Book 9B

© 2026 NeckPinch · www.neckpinch.com · All rights reserved.

Course 9Book 9B: Comparison, Convergence and Heat on ManifoldsChapter 6

Scalar Curvature and Topology

Positive scalar curvature, its obstructions, and the positive mass theorem.

15 min read · Updated Oct 3, 2026

This chapter is a survey and has no single companion. Petersen's Riemannian Geometry discusses scalar curvature and the Bochner technique; Gromov's long essay "Four lectures on scalar curvature" (2019, arXiv:1908.10612) is a modern overview; the original papers are cited in the text.

In this chapter · 7 sections
  1. 6.1The positive mass theorem
  2. 6.2Negative scalar curvature is cheap
  3. 6.3Positive scalar curvature is obstructed
  4. 6.4Positive scalar curvature survives surgery
  5. 6.5Three dimensions: the classification
  6. 6.6History
  7. 6.7Exercises

Scalar curvature is the weakest of the curvatures: one number per point, the average of all sectional curvatures (9A.4 Curvature and What It Means). Negative scalar curvature says almost nothing about a manifold, since every manifold of dimension at least three carries a metric with negative scalar curvature. Positive scalar curvature is different. It is obstructed: the 3-torus, for example, carries no metric with R>0R > 0. And it can be built: it survives connected sums, through thin necks.

This chapter surveys what is known, at the level needed later. Two reasons make it more than a detour. The Ricci flow preserves positive scalar curvature, and in three dimensions the flow with surgery classifies exactly which closed manifolds carry it. That classification is a consequence of Perelman's work, proved in 12C.1 Reading Off the Topology, and it is stated here only as a target. The second reason is physical. In general relativity, scalar curvature is energy density, and the positive mass theorem turns "R≥0R \geq 0" into "the total mass is nonnegative".

By the end of this chapter you will be able to:

  • explain why negative scalar curvature is unobstructed and positive scalar curvature is not;
  • state the Schoen–Yau and Gromov–Lawson results on the torus and on surgery;
  • describe the Gromov–Lawson neck and check its positive scalar curvature in a rotationally symmetric model;
  • state the classification of closed 3-manifolds with positive scalar curvature, and its status;
  • state the positive mass theorem and compute the scalar curvature of the Schwarzschild metric.

The positive mass theorem

In the world Model Scalar curvature is energy density

In general relativity, a moment of time in an isolated system is described by a three-dimensional Riemannian manifold (M3,g)(M^3, g), the space at that instant, together with data describing how it is moving. When the moment is time-symmetric (nothing is moving at that instant, like a ball at the top of its flight), Einstein's equations reduce to a single constraint on the spatial metric:

R=16πμ(G=c=1),R = 16\pi\mu \qquad (G = c = 1),

where μ\mu is the energy density of matter. Nonnegative energy density means nonnegative scalar curvature. Far from the system, gg approaches the Euclidean metric, and the rate at which it does so defines the total (ADM) mass mm, named after Arnowitt, Deser and Misner.

The positive mass theorem says: if (M3,g)(M^3, g) is complete, asymptotically flat and has R≥0R \geq 0, then m≥0m \geq 0, and m=0m = 0 only for Euclidean space. Richard Schoen and Shing-Tung Yau proved it in 1979, using stable minimal surfaces (9A.8 Submanifolds and Minimal Surfaces); Edward Witten gave a different proof in 1981, using spinors. Physically, a system built from matter with positive energy cannot have negative total mass, however strongly its parts attract each other. In 2001, Gerhard Huisken and Tom Ilmanen (for a connected horizon) and Hubert Bray (in general) proved the stronger Riemannian Penrose inequality m≥A/16πm \geq \sqrt{A/16\pi}, where AA is the area of the outermost minimal surface, the black hole's horizon. Huisken and Ilmanen's proof runs a geometric flow, the inverse mean curvature flow.

Negative scalar curvature is cheap

Jerry Kazdan and Frank Warner showed in 1975 that on a closed manifold of dimension n≥3n \geq 3, every smooth function that is negative somewhere is the scalar curvature of some metric. In particular every closed manifold of dimension at least three has a metric of constant negative scalar curvature. Joachim Lohkamp went further in 1994: every manifold of dimension at least three carries a metric of negative Ricci curvature. So negative curvature conditions of the averaged kinds carry no topological information. Contrast sectional curvature, where K<0K < 0 forces the universal cover to be Rn\mathbb{R}^n (Cartan–Hadamard, 9A.7 Jacobi Fields and Curvature versus Topology).

Positive scalar curvature is obstructed

Three lines of argument obstruct positive scalar curvature (R>0R > 0, "PSC").

  • Spinors (Lichnerowicz, 1963). On a closed spin manifold, a Bochner-type formula for the Dirac operator, D2=∇∗∇+R4D^2 = \nabla^*\nabla + \frac R4, shows that PSC forbids harmonic spinors, and by the index theorem a topological invariant, the A^\hat A-genus, must vanish. Nigel Hitchin (1974) refined the invariant.
  • Minimal hypersurfaces (Schoen–Yau, 1979). The stability argument of 9A.8 Submanifolds and Minimal Surfaces: in a 3-manifold with PSC, every stable minimal surface is a sphere. In T3T^3, minimising area in the homology class of a 2-torus produces a stable minimal torus, a contradiction. So T3T^3 has no metric with R>0R > 0. Schoen and Yau extended the argument by induction on dimension, slicing by minimal hypersurfaces.
  • Enlargeability (Gromov–Lawson, 1980–83). Using spinors on covering spaces, Mikhail Gromov and Blaine Lawson proved that no torus TnT^n, and more generally no closed spin manifold that admits a map of nonzero degree to a torus, carries PSC.

Since TnT^n has a flat metric, the dividing line falls exactly at zero: flat is possible, positive is not. That a torus cannot do better than flat was conjectured by Robert Geroch, and the two proofs above settled it.

Positive scalar curvature survives surgery

Theorem 6.1 Gromov–Lawson, Schoen–Yau

If MnM^n carries a metric of positive scalar curvature and M′M' is obtained from MM by a surgery in codimension at least 33, then M′M' carries a metric of positive scalar curvature. In particular, the connected sum of two manifolds of dimension n≥3n \geq 3 with PSC carries PSC.

A connected sum removes a small ball from each manifold and joins the boundary spheres with a tube Sn−1×[0,1]S^{n-1}\times[0, 1]. The idea of the proof is that a thin tube has huge positive scalar curvature, (n−1)(n−2)/ε2(n - 1)(n - 2)/\varepsilon^2 for a round Sn−1(ε)S^{n-1}(\varepsilon) factor, from its small spheres. The bending needed to attach it can be done with negative curvature contributions that stay smaller. In a rotationally symmetric model you can check this directly (Figure 6.1, Exercise 6.5). Codimension at least 33 is needed so that the attached tube has spheres of dimension at least 22, whose curvature is positive.

Figure 6.1. A rotationally symmetric metric ds2+φ(s)2gS2ds^2 + \varphi(s)^2g_{S^2} on S3=S3#S3S^3 = S^3\#S^3 with positive scalar curvature (computed). A round cylindrical neck of radius 0.150.15 (R=20.152≈89R = \frac{2}{0.15^2} \approx 89) flares out along a solution of 2φφ′′=12(1−φ′2)2\varphi\varphi'' = \frac12(1 - \varphi'^2), on which R=1−φ′2φ2>0R = \frac{1 - \varphi'^2}{\varphi^2} > 0, and joins round caps of radius 0.460.46 at slope 0.60.6 (R=6ρ2≈28.6R = \frac{6}{\rho^2} \approx 28.6). Bottom: RR along the axis, on a logarithmic scale; its minimum, about 4.84.8, is at the joins. RR jumps where φ′′\varphi'' jumps, but any smoothing keeps it positive, because RR depends affinely on φ′′\varphi''.

Three dimensions: the classification

Combining these facts with Perelman's work gives a complete answer in dimension three.

Theorem 6.2 Positive scalar curvature in dimension three

A closed orientable 3-manifold carries a metric of positive scalar curvature if and only if it is a connected sum of spherical space forms S3/ΓS^3/\Gamma and copies of S2×S1S^2\times S^1.

The "if" direction is the surgery theorem: spherical space forms are positively curved, S2×S1S^2\times S^1 has R=2R = 2 with the product metric, and connected sums preserve PSC. The "only if" direction needs the Ricci flow with surgery. PSC is preserved by the flow, since ∂tR≥ΔR+2nR2\partial_tR \geq \Delta R + \frac2nR^2, and it forces the flow to become extinct in finite time (Exercise 6.7). The surgeries cut the manifold along necks into the pieces that are listed. This is proved only in 12C.1 Reading Off the Topology, after the whole of Perelman's argument. Here it is a target, and an example of the kind of topological conclusion the flow delivers.

Where this goes Scalar curvature under the flow

The scalar curvature satisfies ∂tR=ΔR+2∣Ric⁡∣2\partial_tR = \Delta R + 2|\operatorname{Ric}|^2 (11A.2 How Curvature Evolves), and since ∣Ric⁡∣2≥R2n|\operatorname{Ric}|^2 \geq \frac{R^2}{n}, its minimum can only increase. Positive scalar curvature is preserved, and a lower bound improves with time: R≥−n2tR \geq -\frac{n}{2t} for any closed solution. Perelman's entropy (12A.3 The 𝓦-Entropy) contains scalar curvature as its potential term, and its monotonicity is a sharper form of this.

History

Lichnerowicz's vanishing theorem appeared in 1963. Kazdan and Warner's results date from 1975, Lohkamp's from 1994. Schoen and Yau's work on minimal surfaces, scalar curvature and the positive mass theorem appeared in 1979, Gromov and Lawson's surgery theorem in 1980 and their work on enlargeable manifolds in 1983. Witten's proof of the positive mass theorem appeared in 1981. Huisken–Ilmanen and Bray proved the Riemannian Penrose inequality in 2001. The three-dimensional classification followed from Perelman's 2002–03 papers.

Recall Where we stand

Negative scalar (even Ricci) curvature exists on every manifold of dimension at least three. Positive scalar curvature is obstructed: by spinors (A^=0\hat A = 0 on spin manifolds), by stable minimal surfaces (Schoen–Yau: no PSC on T3T^3) and by enlargeability (Gromov–Lawson: no PSC on TnT^n). It is preserved by surgeries of codimension at least three, through thin necks whose small spheres carry large positive curvature. In dimension three, the PSC manifolds are exactly the connected sums of spherical space forms and S2×S1S^2\times S^1, a result proved via the Ricci flow in 12C.1 Reading Off the Topology. In relativity, R=16πμR = 16\pi\mu on time-symmetric data, and R≥0R \geq 0 forces nonnegative total mass. 9B.7 The Heat Equation on a Manifold builds the last tool before the Ricci flow: the heat equation on a closed manifold.

Exercises

Exercise 6.3 The Schwarzschild metric

In dimension 33, show that for g=u4∣dx∣2g = u^4|dx|^2 the conformal formula of 9A.5 Computing Curvature gives Rg=−8u−5ΔuR_g = -8u^{-5}\Delta u, with Δ\Delta the Euclidean Laplacian. Deduce that the spatial Schwarzschild metric g=(1+m2∣x∣)4∣dx∣2g = (1 + \frac{m}{2|x|})^4|dx|^2 on R3∖{0}\mathbb{R}^3\setminus\{0\} has R=0R = 0.

Solution

g=e2w∣dx∣2g = e^{2w}|dx|^2 with w=2log⁡uw = 2\log u. With n=3n = 3 and flat background, Rg=e−2w(−4Δw−2∣∇w∣2)R_g = e^{-2w}(-4\Delta w - 2|\nabla w|^2). Here ∇w=2∇uu\nabla w = \frac{2\nabla u}{u} and Δw=2Δuu−2∣∇u∣2u2\Delta w = \frac{2\Delta u}{u} - \frac{2|\nabla u|^2}{u^2}, so −4Δw−2∣∇w∣2=−8Δuu-4\Delta w - 2|\nabla w|^2 = -\frac{8\Delta u}{u}, and Rg=−8u−5ΔuR_g = -8u^{-5}\Delta u. The function 1+m2∣x∣1 + \frac{m}{2|x|} is harmonic away from 00.

Exercise 6.4 The horizon

For the Schwarzschild metric with m>0m > 0, show that the inversion x↦m24∣x∣2xx \mapsto \frac{m^2}{4|x|^2}x is an isometry fixing the sphere ∣x∣=m2|x| = \frac m2. Deduce that this sphere is totally geodesic, hence minimal, and compute its area. Check that equality holds in the Penrose inequality m≥A/16πm \geq \sqrt{A/16\pi}.

Solution

With r=∣x∣r = |x| and r′=m24rr' = \frac{m^2}{4r}, the conformal factor transforms as (1+m2r′)4∣dx′∣2=(1+2rm)4m416r4∣dx∣2=(m2r+1)4∣dx∣2(1 + \frac{m}{2r'})^4|dx'|^2 = (1 + \frac{2r}{m})^4\frac{m^4}{16r^4}|dx|^2 = (\frac{m}{2r} + 1)^4|dx|^2, using ∣dx′∣=m24r2∣dx∣|dx'| = \frac{m^2}{4r^2}|dx| for an inversion. The fixed set of an isometric reflection is totally geodesic (9A.8 Submanifolds and Minimal Surfaces). At r=m2r = \frac m2, u=2u = 2, so the area is 4πm24⋅16=16πm24\pi\frac{m^2}{4}\cdot16 = 16\pi m^2, and A/16π=m\sqrt{A/16\pi} = m.

Exercise 6.5 The neck in the figure

For g=ds2+φ(s)2gS2g = ds^2 + \varphi(s)^2g_{S^2} on a 3-manifold, the scalar curvature is R=−4φ′′φ+2(1−φ′2)φ2R = -\frac{4\varphi''}{\varphi} + \frac{2(1 - \varphi'^2)}{\varphi^2} (9A.5 Computing Curvature). (a) Show that if 2φφ′′=12(1−φ′2)2\varphi\varphi'' = \frac12(1 - \varphi'^2), then R=1−φ′2φ2R = \frac{1 - \varphi'^2}{\varphi^2}. (b) Show that on a round cap φ=ρsin⁡s0−sρ\varphi = \rho\sin\frac{s_0 - s}{\rho}, R=6ρ2R = \frac{6}{\rho^2}. (c) At a junction where φ\varphi and φ′\varphi' are continuous but φ′′\varphi'' jumps, explain why any smoothing with φ′′\varphi'' between its two one-sided values keeps RR between the two one-sided values of RR.

Solution

(a) −4φ′′φ=−1−φ′2φ2-\frac{4\varphi''}{\varphi} = -\frac{1 - \varphi'^2}{\varphi^2}, and adding 2(1−φ′2)φ2\frac{2(1 - \varphi'^2)}{\varphi^2} gives the claim. (b) φ′′=−φρ2\varphi'' = -\frac{\varphi}{\rho^2} and φ′2=cos⁡2s0−sρ\varphi'^2 = \cos^2\frac{s_0 - s}{\rho}, so 1−φ′2=φ2ρ21 - \varphi'^2 = \frac{\varphi^2}{\rho^2} and R=4ρ2+2ρ2R = \frac{4}{\rho^2} + \frac{2}{\rho^2}. (c) At fixed φ\varphi and φ′\varphi', RR is an affine function of φ′′\varphi'', so it takes values between its values at the endpoints of any interval of φ′′\varphi''.

Exercise 6.6 Which carry positive scalar curvature?

Using Theorem 6.2, decide which of these carry PSC: T3T^3; S2×S1S^2\times S^1; the Poincaré homology sphere; RP3#RP3\mathbb{RP}^3\#\mathbb{RP}^3; a closed hyperbolic 3-manifold; L(5,1)#(S2×S1)L(5, 1)\#(S^2\times S^1).

Solution

T3T^3: no (Schoen–Yau, Gromov–Lawson). S2×S1S^2\times S^1: yes. The Poincaré sphere is S3/ΓS^3/\Gamma with Γ\Gamma the binary icosahedral group (7A.9 The Poincaré Conjecture, Precisely): yes. RP3#RP3\mathbb{RP}^3\#\mathbb{RP}^3: yes, a connected sum of space forms. A hyperbolic manifold is aspherical with infinite fundamental group and is prime, not on the list: no. L(5,1)#(S2×S1)L(5, 1)\#(S^2\times S^1): yes.

Exercise 6.7 Rehearsal: the minimum of scalar curvature

Assume (from 11A.2 How Curvature Evolves) that under the Ricci flow on a closed nn-manifold, ∂tR=ΔR+2∣Ric⁡∣2\partial_tR = \Delta R + 2|\operatorname{Ric}|^2. (a) Using ∣Ric⁡∣2≥R2n|\operatorname{Ric}|^2 \geq \frac{R^2}{n} and the maximum principle argument of 6A.4 Maximum Principles (at a spatial minimum, ΔR≥0\Delta R \geq 0), show that ρ(t)=min⁡R(⋅,t)\rho(t) = \min R(\cdot, t) satisfies ρ′≥2nρ2\rho' \geq \frac2n\rho^2 in the sense of forward difference quotients. (b) If ρ(0)>0\rho(0) > 0, deduce ρ(t)≥ρ(0)1−2nρ(0)t\rho(t) \geq \frac{\rho(0)}{1 - \frac{2}{n}\rho(0)t}, so the flow cannot exist beyond T=n2ρ(0)T = \frac{n}{2\rho(0)}. (c) Check it on the round sphere, where ρ(0)=n(n−1)\rho(0) = n(n - 1) and the true extinction time is 12(n−1)\frac{1}{2(n - 1)}.

Solution

(a) At a point where R(⋅,t)R(\cdot, t) attains its minimum, ΔR≥0\Delta R \geq 0, so ∂tR≥2nR2=2nρ2\partial_tR \geq \frac2nR^2 = \frac2n\rho^2 there; Hamilton's trick (6A.4 Maximum Principles) turns this into the differential inequality for ρ\rho. (b) Compare with the solution of y′=2ny2y' = \frac2ny^2, y(0)=ρ(0)y(0) = \rho(0), which is ρ(0)1−2nρ(0)t\frac{\rho(0)}{1 - \frac2n\rho(0)t} and blows up at n2ρ(0)\frac{n}{2\rho(0)}; RR is finite while the flow exists. (c) n2n(n−1)=12(n−1)\frac{n}{2n(n - 1)} = \frac{1}{2(n - 1)}: the bound is sharp for the sphere, where RR is constant and ∣Ric⁡∣2=R2n|\operatorname{Ric}|^2 = \frac{R^2}{n} exactly.

© 2026 NeckPinch (www.neckpinch.com). All content in the guidebook (text, mathematics, figures and exercises) is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. No part may be copied, republished or redistributed without written permission.