x2π(y2+x22)dy=1\int\frac{x_2}{\pi(y^2 + x_2^2)}dy = 1, which you can do directly.)

Solution

After y′=xnzy' = x_nz: 2nα(n)∫Rn−1dz(1+∣z∣2)n/2\frac{2}{n\alpha(n)}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n-1}}\frac{dz}{(1 + |z|^2)^{n/2}}. In polar coordinates this is 2nα(n)⋅(n−1)α(n−1)∫0∞rn−2(1+r2)n/2dr\frac{2}{n\alpha(n)}\cdot(n - 1)\alpha(n - 1)\int_0^\infty\frac{r^{n-2}}{(1 + r^2)^{n/2}}dr, and with r=tan⁡θr = \tan\theta the integral is ∫0π/2sin⁡n−2θ dθ\int_0^{\pi/2}\sin^{n-2}\theta\,d\theta. The identity (n−1)α(n−1)∫0π/2sin⁡n−2θ dθ=n2α(n)(n - 1)\alpha(n - 1)\int_0^{\pi/2}\sin^{n-2}\theta\,d\theta = \frac n2\alpha(n) is the formula for the volume of the unit ball by slicing (3A.5 Product Measures and Change of Variables), which makes the total 11. For n=2n = 2: 1π[arctan⁡(y/x2)]−∞∞=1\frac1\pi[\arctan(y/x_2)]_{-\infty}^\infty = 1.

Exercise 4.9 The Poisson kernel is harmonic

Show directly that K(x)=xn∣x∣nK(x) = \frac{x_n}{|x|^n} is harmonic in {xn>0}\{x_n > 0\}, using Δ(fg)=fΔg+2∇f⋅∇g+gΔf\Delta(fg) = f\Delta g + 2\nabla f\cdot\nabla g + g\Delta f with f=xnf = x_n and g=∣x∣−ng = |x|^{-n}, and Δ∣x∣−n=2n∣x∣−n−2\Delta|x|^{-n} = 2n|x|^{-n-2} (from the radial formula of 6A.2 Harmonic Functions).

Solution

Δxn=0\Delta x_n = 0, ∇xn=en\nabla x_n = e_n, ∇∣x∣−n=−n∣x∣−n−2x\nabla|x|^{-n} = -n|x|^{-n-2}x, and Δ∣x∣−n=v′′+n−1rv′\Delta|x|^{-n} = v'' + \frac{n - 1}{r}v' with v=r−nv = r^{-n}: n(n+1)r−n−2−n(n−1)r−n−2=2nr−n−2n(n + 1)r^{-n-2} - n(n - 1)r^{-n-2} = 2nr^{-n-2}. So ΔK=2en⋅(−n∣x∣−n−2x)+xn⋅2n∣x∣−n−2=0\Delta K = 2e_n\cdot(-n|x|^{-n-2}x) + x_n\cdot2n|x|^{-n-2} = 0.

Exercise 4.10 Inversion in the sphere

For x≠0x \neq 0 in the unit ball and x~=x/∣x∣2\tilde x = x/|x|^2, show that ∣x∣2∣y−x~∣2=∣y−x∣2|x|^2|y - \tilde x|^2 = |y - x|^2 when ∣y∣=1|y| = 1. (Expand both sides.)

Solution

∣x∣2∣y−x~∣2=∣x∣2(∣y∣2−2x⋅y∣x∣2+1∣x∣2)=∣x∣2−2x⋅y+1|x|^2|y - \tilde x|^2 = |x|^2\big(|y|^2 - 2\frac{x\cdot y}{|x|^2} + \frac{1}{|x|^2}\big) = |x|^2 - 2x\cdot y + 1 when ∣y∣=1|y| = 1, and ∣y−x∣2=1−2x⋅y+∣x∣2|y - x|^2 = 1 - 2x\cdot y + |x|^2.

Exercise 4.11 The Poisson kernel by summing a series

Show that ∑m∈Zr∣m∣eimψ=1−r21−2rcos⁡ψ+r2\sum_{m\in\mathbb{Z}}r^{|m|}e^{im\psi} = \frac{1 - r^2}{1 - 2r\cos\psi + r^2} for 0≤r<10 \leq r < 1, and deduce that separation of variables on the disc reproduces Poisson's formula.

Solution

∑m≥0(reiψ)m+∑m≥1(re−iψ)m=11−reiψ+re−iψ1−re−iψ\sum_{m\geq0}(re^{i\psi})^m + \sum_{m\geq1}(re^{-i\psi})^m = \frac{1}{1 - re^{i\psi}} + \frac{re^{-i\psi}}{1 - re^{-i\psi}}. Over the common denominator ∣1−reiψ∣2=1−2rcos⁡ψ+r2|1 - re^{i\psi}|^2 = 1 - 2r\cos\psi + r^2, the numerator is (1−re−iψ)+re−iψ(1−reiψ)=1−r2(1 - re^{-i\psi}) + re^{-i\psi}(1 - re^{i\psi}) = 1 - r^2. Then u=∑g^mr∣m∣eimθ=12π∫g(φ)∑r∣m∣eim(θ−φ)dφu = \sum\hat g_mr^{|m|}e^{im\theta} = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int g(\varphi)\sum r^{|m|}e^{im(\theta - \varphi)}d\varphi (interchange justified by uniform convergence for fixed r<1r < 1).

Exercise 4.12 A one-dimensional Green's function

Find the Green's function of −u′′=f-u'' = f on (0,1)(0, 1) with u(0)=u(1)=0u(0) = u(1) = 0, and check that it is symmetric and that u(x)=∫01G(x,y)f(y) dyu(x) = \int_0^1G(x, y)f(y)\,dy solves the problem. Interpret G(x,y)G(x, y) as the deflection at yy of a taut string pushed by a unit point force at xx.

Solution

G(x,y)=y(1−x)G(x, y) = y(1 - x) for y≤xy \leq x and x(1−y)x(1 - y) for y≥xy \geq x: in yy it is linear on each side of xx, vanishes at 00 and 11, is continuous, and its derivative jumps by −1-1 at y=xy = x, which is −∂y2G=δx-\partial_y^2G = \delta_x. It is symmetric by inspection. Then u(x)=(1−x)∫0xyf(y) dy+x∫x1(1−y)f(y) dyu(x) = (1 - x)\int_0^xyf(y)\,dy + x\int_x^1(1 - y)f(y)\,dy, and differentiating twice gives u′′=−fu'' = -f. A string under unit tension, pinned at both ends, pushed at one point, takes this tent shape.

Exercise 4.13 Heat on an interval by images

Let gg be continuous on [0,π][0, \pi] with g(0)=g(π)=0g(0) = g(\pi) = 0, and g~\tilde g its odd 2π2\pi-periodic extension. Show that u=Φ(⋅,t)∗g~u = \Phi(\cdot, t) * \tilde g solves the heat equation on (0,π)(0, \pi) with u=0u = 0 at both ends, and rewrite it as ∫0πp(t,x,y)g(y) dy\int_0^\pi p(t, x, y)g(y)\,dy with the image sum for pp given in the text.

Solution

The convolution of the even kernel with the odd function g~\tilde g is odd about 00; since g~\tilde g is also odd about π\pi (being odd and 2π2\pi-periodic), uu is odd about π\pi as well, so u(0,t)=u(π,t)=0u(0, t) = u(\pi, t) = 0. Writing ∫RΦ(x−y)g~(y) dy\int_{\mathbb{R}}\Phi(x - y)\tilde g(y)\,dy as a sum over the intervals [2πm,2πm+π][2\pi m, 2\pi m + \pi] (where g~(y)=g(y−2πm)\tilde g(y) = g(y - 2\pi m)) and [2πm−π,2πm][2\pi m - \pi, 2\pi m] (where g~(y)=−g(2πm−y)\tilde g(y) = -g(2\pi m - y)), and substituting back into [0,π][0, \pi], gives the kernel ∑m(Φ(x−y−2πm,t)−Φ(x+y−2πm,t))\sum_m\big(\Phi(x - y - 2\pi m, t) - \Phi(x + y - 2\pi m, t)\big), which is the formula in the text after replacing mm by −m-m.

Exercise 4.14 The Laplace transform of the boundary kernel

(a) Show that ∫0tk(x,τ) dτ=erfc⁡(x2t)\int_0^tk(x, \tau)\,d\tau = \operatorname{erfc}\big(\frac{x}{2\sqrt t}\big) for k(x,τ)=x2πτ3/2e−x2/4τk(x, \tau) = \frac{x}{2\sqrt\pi\tau^{3/2}}e^{-x^2/4\tau} (substitute s=x2τs = \frac{x}{2\sqrt\tau}). (b) Granting the standard transform ∫0∞e−sterfc⁡(x2t)dt=1se−xs\int_0^\infty e^{-st}\operatorname{erfc}\big(\frac{x}{2\sqrt t}\big)dt = \frac1se^{-x\sqrt s}, deduce that kˉ(x,s)=e−xs\bar k(x, s) = e^{-x\sqrt s}.

Solution

(a) With s=x2τs = \frac{x}{2\sqrt\tau}, ds=−x4τ−3/2dτds = -\frac{x}{4}\tau^{-3/2}d\tau, so k dτ=−2πe−s2dsk\,d\tau = -\frac{2}{\sqrt\pi}e^{-s^2}ds, and as τ\tau runs from 00 to tt, ss runs from ∞\infty to x2t\frac{x}{2\sqrt t}: the integral is 2π∫x/2t∞e−s2ds=erfc⁡(x2t)\frac{2}{\sqrt\pi}\int_{x/2\sqrt t}^\infty e^{-s^2}ds = \operatorname{erfc}\big(\frac{x}{2\sqrt t}\big). (b) The function in (a) is the integral of kk from 00, whose transform is 1skˉ\frac1s\bar k (since the transform of ∫0tk\int_0^tk is kˉ/s\bar k/s). So kˉ=e−xs\bar k = e^{-x\sqrt s}.

Exercise 4.15 The KdV soliton

Substitute u=v(x−ct)u = v(x - ct) into ut+6uux+uxxx=0u_t + 6uu_x + u_{xxx} = 0, integrate once (with vv, v′v', v′′→0v'' \to 0 at infinity) to get −cv+3v2+v′′=0-cv + 3v^2 + v'' = 0, multiply by v′v' and integrate again to get v′2=cv2−2v3v'^2 = cv^2 - 2v^3. Verify that v=c2sech⁡2(c2ξ)v = \frac c2\operatorname{sech}^2\big(\frac{\sqrt c}{2}\xi\big) satisfies this.

Solution

With v=asech⁡2(bξ)v = a\operatorname{sech}^2(b\xi): v′=−2absech⁡2(bξ)tanh⁡(bξ)v' = -2ab\operatorname{sech}^2(b\xi)\tanh(b\xi), so v′2=4a2b2sech⁡4tanh⁡2=4a2b2sech⁡4(1−sech⁡2)v'^2 = 4a^2b^2\operatorname{sech}^4\tanh^2 = 4a^2b^2\operatorname{sech}^4(1 - \operatorname{sech}^2). And cv2−2v3=ca2sech⁡4−2a3sech⁡6cv^2 - 2v^3 = ca^2\operatorname{sech}^4 - 2a^3\operatorname{sech}^6. Matching: 4a2b2=ca24a^2b^2 = ca^2 and 4a2b2=2a34a^2b^2 = 2a^3, so b2=c4b^2 = \frac c4 and a=2b2=c2a = 2b^2 = \frac c2.

Exercise 4.16 Rehearsal: the Green's function of the torus

On the flat torus Tn=Rn/Zn\mathbb{T}^n = \mathbb{R}^n/\mathbb{Z}^n there is no boundary, and −Δu=f-\Delta u = f has a solution only if ∫Tnf=0\int_{\mathbb{T}^n}f = 0 (integrate the equation). (a) Show by Fourier series that for such ff the mean-zero solution is u=∑k≠0f^k4π2∣k∣2e2πik⋅xu = \sum_{k\neq0}\frac{\hat f_k}{4\pi^2|k|^2}e^{2\pi ik\cdot x}. (b) Deduce that u=G∗fu = G * f with G(x)=∑k≠0e2πik⋅x4π2∣k∣2G(x) = \sum_{k\neq0}\frac{e^{2\pi ik\cdot x}}{4\pi^2|k|^2}, which satisfies −ΔG=δ0−1-\Delta G = \delta_0 - 1 in the sense of distributions: a point source plus a uniform sink, so that the total is zero. On a closed manifold the Green's function of the Laplacian has the same structure, −ΔyG(x,y)=δx−1vol⁡-\Delta_yG(x, y) = \delta_x - \frac{1}{\operatorname{vol}}, and it is how solutions of Poisson's equation, and hence the potentials used in Perelman's and Hamilton's estimates, are written on closed manifolds (9B.7 The Heat Equation on a Manifold).

Solution

(a) −Δe2πik⋅x=4π2∣k∣2e2πik⋅x-\Delta e^{2\pi ik\cdot x} = 4\pi^2|k|^2e^{2\pi ik\cdot x}, so the Fourier coefficients satisfy 4π2∣k∣2u^k=f^k4\pi^2|k|^2\hat u_k = \hat f_k; for k=0k = 0 the equation forces f^0=0\hat f_0 = 0, and u^0\hat u_0 is free (set it to 00). (b) Convolution multiplies Fourier coefficients (2B.7 Fourier Series and the First Heat Equation). The coefficients of −ΔG-\Delta G are 11 for k≠0k \neq 0 and 00 for k=0k = 0, which are those of δ0−1\delta_0 - 1.

Free resources for this chapter

Chosen for what this chapter covers, and all free to read. Links checked Oct 20, 2026.

© 2026 NeckPinch (www.neckpinch.com). All content in the guidebook (text, mathematics, figures and exercises) is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. No part may be copied, republished or redistributed without written permission.