A scale-invariant entropy, log-Sobolev, and no shrinking breathers.
20 min read Β· Updated Oct 3, 2026
Read Perelman I, Β§3 and Β§5, then Kleiner and Lott's notes on those sections and Topping's chapter on the W-entropy. For the logarithmic Sobolev inequality, Gross's "Logarithmic Sobolev inequalities" (American Journal of Mathematics, 1975) is the source; 6A.10 Entropy, Information and Diffusion met it first.
The functional F of 12A.2 Ricci Flow as a Gradient Flow has no scale in it, so it cannot see shrinking solitons or measure geometry at a given size. Perelman's remedy is to insert a scale Ο>0 and a Gaussian weight. The result is the W-entropy
In the worldModelInformation, concentration and the Gaussian
Leonard Gross proved in 1975 the Gaussian logarithmic Sobolev inequality: for the standard Gaussian measure Ξ³ on Rn and smooth Ο with β«Ο2dΞ³=1,
β«Ο2logΟ2dΞ³β€2β«β£βΟβ£2dΞ³.
It has no dimension-dependent constant, which makes it work in infinite dimensions, and Gross showed it is equivalent to the hypercontractivity of the OrnsteinβUhlenbeck semigroup, the heat flow that relaxes to the Gaussian. Logarithmic Sobolev inequalities are now basic tools in probability (concentration of measure: Lipschitz functions of many Gaussian variables are nearly constant), in information theory, where they relate entropy and Fisher information, and in the analysis of Markov chains and sampling algorithms. Perelman's ΞΌ(g,Ο) asks how far a Riemannian manifold, viewed at scale Οβ, is from satisfying the Euclidean version.
Scale invariance. If g~β=cg and Ο~=cΟ, then Ο~R~=ΟR, Ο~β£βfβ£g~β2β=Οβ£βfβ£g2β, and (4ΟΟ~)βn/2dV~=(4ΟΟ)βn/2dV: so W(cg,f,cΟ)=W(g,f,Ο), and the constraint is preserved (Exercise 3.3).
The equation for f says exactly that u=(4ΟΟ)βn/2eβf satisfies the conjugate heat equation β‘βu=0 (9B.7 The Heat Equation on a Manifold), which preserves the constraint β«udV=1.
with equality exactly when Ric+β2f=2Ο1βg: a shrinking gradient soliton.
Perelman calls the derivation "a routine computation", and it is, given 12A.2 Ricci Flow as a Gradient Flow. The cleanest route goes through a pointwise formula that he proves later (Proposition 9.1, 12A.6 Pseudolocality). The function v=[Ο(2Ξfββ£βfβ£2+R)+fβn]u has integral W (integrate Ξfu by parts), and it satisfies β‘βv=β2Οβ£Ric+β2fβ2Ο1βgβ£2u. Since βtβdV=βRdV and β«ΞvdV=0, the time derivative of β«vdV is ββ«β‘βvdV, which is the monotonicity formula (Exercise 3.6). The pointwise formula is also how Perelman localises the argument in Β§Β§9β10.
On a closed manifold the infimum defining ΞΌ is attained by a smooth f; this follows from work of Oscar Rothaus (1981) on logarithmic Sobolev inequalities, and uses the Sobolev embedding (4A.10 Sobolev Embeddings and Critical Exponents) with care at the logarithmic term. By monotonicity, running the conjugate heat equation backwards from a minimiser as in 12A.2 Ricci Flow as a Gradient Flow:
On flat Rn, take f=4Οβ£xβ£2β. Then u=(4ΟΟ)βn/2eββ£xβ£2/4Ο is the heat kernel (6A.3 The Heat Equation on ββΏ), the constraint holds, and
using β«β£xβ£2udx=2nΟ. The Gaussian is a shrinking soliton (with Ric+β2f=2Ο1βg, 11B.1 Ricci Solitons), so it is the equality case. For any other f on Rn, W(Ξ΄,f,Ο)β₯0; Perelman notes that this is Gross's inequality after the substitution f=2β£xβ£2ββ2logΟ (at Ο=21β) and an integration by parts (Exercise 3.5). So ΞΌ(Rn,Ο)=0, and Figure 3.1 shows the minimisation in a one-parameter family.
Figure 3.1.W(R,fΟβ,Ο) for Gaussian test functions of width Ο at fixed Ο: W=21β(ΟΟββ1+logΟΟβ)β₯0, with minimum 0 exactly at Ο=Ο, where u is the heat kernel (computed from the closed form and checked by numerical integration).
Perelman shows that for any closed (M,g), ΞΌ(g,Ο)<0 for small Ο>0 and ΞΌ(g,Ο)β0 as Οβ0. He sketches the proof and leaves the details, which are not hard, to the reader. Negativity: run the conjugate heat equation backwards from a delta function at a later time ΟΛ; along it Wβ0 as the delta is approached, so by monotonicity W<0 earlier. The limit: rescaling the metric by 2Ο1β (which takes Ο to 21β), the manifold looks Euclidean at scale Οβ, and a minimiser with Wβ€c<0 would produce a function on Rn violating Gross's inequality. So ΞΌ measures the failure of the Euclidean logarithmic Sobolev inequality at scale Οβ. Figure 3.2 shows an upper bound for ΞΌ on the round sphere.
Figure 3.2. An upper bound for ΞΌ on the unit S2: W of the constant test function, 2ΟβlogΟβ2 (computed). It is negative near Ο=21β, with minimum log2β1ββ0.31, so ΞΌ(S2,21β)<0. For small Ο the constant is a poor test function (the true ΞΌ tends to 0, as Perelman shows, using test functions concentrated at a point), and for large Ο the bound grows like 2Ο, reflecting Ξ»(S2)=2>0.
Theorem 3.2No shrinking breathers (Perelman I, Β§3)
A shrinking breather on a closed manifold, g(t2β)=cΟβg(t1β) with c<1, is a shrinking gradient soliton.
Proof. Choose Ο1β with Ο1βΟ1ββ(t2ββt1β)β=c, so that Ο2β=Ο1ββ(t2ββt1β)=cΟ1β. By scale and diffeomorphism invariance, ΞΌ(g(t2β),Ο2β)=ΞΌ(cΟβg(t1β),cΟ1β)=ΞΌ(g(t1β),Ο1β). Monotonicity makes ΞΌ constant along the flow between, so a minimiser at t2β, flowed backwards, achieves equality in Theorem 3.1: Ric+β2f=2Ο1βg.
This is the template "monotone quantity, invariant under the symmetries, equality case is a soliton", now at full strength. The same structure appears throughout the Path:
so that W is minus an entropy and the monotonicity formula is the statement that the fluctuation is nonnegative, vanishing only on shrinking solitons. He explicitly sets aside the question of whether a "density of states" exists that would make this literal. It is a heuristic that explains the name and suggested the formula, not a physical model of anything, and the proofs do not use it. In the same section Perelman asks whether an ancient solution along which this entropy stays bounded must be a shrinking gradient soliton, a question close to the study of ΞΊ-solutions (12B.1 ΞΊ-Solutions).
Where this goesFrom entropy to volume
12A.4 ΞΊ-Noncollapsing uses ΞΌ to prove noncollapsing. If a ball of radius r with bounded curvature had very small volume, a test function concentrated on it would make W(g,f,r2) very negative. Monotonicity carries this back to time 0, where ΞΌ is bounded below on a closed manifold: a contradiction.
Gross proved the Gaussian logarithmic Sobolev inequality in 1975, and Rothaus studied minimisers of logarithmic Sobolev functionals in 1981. Bakry and Γmery (1985) connected such inequalities to curvature. Perelman introduced W in Β§3 of his first preprint, noting in his historical remarks that the logarithmic Sobolev inequality had appeared in geometric evolution equations in work of Klaus Ecker, and that Ivey had proved the no-breathers theorem in dimension three.
RecallWhere we stand
W(g,f,Ο)=β«[Ο(β£βfβ£2+R)+fβn](4ΟΟ)βn/2eβfdV, with β«(4ΟΟ)βn/2eβf=1, is scale-invariant. Along the Ricci flow with βtβΟ=β1 and u=(4ΟΟ)βn/2eβf solving β‘βu=0, dtdβW=β«2Οβ£Ric+β2fβ2Οgββ£2uβ₯0, with equality on shrinking gradient solitons. On Rn the Gaussian gives W=0 and ΞΌ=0 is Gross's log-Sobolev inequality; on closed manifolds ΞΌ(g,Ο) is negative for small Ο and tends to 0. Shrinking breathers are shrinking solitons. Perelman's statistical analogy reads W as minus an entropy. 12A.4 ΞΊ-Noncollapsing turns ΞΌ into a volume bound.
Verify that W(cg,f,cΟ)=W(g,f,Ο) and that the constraint is unchanged, using Rcgβ=cβ1Rgβ, β£βfβ£cg2β=cβ1β£βfβ£g2β and dVcgβ=cn/2dVgβ.
Solution
cΟβ cβ1(β£βfβ£2+R)=Ο(β£βfβ£2+R); fβn is unchanged; (4ΟcΟ)βn/2eβfcn/2dV=(4ΟΟ)βn/2eβfdV. Both the integrand and the measure are invariant.
Exercise 3.4Gaussians of the wrong width
On R (with n=1), let u be the Gaussian density of variance 2Ο, u=(4ΟΟ)β1/2eβx2/4Ο, and define f by u=(4ΟΟ)β1/2eβf. Show f=4Οx2β+21βlogΟΟβ, and compute W=21β(ΟΟββ1+logΟΟβ). Show it is β₯0 with equality only at Ο=Ο.
Solution
Taking logarithms, f=4Οx2β+21βlog4ΟΟ4ΟΟβ. Then β£fβ²β£2=4Ο2x2β, and with β«x2u=2Ο: W=Ο4Ο22Οβ+4Ο2Οβ+21βlogΟΟββ1=21β(ΟΟβ+1+logΟΟββ2). With s=ΟΟβ: sβ1βlogsβ₯0, with equality only at s=1.
Exercise 3.5From Wβ₯0 to Gross
On Rn with Ο=21β, write u=(2Ο)βn/2eβf and f=2β£xβ£2ββ2logΟ, so that u=Ο2Ξ³ with Ξ³ the standard Gaussian density and β«Ο2dΞ³=1. Show that W=β«[21ββ£βfβ£2+fβn]udx becomes, after an integration by parts, 2β«β£βΟβ£2dΞ³ββ«Ο2logΟ2dΞ³, so Wβ₯0 is Gross's inequality.
Exercise 3.6From the pointwise formula to the integral
Assume β‘βv=β2Οβ£Ric+β2fβ2Οgββ£2u (Perelman I, Proposition 9.1). Using βtβdV=βRdV, show dtdββ«vdV=β«(βtβvβRv)dV=ββ«β‘βvdV, and that β«vdV=W. Deduce the monotonicity formula.
Solution
dtdββ«vdV=β«(βtβvβRv)dV=β«(ββ‘βvβΞv)dV=ββ«β‘βvdV, since β«Ξv=0. And β«v=β«[Ο(2Ξfββ£βfβ£2+R)+fβn]u, with β«Ξfu=β«β£βfβ£2u (integrate by parts, βu=βuβf), so β«v=W. Hence dtdβW=β«2Οβ£β―β£2uβ₯0.
Exercise 3.7Rehearsal: a test function on the sphere
On the round unit Sn, the constant f satisfying the constraint is f=log(4ΟΟ)n/2β£Snβ£β. Show that W(g,f,Ο)=n(nβ1)Ο+log(4ΟΟ)n/2β£Snβ£ββn, and for n=2 that this is 2ΟβlogΟβ2, minimised at Ο=21β. What does its negativity there tell you about ΞΌ(S2,21β)?
Solution
With constant f, β£βfβ£2=0, R=n(nβ1), and β«u=1, so W=Οn(nβ1)+fβn. For n=2, β£S2β£=4Ο and f=log4ΟΟ4Οβ=βlogΟ. The derivative 2βΟ1β vanishes at Ο=21β, where the value is 1+log2β2=log2β1<0. Since ΞΌ is an infimum, ΞΌ(S2,21β)β€log2β1<0.