© 2026 NeckPinch · www.neckpinch.com · All rights reserved.
Course 7Book 7A: Topology and the Fundamental GroupChapter 5
Computing π₁
Seifert–van Kampen, surfaces, projective spaces and knots.
Read with Lee, Introduction to Topological Manifolds, chapter 9 (some group theory: free groups, presentations, free products) and chapter 10 (the Seifert–van Kampen theorem and its applications to graphs, cell complexes, surfaces and knots), or Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, section 1.2.
The circle is the only space whose fundamental group 7A.4 The Fundamental Group computed from scratch. Most spaces of interest are built by gluing simpler pieces, and the Seifert–van Kampen theorem computes the fundamental group of a union from the fundamental groups of the pieces and of their overlap. With it, every surface's fundamental group follows from a single picture, and so does the fundamental group of the complement of a knot. The results are given by presentations: generators, one for each independent loop, and relations, one for each way of filling a loop in.
The mechanism to remember is that gluing in a disc along a loop kills that loop, and gluing in higher-dimensional cells changes nothing. So the fundamental group of a cell complex is determined by its 1-cells and 2-cells. For three-manifolds this means it can be read off from a Heegaard diagram (10A.2 Building Three-Manifolds).
By the end of this chapter you will be able to:
- work with free groups, presentations and free products, and abelianise a presentation;
- state the Seifert–van Kampen theorem and apply it to wedges of circles and to attaching cells;
- compute of every closed surface, of , and of the torus;
- write the Wirtinger presentation of a knot group, and show that the trefoil is knotted;
- explain why the fundamental group distinguishes all closed surfaces.
Knotted DNA
Many DNA molecules in cells are closed loops: the circular chromosomes of bacteria, plasmids, and the DNA of some viruses. A closed loop of DNA in three-dimensional space is a knot, and it can also be linked with other loops. Its knot type cannot change by any motion of the molecule in which the strands do not pass through each other. Yet cells must untangle DNA to copy and divide it, and the enzymes that do so, type II topoisomerases, work by cutting both strands of one segment of the double helix, passing another segment through the gap, and resealing: they change the knot type by a crossing change. Other enzymes, site-specific recombinases, cut and reconnect strands in ways that produce specific knots and links, and the knot types of the products have been used to deduce how the enzymes act.
Knot types can be told apart in the laboratory: a knotted circular DNA molecule of a given length is more compact than an unknotted one, and in gel electrophoresis knots of different types travel different distances. Andrzej Stasiak and colleagues showed that the distance travelled is closely correlated with the average crossing number of the knot's tightest configuration ("Electrophoretic mobility of DNA knots", Nature, 1996). Proteins can be knotted too: William Taylor found a deep figure-eight knot in the backbone of a plant enzyme in 2000 (Nature, 2000), and many knotted proteins are now known.
Mathematically, a knot is distinguished from the unknot by its knot group, the fundamental group of its complement in space. The complement of a knot is a three-manifold (10A.1 A Zoo of Three-Manifolds), and this chapter computes its fundamental group from a picture of the knot.
Free groups and presentations
The free group on a set consists of reduced words in the letters , (words with no adjacent or ), multiplied by concatenation and cancellation. The free group on one letter is ; on two letters , it is non-abelian () and enormous. Every group generated by is a quotient of .
A presentation , with a set of words, is the quotient of by the normal closure of , the smallest normal subgroup containing : the "largest" group generated by in which the relations hold. For example and . Deciding whether two presentations give isomorphic groups is in general undecidable (Adian and Rabin, 1955–58), which is part of why three-manifold topology is hard.
The abelianisation forces all generators to commute; for a finite presentation it is a finitely generated abelian group computed by integer linear algebra on the relations. It is the first homology group (7A.8 Homology in Brief).
The free product is the group of reduced words alternating between non-identity elements of and of ; if and , then . Given homomorphisms and , the amalgamated free product adds the relations for all .
The Seifert–van Kampen theorem
Let with , open, and , and path-connected, all containing the basepoint . Then the homomorphism induced by the inclusions is surjective, and its kernel is the normal subgroup generated by the elements for , where , are the inclusions of into and . That is,
Proof. (Sketch; Lee, chapter 10, or Hatcher, section 1.2.) Surjectivity. Given a loop in , the open sets and cover , so by the Lebesgue number lemma (2B.3 Compactness) there is a subdivision with each piece in or in . Join each to by a path in (possible since it is path-connected and contains both points, when lies in , which can be arranged). Inserting these paths and their reverses writes as a product of loops each lying in or in . The kernel. A loop in can be read either as a loop in or as one in , so the stated elements are in the kernel. That nothing else is, is proved by subdividing a null-homotopy into small squares, each mapped into or , and moving across it one square at a time.
Wedges of circles. The wedge (two circles joined at a point, a figure eight) is covered by two open sets, each a circle with a short whisker of the other, whose intersection is a contractible cross. So , free on the two loops. The same works for any number of circles, and for any connected graph: its fundamental group is free, on as many generators as edges outside a spanning tree.
Let be obtained from a path-connected space by attaching a 2-dimensional disc along a loop . Then , where is the normal subgroup generated by the class of . Attaching an -dimensional cell with doesn't change the fundamental group.
Proof. Take = minus the centre of the disc, which deformation retracts onto , and = the open disc, which is contractible; is a punctured disc, with generated by a loop around the centre, which is homotopic in to . Van Kampen gives modulo the normal closure of . For an -cell with , is simply connected (7A.4 The Fundamental Group), so nothing is added or killed.
Surfaces, projective spaces and the torus
A closed surface described by a polygon word (7A.3 Manifolds and Surfaces) is a cell complex: after gluing, the boundary of the polygon becomes a wedge of circles, one for each letter (all corners are identified in the normal forms), and the polygon is a 2-cell attached along the word. So:
| surface | presentation of | abelianisation |
|---|---|---|
| trivial | ||
| torus | ||
| genus , | ||
Here is the commutator. The abelianisations are all different, so the fundamental group distinguishes every closed surface from every other, which completes the proof that the surfaces in the classification theorem are pairwise distinct (7A.3 Manifolds and Surfaces). And only has trivial fundamental group: a simply connected closed surface is a sphere.
Projective spaces. has a cell structure with one cell in each dimension ; the 2-cell is attached to the circle by a map of degree . So for every , by Corollary 5.2. In particular , a Path milestone that 7A.6 Covering Spaces proves again with covering spaces and interprets physically.
Knot groups
A knot is an embedded circle (or ), and its knot group is . Equivalent knots, those that can be deformed into each other through embeddings, have homeomorphic complements and isomorphic groups. The unknot's complement deformation retracts onto a circle linking it, so its group is .
The Wirtinger presentation. Draw the knot as a diagram in the plane with breaks at undercrossings, so that it falls into arcs. Give the knot an orientation. Each arc contributes a generator : a loop from a basepoint above the plane that dips down under the arc and back, going around it in the right-handed sense. At each crossing, where an overcrossing arc separates two undercrossing arcs and , there is one relation,
depending on the sign of the crossing. (Van Kampen, applied to the complement cut along the plane of the diagram, proves this.) One of the relations always follows from the others.
For the trefoil, with three arcs , , and three crossings (Figure 5.2), the Wirtinger presentation reduces to
the second form by , (Exercise 5.5). This group is non-abelian: sending and in the symmetric group respects the relation and is onto a non-abelian group (Exercise 5.6). Since the unknot's group is , abelian, the trefoil is knotted: no deformation through embeddings untangles it. Its abelianisation is , the same as the unknot's; every knot group has abelianisation , so the non-abelian structure is essential.
The complement of a knot in is a three-manifold, and removing a neighbourhood of the knot leaves a compact three-manifold whose boundary is a torus. Cutting out such a neighbourhood and gluing it back differently, Dehn surgery, produces new closed three-manifolds; every closed orientable three-manifold arises by surgery on some link in (10A.2 Building Three-Manifolds). Knot complements are also the source of many hyperbolic three-manifolds (10A.6 Hyperbolic Three-Manifolds): the complement of the figure-eight knot carries a complete hyperbolic metric, and its geometry is determined by its fundamental group (Mostow rigidity). For three-manifolds the fundamental group carries an enormous amount of information, which is one reason the Poincaré conjecture is stated in terms of it.
History
Walther Dyck introduced group presentations in 1882 and Heinrich Tietze developed them in 1908. Max Dehn studied knot groups and proved in 1910 that the trefoil is knotted and distinct from its mirror image (the latter in 1914). Wilhelm Wirtinger described his presentation in lectures in 1905; it was published by Emil Artin in 1925. Herbert Seifert (1931) and Egbert van Kampen (1933) proved the theorem that bears their names. Sergei Adian (1955–57) and Michael Rabin (1958) proved that most properties of finitely presented groups, including triviality, are undecidable. Stasiak and colleagues' work on DNA knot mobility appeared in 1996 and Taylor's knotted protein in 2000.
Groups are presented by generators and relations; free groups have no relations, and abelianisation makes generators commute. Seifert–van Kampen computes as the amalgamated free product of and over . Wedges of circles have free fundamental groups; attaching a 2-cell along a loop kills that loop, and higher cells change nothing. So , for , and the fundamental group distinguishes all closed surfaces, with only simply connected. Knot groups have Wirtinger presentations; the trefoil group maps onto , so the trefoil is knotted. 7A.6 Covering Spaces relates fundamental groups to covering spaces.
Exercises
Show that is non-abelian by finding a homomorphism onto . Show that the loops , , are all non-trivial.
Solution
Send , ; since the group is free, any assignment extends to a homomorphism. The image is generated by two transpositions, hence all of , which is non-abelian, so in the free group. Since transpositions are their own inverses, ; the product of two transpositions sharing one point is a 3-cycle, and the square of a 3-cycle is a 3-cycle, so the image is non-trivial.
Write down from the octagon word . Show that it maps onto (set ), so it is non-abelian, and compute its abelianisation.
In , let and . (a) Show . (b) Show that and , so , generate, and that the relation implies . Conclude that the two presentations give isomorphic groups.
Solution
(a) , using . (b) , and . Conversely, with , : and .
Check that , satisfies in , and conclude that the trefoil group is non-abelian, so the trefoil is not the unknot. Show also that every knot group has abelianisation (in the Wirtinger presentation, abelianising makes all generators equal).
Solution
. In the abelianisation, each relation becomes ; the arcs of a connected diagram are linked by crossings, so all generators become equal, leaving one generator and no relation: .
From the word , . Show its abelianisation is , and compare with the torus.
A closed three-manifold can be built from a solid torus by attaching a 2-cell along a curve on its boundary torus and then a 3-cell; the curve is the meridian of the second solid torus in a genus-1 Heegaard splitting (7A.2 Compactness and Compactification, 10A.2 Building Three-Manifolds). (a) Using Corollary 5.2, show , where is the number of times winds around the core of (its class in ). (b) For (two solid tori, meridian glued to longitude), : . (c) For (meridian glued to meridian), : . (d) For the lens space , winds times around the core: .
Solution
(a) deformation retracts onto its core circle, so , generated by the core. Attaching the 2-cell along kills times the generator, giving ( if ); the 3-cell changes nothing. (b)–(d) follow by substituting , , .
© 2026 NeckPinch (www.neckpinch.com). All content in the guidebook (text, mathematics, figures and exercises) is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. No part may be copied, republished or redistributed without written permission.