Book 11B

© 2026 NeckPinch · www.neckpinch.com · All rights reserved.

Course 11Book 11B: Solitons, Compactness and SingularitiesChapter 2

Ancient Solutions and the Harnack Inequality

Comparing curvature across space and time.

16 min read · Updated Oct 3, 2026

Read Hamilton's "The Harnack estimate for the Ricci flow" (Journal of Differential Geometry 37, 1993) and "Eternal solutions to the Ricci flow" (Journal of Differential Geometry 38, 1993), with Chow, Lu and Ni's Hamilton's Ricci Flow, chapter 10, as the reference account. 6A.10 Entropy, Information and Diffusion and 9B.7 The Heat Equation on a Manifold gave the Li–Yau inequality, its ancestor.

In this chapter · 7 sections
  1. 2.1The ancestor
  2. 2.2Ancient solutions
  3. 2.3Hamilton's Harnack inequality
  4. 2.4Comparing curvature across space-time
  5. 2.5Eternal solutions and rigidity
  6. 2.6History
  7. 2.7Exercises

Singularity models live forever in the past. When you blow up a flow near a singularity, rescaling by a large factor QQ, the time interval before the singularity is stretched by QQ as well. In the limit it becomes infinitely long: the model is an ancient solution, defined for all t∈(−∞,T)t \in (-\infty, T). Ancient solutions are rigid, because they have had infinite time to smooth out, and Hamilton's main tool for exploiting this is his Harnack inequality for the Ricci flow (1993). It is a differential inequality for the curvature, the analogue of the Li–Yau inequality for positive solutions of the heat equation, and it lets one compare curvature at different points and times. For ancient solutions with nonnegative curvature operator it gives ∂tR≥0\partial_tR \geq 0: curvature can only increase in time at each point.

By the end of this chapter you will be able to:

  • define ancient, eternal and immortal solutions, and explain why blow-up limits are ancient;
  • state the trace form of Hamilton's Harnack inequality and describe the matrix form;
  • deduce ∂tR≥0\partial_tR \geq 0 for ancient solutions with nonnegative curvature operator;
  • integrate the inequality along a space-time path to compare curvatures;
  • state Hamilton's rigidity theorem for eternal solutions, and check it on the cigar.

The ancestor

In the world Model Heat now bounds heat later

For a positive solution uu of the heat equation on Rn\mathbb{R}^n (or on a manifold with Ric⁡≥0\operatorname{Ric} \geq 0), the Li–Yau inequality (9B.7 The Heat Equation on a Manifold) says ∣∇u∣2u2−∂tuu≤n2t\frac{|\nabla u|^2}{u^2} - \frac{\partial_tu}{u} \leq \frac{n}{2t}. Integrated along a path, it says that the temperature at a point x2x_2 at a later time t2t_2 is at least the temperature at x1x_1 at an earlier time t1t_1, reduced by a factor (t1t2)n/2e−∣x1−x2∣2/4(t2−t1)\big(\frac{t_1}{t_2}\big)^{n/2}e^{-|x_1 - x_2|^2/4(t_2 - t_1)}: heat cannot disappear faster than diffusion allows. The Gaussian heat kernel, a self-similar solution, makes the inequality an equality. Hamilton's Harnack inequality is the same kind of statement, with the temperature replaced by the scalar curvature, the heat equation by the Ricci flow, and the Gaussian by the expanding gradient solitons.

Ancient solutions

A Ricci flow defined for t∈(−∞,T)t \in (-\infty, T) is ancient; one defined for all t∈Rt \in \mathbb{R} is eternal; one defined on (0,∞)(0, \infty), or [0,∞)[0, \infty), is immortal. Examples:

  • shrinking round spheres and cylinders, and all shrinking solitons, are ancient;
  • steady solitons, such as the cigar and the Bryant soliton (11B.1 Ricci Solitons), are eternal;
  • the King–Rosenau sausage on S2S^2 (11A.7 Ricci Flow on Surfaces) is ancient but not a soliton;
  • hyperbolic metrics and expanding solitons are immortal.

Why blow-up limits are ancient. If g(t)g(t) exists on [0,T)[0, T) and Qk→∞Q_k \to \infty, the rescaled flows gk(s)=Qkg(tk+sQk)g_k(s) = Q_kg(t_k + \frac{s}{Q_k}) exist for s∈[−Qktk,Qk(T−tk))s \in [-Q_kt_k, Q_k(T - t_k)). If tkt_k stays away from 00, the left end −Qktk→−∞-Q_kt_k \to -\infty, and any limit flow (11B.3 Compactness of Ricci Flows) is defined for all negative times (Exercise 2.5).

Hamilton's Harnack inequality

Theorem 2.1 Hamilton's Harnack inequality (1993), trace form

Let g(t)g(t), t∈(0,T)t \in (0, T), be a complete Ricci flow with bounded curvature and nonnegative curvature operator. Then for every vector field VV,

∂tR+Rt+2⟨∇R,V⟩+2Ric⁡(V,V)≥0.\partial_tR + \frac Rt + 2\langle\nabla R, V\rangle + 2\operatorname{Ric}(V, V) \geq 0.

This is the trace of the matrix Harnack inequality: a certain quadratic form, built from Ric⁡\operatorname{Ric}, its first and second derivatives, the curvature tensor and 12tRic⁡\frac{1}{2t}\operatorname{Ric}, is nonnegative on all pairs (a vector WW and a 2-form UU). Hamilton proved it with the maximum principle for systems (11A.4 Maximum Principles under Ricci Flow), applied to the evolution equation of this quadratic form. The proof is a long computation, and the guide does not reproduce it.

Equality. For an expanding gradient soliton with nonnegative curvature operator, after shifting time so that the soliton emerges at t=0t = 0, the trace inequality holds with equality for the right choice of VV, the gradient of the soliton potential up to sign and normalisation. Solitons are the equality cases of Harnack inequalities, as the Gaussian is for Li–Yau.

Ancient solutions. If g(t)g(t) is ancient, apply the theorem on (t0,T)(t_0, T), so that 1t\frac1t becomes 1t−t0\frac{1}{t - t_0}, and let t0→−∞t_0 \to -\infty. With V=0V = 0:

Corollary 2.2 Curvature increases on ancient solutions

On a complete ancient solution with bounded, nonnegative curvature operator, ∂tR≥0\partial_tR \geq 0 at every point.

Comparing curvature across space-time

Integrating the trace inequality along a path, with VV chosen as half the velocity of the path, gives (Exercise 2.7):

Proposition 2.3 Integrated Harnack

Under the hypotheses of Theorem 2.1, for 0<t1<t20 < t_1 < t_2 and points x1,x2x_1, x_2,

R(x2,t2)≥t1t2exp⁡(−dt1(x1,x2)22(t2−t1))R(x1,t1),R(x_2, t_2) \geq \frac{t_1}{t_2}\exp\Big(-\frac{d_{t_1}(x_1, x_2)^2}{2(t_2 - t_1)}\Big)R(x_1, t_1),

where dt1d_{t_1} is the distance at time t1t_1.

Curvature cannot be large at one place and time and then disappear immediately nearby: wherever it was large, it stays comparably large a little later, at nearby points. This is one of the tools for showing that blow-up limits have bounded curvature on their whole past, and in Perelman's work it is replaced by the more powerful reduced distance (12A.5 Reduced Distance and Reduced Volume), whose definition is modelled on the path integral in this estimate.

Figure 2.1. The integrated Harnack inequality compares RR at (x2,t2)(x_2, t_2) with RR at an earlier point (x1,t1)(x_1, t_1), along a path in space-time. The loss factor depends on t1t2\frac{t_1}{t_2} and on d2t2−t1\frac{d^2}{t_2 - t_1}, as for the heat equation.

Eternal solutions and rigidity

Theorem 2.4 Hamilton's rigidity for eternal solutions (1993)

Let g(t)g(t), t∈Rt \in \mathbb{R}, be a complete eternal solution with bounded nonnegative curvature operator and positive Ricci curvature, such that RR attains its maximum over space and time at some point (x0,t0)(x_0, t_0). Then g(t)g(t) is a steady gradient soliton.

The idea: at the space-time maximum, the Harnack quantity attains its minimum value 00, and a strong maximum principle for the matrix Harnack form makes it vanish identically; the vanishing is exactly the soliton equation. The cigar is the example: in coordinates where it moves by diffeomorphisms, it is g(t)=dx2+dy2e4t+x2+y2g(t) = \frac{dx^2 + dy^2}{e^{4t} + x^2 + y^2}, with R=4e4te4t+x2+y2R = \frac{4e^{4t}}{e^{4t} + x^2 + y^2}. At each fixed point RR increases in time, and R(0,t)=4R(0, t) = 4 is the maximum over all of space-time (Figure 2.2, Exercise 2.8). Hamilton used the theorem in his attack on the cigar problem: a Type II blow-up limit in dimension three with these properties would split off a cigar factor (11B.4 Singularities).

Figure 2.2. The cigar as an eternal solution, g(t)=dx2+dy2e4t+r2g(t) = \frac{dx^2 + dy^2}{e^{4t} + r^2}: scalar curvature against the coordinate radius rr at t=−1,0,1t = -1, 0, 1 (computed). At each point RR increases with tt (∂tR≥0\partial_tR \geq 0), and the space-time maximum 44 is attained at the tip at every time, as Hamilton's rigidity theorem requires of a steady soliton.
Where this goes Where the Harnack inequality is used

11B.4 Singularities uses it to control blow-up limits of Type II singularities. In 12B.1 κ-Solutions it is part of the definition of a κ\kappa-solution's good behaviour: κ\kappa-solutions have ∂tR≥0\partial_tR \geq 0, which with noncollapsing gives the compactness of κ\kappa-solutions in 12B.2 The Structure of κ-Solutions. Perelman's reduced distance (12A.5 Reduced Distance and Reduced Volume) generalises the path integral in the integrated form.

History

Peter Li and Shing-Tung Yau proved their inequality for the heat equation in 1986. Hamilton proved the Harnack inequality for the Ricci flow on surfaces in 1988, in general dimension in 1993, and the rigidity of eternal solutions the same year. Bennett Chow and Sun-Chin Chu (1995) interpreted the Harnack quantity geometrically, as the curvature of a connection on space-time. Ancient solutions were studied systematically after Perelman, who made them central.

Recall Where we stand

Blow-up limits are ancient, defined for all negative times. On complete flows with bounded nonnegative curvature operator, Hamilton's Harnack inequality ∂tR+Rt+2⟨∇R,V⟩+2Ric⁡(V,V)≥0\partial_tR + \frac Rt + 2\langle\nabla R, V\rangle + 2\operatorname{Ric}(V, V) \geq 0 holds, with equality on expanding gradient solitons; for ancient solutions it gives ∂tR≥0\partial_tR \geq 0. Integrated along paths, it bounds R(x2,t2)R(x_2, t_2) below by t1t2e−d2/2(t2−t1)R(x1,t1)\frac{t_1}{t_2}e^{-d^2/2(t_2 - t_1)}R(x_1, t_1). An eternal solution with positive Ricci curvature whose scalar curvature attains a space-time maximum is a steady soliton; the cigar is the example. 11B.3 Compactness of Ricci Flows gives the compactness theorem that produces limits in the first place.

Exercises

Exercise 2.5 Blow-up limits are ancient

Let g(t)g(t) exist on [0,T)[0, T), and suppose tk→Tt_k \to T and Qk→∞Q_k \to \infty. Show that gk(s)=Qkg(tk+sQk)g_k(s) = Q_kg(t_k + \frac{s}{Q_k}) is defined for s∈[−Qktk,Qk(T−tk))s \in [-Q_kt_k, Q_k(T - t_k)) and is a Ricci flow (11A.1 The Equation and Its First Solutions). Why does −Qktk→−∞-Q_kt_k \to -\infty? What extra condition makes the limit eternal rather than only ancient?

Solution

tk+sQk∈[0,T)t_k + \frac{s}{Q_k} \in [0, T) iff s∈[−Qktk,Qk(T−tk))s \in [-Q_kt_k, Q_k(T - t_k)); parabolic rescaling preserves the equation. Since tk→T>0t_k \to T > 0, Qktk→∞Q_kt_k \to \infty. The limit is eternal if also Qk(T−tk)→∞Q_k(T - t_k) \to \infty, which happens for Type II singularities with suitable point picking (11B.4 Singularities); for Type I one has Qk(T−tk)Q_k(T - t_k) bounded and the limit is ancient only.

Exercise 2.6 ∂tR≥0\partial_tR \geq 0

Apply the trace Harnack inequality on (t0,T)(t_0, T) to an ancient solution, with V=0V = 0, and let t0→−∞t_0 \to -\infty to obtain ∂tR≥0\partial_tR \geq 0. Check it on the shrinking round sphere, R=n(n−1)2(n−1)(T−t)R = \frac{n(n - 1)}{2(n - 1)(T - t)}.

Solution

On (t0,T)(t_0, T), the theorem gives ∂tR+Rt−t0≥0\partial_tR + \frac{R}{t - t_0} \geq 0. As t0→−∞t_0 \to -\infty, Rt−t0→0\frac{R}{t - t_0} \to 0 (since RR is bounded at each time). For the sphere, R=n2(T−t)R = \frac{n}{2(T - t)} and ∂tR=n2(T−t)2>0\partial_tR = \frac{n}{2(T - t)^2} > 0.

Exercise 2.7 The integrated form

Let γ:[t1,t2]→M\gamma : [t_1, t_2] \to M be a path from x1x_1 to x2x_2, and L(t)=log⁡R(γ(t),t)L(t) = \log R(\gamma(t), t). (a) Show L′=∂tR+⟨∇R,γ′⟩RL' = \frac{\partial_tR + \langle\nabla R, \gamma'\rangle}{R}. (b) Apply the trace inequality with V=12γ′V = \frac12\gamma', and use Ric⁡≤Rg\operatorname{Ric} \leq Rg (true when the curvature operator is nonnegative) to get L′≥−1t−12∣γ′∣g(t)2L' \geq -\frac1t - \frac12|\gamma'|^2_{g(t)}. (c) Integrate, choose γ\gamma a g(t1)g(t_1)-geodesic of constant speed, and use that the metric shrinks (Ric⁡≥0\operatorname{Ric} \geq 0) to obtain the proposition.

Solution

(a) Chain rule. (b) The inequality with V=12γ′V = \frac12\gamma': ∂tR≥−Rt−⟨∇R,γ′⟩−12Ric⁡(γ′,γ′)\partial_tR \geq -\frac Rt - \langle\nabla R, \gamma'\rangle - \frac12\operatorname{Ric}(\gamma', \gamma'), so ∂tR+⟨∇R,γ′⟩≥−Rt−12R∣γ′∣2\partial_tR + \langle\nabla R, \gamma'\rangle \geq -\frac Rt - \frac12R|\gamma'|^2. Divide by RR. (c) L(t2)−L(t1)≥−log⁡t2t1−12∫t1t2∣γ′∣g(t)2dtL(t_2) - L(t_1) \geq -\log\frac{t_2}{t_1} - \frac12\int_{t_1}^{t_2}|\gamma'|^2_{g(t)}dt. Since ∂tg=−2Ric⁡≤0\partial_tg = -2\operatorname{Ric} \leq 0, ∣γ′∣g(t)≤∣γ′∣g(t1)=dt1(x1,x2)t2−t1|\gamma'|_{g(t)} \leq |\gamma'|_{g(t_1)} = \frac{d_{t_1}(x_1, x_2)}{t_2 - t_1}, so the integral is at most dt12t2−t1\frac{d_{t_1}^2}{t_2 - t_1}. Exponentiate.

Exercise 2.8 The cigar as an eternal solution

Show that g(t)=dx2+dy2e4t+r2g(t) = \frac{dx^2 + dy^2}{e^{4t} + r^2} is a Ricci flow, using that dx2+dy2a+r2\frac{dx^2 + dy^2}{a + r^2} is the cigar rescaled (substitute x=a yx = \sqrt a\,y) and so has R=4aa+r2R = \frac{4a}{a + r^2}. Show ∂tR≥0\partial_tR \geq 0 at each point and max⁡R=4\max R = 4 for every tt.

Solution

With x=a yx = \sqrt a\,y, ∣dx∣2a+∣x∣2=∣dy∣21+∣y∣2\frac{|dx|^2}{a + |x|^2} = \frac{|dy|^2}{1 + |y|^2}, the cigar, with R=41+∣y∣2=4aa+r2R = \frac{4}{1 + |y|^2} = \frac{4a}{a + r^2}. With a=e4ta = e^{4t}: ∂tg=−4e4t(e4t+r2)2∣dx∣2\partial_tg = -\frac{4e^{4t}}{(e^{4t} + r^2)^2}|dx|^2 and −2Ric⁡=−Rg=−4e4te4t+r2⋅∣dx∣2e4t+r2-2\operatorname{Ric} = -Rg = -\frac{4e^{4t}}{e^{4t} + r^2}\cdot\frac{|dx|^2}{e^{4t} + r^2}: equal. ∂tR=16e4tr2(e4t+r2)2≥0\partial_tR = \frac{16e^{4t}r^2}{(e^{4t} + r^2)^2} \geq 0, and R≤4R \leq 4 with equality at r=0r = 0.

Exercise 2.9 Rehearsal: Harnack on the cylinder

On the shrinking cylinder S2×RS^2\times\mathbb{R} with ρ2=2(T−t)\rho^2 = 2(T - t), R=1T−tR = \frac{1}{T - t} is constant in space. Check the trace Harnack inequality for every VV, with tt replaced by t−t0t - t_0 for any t0<tt_0 < t. When is it closest to equality?

Solution

∇R=0\nabla R = 0, ∂tR=1(T−t)2\partial_tR = \frac{1}{(T - t)^2}, and Ric⁡(V,V)≥0\operatorname{Ric}(V, V) \geq 0. So the left side is 1(T−t)2+1(T−t)(t−t0)+2Ric⁡(V,V)>0\frac{1}{(T - t)^2} + \frac{1}{(T - t)(t - t_0)} + 2\operatorname{Ric}(V, V) > 0. It is smallest for VV along the R\mathbb{R} factor (where Ric⁡(V,V)=0\operatorname{Ric}(V, V) = 0) and t0→−∞t_0 \to -\infty, giving 1(T−t)2>0\frac{1}{(T - t)^2} > 0: strict. The cylinder is a shrinking soliton, and the trace inequality is an equality only for expanding ones.

© 2026 NeckPinch (www.neckpinch.com). All content in the guidebook (text, mathematics, figures and exercises) is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. No part may be copied, republished or redistributed without written permission.