© 2026 NeckPinch · www.neckpinch.com · All rights reserved.
Course 11Book 11A: The Ricci Flow: Existence and Maximum PrinciplesChapter 8
The Strong Maximum Principle and Splitting
Why a zero of nonnegative curvature spreads everywhere: flatness, local splittings into a surface times a line, and why cones cannot occur.
Read with Morgan and Tian's Ricci Flow and the Poincaré Conjecture, chapter 4, §4 (the strong maximum principle for curvature: Theorem 4.18, Corollaries 4.19–4.20 and Proposition 4.22), which this chapter follows, and with Hamilton's "Four-manifolds with positive curvature operator" (1986) for the general null-space theorem. The strong maximum principle for scalar heat equations is in 6A.5 Maximum Principles.
The maximum principles of 11A.7 Maximum Principles under Ricci Flow say that nonnegative curvature is preserved. The strong maximum principle says much more: if the curvature is nonnegative and vanishes somewhere, in some direction, at a positive time, then it vanishes in that direction everywhere, and the manifold splits off a flat factor. Positivity spreads instantly through a connected manifold under a heat equation; so does the structure of the zeros.
This is one of the main tools in Perelman's analysis of -solutions (12B.1 κ-Solutions, 12B.3 The Structure of κ-Solutions), and Morgan and Tian use it in the form proved here at least a dozen times. A three-dimensional -solution has nonnegative curvature. If its curvature operator has a zero eigenvalue anywhere, the strong maximum principle makes it split, locally a surface times a line, and globally (after passing to a cover) a product ; and then the two-dimensional theory shows that is a round sphere and the solution is a neck. If not, its curvature is positive, and the soul theorem makes it a ball or compact. The other application is negative: a nonflat cone cannot occur as a time slice of a flow with nonnegative curvature, which is how blow-down limits of -solutions are shown to be lower-dimensional.
By the end of this chapter you will be able to:
- state the strong maximum principle for the heat equation with Dirichlet boundary values, and the comparison trick that transfers it to curvature;
- prove that a three-dimensional Ricci flow with nonnegative sectional curvature and at one point of a later time is flat;
- prove that if, in addition, the Ricci curvature has a zero eigenvalue somewhere, the flow splits locally as a surface times a line, by showing that the null direction is parallel and constant in time;
- describe the global versions on covers, and the four possible covers;
- prove that a time slice of a flow with nonnegative curvature cannot contain an open piece of a nonflat cone;
- state Hamilton's null-space theorem in all dimensions and the classification of compact 3-manifolds with nonnegative Ricci curvature.
The strong maximum principle for scalars
Let be a compact connected manifold with boundary and , , a solution of (for a smooth family of metrics) with on and . Then on , and if at some point , then on .
The first statement is the weak maximum principle. The second is the parabolic strong maximum principle of 6A.5 Maximum Principles (Nirenberg's), proved there with Hopf's barrier argument; equivalently, the Dirichlet heat kernel of is strictly positive in the interior for positive times. Heat started at one point is felt everywhere immediately.
The trick for transferring this to curvature is comparison with a Dirichlet solution. Suppose a quantity built from the curvature is a supersolution of the heat equation, , at least in a weak sense. Put underneath it a solution of the heat equation with Dirichlet boundary values and with , positive somewhere. The weak maximum principle applied to gives , and the strong maximum principle for gives in the interior at positive times. So there.
For a scalar such as this is immediate. For quantities like "the smallest eigenvalue of ", which are not smooth and satisfy no exact equation, Morgan and Tian use the maximum principle for systems (11A.7 Maximum Principles under Ricci Flow) on the bundle with the convex set : the conclusion is again (their Proposition 4.17). The conditions on are those that make this set convex and invariant: is concave on each fibre (so is convex), invariant under parallel transport, and the reaction term does not decrease it at points where it is nonnegative.
Flatness from a single zero
Let , , , be a three-dimensional Ricci flow with nonnegative sectional curvature, connected but not necessarily complete. If for some , then is flat for every .
Proof. Nonnegative sectional curvature makes , with at a point exactly when all sectional curvatures vanish there (the scalar curvature is a sum of sectional curvatures). Suppose the flow is not flat at some time; then for some and some , and by continuity we may take . Shift time so that . Choose a compact connected domain with smooth boundary, containing and in its interior, and a smooth function on with , on and . Let solve on with on and . Then
and on the parabolic boundary (, where , and , where ). By the weak maximum principle on , and by the strong one . So : a contradiction.
Note what the theorem does not need: completeness, or any control at infinity. It is a local statement in space, which is why it applies to limits of flows that are only known on regions, as in Morgan and Tian's chapters 10 and 11.
Splitting from a zero eigenvalue of Ricci
Let , , , be a three-dimensional Ricci flow with nonnegative sectional curvature, connected, and not flat. If the Ricci curvature at some has a zero eigenvalue, then for every , splits locally as the Riemannian product of a surface of positive curvature and a line, and the flow is locally the product of a Ricci flow on the surface and the static flow on the line.
Proof. Step 1: positive scalar curvature. By Theorem 8.2, since the flow is not flat at time , on .
Step 2: the null space spreads. In Hamilton's normalisation, let be the eigenvalues of (11A.3 Curvature in a Moving Frame); the Ricci eigenvalues are , so a zero Ricci eigenvalue means , that is . Let , the sum of the two smallest eigenvalues. It is the minimum of the traces of over 2-dimensional subspaces of , so it is concave on each fibre and is convex; it is invariant under parallel transport; and by 11A.3 Curvature in a Moving Frame the ODE does not decrease it where it is zero: . The comparison trick, run as in the previous proof but with in place of and the maximum principle for systems in place of the scalar one, shows: if for some with , then . Since , we conclude on and, by continuity, on .
Step 3: the line field. So at every point and time, and, by Step 1, for . The curvature operator has a 2-dimensional null space in and one positive eigenvalue , with eigenvector a 2-form for some orthonormal . The planes on which the sectional curvature vanishes are exactly those containing the unit vector orthogonal to : the sectional curvatures are on and on , . So , and spans a smooth line field on (smooth because is a simple eigenvalue and the null space is its orthogonal complement). Locally is a smooth unit vector field, defined up to sign.
Step 4: is parallel. Here the evolution equation does the work, as in Hamilton's original argument. Let , a smooth unit section (up to sign) of the image of , so that near any point, with , and let be any smooth section of the null space (which has constant rank , by Steps 2 and 3). Then in space and time. Differentiate twice in space: gives , and
Differentiate once in time, in Uhlenbeck's frame (11A.3 Curvature in a Moving Frame): . Now insert the evolution equation . Since , and since in dimension three is the adjugate (11A.3 Curvature in a Moving Frame), which for is ,
As , this forces : the derivative of a section of the null space stays in the null space. So is a parallel subbundle of , its orthogonal complement, spanned by , is parallel too, and the unit section is parallel (its derivative is orthogonal to it, because , and lies in its span). Finally is the unit vector with , and the Hodge star commutes with covariant differentiation, so .
Step 5: is constant in time, and the flow splits. A parallel unit vector field splits the metric locally as a product , with the -direction (de Rham's local splitting: the distribution is integrable and totally geodesic because is parallel, and the flow of is by local isometries, as in the splitting theorem of 9B.5 Splitting and Soul Theorems). On a product the curvature is the pullback of the curvature of the surface factor, and . So : the metric does not change in the -direction or across it, and the evolution of , being the pullback of the evolution on , keeps in the null space. Hence the line field is independent of , and the flow is locally the product of a Ricci flow on , of curvature , with the static line.
Step 4 is the heart of the matter. The null space persists in time (Step 2), so the quantity is identically zero; differentiating it once in time and twice in space, and comparing through the evolution equation, leaves a sum of two nonnegative terms that must vanish, and . The first says the null space cannot turn. Algebra alone (the curvature is nonnegative and vanishes on some planes) gives only first-order information and does not suffice; the parabolic equation supplies the second-order information.
The global version. On a complete manifold the local splitting globalises after passing to a cover.
Let , , , be a Ricci flow of complete connected 3-manifolds with , with not flat, and suppose has a zero eigenvalue for some . Then a cover of splits, with its pulled-back flow, as , with a Ricci flow of surfaces of positive curvature.
The cover is needed because the line field may not be orientable, or its orthogonal surfaces may close up. Morgan and Tian list the possibilities (their Remark 4.21): the cover can be trivial, an infinite cyclic cover, a double cover, or a cover with group the infinite dihedral group . In the first two cases there is a global parallel unit vector field spanning the null direction; in the last two only a nonorientable line field. Examples: itself (trivial cover); (covered by with group ); the cross-cap quotient of 10A.6 Necks, Caps and Their Topology (double cover); and with a product-like metric (group ).
Cones are excluded
The open cone over a Riemannian surface is with . Its curvature is computed from the warped product formulas of 9A.5 Computing Curvature with warping function : planes containing have curvature , and the plane tangent to has curvature . So the curvature operator of a cone has a 2-dimensional null space at every point, and its third eigenvalue scales like along the rays. The cone is flat exactly when , that is when is locally the unit sphere and the cone is locally .
Let , , , be a three-dimensional Ricci flow with nonnegative sectional curvature. If is isometric to an open subset of a cone, then is flat for every .
Proof. If is flat, Theorem 8.2 (applied at any point, where ) makes every flat. Suppose is not flat. Shrinking , we may assume the nonzero eigenvalue never vanishes on . At every point the curvature has a 2-dimensional null space, so the Ricci curvature has a zero eigenvalue, and by Theorem 8.3 splits locally as a surface of positive curvature times a line, with the line in the null direction. In the cone, the null direction at each point is the radial direction (it is the vector with ). So the lines of the splitting are the rays of the cone. Along a line of a product , the curvature is constant (it is the curvature of at a fixed point). But along a ray of the cone the nonzero eigenvalue is proportional to , which is not constant: a contradiction.
This proposition is what makes asymptotic cones of -solutions useful. Rescaling a nonnegatively curved -solution down (a blow-down) produces, in the limit, a cone (9B.5 Splitting and Soul Theorems); if the limit were a smooth flow with nonnegative curvature through a nonflat cone, the proposition would force flatness. So the blow-down is either flat or singular, and in three dimensions Perelman uses this to show that the asymptotic volume of a -solution vanishes (12B.3 The Structure of κ-Solutions; Morgan and Tian, chapter 9, §6).
All dimensions, and compact manifolds
Hamilton proved the strong maximum principle for the full curvature operator in every dimension (1986; statement here).
Let , , be a Ricci flow with on a connected manifold. For , the null space of has constant rank and is invariant under parallel transport, and the image of is a Lie subalgebra of , invariant under parallel transport; by the Ambrose–Singer theorem it is the Lie algebra of the restricted holonomy group.
The proof is the argument of Step 4 above in general dimension: on the null space, , both terms are nonnegative, and the vanishing of the second, which is built from the Lie bracket, is what makes the image closed under brackets. In dimension three the possible null spaces are (positive curvature), a 2-dimensional subspace (the splitting above), or all of (flat).
Combining with Hamilton's 1982 theorem gives the classification of compact 3-manifolds with nonnegative Ricci curvature (Hamilton 1986; statement): if is closed and has a metric with , then under the Ricci flow either becomes positive at once, and is a spherical space form (11A.11 Hamilton’s 1982 Theorem); or the flow splits locally, and is a quotient of ; or , which in three dimensions means flat, and is a quotient of . The middle case uses the analogue of Theorem 8.3 for Ricci curvature, whose proof is the same with .
12B.1 κ-Solutions and 12B.3 The Structure of κ-Solutions: a -solution whose curvature operator has a zero eigenvalue is a quotient of the round cylinder; asymptotic cones of -solutions are not smooth nonflat cones; the asymptotic volume vanishes. Morgan and Tian also use Theorem 8.2 and Theorem 8.3 on incomplete limits in their chapters 10 and 11, where completeness is not available.
History
Hamilton proved the strong maximum principle for the curvature operator, and the classification of compact 3-manifolds with nonnegative Ricci curvature and 4-manifolds with nonnegative curvature operator, in "Four-manifolds with positive curvature operator" (1986). Louis Nirenberg proved the strong maximum principle for parabolic equations in 1953. Perelman used the splitting consequences throughout his study of -solutions (2002), and Morgan and Tian's chapter 4, §4 gives the local versions used here.
Heat started at one point is felt everywhere at once: a Dirichlet solution with nonnegative, not identically zero initial data is positive in the interior. Comparing a curvature quantity with such a solution transfers this to curvature. So in a three-dimensional flow with , at one point of a later time forces flatness; and a zero Ricci eigenvalue at one point forces everywhere, a parallel null vector field (its derivative vanishes because nonnegative curvature has a minimum on its planes), and a local splitting preserved by the flow, global on a cover. Cones have curvature scaling like along rays, incompatible with splitting, so nonflat cones never occur in such flows. Hamilton's null-space theorem gives the analogue in all dimensions. 11A.10 Hamilton–Ivey Pinching proves Hamilton–Ivey pinching.
Exercises
On the interval with the flat metric, solve the heat equation with Dirichlet conditions and initial data a small nonnegative bump near , by Fourier series, and explain why for every and , even far from the bump.
Solution
with . Positivity for all follows from the representation with the Dirichlet heat kernel for and (a consequence of the strong maximum principle, or of the method of images, which writes as an alternating sum of Gaussians that is positive inside the interval). Since and is positive on a set of positive measure, everywhere in the interior. For large , with : positive everywhere, and with the shape of the first eigenfunction.
Explain why a three-dimensional Ricci flow cannot start from a metric that is round near one point and flat near another, with everywhere, and remain flat near the second point for a positive time.
Solution
If the flow stayed flat near the second point up to some time , then . The flow has nonnegative sectional curvature for all time (preserved, 11A.7 Maximum Principles under Ricci Flow), so Theorem 8.2 makes it flat everywhere on , including at near the first point, where it is round: a contradiction. The positive curvature near the first point immediately makes everywhere.
For the cone over a surface of Gauss curvature , verify with the warped product formulas that the sectional curvatures are on planes containing and on planes tangent to . For a round sphere of radius , show the cone has positive curvature, and describe it near its vertex.
Solution
For , 9A.5 Computing Curvature gives and for tangent to . With : and , giving and . A round sphere of radius has when , so the tangential curvature is positive and blows up at the vertex , where the cone is singular: it is a cone of total angle less than that of , like a sharpened pencil tip in one dimension higher. By Proposition 8.5 no smooth flow with nonnegative curvature can pass through a time slice containing such a piece, away from the vertex.
In Step 4 of the proof of Theorem 8.3, the key claim is that if is a smooth function along a curve with , then . Use this to show: if is a smooth family of nonnegative symmetric matrices with , then is orthogonal to , in the sense that ; and that . (Hint for the last part: apply the first part to for and every real .)
Solution
with , so . For the last part, let and apply the first part to , which is in for every real : for all , so all three coefficients vanish, in particular . So is orthogonal to , which for a symmetric matrix means . This kind of first-order information is what a minimum provides; in the proof of Theorem 8.3 the second-order information from the evolution equation is what forces the null space to be parallel.
Let , , be a complete ancient solution of the three-dimensional Ricci flow with bounded nonnegative curvature operator, not flat, and suppose the curvature operator has a zero eigenvalue at some point. Using Corollary 8.4, show that a cover of is with an ancient solution on a surface with positive curvature. Using the classification of compact ancient solutions on (Daskalopoulos–Hamilton–Šešum, 11A.12 Ricci Flow on Surfaces), explain why, if is compact and the flow is -noncollapsed, the cover is the round shrinking cylinder. What input from Perelman's theory handles a noncompact ?
Solution
By the global splitting, a cover is with an ancient solution of the Ricci flow on a surface, with positive curvature (and complete, since is). If is compact it is (or , covered by ), and compact ancient solutions on are the round shrinking spheres or the King–Rosenau sausages. The sausage is collapsed in the far past (it looks like two cigars), so if one knows that the factor is -noncollapsed it is round, and the cover is the round shrinking cylinder. If were noncompact, it would be a complete ancient surface solution with positive curvature, and the cigar is the model; it is collapsed at large scales. Perelman's -noncollapsing (and his classification of two-dimensional -solutions as round spheres, 12B.1 κ-Solutions) is the extra input: it excludes the sausage and the cigar, leaving the round cylinder and its quotients.
Free resources for this chapter
Chosen for what this chapter covers, and all free to read. Links checked Oct 16, 2026.
© 2026 NeckPinch (www.neckpinch.com). All content in the guidebook (text, mathematics, figures and exercises) is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. No part may be copied, republished or redistributed without written permission.