Book 9A

© 2026 NeckPinch · www.neckpinch.com · All rights reserved.

Course 9Book 9A: Metrics, Connections and CurvatureChapter 3

Geodesics and the Exponential Map

Shortest paths, normal coordinates, cut loci and the injectivity radius.

27 min read · Updated Oct 3, 2026

Read with Lee, Introduction to Riemannian Manifolds (2nd edition), chapter 5 (geodesics and the exponential map, normal coordinates) and chapter 6 (geodesics and distance: the Gauss lemma, minimising properties, completeness and Hopf–Rinow, cut points). Petersen's Riemannian Geometry, chapter 5, is the second voice.

In this chapter · 7 sections
  1. 3.1Flying over the pole
  2. 3.2The geodesic equation
  3. 3.3The exponential map and normal coordinates
  4. 3.4Completeness
  5. 3.5Cut points and the injectivity radius
  6. 3.6History
  7. 3.7Exercises

A geodesic is a curve that does not turn: its velocity is parallel along itself. On the sphere geodesics are great circles, in the hyperbolic half-plane they are vertical lines and semicircles, on a flat torus they are straight lines that wrap around, closing up or winding densely. Short pieces of geodesics are shortest paths, and conversely every shortest path is a geodesic. That makes geodesics the link between the connection of 9A.2 Connections and the distance of 9A.1 Riemannian Metrics and Model Spaces.

Following the geodesics out from a point gives the exponential map, which wraps the flat tangent space around the manifold. Near the point it is a diffeomorphism, and it gives normal coordinates, the best coordinates a curved space allows: Euclidean to first order at the point, with curvature as the first correction. Further out, geodesics from a point can meet again, and the radius up to which they cannot, the injectivity radius, is a measure of how much room the manifold has. A lower bound on it is exactly what Hamilton's compactness theorem needs (11B.3 Compactness of Ricci Flows) and what Perelman's noncollapsing theorem supplies (12A.4 κ-Noncollapsing).

By the end of this chapter you will be able to:

  • write and solve the geodesic equation, and find the geodesics of the model spaces;
  • use symmetry (Clairaut's relation) to find geodesics of surfaces of revolution;
  • define the exponential map and normal coordinates, and state the Gauss lemma;
  • prove that geodesics are locally shortest, and state the Hopf–Rinow theorem;
  • define cut points, conjugate points and the injectivity radius, and compute them for spheres and flat tori.

Flying over the pole

In the world Data Polar routes

On a world map, a flight from New York to Hong Kong looks as though it should head west across the Pacific. The shortest route on the sphere, a great-circle arc, instead heads north over Canada, crosses the Arctic within about 700700 km of the North Pole and descends through Siberia and China. Airlines could only fly such routes once the airspace and the support infrastructure existed: after demonstration flights from 1998, four cross-polar routes between North America and Asia, designated Polar 1 to Polar 4, were officially opened in February 2001, and scheduled services use routes like them today, adjusted daily for winds and airspace.

The same geometry explains a curiosity of the globe. From a point to its antipode every great circle is a shortest route, so there is no preferred direction to set off in. Madrid and Wellington are nearly antipodal (Wellington lies within about 200200 km of Madrid's antipode), and the shortest routes between them fan out in every direction.

The geodesic equation

A curve γ\gamma is a geodesic if its acceleration vanishes:

Dtγ′=0,that is,γ¨k+Γijk(γ) γ˙iγ˙j=0.D_t\gamma' = 0, \qquad\text{that is,}\qquad \ddot\gamma^k + \Gamma_{ij}^k(\gamma)\,\dot\gamma^i\dot\gamma^j = 0.

This is a second-order system of ODEs, so by 2B.10 Ordinary Differential Equations, for every p∈Mp \in M and v∈TpMv \in T_pM there is a unique maximal geodesic γv\gamma_v with γv(0)=p\gamma_v(0) = p and γv′(0)=v\gamma_v'(0) = v. Geodesics have constant speed, because parallel transport preserves lengths: ddt∣γ′∣2=2⟨Dtγ′,γ′⟩=0\frac{d}{dt}|\gamma'|^2 = 2\langle D_t\gamma', \gamma'\rangle = 0. Rescaling the parameter rescales the velocity: γcv(t)=γv(ct)\gamma_{cv}(t) = \gamma_v(ct). Isometries take geodesics to geodesics.

For a submanifold of RN\mathbb{R}^N, Dtγ′=(γ′′)⊤D_t\gamma' = (\gamma'')^\top (9A.2 Connections), so a geodesic is a curve whose acceleration in space is normal to the submanifold: a particle constrained to the surface and feeling no force but the constraint. On the sphere, great circles have acceleration pointing to the centre, normal to the sphere, so they are geodesics; by uniqueness they are all of them.

Hyperbolic half-plane. For g=dx2+dy2y2g = \frac{dx^2 + dy^2}{y^2}, the geodesics are the vertical half-lines and the semicircles centred on the real axis (Exercise 3.4). In the disc model they are diameters and circular arcs meeting the boundary at right angles. Through a point not on a given geodesic pass infinitely many geodesics that never meet it: Euclid's parallel postulate fails.

Symmetry and Clairaut's relation. If a Killing field XX (the generator of a one-parameter group of isometries, 8A.6 Flows and the Lie Derivative) is present, then ⟨γ′,X⟩\langle\gamma', X\rangle is constant along every geodesic γ\gamma (Exercise 3.5). For a surface of revolution dr2+φ(r)2dθ2dr^2 + \varphi(r)^2d\theta^2, the rotation field X=∂θX = \partial_\theta has ∣X∣=φ|X| = \varphi, and if ψ\psi is the angle between γ′\gamma' and the meridian, ⟨γ′,∂θ⟩=∣γ′∣φsin⁡ψ\langle\gamma', \partial_\theta\rangle = |\gamma'|\varphi\sin\psi. So along a unit-speed geodesic

φ(r)sin⁡ψ=const,\varphi(r)\sin\psi = \text{const},

Clairaut's relation: the radius of the circle of symmetry times the sine of the angle with the meridian is conserved. On a dumbbell, a geodesic entering the neck at an angle must turn steeper as φ\varphi shrinks, and if φ\varphi falls below the constant it turns back. The optical rays of 9A.1 Riemannian Metrics and Model Spaces obey the same law, Snell's law.

The exponential map and normal coordinates

The exponential map at pp is

exp⁡p:TpM→M,exp⁡p(v)=γv(1),\exp_p : T_pM \to M, \qquad \exp_p(v) = \gamma_v(1),

defined wherever the geodesic γv\gamma_v lasts until time 11. So exp⁡p(tv)=γv(t)\exp_p(tv) = \gamma_v(t): it maps lines through the origin to geodesics through pp. Its differential at 00 is the identity of TpMT_pM (dexp⁡p(0)v=γv′(0)=vd\exp_p(0)v = \gamma_v'(0) = v), so by the inverse function theorem (2B.9 The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems), exp⁡p\exp_p maps some ball Bε(0)⊂TpMB_\varepsilon(0) \subset T_pM diffeomorphically onto a neighbourhood of pp, a normal neighbourhood.

Choosing an orthonormal basis e1,…,ene_1, \dots, e_n of TpMT_pM and setting x↦exp⁡p(xiei)x \mapsto \exp_p(x^ie_i) gives normal coordinates centred at pp. In them:

  • the geodesics through pp are the straight lines t↦tvt \mapsto tv;
  • gij(p)=δijg_{ij}(p) = \delta_{ij} and all ∂kgij(p)=0\partial_kg_{ij}(p) = 0, so Γijk(p)=0\Gamma_{ij}^k(p) = 0 (Exercise 3.6).

Normal coordinates make the metric Euclidean to first order at one point, and no coordinates can do better: the second derivatives of gijg_{ij} at pp are curvature. On the unit sphere, normal coordinates at the north pole are the azimuthal equidistant projection (the projection of the United Nations emblem), in which g=dr2+sin⁡2r dθ2g = dr^2 + \sin^2r\,d\theta^2; compared with the Euclidean dr2+r2dθ2dr^2 + r^2d\theta^2, lengths across the radial direction are shrunk by sin⁡rr=1−r26+…\frac{\sin r}{r} = 1 - \frac{r^2}{6} + \dots, a second-order effect. In general, for a vector vv perpendicular to the position xx in normal coordinates,

gx(v,v)=∣v∣2(1−13K(x,v) ∣x∣2)+O(∣x∣3),g_x(v, v) = |v|^2\Big(1 - \tfrac13K(x, v)\,|x|^2\Big) + O(|x|^3),

where K(x,v)K(x, v) is the sectional curvature of the plane spanned by xx and vv (9A.4 Curvature and What It Means defines it and states the full tensor expansion).

Figure 3.1. The exponential map at the north pole of the unit sphere. Geodesics leave in every direction and all reconverge at the south pole, at distance π\pi: the south pole is the cut point of each of them and a conjugate point. The geodesic circles (latitudes) meet the geodesics at right angles, as the Gauss lemma requires.
Theorem 3.1 Gauss lemma

In a normal neighbourhood of pp, the radial geodesics from pp meet the geodesic spheres {exp⁡p(v):∣v∣=r}\{\exp_p(v) : |v| = r\} at right angles. Equivalently, in normal coordinates the radial unit vector field ∂r=xi∣x∣∂i\partial_r = \frac{x^i}{|x|}\partial_i satisfies g(∂r,∂r)=1g(\partial_r, \partial_r) = 1 and g(∂r,w)=0g(\partial_r, w) = 0 for every ww tangent to a geodesic sphere, so

g=dr2+hr,g = dr^2 + h_r,

with hrh_r a metric on the sphere of directions, depending on rr.

Proof. Let v(s)v(s) be a curve of unit vectors in TpMT_pM, and consider the family of geodesics Γ(s,t)=exp⁡p(tv(s))\Gamma(s, t) = \exp_p(tv(s)). Each t↦Γ(s,t)t \mapsto \Gamma(s, t) is a unit-speed geodesic, and every vector tangent to a geodesic sphere arises as ∂sΓ\partial_s\Gamma for such a family. Write T=∂tΓT = \partial_t\Gamma and S=∂sΓS = \partial_s\Gamma at s=0s = 0. Then

∂t⟨S,T⟩=⟨DtS,T⟩+⟨S,DtT⟩=⟨DsT,T⟩+0=12∂s∣T∣2=0,\partial_t\langle S, T\rangle = \langle D_tS, T\rangle + \langle S, D_tT\rangle = \langle D_sT, T\rangle + 0 = \tfrac12\partial_s|T|^2 = 0,

using DtS=DsTD_tS = D_sT (the symmetry lemma, from torsion-freeness) and ∣T∣=1|T| = 1 for every ss. So ⟨S,T⟩\langle S, T\rangle is constant in tt, and it vanishes at t=0t = 0 where S=0S = 0. Hence ⟨S,T⟩=0\langle S, T\rangle = 0 for all tt: the geodesic sphere's tangent vector SS is orthogonal to the radial geodesic.

Theorem 3.2 Geodesics are locally shortest

If exp⁡p\exp_p is a diffeomorphism on Bε(0)B_\varepsilon(0), then for ∣v∣<ε|v| < \varepsilon the radial geodesic t↦exp⁡p(tv)t \mapsto \exp_p(tv), 0≤t≤10 \leq t \leq 1, is the shortest curve from pp to exp⁡p(v)\exp_p(v), and any other curve of the same length is a reparametrisation of it. In particular d(p,exp⁡p(v))=∣v∣d(p, \exp_p(v)) = |v|. Conversely, every curve that minimises length between its endpoints, parametrised proportionally to arc length, is a geodesic.

Proof. In polar normal coordinates g=dr2+hrg = dr^2 + h_r, so for any curve cc from pp to q=exp⁡p(v)q = \exp_p(v) staying in the normal ball, ∣c′∣2≥(ddtr(c(t)))2|c'|^2 \geq (\frac{d}{dt}r(c(t)))^2 and L(c)≥∫∣ddtr(c)∣ dt≥r(q)=∣v∣L(c) \geq \int|\frac{d}{dt}r(c)|\,dt \geq r(q) = |v|, with equality only if the hrh_r component of c′c' vanishes and rr is monotone, that is, cc is the radial geodesic. A curve that leaves the normal ball must first travel from pp to a geodesic sphere of radius ρ\rho for every ρ<ε\rho < \varepsilon, which by the same estimate costs length at least ρ\rho; taking ∣v∣<ρ<ε|v| < \rho < \varepsilon, it is longer than ∣v∣|v|. For the converse: a minimising curve minimises between any two of its points, and short pieces of it lie in normal neighbourhoods, where the minimisers are the radial geodesics.

Figure 3.2. The Gauss lemma in the hyperbolic half-plane: geodesics through the point ii (semicircles centred on the real axis, and the vertical line) and the geodesic circles of hyperbolic radius 0.40.4, 0.80.8 and 1.21.2 about it. The geodesic circle of radius ρ\rho is the Euclidean circle with centre icosh⁡ρi\cosh\rho and radius sinh⁡ρ\sinh\rho, not centred at ii. The crossings are at right angles (checked numerically in the script).

Completeness

(M,g)(M, g) is geodesically complete if every geodesic is defined for all time, that is, exp⁡p\exp_p is defined on all of TpMT_pM for every pp.

Theorem 3.3 Hopf–Rinow

For a connected Riemannian manifold the following are equivalent: (a) MM is geodesically complete; (b) exp⁡p\exp_p is defined on all of TpMT_pM for some pp; (c) (M,d)(M, d) is a complete metric space; (d) closed bounded subsets of MM are compact. If they hold, any two points of MM are joined by a minimising geodesic, a geodesic of length d(p,q)d(p, q).

The proof (Lee, chapter 6) is a careful use of the local minimising property and of compactness (2B.3 Compactness). Every compact Riemannian manifold is complete. The punctured plane is not: the geodesic heading into the puncture stops, there is no shortest curve between (−1,0)(-1, 0) and (1,0)(1, 0), and Cauchy sequences converging to the origin have no limit. The Ricci flow is almost always studied on complete manifolds, and the limits of blow-ups (11B.3 Compactness of Ricci Flows) are taken to be complete.

In the world Model Free fall is geodesic motion

In general relativity, gravity is not a force: a freely falling body follows a geodesic of the spacetime metric, a Lorentzian metric of signature (−,+,+,+)(-, +, +, +), and so does light, along geodesics of zero length. Near the Sun, spacetime is curved, so starlight passing the Sun's edge is deflected, by 1.751.75 arcseconds according to Einstein's 1915 theory, twice the value a Newtonian argument gives. During the solar eclipse of 29 May 1919, expeditions to Sobral in Brazil and the island of Príncipe, organised by Frank Dyson and Arthur Eddington, photographed stars near the eclipsed Sun. Their announced results, 1.98±0.121.98 \pm 0.12 and 1.61±0.301.61 \pm 0.30 arcseconds, were taken to confirm Einstein. The precision of the data, and the decision to discard a third set of plates from Sobral that gave a lower value, have been debated ever since: John Earman and Clark Glymour (1980) argued that the analysis was biased, while Daniel Kennefick (2009) and others argue the choices were justified. Later measurements, especially of radio waves from quasars, have confirmed the general relativistic value to better than 0.1%0.1\%.

Cut points and the injectivity radius

A geodesic from pp stops minimising at some point. On the sphere, the meridian from the north pole minimises up to the south pole, at distance π\pi, and not beyond: past the south pole the other half of the great circle is shorter. The cut point of pp along a unit-speed geodesic γ\gamma from pp is γ(t0)\gamma(t_0), where t0t_0 is the last time at which γ∣[0,t0]\gamma|_{[0, t_0]} minimises; the cut locus Cut⁡(p)\operatorname{Cut}(p) is the set of all cut points of pp. On the round sphere Cut⁡(p)\operatorname{Cut}(p) is the antipode. On a flat torus it is a graph made of the edges of the Voronoi cell of pp's lattice of lifts.

A geodesic can stop minimising for two reasons. Either a different geodesic of the same length arrives at the same point (a loop-closing phenomenon, as on the torus), or nearby geodesics from pp refocus at the point: it is a conjugate point, where dexp⁡pd\exp_p fails to be invertible (9A.7 Jacobi Fields and Curvature versus Topology). The south pole is conjugate to the north pole: the whole family of meridians refocuses there.

The injectivity radius at pp is

inj⁡(p)=sup⁡{ε:exp⁡p is a diffeomorphism of Bε(0) onto its image}=d(p,Cut⁡(p)),\operatorname{inj}(p) = \sup\{\varepsilon : \exp_p \text{ is a diffeomorphism of } B_\varepsilon(0) \text{ onto its image}\} = d(p, \operatorname{Cut}(p)),

and inj⁡(M)=inf⁡pinj⁡(p)\operatorname{inj}(M) = \inf_p\operatorname{inj}(p), which is positive for compact MM. For the unit sphere it is π\pi; for RPn\mathbb{RP}^n with the round metric, π2\frac{\pi}{2}; for Rn\mathbb{R}^n and Hn\mathbb{H}^n, infinite; for the flat torus R2/(aZ×bZ)\mathbb{R}^2/(a\mathbb{Z}\times b\mathbb{Z}), 12min⁡(a,b)\frac12\min(a, b), half the length of the shortest closed geodesic (Exercise 3.7). A short closed geodesic forces a small injectivity radius, and a very thin flat torus has small injectivity radius everywhere although its curvature is zero.

Figure 3.3. Geodesics on the square flat torus R2/Z2\mathbb{R}^2/\mathbb{Z}^2, drawn in the fundamental square with opposite sides identified. Left: slope 23\frac23, a closed geodesic. Right: slope 5−12\frac{\sqrt5 - 1}{2}, irrational, shown for 4040 crossings: it never closes and is dense in the torus.
Where this goes Injectivity radius and the Ricci flow

Curvature bounds alone do not control the injectivity radius: the thin flat tori above, and the Berger spheres of 9A.1 Riemannian Metrics and Model Spaces as they collapse, have bounded curvature and injectivity radius tending to zero. Hamilton's compactness theorem for Ricci flows (11B.3 Compactness of Ricci Flows) needs a curvature bound and a lower bound on the injectivity radius at one point. Perelman's κ\kappa-noncollapsing theorem (12A.4 κ-Noncollapsing) gives a lower bound on volume ratios, which Cheeger's estimate (9B.3 Collapsing and Noncollapsing) turns into the missing injectivity radius bound. That is why this definition matters so much.

History

Geodesics on surfaces were studied by Johann Bernoulli and Euler in the eighteenth century as solutions of a variational problem, and Clairaut found his relation for surfaces of revolution in the same period. The exponential map and normal coordinates go back to Riemann's 1854 lecture, and Gauss's lemma to his 1827 Disquisitiones generales circa superficies curvas. Heinz Hopf and Willi Rinow proved their theorem in 1931. Cut loci were studied by Poincaré (1905) for convex surfaces and by J. H. C. Whitehead (1935) in general. Buckminster Fuller's geodesic domes, patented in 1954, take their name from the great circles along which their frames lie.

Recall Where we stand

Geodesics are curves with Dtγ′=0D_t\gamma' = 0, solutions of γ¨k+Γijkγ˙iγ˙j=0\ddot\gamma^k + \Gamma_{ij}^k\dot\gamma^i\dot\gamma^j = 0; they have constant speed, are great circles on spheres and semicircles in the half-plane, and conserve ⟨γ′,X⟩\langle\gamma', X\rangle for every Killing field XX (Clairaut's relation). The exponential map gives normal coordinates, Euclidean to first order with curvature at second order, and the Gauss lemma makes radial geodesics orthogonal to geodesic spheres, from which geodesics are locally shortest. Hopf–Rinow equates geodesic and metric completeness and gives minimising geodesics. Geodesics stop minimising at cut points, and the injectivity radius, π\pi on the unit sphere and half the shortest loop on a flat torus, is the size of the largest ball on which exp⁡p\exp_p is a diffeomorphism. 9A.4 Curvature and What It Means defines curvature and explains what it means.

Exercises

Exercise 3.4 Geodesics of the half-plane

For g=dx2+dy2y2g = \frac{dx^2 + dy^2}{y^2}, show that the Christoffel symbols are Γxyx=Γyxx=−1y\Gamma_{xy}^x = \Gamma_{yx}^x = -\frac1y, Γxxy=1y\Gamma_{xx}^y = \frac1y, Γyyy=−1y\Gamma_{yy}^y = -\frac1y, and the others vanish. Show that vertical lines are geodesics (after reparametrisation), and that the unit-speed curve x=tanh⁡tx = \tanh t, y=sech⁡ty = \operatorname{sech}t is a geodesic. What curve is it?

Solution

With gxx=gyy=y−2g_{xx} = g_{yy} = y^{-2}, ∂ygxx=∂ygyy=−2y−3\partial_yg_{xx} = \partial_yg_{yy} = -2y^{-3}. The formula of 9A.2 Connections gives Γxyx=12y2(−2y−3)=−1y\Gamma_{xy}^x = \frac12y^2(-2y^{-3}) = -\frac1y, Γxxy=−12y2∂ygxx=1y\Gamma_{xx}^y = -\frac12y^2\partial_yg_{xx} = \frac1y, Γyyy=12y2∂ygyy=−1y\Gamma_{yy}^y = \frac12y^2\partial_yg_{yy} = -\frac1y. The equations are x¨−2yx˙y˙=0\ddot x - \frac2y\dot x\dot y = 0 and y¨+1y(x˙2−y˙2)=0\ddot y + \frac1y(\dot x^2 - \dot y^2) = 0. For xx constant, the second is y¨=y˙2/y\ddot y = \dot y^2/y, solved by y=ety = e^t. For x=tanh⁡tx = \tanh t, y=sech⁡ty = \operatorname{sech}t: x˙=sech⁡2t\dot x = \operatorname{sech}^2t, y˙=−sech⁡ttanh⁡t\dot y = -\operatorname{sech}t\tanh t, and both equations check by differentiation; x2+y2=1x^2 + y^2 = 1, so it is the unit semicircle, with speed x˙2+y˙2y=sech⁡tsech⁡t=1\frac{\sqrt{\dot x^2 + \dot y^2}}{y} = \frac{\operatorname{sech}t}{\operatorname{sech}t} = 1.

Exercise 3.5 Conservation laws from symmetry

Let XX be a Killing field, so that ⟨∇YX,Z⟩+⟨Y,∇ZX⟩=0\langle\nabla_YX, Z\rangle + \langle Y, \nabla_ZX\rangle = 0 for all Y,ZY, Z (this is LXg=0\mathcal{L}_Xg = 0). Show that ⟨γ′,X⟩\langle\gamma', X\rangle is constant along every geodesic. Deduce Clairaut's relation, and show that the meridians and the equator (φ′=0\varphi' = 0) of a surface of revolution are geodesics.

Solution

ddt⟨γ′,X⟩=⟨Dtγ′,X⟩+⟨γ′,∇γ′X⟩=0+0\frac{d}{dt}\langle\gamma', X\rangle = \langle D_t\gamma', X\rangle + \langle\gamma', \nabla_{\gamma'}X\rangle = 0 + 0, the second by the Killing equation with Y=Z=γ′Y = Z = \gamma'. For X=∂θX = \partial_\theta this is the conservation of φsin⁡ψ\varphi\sin\psi, as in the text. Meridians: θ\theta constant, r=tr = t; the equations r¨−φφ′θ˙2=0\ddot r - \varphi\varphi'\dot\theta^2 = 0 and θ¨+2φ′φr˙θ˙=0\ddot\theta + 2\frac{\varphi'}{\varphi}\dot r\dot\theta = 0 hold with θ˙=0\dot\theta = 0, r¨=0\ddot r = 0. A circle r=r0r = r_0 with θ=t\theta = t needs φ(r0)φ′(r0)=0\varphi(r_0)\varphi'(r_0) = 0, so it is a geodesic exactly where φ′(r0)=0\varphi'(r_0) = 0, at the equator or the waist of a neck.

Exercise 3.6 Normal coordinates are Euclidean to first order

In normal coordinates at pp, the lines t↦tvt \mapsto tv are geodesics. Substitute into the geodesic equation to show Γijk(0)vivj=0\Gamma_{ij}^k(0)v^iv^j = 0 for all vv, hence Γijk(0)=0\Gamma_{ij}^k(0) = 0 by symmetry. Deduce ∂kgij(0)=0\partial_kg_{ij}(0) = 0 from ∂kgij=gljΓkil+gilΓkjl\partial_kg_{ij} = g_{lj}\Gamma_{ki}^l + g_{il}\Gamma_{kj}^l (which is ∇g=0\nabla g = 0).

Solution

For γ(t)=tv\gamma(t) = tv, γ¨=0\ddot\gamma = 0 and the equation gives Γijk(tv)vivj=0\Gamma_{ij}^k(tv)v^iv^j = 0; at t=0t = 0 this holds for every vv, and a symmetric bilinear form vanishing on the diagonal vanishes (polarisation), so Γijk(0)=0\Gamma_{ij}^k(0) = 0. Then ∂kgij(0)=0\partial_kg_{ij}(0) = 0 from the stated identity.

Exercise 3.7 Injectivity radii

(a) Show that the injectivity radius of the unit sphere is π\pi. (b) For the flat torus R2/(aZ×bZ)\mathbb{R}^2/(a\mathbb{Z}\times b\mathbb{Z}) with a≤ba \leq b, show that exp⁡p\exp_p is injective on the open disc of radius a2\frac a2 but not on any larger one. (c) Why is the injectivity radius of the round RP2\mathbb{RP}^2 equal to π2\frac{\pi}{2}?

Solution

(a) The geodesics from pp are great circles, minimising up to the antipode at distance π\pi; exp⁡p\exp_p is a diffeomorphism from the open disc of radius π\pi onto S2S^2 minus the antipode, and the whole circle ∣v∣=π|v| = \pi goes to the antipode. (b) exp⁡p(v)=p+v mod \exp_p(v) = p + v \bmod the lattice; v≠wv \neq w have the same image iff v−wv - w is a nonzero lattice vector, of length at least aa. If ∣v∣,∣w∣<a2|v|, |w| < \frac a2 then ∣v−w∣<a|v - w| < a, so exp⁡p\exp_p is injective; but v=a2e1v = \frac a2e_1 and w=−a2e1w = -\frac a2e_1 have the same image. (It is also a local diffeomorphism everywhere, being a translation.) (c) RP2=S2/±\mathbb{RP}^2 = S^2/\pm: geodesics from [p][p] are images of great circles, and the geodesics in directions vv and −v-v meet again after length π2\frac{\pi}{2}, at the image of the point on the equator between them; before that the quotient map is injective on the hemisphere's interior.

Exercise 3.8 An incomplete example

Show that the punctured plane R2∖{0}\mathbb{R}^2\setminus\{0\} is not complete in any of the senses of Theorem 3.3, and that no geodesic joins (−1,0)(-1, 0) to (1,0)(1, 0) with length 22.

Solution

The geodesic t↦(1−t,0)t \mapsto (1 - t, 0) ends at t=1t = 1; the sequence (1k,0)(\frac1k, 0) is Cauchy without a limit; the closed bounded set {0<∣x∣≤1}\{0 < |x| \leq 1\} is not compact. The distance between (±1,0)(\pm1, 0) is 22 (curves can pass just above the origin), but the only straight segment of length 22 goes through the origin, and every geodesic in the punctured plane is a straight segment.

Exercise 3.9 Rehearsal: normal coordinates on the sphere

On the unit sphere, normal coordinates at the north pole are x=r(cos⁡θ,sin⁡θ)x = r(\cos\theta, \sin\theta) with g=dr2+sin⁡2r dθ2g = dr^2 + \sin^2r\,d\theta^2. Show that

gij(x)=δij−13(∣x∣2δij−xixj)+O(∣x∣4),g_{ij}(x) = \delta_{ij} - \tfrac13\big(|x|^2\delta_{ij} - x_ix_j\big) + O(|x|^4),

and check this against the formula with K=1K = 1 in the text. In 9A.4 Curvature and What It Means this becomes gij=δij−13Rikljxkxl+O(∣x∣3)g_{ij} = \delta_{ij} - \frac13R_{iklj}x^kx^l + O(|x|^3) in general, and the volume element becomes 1−16Rklxkxl+…1 - \frac16R_{kl}x^kx^l + \dots, the second meaning of Ricci curvature.

Solution

In Cartesian form, dr2+r2dθ2=∣dx∣2dr^2 + r^2d\theta^2 = |dx|^2 and r2dθ2=∣dx∣2−dr2r^2d\theta^2 = |dx|^2 - dr^2, with dr=xi dxi∣x∣dr = \frac{x_i\,dx^i}{|x|}. So g=dr2+sin⁡2rr2(∣dx∣2−dr2)g = dr^2 + \frac{\sin^2r}{r^2}(|dx|^2 - dr^2), and sin⁡2rr2=1−r23+O(r4)\frac{\sin^2r}{r^2} = 1 - \frac{r^2}{3} + O(r^4), giving g=∣dx∣2−∣x∣23(∣dx∣2−(xi dxi)2∣x∣2)+O(∣x∣4)g = |dx|^2 - \frac{|x|^2}{3}\big(|dx|^2 - \frac{(x_i\,dx^i)^2}{|x|^2}\big) + O(|x|^4), the stated formula. For v⊥xv \perp x it gives ∣v∣2(1−13∣x∣2)|v|^2(1 - \frac13|x|^2), the text's formula with K=1K = 1; for v∥xv \parallel x there is no correction, as the Gauss lemma requires.

© 2026 NeckPinch (www.neckpinch.com). All content in the guidebook (text, mathematics, figures and exercises) is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. No part may be copied, republished or redistributed without written permission.