© 2026 NeckPinch · www.neckpinch.com · All rights reserved.
Course 11Book 11B: Solitons, Compactness and SingularitiesChapter 4
Singularities
Blow-ups, neckpinches, degenerate neckpinches and the cigar problem.
Read Hamilton's survey "The formation of singularities in the Ricci flow" (Surveys in Differential Geometry II, 1995), sections on singularity types and blow-ups, with Chow and Knopf's The Ricci Flow: An Introduction, chapters 8–9, and Angenent and Knopf, "An example of neckpinching in Ricci flow on " (Mathematical Research Letters, 2004).
On a closed manifold, a Ricci flow that stops at a finite time does so because curvature blows up (11A.3 Short-Time Existence and Uniqueness). This chapter studies how. Singularities are classified by the rate of blow-up (Type I or Type II), and studied by blowing up: rescaling the flow at points of large curvature and taking a limit with the compactness theorem of 11B.3 Compactness of Ricci Flows. The limits are ancient solutions (11B.2 Ancient Solutions and the Harnack Inequality), in three dimensions with nonnegative curvature (11A.5 Hamilton–Ivey Pinching). The fundamental example is the neckpinch: a 3-sphere shaped like a dumbbell develops a thin neck that pinches off in finite time, while the rest of the manifold stays smooth. Near the pinch, the flow looks like a shrinking round cylinder. Since the manifold does not become singular everywhere at once, a flow that is to continue needs a way past the pinch: surgery.
By the end of this chapter you will be able to:
- define Type I and Type II singularities and describe the blow-up procedure with point picking;
- describe the round shrinking sphere, the neckpinch and the degenerate neckpinch, and their blow-up limits;
- derive the PDE of rotationally symmetric Ricci flow, and bound the neck radius by the cylinder's;
- explain the cigar problem and how Perelman resolved it;
- explain why the three-dimensional flow needs surgery.
Pinching in other flows
A liquid thread pinches off into drops (11B.1 Ricci Solitons). A dumbbell-shaped surface moving by mean curvature flow, the surface analogue of curve shortening (6A.8 Curve Shortening and the First Geometric Flows), develops a thin neck that pinches before the bulbs disappear; Matthew Grayson proved this in 1989. In both cases a singularity forms at a neck, in a region much smaller than the whole object, and the rest is unaffected at first.
Fluids and mean curvature flow live in an ambient space, and their pinch-off is visible there: the object breaks into pieces. The Ricci flow has no ambient space. The neck pinches intrinsically: a 2-sphere in the 3-manifold shrinks to a point while the metric on the two sides stays smooth. The topology does not change by itself; it changes only when surgery cuts the manifold at the neck and caps it off (12B.4 Surgery).
Types of singularities and the blow-up procedure
Let be a Ricci flow on a closed manifold with maximal time . Write , which satisfies (11A.3 Short-Time Existence and Uniqueness). The singularity is
- Type I if stays bounded: curvature blows up at the rate of the shrinking sphere;
- Type II if : curvature blows up faster somewhere.
Blowing up. Choose points with and rescale:
For a limit to exist, the rescaled flows need curvature bounds on large parabolic neighbourhoods of . Point picking arranges this: for Type I, choose comparable to ; for Type II, Hamilton chose to nearly maximise over for , which forces on growing neighbourhoods and makes the limit eternal. Given an injectivity radius bound at , the compactness theorem (11B.3 Compactness of Ricci Flows) gives a limit, an ancient (Type I) or eternal (Type II) solution. In dimension three, by Hamilton–Ivey (11A.5 Hamilton–Ivey Pinching), its curvature is nonnegative.
Examples
The round sphere. or any with constant curvature shrinks to a point; every blow-up limit is the shrinking round sphere (or quotient). This is Type I, and it is what Hamilton's theorem (11A.6 Hamilton’s 1982 Theorem) says happens whenever initially.
The neckpinch. Consider rotationally symmetric metrics on , closed off at the ends to make . With (arc length) and the warped-product curvatures of 9A.5 Computing Curvature, the Ricci flow becomes (Exercise 4.1)
Sigurd Angenent and Dan Knopf (2004) proved that if the initial metric has a sufficiently thin neck between two large bulbs (and satisfies some technical conditions), then the neck pinches at a finite time , the bulbs stay large, and near the neck
the neck shrinks exactly like the round cylinder , a Type I singularity whose blow-up limit is the shrinking cylinder. Miles Simon (2000) had shown earlier that such necks pinch. Figure 4.1 shows a computed example, and Figure 4.2 its blow-up.
The degenerate neckpinch. If the neck is placed asymmetrically so that one bulb is barely larger than the neck, the bulb and the neck can pinch simultaneously. The singularity is then at the tip of a shrinking "cap" and is Type II. Hui-Ling Gu and Xi-Ping Zhu (2008) proved that Type II singularities form for suitable rotationally symmetric metrics on , and Angenent, Isenberg and Knopf (2015) analysed the degenerate neckpinch in detail: its blow-up at the tip, with Hamilton's point picking, is the Bryant soliton (11B.1 Ricci Solitons).
The cigar problem. In dimension three, the cigar times a line (11B.1 Ricci Solitons) is a steady soliton with nonnegative curvature: an eternal solution of exactly the kind Type II blow-ups produce. Hamilton could not rule out that it appears as a blow-up limit, and if it did, his program would stall: near such a singularity the manifold would look like a thin tube with a cap, not like a neck that can be cut. Perelman resolved the problem: the cigar times a line is not -noncollapsed at large scales (9B.3 Collapsing and Noncollapsing), while every blow-up limit is, by his noncollapsing theorem (12A.4 κ-Noncollapsing). So the cigar never appears.
Why surgery
The neckpinch shows that a three-dimensional Ricci flow can develop a singularity on a small set (the neck's central sphere) while most of the manifold is smooth. The flow cannot be continued as a smooth flow past : the metric degenerates on the neck. Hamilton proposed to stop the flow just before the neck pinches, cut along the central 2-sphere of the neck, glue in two caps (round hemispheres, suitably bent), and restart the flow. Topologically, cutting a neck undoes a connected sum or removes an summand (10A.3 The Prime Decomposition). Making this work requires knowing that every high-curvature region looks like a neck or a cap (so that there is always somewhere to cut), and that surgeries do not accumulate. Hamilton did this for four-manifolds with positive isotropic curvature (1997). Perelman did it for every three-manifold (12B.3 The Canonical Neighbourhood Theorem–12B.5 Ricci Flow with Surgery for All Time).
The cigar problem needed noncollapsing (12A.4 κ-Noncollapsing). Classifying the possible blow-up limits needed the theory of -solutions (12B.1 κ-Solutions, 12B.2 The Structure of κ-Solutions). Knowing that high curvature always looks like a neck or a cap needed the canonical neighbourhood theorem (12B.3 The Canonical Neighbourhood Theorem). 11B.5 Hamilton’s Program in 2002 lists these gaps as they stood in 2002.
History
Hamilton classified singularity types and introduced point picking in his 1995 survey, where he also posed the cigar problem. Grayson's dumbbell neckpinch for mean curvature flow appeared in 1989. Miles Simon (2000) proved neckpinching for a class of rotationally symmetric metrics, Angenent and Knopf (2004) gave the precise asymptotics, Gu and Zhu (2008) proved the existence of Type II singularities on spheres, and Angenent, Isenberg and Knopf (2015) analysed degenerate neckpinches.
At a finite singular time, curvature blows up at least like : Type I at exactly that rate, Type II faster. Blowing up with point picking and compactness gives ancient (Type I) or eternal (Type II) limits, with nonnegative curvature in dimension three. Round spheres shrink to round points. Rotationally symmetric dumbbells develop neckpinches, with and cylinder blow-ups; degenerate neckpinches are Type II with Bryant-soliton blow-ups. The cigar times a line was the feared Type II model, excluded by Perelman's noncollapsing. Singularities on small sets force surgery: cut necks, cap, restart. 11B.5 Hamilton’s Program in 2002 summarises Hamilton's program and its gaps in 2002.
Exercises
For , use the curvatures of 9A.5 Computing Curvature with the arc length: , and on unit vectors tangent to the spheres . Show that gives the two equations in the text.
Solution
The component: , so . The sphere component: , so , at fixed .
At a minimum of in the interior, and . Show that satisfies (in the sense of 9B.7 The Heat Equation on a Manifold). If the neck pinches at , deduce , so the curvature at the neck is at least that of the shrinking cylinder.
Solution
At the minimum, , so there; Hamilton's trick gives the same for . Integrating from to , where : . The sectional curvature of the sphere factor at the neck, , is then at least .
Suppose on and . Show that the rescaled flows satisfy for . So the curvature is bounded on uniformly in , as the compactness theorem requires.
Solution
.
In a few sentences: explain why the neckpinch, unlike the round sphere, cannot be handled by "stopping the flow and declaring the manifold understood", and what topological operation surgery performs on and on when it cuts one neck.
Solution
When a round sphere becomes singular, the whole manifold shrinks to a point and becomes round: its topology is identified (). At a neckpinch, only the neck becomes singular; the two bulbs are large and their geometry is arbitrary, so nothing is learned about their topology, and the flow must continue to reveal it. Surgery cuts the neck's central 2-sphere and caps both sides. On a dumbbell the sphere separates, and the result is two 3-spheres (undoing ). On with a neck around the circle, the sphere is non-separating and surgery leaves one : the summand has been removed.
Recall from 9B.3 Collapsing and Noncollapsing that fails to be -noncollapsed at large scales for every . Explain why a blow-up limit of a flow that is -noncollapsed at scales below is -noncollapsed at all scales, so it cannot be . (Use the scale invariance of the definition.)
Solution
If is -noncollapsed at scales below , then is -noncollapsed at scales below (9B.3 Collapsing and Noncollapsing). As these scales grow without bound, and noncollapsing at each fixed scale passes to smooth limits. So the limit is -noncollapsed at every scale, which is not.
© 2026 NeckPinch (www.neckpinch.com). All content in the guidebook (text, mathematics, figures and exercises) is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. No part may be copied, republished or redistributed without written permission.