© 2026 NeckPinch · www.neckpinch.com · All rights reserved.
Course 6Book 6A: The Heat Equation and Its RelativesChapter 3
The Heat Equation on ℝⁿ
The heat kernel, smoothing, uniqueness, Brownian motion, and a Gaussian that runs to Perelman.
Read with Evans, Partial Differential Equations, section 2.3 (the heat equation: fundamental solution, mean value formula, properties of solutions, energy methods), and section 4.3.1 for the Fourier transform derivation. The Fourier side was done in [[4A.5]].
This chapter solves the heat equation on all of space. The solution is a convolution with one function, the heat kernel
and almost everything about the equation can be read off from it. It is positive, it has total mass , it is a Gaussian whose width grows like , and it is smooth. So solutions are averages of their initial data with Gaussian weights: they are instantly smooth, they spread at infinite speed, and their maxima can only decrease.
The heat kernel is also a probability law: the distribution of a Brownian particle. That is how Einstein used it in 1905 and how Perrin confirmed it, and it is the sense in which Perelman's and Bamler's heat kernels on Ricci flows are probability measures. And the Gaussian is the function Perelman puts at the centre of his entropy: this chapter's rehearsal computes it.
By the end of this chapter you will be able to:
- derive the heat kernel by self-similarity and by the Fourier transform, and list its properties;
- solve the Cauchy problem by convolution and prove that solutions are smooth for ;
- prove a maximum principle and uniqueness on bounded domains, and explain why uniqueness on needs a growth condition;
- use energy methods for uniqueness and decay;
- interpret the heat kernel as the law of Brownian motion, and estimate diffusion from physical data.
Brownian motion
In 1827 the botanist Robert Brown saw small particles released from pollen grains jiggling irregularly in water. In 1905 Albert Einstein explained the motion as the result of collisions with water molecules and derived two formulas. A particle performing such a random walk has, in each coordinate, a mean square displacement
because its position at time is distributed according to the heat kernel of (Proposition 3.4). And for a sphere of radius in a fluid of viscosity at absolute temperature , the diffusion coefficient is
where is the gas constant and is Avogadro's number. Measuring by watching particles therefore measures the number of molecules in a mole.
Jean Perrin did this in 1908–09. He prepared suspensions of nearly uniform resin spheres, recorded their positions through a microscope at regular intervals, and computed mean square displacements. His values of Avogadro's number from these and related measurements were around (his published series range from about to ), compared with the modern exact value . The agreement, from several independent methods, settled the long dispute over whether atoms are real; Perrin received the 1926 Nobel Prize in Physics for this work.
To see the scale: a sphere of radius µm in water at °C (viscosity about Pa·s) has, by Einstein's formula with the modern , m²/s. In seconds it wanders a root-mean-square distance µm in each direction: a few of its own diameters, easy to follow in a microscope (Exercise 3.8, Figure 3.3).
The heat kernel
There are two derivations, both already half done.
By scaling (6A.1 What a PDE Is). A solution of the form conserves , and substituting into the heat equation forces . Choosing to make the total integral gives (Exercise 3.5).
By the Fourier transform (4A.5 The Fourier Transform). With , the heat equation becomes , so . A product of transforms is the transform of a convolution, and the inverse transform of the Gaussian is (computed by contour shifting in the last exercise of 5A.3 Residues and Fourier Transforms). So .
For :
- , and ;
- is smooth and solves on ;
- (semigroup) ;
- (approximate identity) for every , as ;
- (scaling) ; in each coordinate the variance of is .
Proof. (1) The Gaussian integral (3A.5 Product Measures and Change of Variables): . (2) A direct computation (Exercise 3.6). (3) On the Fourier side, . (4) Substituting , the integral is by dominated convergence (3A.3 The Lebesgue Integral). (5) Substitution, and (Exercise 3.5).
The semigroup property says that running the heat equation for time and then for time is the same as running it for time . The approximate-identity property says that as the kernel concentrates all its mass at the origin, so : the heat kernel is the temperature after a unit of heat is released at a point at time (Figure 3.1).
Solving the Cauchy problem
Let be bounded and continuous on , and define
Then is on , solves there, satisfies , and as , for every .
Proof. Smoothness and the equation. is smooth for , and all its derivatives decay like a polynomial times , so they can be taken under the integral sign (3A.3 The Lebesgue Integral); each derivative of is the integral of against the corresponding derivative of , and .
Bounds. is an average of with the positive weights , of total mass .
Initial values. Given , pick with for . For ,
and the first term is at most , the second tends to as by property 4.
Three features distinguish the heat equation from the wave equation and from ODEs.
Instant smoothing. The initial data need only be bounded and continuous (in fact bounded and measurable will do, with convergence almost everywhere), yet is for every . Moreover, differentiating the kernel gives explicit bounds:
Each derivative costs a factor , exactly as parabolic scaling predicts (Exercise 3.7). These smoothing estimates are the model for Shi's derivative estimates for the Ricci flow (11A.3 Short-Time Existence and Uniqueness).
Infinite speed of propagation. If is not identically zero, then for every and every , because everywhere. A disturbance is felt everywhere immediately, though only with weight at distance . The heat equation is a model, accurate over the scales where the random-walk picture applies, not a law that violates relativity.
Inhomogeneous equations. The solution of with is given by Duhamel's principle: superpose the solutions started at each earlier time with data ,
the same idea as variation of constants for linear ODE (2B.10 Ordinary Differential Equations). It is the starting point of the fixed-point arguments for nonlinear equations in 6A.7 Nonlinear Parabolic Equations.
In 1973 Fischer Black and Myron Scholes, and independently Robert Merton, derived a PDE for the price of a European option on a stock with price , volatility and riskless interest rate :
solved backward from the payoff at the expiry time . The substitutions , and , with , and , turn it into , an ordinary heat equation run forward in , the time remaining to expiry. The Black–Scholes formula for the price of a call option is the heat-kernel convolution of the transformed payoff, which is why it is written with the Gaussian distribution function. Scholes and Merton received the 1997 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for this work (Black had died in 1995). The model's assumptions, such as constant volatility and continuous trading without costs, fail in real markets, and practitioners adjust for that; the mathematics is a heat equation exactly.
Maximum principle and uniqueness
On a bounded region the heat equation is well posed with initial values and boundary values. Let be bounded and open, and let be the space-time cylinder. Its parabolic boundary is the bottom and the sides, : everything except the top, the part of the boundary where data are prescribed (Figure 3.2).
Let be continuous on , with and continuous in , and there. Then
Proof. First suppose strictly. If the maximum over were at a point with and , then , so (2B.8 Calculus in Several Variables), and (it is if , and if , since can only have increased to reach a maximum at the final time). Then there, a contradiction. In general apply this to , which has , and let .
Applied to the difference of two solutions and its negative, the maximum principle gives uniqueness and stability: two solutions with the same initial and boundary values agree, and if the data differ by at most the solutions differ by at most .
On all of there is no lateral boundary, and something must replace it. Uniqueness holds among solutions that do not grow too fast: if solves the heat equation on , is continuous up to with , and satisfies for some constants , , then (Evans, section 2.3.3). The growth condition cannot be dropped. Andrey Tychonoff constructed in 1935 a non-zero solution on with zero initial values,
which grows faster than any as (Exercise 3.10): heat that arrives "from infinity" in no time.
The same issue arises for the Ricci flow on a complete noncompact manifold. Without some control at infinity, uniqueness can fail. The standard results assume bounded curvature: Shi constructed solutions with bounded curvature (1989), and Chen and Zhu proved in 2006 that complete solutions with bounded curvature are unique. Bounded curvature plays the role of the growth condition here, and it is the hypothesis built into the singularity analysis of Books 11B and 12B.
Energy methods
A second route to uniqueness, which needs no maximum principle and works for systems: measure the size of a solution by an integral. For a solution on the bounded region with on , let . Then, integrating by parts (1A.10 Divergence, Curl and the Integral Theorems),
So never increases; if two solutions have the same data, the energy of their difference is at the start and so always. More is true. By the Poincaré inequality (4A.9 Sobolev Spaces), , so : the solution decays exponentially at a rate set by the first Dirichlet eigenvalue of (4A.7 Compact Operators and Spectra). Showing that is a convex function of , by one more differentiation, proves backward uniqueness: two solutions that agree at time agreed at all earlier times (Evans, section 2.3.4), even though the backward problem is ill-posed (6A.1 What a PDE Is).
The heat kernel is a probability law
Let be a standard Brownian motion in , so that is Gaussian with mean and covariance . Then has density , and the solution of the Cauchy problem is
Proof. A Gaussian with covariance has density (3A.4 Measures, Probability and Weights), which is . The formula is then Theorem 3.2, written as an expectation.
The factor is a convention: probabilists normalise Brownian motion so that its generator is , while the heat equation here has . In words: the temperature at at time is the average of the initial temperature over the endpoints of random paths started at . The density of a diffusing particle evolves by the heat equation, which in this role is called the Fokker–Planck equation of Brownian motion (Figure 3.3). Harmonic functions have the same interpretation, with stopping at the boundary in place of a fixed time: the solution of the Dirichlet problem at is the expected boundary value where a Brownian path from first exits (the continuous version of the gambler's ruin in 6A.2 Harmonic Functions's exercise on graphs).
In 1862 William Thomson, later Lord Kelvin, used the heat equation to estimate how long ago the Earth's surface solidified. His model was a half-space of rock, initially at a uniform melting temperature , whose surface was suddenly held at . The solution is the self-similar error-function profile of 6A.1 What a PDE Is, , and the temperature gradient at the surface is
Kelvin took the then accepted increase of underground temperature, about °F per feet of depth, a melting temperature of °F, and rock diffusivities derived from measurements on Edinburgh rocks, and obtained about million years; given the uncertainties, he concluded that consolidation took place between and million years ago. The formula reproduces his central figure with a diffusivity of about m²/s, typical of rock (Exercise 3.9).
The modern age of the Earth is about billion years. The mathematics was right; the model was not. Kelvin did not know about radioactive heating, discovered decades later, and, as John Perry pointed out in 1895, heat transport in a partly fluid interior by convection is much faster than conduction through solid rock. It is the classic lesson in the difference between solving an equation correctly and choosing the right equation.
Run the heat kernel backward: with , the function solves the backward heat equation (Exercise 3.11), concentrating at the origin as . Writing it as with , the function has Hessian . In Perelman's work this is the model: along a Ricci flow he solves the conjugate heat equation backward from a point at time , writes the solution as , and measures how far is from satisfying , the shrinking soliton equation; flat space with this is the equality case (12A.3 The 𝓦-Entropy, 12A.5 Reduced Distance and Reduced Volume). Bamler's theory of Ricci flows uses these heat kernels as probability measures on the manifold (12C.5 After Perelman), exactly as Proposition 3.4 does on .
History
Joseph Fourier solved the heat equation on the line with what is in effect the Gaussian kernel in his 1822 Théorie analytique de la chaleur. Kelvin's estimate of the age of the Earth appeared in 1862 in "On the secular cooling of the Earth". Einstein's paper on Brownian motion was one of his papers of 1905; Marian Smoluchowski reached similar results independently in 1906; Perrin's experiments date from 1908–09. Andrey Tychonoff's non-uniqueness example appeared in 1935. The Black–Scholes and Merton papers were published in 1973.
The heat kernel is positive, has mass , forms a semigroup and is an approximate identity. The Cauchy problem is solved by , which is smooth for with derivative bounds , spreads at infinite speed, and stays between and . On bounded regions the maximum is attained on the parabolic boundary, and energy decays; on uniqueness needs a growth condition, as Tychonoff's example shows. The heat kernel is the law of , and Einstein's , confirmed by Perrin, is its variance. 6A.4 Maximum Principles takes the maximum principle as far as it goes.
Exercises
(a) Show that using (3A.5 Product Measures and Change of Variables). (b) Show that and .
Solution
(a) The integral factors into one-dimensional ones, each . (b) In one dimension, , by integrating by parts or differentiating in at : , and . Summing over coordinates gives .
Compute and directly and check that they agree. (Use .)
Solution
. .
In one dimension, show that , and deduce for the solution of Theorem 3.2. Why must every such bound scale like ?
Solution
. Then . The bound must be invariant under the scaling , which multiplies by and by , so it must be .
Using J/K, K, Pa·s and µm, compute and the root-mean-square displacement in one coordinate after s. If an experiment measured a mean square displacement of m² in s for these particles, what value of would it give?
Solution
J; kg/s; m²/s; m. From , , and . Small errors in and change the answer proportionally, which is one reason Perrin's careful selection of uniform particles mattered.
(a) Check that the gradient of at is , using . (b) Convert °F and °F per feet to SI-compatible units (a temperature difference in °F and a gradient in °F per metre suffice), and find the diffusivity for which million years. (c) By what factor would change if were doubled? If were °F?
Solution
(a) at . (b) °F/m; s; m²/s. (c) Halved; multiplied by , about million years, which is the figure Kelvin also gives for that melting temperature.
Show formally (differentiating term by term) that satisfies for any smooth , and that if all derivatives of vanish at . (Making this rigorous needs bounds on for , which is where the rapid growth in comes from; Fritz John's Partial Differential Equations gives the details.)
Let and with . (a) Show that solves the backward heat equation for . (b) Compute , , and , and check the identities
The first is the shrinking soliton equation on flat space, where ; the second is the flat-space case of the identity that makes Perelman's -entropy constant on a shrinking soliton (12A.3 The 𝓦-Entropy).
Solution
(a) , and because it is the heat kernel in the variable ; so . (b) , , , . Then .
© 2026 NeckPinch (www.neckpinch.com). All content in the guidebook (text, mathematics, figures and exercises) is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. No part may be copied, republished or redistributed without written permission.