The variation formulas and the evolution equations, computed once and carefully.
19 min read · Updated Oct 3, 2026
Read with Topping's Lectures on the Ricci Flow, chapter 2 (Riemannian geometry background and the evolution of curvature), and Chow and Knopf's The Ricci Flow: An Introduction, chapter 3 (the evolution equations), using its Appendix A only as a reference for the index calculus of 8A.7 Tensors and Index Notation and 9A.6 The Laplacian and the Bochner Formula.
Under the Ricci flow the metric changes, so its curvature changes, and the curvature is what drives the flow. This chapter computes how. The result is a family of reaction–diffusion equations: each curvature quantity satisfies a heat equation (diffusion) with a quadratic term in the curvature (reaction). The scalar curvature satisfies
∂tR=ΔR+2∣Ric∣2,
the Ricci tensor evolves by the Lichnerowicz Laplacian, and the full curvature tensor by ΔRm+Q(Rm). In dimension three, the reaction term reduces to an ODE for three eigenvalues. The ODE describes what curvature does when diffusion is ignored, and the maximum principles of 11A.4 Maximum Principles under Ricci Flow make that precise.
The chapter is pure computation, by design. The derivations are done once, in full, for a general variation ∂tg=h, and then specialised to h=−2Ric. Every formula is checked on the exact solutions of 11A.1 The Equation and Its First Solutions.
By the end of this chapter you will be able to:
derive the variations of the Christoffel symbols, the Ricci tensor, the scalar curvature and the volume form under ∂tg=h;
derive the evolution of R, Ric and dV under the Ricci flow;
state the evolution of the curvature tensor and explain Uhlenbeck's trick;
write the three-dimensional curvature ODE and describe its phase portrait;
check each formula on shrinking spheres and cylinders.
Let g(t) be any family of metrics with ∂tgij=hij. All the formulas below are tensorial, so they can be checked at a point in coordinates in which the Christoffel symbols vanish (9A.3 Geodesics and the Exponential Map); this is how each is derived.
Figure 2.1. The order of the computation: ∂tΓ from h (as in 9A.2 Connections), then ∂tRm from ∇∂tΓ, then Ric and R by contraction, using ∂tg−1=−h. The volume form needs only trh.
Proof.Scalar curvature.⟨h,Ric⟩=−2∣Ric∣2. By the contracted Bianchi identity (9A.4 Curvature and What It Means), ∇kRjk=21∇jR, so divdivh=−2∇j∇kRjk=−ΔR. And Δtrh=−2ΔR. So ∂tR=2∣Ric∣2−ΔR+2ΔR.
Ricci tensor. The variation formula gives ∂tRjk=ΔRjk+∇j∇kR−∇m∇jRkm−∇m∇kRjm. Commute the derivatives in the last two terms with the Ricci identities of 9A.6 The Laplacian and the Bochner Formula: ∇m∇jRkm=∇j∇mRkm+(curvature⋅Ric)=21∇j∇kR+(curvature⋅Ric). The second-derivative terms in R cancel, and the curvature terms are exactly those of ΔL. (The sign of the middle term was checked against the shrinking sphere in 9A.6 The Laplacian and the Bochner Formula.)
Volume.21trh=−R.
Curvature tensor. The same steps applied to ∂tRijkl give ΔRm plus terms quadratic in Rm (from commuting derivatives) and terms Ric∗Rm (from lowering indices with the changing metric); Hamilton (1982) wrote them out.
Checks on the exact solutions (Exercise 2.3): on the shrinking unit sphere in dimension n, R=1−2(n−1)tn(n−1), and R′=2∣Ric∣2=n2R2, since Ric is a multiple of g and R is constant in space. On the shrinking cylinder S2×R, R=ρ22 and ∣Ric∣2=ρ42=2R2, so R′=R2, which matches ρ2=ρ02−2t.
The quadratic term Q(Rm) is clean only in the right frame. Uhlenbeck's trick evolves an orthonormal frame {ea} by ∂tea=Ric(ea) (raising an index with g), which keeps it orthonormal for g(t) (Exercise 2.4). Written in this moving frame, the curvature tensor evolves by a heat equation whose reaction term involves no Ricci-times-Riemann terms, only an intrinsic quadratic in the curvature.
Hamilton (1986) wrote this reaction term through the curvature operator. Here the literature's normalisation differs from the one in 9A.5 Computing Curvature. Hamilton's operator M is twice the guide's R: on the unit sphere, M=2id, and in dimension three its eigenvalues are twice the sectional curvatures of the eigenplanes, with R=trM. With that normalisation,
∂tM=ΔM+M2+M#,
where M# is a quadratic expression built from the Lie algebra structure of Λ2≅so(n). In dimension three, M# is the adjugate: if M=diag(λ,μ,ν), then M#=diag(μν,λν,λμ). Ignoring the Laplacian gives the three-dimensional curvature ODE
Checks. The unit sphere: λ=μ=ν=2K with K=1−4t1, and (2K)′=8K2=(2K)2+(2K)2. The cylinder S2×R: λ=ρ22, μ=ν=0, and λ′=λ2, while μ and ν stay 0.
Figure 2.2. Trajectories of the three-dimensional curvature ODE, drawn in the ratios (λμ,λν) (computed). The shaded region ν≥0 (nonnegative curvature) is invariant. Trajectories move toward (1,1), the round sphere, as the curvature blows up, including ones that start with ν<0: negative curvature becomes small relative to the largest eigenvalue, the mechanism behind Hamilton–Ivey pinching (11A.5 Hamilton–Ivey Pinching). The cylinder (0,0) is a fixed point, but an unstable one.
Where this goesReaction against diffusion
Every evolution equation in this chapter has the same shape: diffusion, which averages and smooths, plus a quadratic reaction, which in positive curvature drives blow-up. The maximum principles of 11A.4 Maximum Principles under Ricci Flow use the diffusion to show that the reaction's invariant sets are respected. 11A.6 Hamilton’s 1982 Theorem uses them to show that positive Ricci curvature in dimension three becomes round, and 11A.5 Hamilton–Ivey Pinching that negative curvature becomes negligible where curvature is large.
Hamilton derived the evolution equations in his 1982 paper, introduced the curvature operator form with M2+M# in "Four-manifolds with positive curvature operator" (1986), and used the moving frames that Karen Uhlenbeck had suggested. The Lichnerowicz Laplacian dates from Lichnerowicz's 1961 work on Einstein deformations.
RecallWhere we stand
For ∂tg=h: ∂tΓ=21g−1(∇h+∇h−∇h), ∂tRm=∇∂tΓ−∇∂tΓ, ∂tR=−⟨h,Ric⟩+divdivh−Δtrh, ∂tdV=21trhdV. Under the Ricci flow: ∂tR=ΔR+2∣Ric∣2, ∂tRic=ΔLRic, ∂tRm=ΔRm+Q(Rm), ∂tdV=−RdV. In Uhlenbeck's frame and Hamilton's normalisation, ∂tM=ΔM+M2+M#; in dimension three its reaction is the ODE λ′=λ2+μν and cyclically, whose trajectories approach round curvature. All formulas check on spheres and cylinders. 11A.3 Short-Time Existence and Uniqueness shows the flow exists.
At a point where Γ=0, substitute ∂tΓjkl=21glm(∇jhkm+∇khjm−∇mhjk) into ∂tRjk=∇l∂tΓjkl−∇j∂tΓlkl to obtain the formula in the text. Then contract with gjk to derive ∂tR.
Solution
∇l∂tΓjkl=21(∇m∇jhkm+∇m∇khjm−Δhjk); ∂tΓlkl=21glm(∇lhkm+∇khlm−∇mhlk)=21∇ktrh, the first and third terms cancelling. Contracting: gjk∂tRjk=21(2divdivh−Δtrh−Δtrh)=divdivh−Δtrh, and ∂tR=(∂tgjk)Rjk+gjk∂tRjk with ∂tgjk=−hjk.
Exercise 2.3Checking on exact solutions
(a) On the shrinking round Sn with r(t)2=1−2(n−1)t, check ∂tR=2∣Ric∣2. (b) On S2(ρ(t))×R, check ∂tR=2∣Ric∣2 and ∂tRic=ΔLRic (with ΔRic=0, since the cylinder's curvature is parallel). (c) Check ∂tVol=−∫R on the sphere.
Solution
(a) R=r2n(n−1), R′=r4n(n−1)⋅2(n−1); ∣Ric∣2=nr4(n−1)2. (b) R=ρ22, R′=ρ44 (ρ2′=−2); Ric=ρ21gS2(ρ) restricted, eigenvalues ρ21,ρ21,0, so 2∣Ric∣2=ρ44. For Ricci: as a tensor, Ric=gS2(1)⊕0 is constant in time, so ∂tRic=0; and 2RpjkqRpq−2RjpRpk: on the S2 factor, with Ric=ρ21g there and constant curvature ρ21, the first term is 2⋅ρ21⋅ρ21(2−1)gjk=ρ42gjk and the second is ρ42gjk, so they cancel; on the line factor both vanish. (c) Vol=∣Sn∣rn, dtdVol=∣Sn∣nrn−1r′=∣Sn∣nrn−2⋅(−(n−1))=−r2n(n−1)∣Sn∣rn=−RVol.
Exercise 2.4Uhlenbeck's frame stays orthonormal
Let ∂tea=Ric(ea), meaning ∂teai=Rijeaj. Show ∂t(g(ea,eb))=0 under the Ricci flow.
Exercise 2.5The ODE preserves order and positivity
For λ′=λ2+μν and cyclically, show (λ−μ)′=(λ−μ)(λ+μ−ν) and (μ−ν)′=(μ−ν)(μ+ν−λ), so the ordering λ≥μ≥ν is preserved. Show also that if ν≥0 initially, then ν≥0 for all later times.
Solution
(λ−μ)′=λ2−μ2+ν(μ−λ)=(λ−μ)(λ+μ−ν); similarly for μ−ν. A linear ODE x′=a(t)x keeps the sign of x. For ν: ν′=ν2+λμ, and while ν≥0 we have μ≥ν≥0 and λ≥0, so ν′≥0 wherever ν=0; more carefully, at a first time where ν reaches 0, ν′=λμ≥0, so ν cannot become negative.
Exercise 2.6Rehearsal: negative curvature becomes relatively small
Suppose ν<0<μ≤λ. Show that dtd(λν)=λ2λ2(μ−ν)+ν2(λ−μ)>0. Explain why this, with λ→∞ at a singularity, suggests that λ∣ν∣ shrinks where curvature is large. 11A.5 Hamilton–Ivey Pinching turns this into the Hamilton–Ivey estimate.
Solution
dtdλν=λ2ν′λ−νλ′=λ2(ν2+λμ)λ−ν(λ2+μν)=λ2λ2(μ−ν)+ν2(λ−μ), a sum of nonnegative terms, positive since μ>ν. So λν, which is negative, increases towards 0: the negative eigenvalue becomes small compared with the largest. Along a blow-up, this is the ODE form of pinching toward nonnegative curvature.