Book 11A

© 2026 NeckPinch · www.neckpinch.com · All rights reserved.

Course 11Book 11A: The Ricci Flow: Existence and Maximum PrinciplesChapter 9

Flows on Complete Manifolds

Maximum principles on domains with boundary and on complete manifolds of bounded curvature, Shi's existence theorem, and normalised initial conditions.

20 min read · Updated Oct 23, 2026

Read with Morgan and Tian's Ricci Flow and the Poincaré Conjecture, chapter 4, §2.2 (the local maximum principle, Theorem 4.9) and §3 (normalised initial conditions, Definition 4.10 and Proposition 4.11), and chapter 3, §3 (local existence). Shi's existence theorem on complete manifolds is in his 1989 paper "Deforming the metric on complete Riemannian manifolds".

In this chapter · 7 sections
  1. 9.1Domains with boundary
  2. 9.2Why noncompactness is a problem
  3. 9.3The maximum principle on complete manifolds
  4. 9.4Existence and uniqueness on complete manifolds
  5. 9.5Normalised initial conditions
  6. 9.6History
  7. 9.7Exercises
  8. ↗Free resources

So far the maximum principles of Book 11A have been proved on closed manifolds, where a function attains its maximum. But most of the flows that matter in Perelman's argument are not compact. κ\kappa-solutions may be noncompact (S2×RS^2\times\mathbb{R}, the Bryant soliton, the cross-cap); the standard solution of surgery lives on R3\mathbb{R}^3; and blow-up limits are complete noncompact flows. And many arguments are local: they concern a region of a manifold, with information on its boundary, as in 11A.8 The Strong Maximum Principle and Splitting.

This chapter supplies the versions of the theory that work there. First the maximum principle on a compact domain with boundary, which needs nothing new. Then the maximum principle on a complete manifold with bounded curvature, where the difficulty is that a supremum need not be attained; the remedy is to subtract a small multiple of a function that grows at infinity and is a strict supersolution of the heat equation, built from the distance. Then Shi's existence theorem and the uniqueness theorem of Chen and Zhu, stated. Finally the normalisation of initial metrics that Morgan and Tian impose at the start of the flow with surgery, and what it buys for the first stretch of time.

By the end of this chapter you will be able to:

  • prove the maximum principle for systems on a compact domain with boundary, given control on the boundary;
  • explain why the maximum principle can fail on noncompact manifolds without growth conditions, with the classical example of Tychonoff;
  • prove the scalar maximum principle on a complete manifold with bounded curvature for functions bounded above, with an exhaustion barrier built from the distance;
  • state Shi's existence theorem, the uniqueness of Chen and Zhu, and the preservation of curvature conditions for complete flows of bounded curvature;
  • define normalised initial conditions and prove that they give curvature and volume control for a definite time.

Domains with boundary

Proposition 9.1 The maximum principle on a domain

Let UU be a compact domain with smooth boundary in a manifold with a Ricci flow g(t)g(t), 0≤t≤T0 \leq t \leq T, and let M(x,t)\mathcal M(x, t) be a section of a bundle evolving by ∂tM=ΔM+F(M)\partial_t\mathcal M = \Delta\mathcal M + F(\mathcal M) as in 11A.7 Maximum Principles under Ricci Flow, with KK a closed, fibrewise convex set invariant under parallel transport and preserved by the ODE. If M(x,0)∈K\mathcal M(x, 0) \in K for x∈Ux \in U and M(x,t)∈K\mathcal M(x, t) \in K for x∈∂Ux \in \partial U, 0≤t≤T0 \leq t \leq T, then M(x,t)∈K\mathcal M(x, t) \in K for all x∈Ux \in U, t∈[0,T]t \in [0, T].

Proof. The proof of 11A.7 Maximum Principles under Ricci Flow applies verbatim with MM replaced by UU. The function ϕ(t)=max⁡x∈Udist⁡(M(x,t),Kx)\phi(t) = \max_{x \in U}\operatorname{dist}(\mathcal M(x, t), K_x) is continuous with ϕ(0)=0\phi(0) = 0. At a time t0t_0 with ϕ(t0)>0\phi(t_0) > 0, the maximum is attained at some x0∈Ux_0 \in U, and since M∈K\mathcal M \in K on ∂U\partial U, x0x_0 is an interior point; there the argument with the supporting functional, parallel extension, Δf≤0\Delta f \leq 0 and the Lipschitz bound gives ϕ′≤Lϕ\phi' \leq L\phi, and Gronwall forces ϕ≡0\phi \equiv 0.

This is Morgan and Tian's Theorem 4.9, and it is what 11A.8 The Strong Maximum Principle and Splitting used, with a Dirichlet solution of the heat equation as the second component. The role of the boundary condition is simply to keep the maximum away from the boundary. On a noncompact manifold there is no boundary, but there is infinity, and the maximum can escape to it.

Why noncompactness is a problem

On R\mathbb{R} the heat equation has nonzero solutions with zero initial data. Andrey Tychonoff's example (1935) is

u(x,t)=∑k=0∞g(k)(t)(2k)!x2k,g(t)=e−1/t2 (t>0),g(0)=0,u(x, t) = \sum_{k=0}^\infty\frac{g^{(k)}(t)}{(2k)!}x^{2k}, \qquad g(t) = e^{-1/t^2}\ (t > 0),\quad g(0) = 0,

which converges, solves ut=uxxu_t = u_{xx}, vanishes at t=0t = 0, and is not identically zero; it grows faster than ecx2e^{cx^2} for every cc at positive times. So uniqueness, and with it the maximum principle, fails without a growth condition. The classical theorem (Tychonoff, Täcklind) is that uniqueness holds among solutions with ∣u∣≤Cec∣x∣2|u| \leq Ce^{c|x|^2}. For the Ricci flow one assumes bounded curvature, which makes all geometric quantities that appear bounded, and then the maximum principle holds with room to spare.

The maximum principle on complete manifolds

Lemma 9.2 An exhaustion barrier

Let g(t)g(t), 0≤t≤T0 \leq t \leq T, be a Ricci flow of complete metrics with ∣Rm⁡∣≤K|\operatorname{Rm}| \leq K, and p∈Mp \in M. There are constants A,CA, C depending on nn, KK and TT such that ψ(x,t)=eAt(1+dt(p,x)2)\psi(x, t) = e^{At}\big(1 + d_t(p, x)^2\big) satisfies

(∂t−Δ)ψ≥1in the barrier sense,(\partial_t - \Delta)\psi \geq 1\qquad\text{in the barrier sense},

and ψ≥1+dt(p,x)2→∞\psi \geq 1 + d_t(p, x)^2 \to \infty as x→∞x \to \infty, uniformly in tt.

Proof. Write d=dt(p,⋅)d = d_t(p, \cdot). Where dd is smooth, Δd2=2∣∇d∣2+2dΔd=2+2dΔd\Delta d^2 = 2|\nabla d|^2 + 2d\Delta d = 2 + 2d\Delta d, and Laplacian comparison with Ric⁡≥−(n−1)K\operatorname{Ric} \geq -(n - 1)K (9B.1 Laplacian Comparison) gives dΔd≤(n−1)(1+Kd)d\Delta d \leq (n - 1)(1 + \sqrt Kd); so Δd2≤C(1+d2)\Delta d^2 \leq C(1 + d^2). At cut points the same bound holds in the barrier sense: there are smooth upper barriers for dd, hence for d2d^2, with the same Laplacian bound (11A.6 How Distances Change). For the time derivative, ∣∂td∣≤(n−1)Kd|\partial_td| \leq (n - 1)Kd in the sense of forward difference quotients (11A.6 How Distances Change), so ∂td2≥−2(n−1)Kd2\partial_td^2 \geq -2(n - 1)Kd^2. Hence

(∂t−Δ)ψ≥eAt(A(1+d2)−2(n−1)Kd2−C(1+d2))≥eAt(1+d2)≥1(\partial_t - \Delta)\psi \geq e^{At}\Big(A(1 + d^2) - 2(n - 1)Kd^2 - C(1 + d^2)\Big) \geq e^{At}(1 + d^2) \geq 1

once A≥2(n−1)K+C+1A \geq 2(n - 1)K + C + 1. Completeness gives d→∞d \to \infty at infinity, and by distance distortion (11A.6 How Distances Change) uniformly in t∈[0,T]t \in [0, T].

Theorem 9.3 The scalar maximum principle on complete manifolds

Let g(t)g(t), 0≤t≤T0 \leq t \leq T, be a Ricci flow of complete metrics with bounded curvature, and let uu be a smooth function, bounded above, with (∂t−Δ)u≤⟨X,∇u⟩(\partial_t - \Delta)u \leq \langle X, \nabla u\rangle for a bounded vector field XX, and u(⋅,0)≤0u(\cdot, 0) \leq 0. Then u≤0u \leq 0 on M×[0,T]M\times[0, T].

Proof. Let ψ\psi be the barrier of Lemma 9.2, built with AA large enough that also ∣⟨X,∇ψ⟩∣≤12(∂t−Δ)ψ|\langle X, \nabla\psi\rangle| \leq \frac12(\partial_t - \Delta)\psi (possible because ∣∇ψ∣=2eAtd≤eAt(1+d2)|\nabla\psi| = 2e^{At}d \leq e^{At}(1 + d^2) and XX is bounded; increase AA by 2sup⁡∣X∣2\sup|X|). For ε>0\varepsilon > 0 let w=u−εψw = u - \varepsilon\psi. Since uu is bounded above and ψ→∞\psi \to \infty at infinity uniformly in tt, the set where w≥−1w \geq -1 is contained in a compact set, so ww attains its maximum over MM at each time, inside that compact set. At t=0t = 0, w<0w < 0. Suppose ww reaches the value 00, and let t0>0t_0 > 0 be the first time, at a point x0x_0. If ψ\psi is smooth at (x0,t0)(x_0, t_0): there ∇w=0\nabla w = 0, Δw≤0\Delta w \leq 0 and ∂tw≥0\partial_tw \geq 0 (in the forward sense), so

0≤(∂t−Δ)w≤⟨X,∇u⟩−ε(∂t−Δ)ψ=ε⟨X,∇ψ⟩−ε(∂t−Δ)ψ≤−ε2(∂t−Δ)ψ<0,0 \leq (\partial_t - \Delta)w \leq \langle X, \nabla u\rangle - \varepsilon(\partial_t - \Delta)\psi = \varepsilon\langle X, \nabla\psi\rangle - \varepsilon(\partial_t - \Delta)\psi \leq -\frac\varepsilon2(\partial_t - \Delta)\psi < 0,

using ∇u=ε∇ψ\nabla u = \varepsilon\nabla\psi at the maximum: a contradiction. If ψ\psi is not smooth there, replace it near (x0,t0)(x_0, t_0) by a smooth upper barrier ψ~≥ψ\tilde\psi \geq \psi with ψ~=ψ\tilde\psi = \psi at (x0,t0)(x_0, t_0) and the same differential inequality up to an arbitrarily small error; then u−εψ~≤wu - \varepsilon\tilde\psi \leq w still has a local maximum at (x0,t0)(x_0, t_0) and the same computation applies. So w<0w < 0 for all tt, that is u<εψu < \varepsilon\psi; let ε→0\varepsilon \to 0.

The hypothesis "bounded above" can be weakened to growth like ecd2e^{cd^2}, as in the classical theorem, but bounded is what is used: the quantities to which the principle is applied, such as curvature or Rmin⁡R_{\min}-comparisons, are bounded on flows of bounded curvature. With it, every scalar consequence of 11A.7 Maximum Principles under Ricci Flow holds on complete flows of bounded curvature: for instance, R≥−n2tR \geq -\frac{n}{2t}, and Rmin⁡R_{\min} (now an infimum) is nondecreasing.

The tensor and system versions extend in the same way (statement here; the barrier is added to the distance from the convex set): on a complete Ricci flow of bounded curvature, closed convex parallel-invariant sets preserved by the ODE are preserved by the PDE. In particular nonnegative curvature operator, and in dimension three nonnegative sectional and Ricci curvature, and the Hamilton–Ivey pinching (11A.10 Hamilton–Ivey Pinching), are preserved for complete flows of bounded curvature. This is the form in which they apply to κ\kappa-solutions and to the standard solution.

Existence and uniqueness on complete manifolds

Theorem 9.4 Shi's existence theorem (1989; statement)

If (M,g0)(M, g_0) is a complete Riemannian manifold with ∣Rm⁡(g0)∣≤K0|\operatorname{Rm}(g_0)| \leq K_0, there is T=T(n,K0)>0T = T(n, K_0) > 0 and a Ricci flow g(t)g(t), 0≤t≤T0 \leq t \leq T, of complete metrics with g(0)=g0g(0) = g_0 and ∣Rm⁡(g(t))∣≤2K0|\operatorname{Rm}(g(t))| \leq 2K_0.

The proof solves the flow on an exhaustion of MM by compact domains, with Dirichlet boundary conditions for the Ricci–DeTurck flow, and uses the local derivative estimates of 11A.5 Shi's Derivative Estimates to obtain bounds independent of the domain, so that the solutions converge. This is the reason Shi proved local estimates at all: on a noncompact manifold there is no global maximum to work with.

Theorem 9.5 Uniqueness (Chen and Zhu 2006; statement)

Two complete Ricci flows with bounded curvature on M×[0,T]M\times[0, T] with the same initial metric coincide.

The proof follows the strategy of 11A.4 Short-Time Existence and Uniqueness, harmonic map heat flow to the Ricci–DeTurck flow, but on a noncompact manifold the harmonic map heat flow must be solved with control at infinity, which is where the work lies. Morgan and Tian use a version of this argument to prove the uniqueness of the standard solution of surgery (their chapter 12, §4–6), a rotationally symmetric flow on R3\mathbb{R}^3 whose uniqueness matters because surgery must glue in a canonical cap.

Without bounded curvature both theorems can fail: there are complete metrics with unbounded curvature on which solutions are not unique, and the restriction is not a technicality.

Normalised initial conditions

The flow with surgery is started from a metric that is normalised, so that all constants can be taken universal.

Definition 9.6 Normalised initial conditions (Morgan–Tian, Definition 4.10)

A Ricci flow has normalised initial conditions if it starts at time 00 and the compact manifold (Mn,g(0))(M^n, g(0)) satisfies:

  1. ∣Rm⁡(x,0)∣≤1|\operatorname{Rm}(x, 0)| \leq 1 for all xx;
  2. Vol⁡B(x,0,r)≥ωn2rn\operatorname{Vol}B(x, 0, r) \geq \frac{\omega_n}{2}r^n for all xx and all r≤1r \leq 1, where ωn\omega_n is the volume of the unit ball in Rn\mathbb{R}^n.

Every metric on a compact manifold becomes normalised after multiplication by a large constant: scaling by λ2\lambda^2 divides ∣Rm⁡∣|\operatorname{Rm}| by λ2\lambda^2, and for λ\lambda large, balls of radius 11 are tiny balls of the original metric, whose volume ratio is close to Euclidean (9B.2 Volume Comparison, Bishop–Gromov and the expansion of the volume of small balls). Since scaling does not change topology, nothing is lost for the Poincaré conjecture.

Proposition 9.7 What normalisation buys (Morgan–Tian, Proposition 4.11)

There is κ0>0\kappa_0 > 0 depending only on nn such that a Ricci flow of complete metrics with bounded curvature and normalised initial conditions satisfies ∣Rm⁡∣≤2|\operatorname{Rm}| \leq 2 on [0,min⁡(T,2−4)][0, \min(T, 2^{-4})], and Vol⁡B(x,t,r)≥κ0rn\operatorname{Vol}B(x, t, r) \geq \kappa_0r^n for all xx, all t∈[0,min⁡(T,2−4)]t \in [0, \min(T, 2^{-4})] and all r≤1r \leq 1.

Proof. Curvature. By 11A.2 How Curvature Evolves, □∣Rm⁡∣2≤C(n)∣Rm⁡∣3\square|\operatorname{Rm}|^2 \leq C(n)|\operatorname{Rm}|^3, and the maximum principle (on complete manifolds of bounded curvature, by Theorem 9.3) gives the doubling time estimate: ∣Rm⁡∣≤2|\operatorname{Rm}| \leq 2 as long as t≤1C(n)t \leq \frac{1}{C(n)}. With the precise constant of the evolution inequality one gets the stated 2−42^{-4} (Morgan and Tian cite the literature for this value; any fixed dimensional constant would do for what follows).

Volume. On [0,2−4][0, 2^{-4}], ∣Ric⁡∣≤2(n−1)|\operatorname{Ric}| \leq 2(n - 1), so by 11A.6 How Distances Change distances at time tt and time 00 differ by a factor at most e2(n−1)t≤e(n−1)/8e^{2(n-1)t} \leq e^{(n-1)/8}, and volumes of fixed sets by a factor at most e2n(n−1)te^{2n(n-1)t}. A ball B(x,t,r)B(x, t, r) therefore contains the ball B(x,0,e−(n−1)/8r)B(x, 0, e^{-(n-1)/8}r), whose g(0)g(0)-volume is at least ωn2e−n(n−1)/8rn\frac{\omega_n}{2}e^{-n(n-1)/8}r^n by normalisation, and whose g(t)g(t)-volume is at least e−n(n−1)/8e^{-n(n-1)/8} times that. This gives κ0=ωn2e−n(n−1)/4\kappa_0 = \frac{\omega_n}{2}e^{-n(n-1)/4}.

The proposition is the starting point of the inductive construction of the flow with surgery (12B.13 Ricci Flow with Surgery for All Time): it provides curvature and noncollapsing control on an initial time interval, before any singularity can form, and all later constants are determined from these.

Where this goes Where complete flows appear

12B.1 κ-Solutions and 12B.3 The Structure of κ-Solutions study κ\kappa-solutions, complete ancient flows with bounded nonnegative curvature, to which the maximum principles of this chapter apply. 12B.9 Surgery uses Shi's existence and the uniqueness of the standard solution. 12B.13 Ricci Flow with Surgery for All Time starts the flow with surgery from normalised initial conditions.

History

Tychonoff's example of nonuniqueness for the heat equation dates from 1935. Shi proved existence on complete manifolds with bounded curvature, with his local derivative estimates, in 1989. Bing-Long Chen and Xi-Ping Zhu proved uniqueness among complete flows of bounded curvature in 2006, in time for the expositions of Perelman's work. Maximum principles on complete manifolds with barrier functions of this kind go back to work on parabolic equations on complete manifolds in the 1980s, by Karp and Li among others.

Recall Where we stand

On a compact domain with control on the boundary, the maximum principle for systems holds as on closed manifolds, because the maximum stays inside. On noncompact manifolds a maximum can escape to infinity, and Tychonoff's solution shows that some growth condition is needed. With bounded curvature, ψ=eAt(1+dt2)\psi = e^{At}(1 + d_t^2) is a strict supersolution growing at infinity, thanks to Laplacian comparison and distance distortion; subtracting εψ\varepsilon\psi proves the maximum principle for functions bounded above, and the system version follows the same way, so preserved curvature conditions persist on complete flows of bounded curvature. Shi solves the flow on complete manifolds with bounded curvature, Chen and Zhu make it unique, and normalised initial data (∣Rm⁡∣≤1|\operatorname{Rm}| \leq 1, Euclidean-ish unit balls) give ∣Rm⁡∣≤2|\operatorname{Rm}| \leq 2 and κ0\kappa_0-noncollapsing up to time 2−42^{-4}. 11A.10 Hamilton–Ivey Pinching proves Hamilton–Ivey pinching.

Exercises

Exercise 9.8 The boundary condition is needed

On U=[0,1]U = [0, 1] with the flat metric, give a solution of the heat equation with u(⋅,0)≤0u(\cdot, 0) \leq 0 that becomes positive inside UU, and explain which hypothesis of Proposition 9.1 it violates.

Solution

u(x,t)=t+x22−1u(x, t) = t + \frac{x^2}{2} - 1 has ut=1=uxxu_t = 1 = u_{xx}, and u(x,0)=x22−1≤0u(x, 0) = \frac{x^2}{2} - 1 \leq 0 on [0,1][0, 1], but u(x,t)>0u(x, t) > 0 for t>1t > 1. The boundary values u(0,t)=t−1u(0, t) = t - 1 and u(1,t)=t−12u(1, t) = t - \frac12 become positive: heat flows in through the boundary. The proposition requires the boundary values to stay in the set (here, u≤0u \leq 0 on ∂U\partial U).

Exercise 9.9 The barrier on flat space

On static Rn\mathbb{R}^n (a Ricci flow that does not move), compute (∂t−Δ)(eAt(1+∣x∣2))(\partial_t - \Delta)\big(e^{At}(1 + |x|^2)\big) and find the smallest AA for which it is at least 11.

Solution

Δ(1+∣x∣2)=2n\Delta(1 + |x|^2) = 2n, so (∂t−Δ)ψ=eAt(A(1+∣x∣2)−2n)(\partial_t - \Delta)\psi = e^{At}\big(A(1 + |x|^2) - 2n\big). At x=0x = 0 this is eAt(A−2n)e^{At}(A - 2n), so A≥2n+1A \geq 2n + 1 suffices for the bound ≥1\geq 1 everywhere (as 1+∣x∣2≥11 + |x|^2 \geq 1 and eAt≥1e^{At} \geq 1). In the lemma the constant CC plays the role of 2n2n, enlarged by the curvature.

Exercise 9.10 Normalising a round sphere

Find the smallest λ\lambda such that λ2g\lambda^2g is normalised, for gg the round unit S3S^3. (Use ∣Rm⁡∣=c0|\operatorname{Rm}| = c_0 for the unit sphere in the norm of 9A.4 Curvature and What It Means, with c0=12c_0 = \sqrt{12} in the convention where ∣Rm⁡∣2=∑Rijkl2|\operatorname{Rm}|^2 = \sum R_{ijkl}^2; and check the volume condition with the formula Vol⁡B(r)=π(2r−sin⁡2r)\operatorname{Vol}B(r) = \pi(2r - \sin2r) for the unit sphere.)

Solution

For the unit S3S^3, Rijkl=δikδjl−δilδjkR_{ijkl} = \delta_{ik}\delta_{jl} - \delta_{il}\delta_{jk}, whose nonzero components are ±1\pm1 for i≠ji \neq j, {k,l}={i,j}\{k, l\} = \{i, j\}: 3⋅2⋅2=123\cdot2\cdot2 = 12 ordered index choices, so ∣Rm⁡∣2=12|\operatorname{Rm}|^2 = 12. After scaling by λ2\lambda^2, ∣Rm⁡∣=12λ2≤1|\operatorname{Rm}| = \frac{\sqrt{12}}{\lambda^2} \leq 1 needs λ≥121/4≈1.86\lambda \geq 12^{1/4} \approx 1.86. For the volume, a ball of radius r≤1r \leq 1 in λ2g\lambda^2g is a ball of radius rλ\frac r\lambda in gg, of gg-volume π(2rλ−sin⁡2rλ)\pi(\frac{2r}{\lambda} - \sin\frac{2r}{\lambda}), so its λ2g\lambda^2g-volume is λ3π(2rλ−sin⁡2rλ)≈43πr3(1−r25λ2)\lambda^3\pi(\frac{2r}{\lambda} - \sin\frac{2r}{\lambda}) \approx \frac43\pi r^3(1 - \frac{r^2}{5\lambda^2}). With ω3=43π\omega_3 = \frac43\pi, the condition ≥ω32r3\geq \frac{\omega_3}{2}r^3 holds easily for λ≥1.86\lambda \geq 1.86. So λ=121/4\lambda = 12^{1/4}.

Exercise 9.11 Rehearsal: growth in Tychonoff's example

Explain, without computing the series, why Tychonoff's solution cannot be bounded on R×[0,T]\mathbb{R}\times[0, T] for any T>0T > 0, using Theorem 9.3 on static R\mathbb{R} applied to uu and to −u-u.

Solution

Static R\mathbb{R} is a complete Ricci flow with zero curvature. If uu were bounded on R×[0,T]\mathbb{R}\times[0, T], then uu and −u-u would both be bounded above, solve the heat equation, and vanish at t=0t = 0; the theorem would give u≤0u \leq 0 and −u≤0-u \leq 0, so u≡0u \equiv 0, contradicting the construction. So uu is unbounded at every positive time, and in fact it must grow faster than any Cecx2Ce^{cx^2}, by the sharper classical uniqueness theorem.

Free resources for this chapter

Chosen for what this chapter covers, and all free to read. Links checked Oct 16, 2026.

© 2026 NeckPinch (www.neckpinch.com). All content in the guidebook (text, mathematics, figures and exercises) is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. No part may be copied, republished or redistributed without written permission.