Book 9A

© 2026 NeckPinch · www.neckpinch.com · All rights reserved.

Course 9Book 9A: Metrics, Connections and CurvatureChapter 5

Computing Curvature

Model spaces, necks, Lie groups and the curvature operator.

29 min read · Updated Oct 3, 2026

Read with Lee, Introduction to Riemannian Manifolds (2nd edition), chapter 7 (the Ricci decomposition, the Weyl tensor, conformal changes) and the computations for the model spaces and warped products in chapters 3 and 8 and their problems. Petersen's Riemannian Geometry, chapter 4 (examples: rotationally symmetric metrics, doubly warped products, Berger spheres), is the second voice. Milnor's paper "Curvatures of left invariant metrics on Lie groups" (Advances in Mathematics, 1976) is the source for the Lie group section.

In this chapter · 8 sections
  1. 5.1Products
  2. 5.2Rotationally symmetric metrics
  3. 5.3Conformal change
  4. 5.4Left-invariant metrics on three-dimensional Lie groups
  5. 5.5The Ricci decomposition
  6. 5.6The curvature operator
  7. 5.7History
  8. 5.8Exercises

This chapter is a workshop. It computes the curvature of the examples that the Ricci flow needs, in a form you can reuse: the model spaces, products, rotationally symmetric metrics (necks, caps, cones and dumbbells), conformal changes, and left-invariant metrics on three-dimensional Lie groups. It then takes the curvature tensor apart into its Ricci decomposition. In dimension three that decomposition shows that the Ricci tensor determines the whole curvature tensor, which is why Hamilton's three-dimensional theory can work with Ricci curvature alone.

There are fewer real-world boxes here than elsewhere, deliberately. The payoff is the next three books: every curvature value quoted later for a neck, a cigar, a Berger sphere or a Bryant soliton comes from the formulas below. Every formula in this chapter has been checked numerically by the figures script for the chapter (in the guide's tools/ folder), on the examples given.

By the end of this chapter you will be able to:

  • compute the curvature of products and of warped products dr2+φ(r)2gSn−1dr^2 + \varphi(r)^2g_{S^{n-1}};
  • read off the geometry of a neck from its profile;
  • transform curvature under a conformal change of metric;
  • compute the Ricci curvature of left-invariant metrics on three-dimensional Lie groups, including Berger spheres, Nil and Sol;
  • state the Ricci decomposition, explain why W=0W = 0 in dimension 33, and describe the curvature operator.

Products

On a Riemannian product (M1×M2,g1⊕g2)(M_1\times M_2, g_1\oplus g_2), the Levi-Civita connection and the curvature split: vectors tangent to the two factors do not interact. So Rm⁡=Rm⁡1⊕Rm⁡2\operatorname{Rm} = \operatorname{Rm}_1\oplus\operatorname{Rm}_2, Ric⁡=Ric⁡1⊕Ric⁡2\operatorname{Ric} = \operatorname{Ric}_1\oplus\operatorname{Ric}_2 and R=R1+R2R = R_1 + R_2, and a mixed plane, spanned by X1∈TM1X_1 \in TM_1 and X2∈TM2X_2 \in TM_2, has K(X1,X2)=0K(X_1, X_2) = 0.

  • S2(ρ)×RS^2(\rho)\times\mathbb{R}, the round cylinder in dimension 33: Ric⁡\operatorname{Ric} has eigenvalues 1ρ2,1ρ2,0\frac{1}{\rho^2}, \frac{1}{\rho^2}, 0, the zero in the axis direction, and R=2ρ2R = \frac{2}{\rho^2}. Its sectional curvatures range over [0,1ρ2][0, \frac{1}{\rho^2}].
  • H2×R\mathbb{H}^2\times\mathbb{R}: Ric⁡\operatorname{Ric} has eigenvalues −1,−1,0-1, -1, 0.
  • S2×S2S^2\times S^2 (equal radii 11): Einstein, with Ric⁡=g\operatorname{Ric} = g, but not of constant curvature; sectional curvatures range over [0,1][0, 1].

The cylinder is the most important of these. It is the model of a neck in a Ricci flow, and under the flow it shrinks by ρ(t)2=ρ02−2t\rho(t)^2 = \rho_0^2 - 2t (the last exercise), pinching off at t=ρ022t = \frac{\rho_0^2}{2} everywhere at once.

Rotationally symmetric metrics

For the warped product g=dr2+φ(r)2gSn−1g = dr^2 + \varphi(r)^2g_{S^{n-1}} of 9A.1 Riemannian Metrics and Model Spaces, use an orthonormal frame e1=∂re_1 = \partial_r and e2,…,ene_2, \dots, e_n tangent to the spheres. The curvature operator is diagonal in this frame, and there are only two kinds of planes:

Krad=K(∂r,ei)=−φ′′φ,Ktan=K(ei,ej)=1−φ′2φ2.K_{\mathrm{rad}} = K(\partial_r, e_i) = -\frac{\varphi''}{\varphi}, \qquad K_{\mathrm{tan}} = K(e_i, e_j) = \frac{1 - \varphi'^2}{\varphi^2}.

Consequently

Ric⁡(∂r,∂r)=−(n−1)φ′′φ,Ric⁡(ei,ei)=−φ′′φ+(n−2)1−φ′2φ2,\operatorname{Ric}(\partial_r, \partial_r) = -(n - 1)\frac{\varphi''}{\varphi}, \qquad \operatorname{Ric}(e_i, e_i) = -\frac{\varphi''}{\varphi} + (n - 2)\frac{1 - \varphi'^2}{\varphi^2},
R=−2(n−1)φ′′φ+(n−1)(n−2)1−φ′2φ2.R = -2(n - 1)\frac{\varphi''}{\varphi} + (n - 1)(n - 2)\frac{1 - \varphi'^2}{\varphi^2}.

Why. The radial planes: the surface swept out by the geodesics in the plane of ∂r\partial_r and eie_i is dr2+φ(r)2dθ2dr^2 + \varphi(r)^2d\theta^2, totally geodesic, and its Gauss curvature is −φ′′φ-\frac{\varphi''}{\varphi} by the formula of 8A.9 The Curvature of Surfaces (Exercise 5.1). The tangential planes: the sphere {r=r0}\{r = r_0\} is a round sphere of radius φ(r0)\varphi(r_0), with intrinsic curvature 1φ2\frac{1}{\varphi^2}, sitting in MM with second fundamental form φ′φ\frac{\varphi'}{\varphi} times its metric; the Gauss equation (9A.8 Submanifolds and Minimal Surfaces) subtracts (φ′φ)2(\frac{\varphi'}{\varphi})^2. Petersen works through the full computation for rotationally symmetric metrics.

Checks. The sphere (φ=sin⁡r\varphi = \sin r): Krad=Ktan=1K_{\mathrm{rad}} = K_{\mathrm{tan}} = 1. Hyperbolic space (φ=sinh⁡r\varphi = \sinh r): both −1-1. The cylinder (φ=ρ\varphi = \rho): Krad=0K_{\mathrm{rad}} = 0, Ktan=1ρ2K_{\mathrm{tan}} = \frac{1}{\rho^2}. The cone (φ=ar\varphi = ar, 0<a<10 < a < 1): Krad=0K_{\mathrm{rad}} = 0 and Ktan=1−a2a2r2>0K_{\mathrm{tan}} = \frac{1 - a^2}{a^2r^2} > 0, blowing up at the tip. So in dimension n≥3n \geq 3 a cone over a small sphere has positive curvature blowing up at the vertex, unlike the 2D cone, which is flat away from its tip. These formulas make the model spaces of 9A.1 Riemannian Metrics and Model Spaces honest: Rn\mathbb{R}^n, SnS^n and Hn\mathbb{H}^n have constant curvature 00, 11, −1-1.

A neck. Figure 5.1 shows the two curvatures along a dumbbell metric on S3S^3 whose neck has radius 0.20.2. In the middle of the neck, Ktan=25K_{\mathrm{tan}} = 25 and Krad=1K_{\mathrm{rad}} = 1, so the neck is nearly a round cylinder S2×RS^2\times\mathbb{R} of radius 0.20.2, with scalar curvature R=2(2Krad+Ktan)=54R = 2(2K_{\mathrm{rad}} + K_{\mathrm{tan}}) = 54, close to the cylinder's 20.22=50\frac{2}{0.2^2} = 50. At the shoulders, where the neck widens quickly, φ′′\varphi'' is large and positive, and both curvatures become strongly negative, KtanK_{\mathrm{tan}} wherever ∣φ′∣>1|\varphi'| > 1. That mix of large positive and negative curvature is what Angenent and Knopf had to control to prove that such necks pinch (11B.4 Singularities).

Figure 5.1. Sectional curvatures of a dumbbell metric dr2+φ(r)2gS2dr^2 + \varphi(r)^2g_{S^2} on S3S^3 with a long neck of radius 0.20.2, computed from the formulas above. The dashed curve is the profile φ\varphi (scaled by 3030). Across the neck the tangential curvature is 10.22=25\frac{1}{0.2^2} = 25 and the radial curvature about 11: the neck is nearly a cylinder. At the shoulders both dip sharply negative.

Conformal change

For g~=e2ug\tilde g = e^{2u}g on an nn-manifold,

Ric⁡~=Ric⁡−(n−2)(∇2u−du⊗du)−(Δu+(n−2)∣∇u∣2)g,\widetilde{\operatorname{Ric}} = \operatorname{Ric} - (n - 2)\big(\nabla^2u - du\otimes du\big) - \big(\Delta u + (n - 2)|\nabla u|^2\big)g,
R~=e−2u(R−2(n−1)Δu−(n−1)(n−2)∣∇u∣2),\tilde R = e^{-2u}\big(R - 2(n - 1)\Delta u - (n - 1)(n - 2)|\nabla u|^2\big),

with Δ\Delta, ∇\nabla and norms taken in gg (Lee, chapter 7). In dimension 22 this is K~=e−2u(K−Δu)\tilde K = e^{-2u}(K - \Delta u), the equation behind uniformization and the two-dimensional Ricci flow (5A.5 Uniformization and the Two-Dimensional Ricci Flow). In dimension n≥3n \geq 3 it is the starting point of the Yamabe problem: find a conformal metric of constant scalar curvature. Writing e2u=v4/(n−2)e^{2u} = v^{4/(n - 2)} turns the scalar curvature equation into the semilinear equation −4(n−1)n−2Δv+Rv=R~v(n+2)/(n−2)-\frac{4(n - 1)}{n - 2}\Delta v + Rv = \tilde Rv^{(n + 2)/(n - 2)} (the critical exponent of the Sobolev embedding, 4A.10 Sobolev Embeddings and Critical Exponents).

As a check, the Poincaré ball metric 4∣dy∣2(1−∣y∣2)2\frac{4|dy|^2}{(1 - |y|^2)^2} is e2ue^{2u} times the flat metric with u=log⁡2−log⁡(1−∣y∣2)u = \log2 - \log(1 - |y|^2), and the formula gives R~=−n(n−1)\tilde R = -n(n - 1) (Exercise 5.3).

Left-invariant metrics on three-dimensional Lie groups

A left-invariant metric on a Lie group GG is determined by an inner product on the Lie algebra g\mathfrak{g} (8A.5 Lie Groups and Group Actions). Its curvature is a computation in linear algebra, and its Ricci flow is a system of ODEs (11A.8 Homogeneous Flows). John Milnor (1976) showed that for a three-dimensional unimodular Lie group (one with tr⁡ad⁡X=0\operatorname{tr}\operatorname{ad}_X = 0 for all XX, which includes every group with a compact quotient), any left-invariant metric has an orthonormal basis e1,e2,e3e_1, e_2, e_3 of g\mathfrak{g} with

[e2,e3]=λ1e1,[e3,e1]=λ2e2,[e1,e2]=λ3e3.[e_2, e_3] = \lambda_1e_1, \qquad [e_3, e_1] = \lambda_2e_2, \qquad [e_1, e_2] = \lambda_3e_3.

Set μi=12(λ1+λ2+λ3)−λi\mu_i = \frac12(\lambda_1 + \lambda_2 + \lambda_3) - \lambda_i. Then the Ricci tensor is diagonal in this basis, with

Ric⁡(e1,e1)=2μ2μ3,Ric⁡(e2,e2)=2μ1μ3,Ric⁡(e3,e3)=2μ1μ2.\operatorname{Ric}(e_1, e_1) = 2\mu_2\mu_3, \qquad \operatorname{Ric}(e_2, e_2) = 2\mu_1\mu_3, \qquad \operatorname{Ric}(e_3, e_3) = 2\mu_1\mu_2.

The signs of (λ1,λ2,λ3)(\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \lambda_3) identify the group: (+,+,+)(+, +, +) is SU(2)SU(2), so S3S^3; (+,+,−)(+, +, -) is SL~(2,R)\widetilde{SL}(2, \mathbb{R}); (+,+,0)(+, +, 0) is the universal cover of the Euclidean group of the plane; (+,−,0)(+, -, 0) is Sol; (+,0,0)(+, 0, 0) is the Heisenberg group, Nil; (0,0,0)(0, 0, 0) is R3\mathbb{R}^3. These carry five of Thurston's eight geometries (10A.5 Thurston’s Eight Geometries).

  • The round S3S^3. For SU(2)SU(2), the unit quaternions, the left-invariant fields X1=qiX_1 = qi, X2=qjX_2 = qj, X3=qkX_3 = qk are orthonormal for the round metric of radius 11, and [X1,X2]=2X3[X_1, X_2] = 2X_3 cyclically. So λi=2\lambda_i = 2, μi=1\mu_i = 1 and Ric⁡=2g\operatorname{Ric} = 2g, as it must be.
  • Berger spheres. Rescale X1X_1, the direction of the Hopf circles, to have length ε\varepsilon: the orthonormal basis is e1=X1/εe_1 = X_1/\varepsilon, e2=X2e_2 = X_2, e3=X3e_3 = X_3, with λ=(2ε,2ε,2ε)\lambda = (2\varepsilon, \frac2\varepsilon, \frac2\varepsilon). Then μ1=2ε−ε\mu_1 = \frac2\varepsilon - \varepsilon and μ2=μ3=ε\mu_2 = \mu_3 = \varepsilon, so
Ric⁡(e1,e1)=2ε2,Ric⁡(e2,e2)=Ric⁡(e3,e3)=4−2ε2,\operatorname{Ric}(e_1, e_1) = 2\varepsilon^2, \qquad \operatorname{Ric}(e_2, e_2) = \operatorname{Ric}(e_3, e_3) = 4 - 2\varepsilon^2,

and the sectional curvatures of the coordinate planes are K(e1,e2)=K(e1,e3)=ε2K(e_1, e_2) = K(e_1, e_3) = \varepsilon^2 and K(e2,e3)=4−3ε2K(e_2, e_3) = 4 - 3\varepsilon^2 (Exercise 5.4). As ε→0\varepsilon \to 0 the curvatures stay between 00 and 44 while the Hopf circles shrink: collapse with bounded curvature (9B.3 Collapsing and Noncollapsing). Ricci curvature is positive exactly for ε<2\varepsilon < \sqrt2 (Figure 5.2).

  • Nil, λ=(1,0,0)\lambda = (1, 0, 0): μ=(−12,12,12)\mu = (-\frac12, \frac12, \frac12) and Ric⁡\operatorname{Ric} has eigenvalues 12,−12,−12\frac12, -\frac12, -\frac12; R=−12R = -\frac12.
  • Sol, λ=(1,−1,0)\lambda = (1, -1, 0): μ=(−1,1,0)\mu = (-1, 1, 0) and Ric⁡\operatorname{Ric} has eigenvalues 0,0,−20, 0, -2.
Figure 5.2. Curvatures of the Berger spheres, the round S3S^3 with the Hopf circles rescaled to length 2πε2\pi\varepsilon, from Milnor's formulas. At ε=1\varepsilon = 1 everything equals the round values (K=1K = 1, Ric⁡=2\operatorname{Ric} = 2). Ricci curvature is positive for ε<2\varepsilon < \sqrt2; as ε→0\varepsilon \to 0 the curvature stays bounded while the volume goes to zero.

The Ricci decomposition

The Kulkarni–Nomizu product of two symmetric 2-tensors is the 4-tensor

(h◯∧k)ijkl=hilkjk+hjkkil−hikkjl−hjlkik,(h \mathbin{\bigcirc\mkern-15mu\wedge} k)_{ijkl} = h_{il}k_{jk} + h_{jk}k_{il} - h_{ik}k_{jl} - h_{jl}k_{ik},

which has the symmetries of a curvature tensor. In this notation a constant curvature tensor is κ2g◯∧g\frac{\kappa}{2}g \mathbin{\bigcirc\mkern-15mu\wedge} g. Every curvature tensor splits orthogonally as

Rm⁡=W+1n−2Ric⁡˚◯∧g+R2n(n−1)g◯∧g,\operatorname{Rm} = W + \frac{1}{n - 2}\mathring{\operatorname{Ric}} \mathbin{\bigcirc\mkern-15mu\wedge} g + \frac{R}{2n(n - 1)}g \mathbin{\bigcirc\mkern-15mu\wedge} g,

where Ric⁡˚=Ric⁡−Rng\mathring{\operatorname{Ric}} = \operatorname{Ric} - \frac Rng is the trace-free Ricci tensor and the Weyl tensor WW is the part with all traces zero (Lee, chapter 7). The three pieces are the scalar part (what constant curvature has), the trace-free Ricci part (what Einstein metrics lack), and the Weyl part, the curvature that Ricci curvature does not see. The Weyl tensor is conformally invariant: W(e2ug)=e2uW(g)W(e^{2u}g) = e^{2u}W(g) as a (0,4)(0, 4)-tensor. In general relativity it is the curvature of empty space, the tidal shape change of 9A.4 Curvature and What It Means.

The idea Why three dimensions is special

The Weyl tensor has the symmetries of a curvature tensor and all its traces vanish. In dimension 33, a curvature tensor has 66 independent components and the Ricci tensor also has 66, so no room is left: W=0W = 0 in dimension 33, and the Ricci tensor determines the whole curvature tensor,

Rijkl=Rilgjk+Rjkgil−Rikgjl−Rjlgik−R2(gilgjk−gikgjl).R_{ijkl} = R_{il}g_{jk} + R_{jk}g_{il} - R_{ik}g_{jl} - R_{jl}g_{ik} - \frac R2(g_{il}g_{jk} - g_{ik}g_{jl}).

This is why Hamilton's 1982 theorem (11A.6 Hamilton’s 1982 Theorem) can be stated and proved with Ricci curvature: in dimension 33, controlling Ric⁡\operatorname{Ric} controls everything. It is also why the three-dimensional Ricci flow is so much more tractable than the four-dimensional one, where the Weyl tensor has 1010 components of its own.

The curvature operator

Since Rm⁡\operatorname{Rm} is antisymmetric in each pair of slots, it defines a symmetric linear map on 2-vectors, the curvature operator R:Λ2TpM→Λ2TpM\mathcal{R} : \Lambda^2T_pM \to \Lambda^2T_pM, by

⟨R(X∧Y),Z∧W⟩=Rm⁡(X,Y,W,Z),\langle\mathcal{R}(X\wedge Y), Z\wedge W\rangle = \operatorname{Rm}(X, Y, W, Z),

where Λ2\Lambda^2 has the inner product that makes ei∧eje_i\wedge e_j (i<ji < j) orthonormal. With this normalisation ⟨R(X∧Y),X∧Y⟩=K(X,Y)∣X∧Y∣2\langle\mathcal{R}(X\wedge Y), X\wedge Y\rangle = K(X, Y)|X\wedge Y|^2, and the unit sphere has R=id⁡\mathcal{R} = \operatorname{id}. (Other books scale R\mathcal{R} by a factor of 22 or change its sign; test on the unit sphere.) Positive curvature operator, R>0\mathcal{R} > 0, implies positive sectional curvature, but is stronger in dimension 44 and above, because not every 2-vector is a plane X∧YX\wedge Y.

In dimension 33, every 2-vector is decomposable, Λ2≅TM\Lambda^2 \cong TM (by ei∧ej↦eke_i\wedge e_j \mapsto e_k for (i,j,k)(i, j, k) cyclic), and if Ric⁡\operatorname{Ric} has eigenvalues r1,r2,r3r_1, r_2, r_3 in an orthonormal eigenbasis, then R\mathcal{R} is diagonal in the basis e2∧e3,e3∧e1,e1∧e2e_2\wedge e_3, e_3\wedge e_1, e_1\wedge e_2 with eigenvalues

r2+r3−r12,r3+r1−r22,r1+r2−r32,\frac{r_2 + r_3 - r_1}{2}, \qquad \frac{r_3 + r_1 - r_2}{2}, \qquad \frac{r_1 + r_2 - r_3}{2},

which are the sectional curvatures of the three coordinate planes (Exercise 5.5). So in dimension 33, R≥0\mathcal{R} \geq 0 if and only if all sectional curvatures are ≥0\geq 0, and the Hamilton–Ivey pinching estimate (11A.5 Hamilton–Ivey Pinching) is a statement about the smallest eigenvalue of R\mathcal{R}.

Where this goes Curvature as a moving target

Under the Ricci flow, the curvature operator evolves by a heat equation with a quadratic reaction term. In Hamilton's normalisation M=2R\mathcal M = 2\mathcal R, it reads ∂tM=ΔM+M2+M#\partial_t\mathcal M = \Delta\mathcal M + \mathcal M^2 + \mathcal M^\#, where M#\mathcal M^\# is a quadratic expression in M\mathcal M (11A.2 How Curvature Evolves). Hamilton's maximum principle for systems (11A.4 Maximum Principles under Ricci Flow) reduces many questions about the flow to the ODE ddtM=M2+M#\frac{d}{dt}\mathcal M = \mathcal M^2 + \mathcal M^\#, which in dimension 33 is an ODE for the three eigenvalues computed above (doubled).

History

Rotationally symmetric metrics have been the first examples since Riemann. Milnor's paper on left-invariant metrics appeared in 1976. The Weyl tensor was introduced by Hermann Weyl in 1918; the Kulkarni–Nomizu product is named after Ravindra Kulkarni and Katsumi Nomizu. The Yamabe problem was posed by Hidehiko Yamabe in 1960 and solved by the combined work of Neil Trudinger (1968), Thierry Aubin (1976) and Richard Schoen (1984). Berger spheres are named after Marcel Berger.

Recall Where we stand

Products split curvature, with mixed planes flat; the cylinder S2×RS^2\times\mathbb{R} has Ricci eigenvalues (1ρ2,1ρ2,0)(\frac{1}{\rho^2}, \frac{1}{\rho^2}, 0). Warped products dr2+φ2gSn−1dr^2 + \varphi^2g_{S^{n-1}} have only two sectional curvatures, −φ′′φ-\frac{\varphi''}{\varphi} and 1−φ′2φ2\frac{1 - \varphi'^2}{\varphi^2}; a thin neck has a large tangential and small radial curvature, nearly a cylinder, and its shoulders have negative curvature. Conformal change transforms Ric⁡\operatorname{Ric} and RR by explicit formulas generalising K~=e−2u(K−Δu)\tilde K = e^{-2u}(K - \Delta u). Milnor's formulas give the Ricci curvature of left-invariant metrics on unimodular 3D Lie groups: Berger spheres have Ricci >0> 0 for ε<2\varepsilon < \sqrt2, Nil has (12,−12,−12)(\frac12, -\frac12, -\frac12), Sol (0,0,−2)(0, 0, -2). Curvature splits into scalar, trace-free Ricci and Weyl parts; in dimension 33, W=0W = 0 and Ricci determines everything, and the curvature operator has eigenvalues 12(rj+rk−ri)\frac12(r_j + r_k - r_i). 9A.6 The Laplacian and the Bochner Formula builds the calculus (Laplacian, Bochner formula, commuting derivatives) in which the flow's evolution equations are written.

Exercises

Exercise 5.1 The radial curvature

For the surface dr2+φ(r)2dθ2dr^2 + \varphi(r)^2d\theta^2, use the formula K=−(G)rrGK = -\frac{(\sqrt G)_{rr}}{\sqrt G} for a metric dr2+G dθ2dr^2 + G\,d\theta^2 (8A.9 The Curvature of Surfaces) to show K=−φ′′φK = -\frac{\varphi''}{\varphi}. Check the sphere, the hyperbolic plane and the cone.

Solution

G=φ\sqrt G = \varphi, so K=−φ′′φK = -\frac{\varphi''}{\varphi}. Sphere: −−sin⁡rsin⁡r=1-\frac{-\sin r}{\sin r} = 1; hyperbolic: −sinh⁡rsinh⁡r=−1-\frac{\sinh r}{\sinh r} = -1; cone φ=ar\varphi = ar: φ′′=0\varphi'' = 0, so K=0K = 0.

Exercise 5.2 Products and cylinders

Compute Ric⁡\operatorname{Ric} and RR for S2(ρ)×RS^2(\rho)\times\mathbb{R}, H2×R\mathbb{H}^2\times\mathbb{R}, S2×S1S^2\times S^1 and S2×S2S^2\times S^2. Which are Einstein? Which have Ric⁡≥0\operatorname{Ric} \geq 0?

Solution

S2(ρ)×RS^2(\rho)\times\mathbb{R} and S2(ρ)×S1S^2(\rho)\times S^1: Ric⁡=1ρ2gS2(ρ)⊕0\operatorname{Ric} = \frac{1}{\rho^2}g_{S^2(\rho)}\oplus0, R=2ρ2R = \frac{2}{\rho^2}, Ric⁡≥0\operatorname{Ric} \geq 0, not Einstein. H2×R\mathbb{H}^2\times\mathbb{R}: Ric⁡=−gH2⊕0\operatorname{Ric} = -g_{\mathbb{H}^2}\oplus0, R=−2R = -2. S2×S2S^2\times S^2 with equal radii 11: Ric⁡=g\operatorname{Ric} = g, Einstein, R=4R = 4. (In 9A.7 Jacobi Fields and Curvature versus Topology you prove that a compact manifold with Ric⁡>0\operatorname{Ric} > 0 has finite fundamental group, so S2×S1S^2\times S^1, with infinite π1\pi_1, has no metric with Ric⁡>0\operatorname{Ric} > 0, though it has one with Ric⁡≥0\operatorname{Ric} \geq 0.)

Exercise 5.3 Hyperbolic space by conformal change

With u=log⁡2−log⁡(1−∣y∣2)u = \log2 - \log(1 - |y|^2) on the unit ball in Rn\mathbb{R}^n and the flat background (Ric⁡=0\operatorname{Ric} = 0), compute ∇u\nabla u, ∣∇u∣2|\nabla u|^2 and Δu\Delta u, and show R~=−n(n−1)\tilde R = -n(n - 1).

Solution

With ρ=∣y∣\rho = |y|: ∇u=2y1−ρ2\nabla u = \frac{2y}{1 - \rho^2}, ∣∇u∣2=4ρ2(1−ρ2)2|\nabla u|^2 = \frac{4\rho^2}{(1 - \rho^2)^2}, Δu=2n1−ρ2+4ρ2(1−ρ2)2\Delta u = \frac{2n}{1 - \rho^2} + \frac{4\rho^2}{(1 - \rho^2)^2}. Then R~=(1−ρ2)24(n−1)(−4n1−ρ2−8ρ2(1−ρ2)2−4(n−2)ρ2(1−ρ2)2)=n−14(−4n(1−ρ2)−4nρ2)=−n(n−1)\tilde R = \frac{(1 - \rho^2)^2}{4}(n - 1)\Big(-\frac{4n}{1 - \rho^2} - \frac{8\rho^2}{(1 - \rho^2)^2} - \frac{4(n - 2)\rho^2}{(1 - \rho^2)^2}\Big) = \frac{n - 1}{4}\big(-4n(1 - \rho^2) - 4n\rho^2\big) = -n(n - 1).

Exercise 5.4 Berger spheres

Verify the brackets λ=(2ε,2ε,2ε)\lambda = (2\varepsilon, \frac2\varepsilon, \frac2\varepsilon) for the Berger basis, and the Ricci curvatures. Using Ric⁡(ei,ei)=∑j≠iK(ei,ej)\operatorname{Ric}(e_i, e_i) = \sum_{j \neq i}K(e_i, e_j) (the curvature operator is diagonal in Milnor's frame), find the three coordinate sectional curvatures. For which ε\varepsilon is the scalar curvature positive?

Solution

[e2,e3]=[X2,X3]=2X1=2εe1[e_2, e_3] = [X_2, X_3] = 2X_1 = 2\varepsilon e_1; [e3,e1]=1ε[X3,X1]=2εX2=2εe2[e_3, e_1] = \frac1\varepsilon[X_3, X_1] = \frac2\varepsilon X_2 = \frac2\varepsilon e_2; similarly [e1,e2]=2εe3[e_1, e_2] = \frac2\varepsilon e_3. Then 12∑λ=ε+2ε\frac12\sum\lambda = \varepsilon + \frac2\varepsilon, so μ1=2ε−ε\mu_1 = \frac2\varepsilon - \varepsilon, μ2=μ3=ε\mu_2 = \mu_3 = \varepsilon, and Ric⁡\operatorname{Ric} is (2ε2,4−2ε2,4−2ε2)(2\varepsilon^2, 4 - 2\varepsilon^2, 4 - 2\varepsilon^2). Writing KijK_{ij} for the coordinate planes: K12+K13=2ε2K_{12} + K_{13} = 2\varepsilon^2, K12+K23=4−2ε2=K13+K23K_{12} + K_{23} = 4 - 2\varepsilon^2 = K_{13} + K_{23}, so K12=K13=ε2K_{12} = K_{13} = \varepsilon^2 and K23=4−3ε2K_{23} = 4 - 3\varepsilon^2. R=8−2ε2>0R = 8 - 2\varepsilon^2 > 0 for ε<2\varepsilon < 2.

Exercise 5.5 Dimension three

In an orthonormal basis diagonalising Ric⁡\operatorname{Ric} with eigenvalues r1,r2,r3r_1, r_2, r_3, use the formula for RijklR_{ijkl} in the box above to show K(e2,e3)=R2332=r2+r3−r12K(e_2, e_3) = R_{2332} = \frac{r_2 + r_3 - r_1}{2}, and that the components RijklR_{ijkl} with {i,j}≠{k,l}\{i, j\} \neq \{k, l\} vanish. Check the round S3S^3 and S2×RS^2\times\mathbb{R}.

Solution

R2332=R22g33+R33g22−R23g32−R32g23−R2(g22g33−g23g32)=r2+r3−r1+r2+r32R_{2332} = R_{22}g_{33} + R_{33}g_{22} - R_{23}g_{32} - R_{32}g_{23} - \frac R2(g_{22}g_{33} - g_{23}g_{32}) = r_2 + r_3 - \frac{r_1 + r_2 + r_3}{2}. If {i,j}≠{k,l}\{i, j\} \neq \{k, l\}, every term of the formula contains an off-diagonal gg or an off-diagonal RR, which vanish. Round S3S^3: ri=2r_i = 2 gives K=1K = 1. S2×RS^2\times\mathbb{R} with r=(1,1,0)r = (1, 1, 0) (e3e_3 the axis): K(e1,e2)=1+1−02=1K(e_1, e_2) = \frac{1 + 1 - 0}{2} = 1, K(e2,e3)=1+0−12=0K(e_2, e_3) = \frac{1 + 0 - 1}{2} = 0.

Exercise 5.6 Nil

For the Heisenberg group with [e2,e3]=e1[e_2, e_3] = e_1 and the other brackets of the basis zero, compute μ\mu, Ric⁡\operatorname{Ric} and RR, and the sectional curvatures of the coordinate planes. Why can no left-invariant metric on Nil have constant curvature?

Solution

λ=(1,0,0)\lambda = (1, 0, 0), 12∑λ=12\frac12\sum\lambda = \frac12, μ=(−12,12,12)\mu = (-\frac12, \frac12, \frac12); Ric⁡=(2⋅14,2⋅(−14),2⋅(−14))=(12,−12,−12)\operatorname{Ric} = (2\cdot\frac14, 2\cdot(-\frac14), 2\cdot(-\frac14)) = (\frac12, -\frac12, -\frac12), R=−12R = -\frac12. Coordinate planes: K23=r2+r3−r12=−34K_{23} = \frac{r_2 + r_3 - r_1}{2} = -\frac34, K12=K13=14K_{12} = K_{13} = \frac14. Any left-invariant metric on Nil can be put in Milnor's form with λ=(λ1,0,0)\lambda = (\lambda_1, 0, 0), λ1>0\lambda_1 > 0, and then Ric⁡\operatorname{Ric} has eigenvalues of both signs, so it is not a multiple of gg.

Exercise 5.7 Rehearsal: the shrinking neck

(a) For the cylinder Sn−1(ρ)×RS^{n-1}(\rho)\times\mathbb{R}, show that g(t)=ρ(t)2gSn−1+dz2g(t) = \rho(t)^2g_{S^{n-1}} + dz^2 is a Ricci flow when ρ(t)2=ρ02−2(n−2)t\rho(t)^2 = \rho_0^2 - 2(n - 2)t, so it becomes singular at T=ρ022(n−2)T = \frac{\rho_0^2}{2(n - 2)} with R(t)=(n−1)(n−2)ρ02−2(n−2)tR(t) = \frac{(n - 1)(n - 2)}{\rho_0^2 - 2(n - 2)t}. (b) Check that (T−t)R(t)(T - t)R(t) is constant: curvature blows up like 1T−t\frac{1}{T - t}, a Type I singularity (11B.4 Singularities). (c) Why does the R\mathbb{R} factor not move?

Solution

(a) Ric⁡(g(t))=(n−2)gSn−1⊕0\operatorname{Ric}(g(t)) = (n - 2)g_{S^{n-1}}\oplus0 (scale invariance, 9A.4 Curvature and What It Means), so ∂t(ρ2)=−2(n−2)\partial_t(\rho^2) = -2(n - 2). R=(n−1)(n−2)ρ2R = \frac{(n - 1)(n - 2)}{\rho^2}. (b) ρ(t)2=2(n−2)(T−t)\rho(t)^2 = 2(n - 2)(T - t), so (T−t)R=n−12(T - t)R = \frac{n - 1}{2}. (c) Ric⁡\operatorname{Ric} vanishes in the axis direction, so ∂tg(∂z,∂z)=0\partial_tg(\partial_z, \partial_z) = 0.

© 2026 NeckPinch (www.neckpinch.com). All content in the guidebook (text, mathematics, figures and exercises) is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. No part may be copied, republished or redistributed without written permission.