© 2026 NeckPinch · www.neckpinch.com · All rights reserved.
Course 7Book 7A: Topology and the Fundamental GroupChapter 4
The Fundamental Group
Loops up to deformation, and π₁ of the circle.
Read with Lee, Introduction to Topological Manifolds, chapters 7 (homotopy and the fundamental group) and 8 (the circle), or Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, section 1.1. Choose one as your main text for this chapter and the next two, and use the other for examples.
The hypothesis of the Poincaré conjecture is that every loop in the manifold can be shrunk to a point. This chapter turns that sentence into mathematics. Loops are continuous maps of a circle; "shrunk" means continuously deformed, a homotopy; and the loops at a point, up to homotopy, form a group, the fundamental group , which Poincaré introduced in 1895 precisely to tell spaces apart. A space whose fundamental group is trivial is simply connected, and the conjecture says that the 3-sphere is the only closed simply connected three-manifold.
The first real computation is for the circle: , the integer being the winding number, how many times a loop goes around. The proof lifts loops from the circle to the line, which is the first instance of a covering space (7A.6 Covering Spaces). The winding number then proves two classical theorems almost for free: Brouwer's fixed point theorem in the disc and the fundamental theorem of algebra.
By the end of this chapter you will be able to:
- define homotopies of paths and maps, and the fundamental group, and prove it is a group;
- explain change of basepoint, induced homomorphisms, homotopy equivalence and contractibility;
- prove by path lifting, and compute winding numbers;
- prove that the circle is not a retract of the disc, and deduce Brouwer's fixed point theorem in dimension and the fundamental theorem of algebra;
- prove that is simply connected for .
A robot on a leash
A robot connected to a base station by a cable, for power or communication, as is common for underwater inspection vehicles and some robots used in disaster sites, can't move as freely as an untethered one. Two routes to the same goal that pass on different sides of an obstacle leave the cable wrapped differently, and the cable can't be unwrapped without retracing. What matters about a route is not just where it ends but its homotopy class: which routes can be deformed into each other without passing through obstacles. A planner must search for the best route within each class, or avoid classes that would leave the cable snagged or too long.
Robotics researchers have built path planners on exactly this idea: Subhrajit Bhattacharya, Maxim Likhachev and Vijay Kumar ("Topological constraints in search-based robot path planning", Autonomous Robots, 2012) computed invariants that distinguish classes of trajectories around obstacles and planned within prescribed classes, and Soonkyum Kim, Bhattacharya and Kumar applied this to tethered robots ("Path planning for a tethered mobile robot", ICRA 2014). In the plane with obstacles, the relevant invariant is the fundamental group of the obstacle-free region, and for a single obstacle it is the winding number of this chapter (Figure 4.1).
Homotopy
Let and be topological spaces and .
Two continuous maps are homotopic, , if there is a continuous with and . Two paths with the same endpoints are path homotopic if there is such an with and fixed for all .
Homotopy is an equivalence relation (Exercise 4.9). A homotopy is a continuous family of maps deforming into . In a convex subset of , any two paths with the same endpoints are path homotopic by the straight-line homotopy . In the plane minus the origin, the two paths around the two sides of the origin are not, as this chapter will prove.
The fundamental group
A loop at is a path with . Two loops can be concatenated: runs through at double speed and then through ,
The set of path-homotopy classes of loops at is a group under , with identity the class of the constant loop and inverse , where .
Proof. Well defined. If is a path homotopy from to and one from to , then running and side by side is a path homotopy from to .
The axioms. All three are instances of one principle: reparametrising a path doesn't change its class. If is continuous with and , then by . Now and traverse the same three loops at different speeds, so they differ by a reparametrisation: associativity. is reparametrised (waiting at for half the time): identity. For inverses, for and for shrinks to the constant loop by going out along only as far as time and coming back.
The group is usually not abelian (7A.5 Computing π₁): loops around two different holes in a twice-punctured plane don't commute.
Basepoints. If is a path from to , then is an isomorphism . So for path-connected the group is independent of the basepoint up to isomorphism, and one writes . The isomorphism depends on , up to conjugation.
Induced homomorphisms. A continuous with induces , . It is a homomorphism, and (functoriality). So homeomorphic spaces have isomorphic fundamental groups: is a topological invariant.
Homotopy invariance. More is true: maps that are homotopic (through basepoint-preserving homotopies) induce the same homomorphism. Two spaces and are homotopy equivalent if there are maps and with and ; then . For instance the punctured plane is homotopy equivalent to the circle (retract each ray onto its point of the unit circle), and so is the annulus and the solid torus . A space homotopy equivalent to a point is contractible: , any convex set, any star-shaped set. Contractible spaces have trivial fundamental group.
A space is simply connected if it is path-connected and its fundamental group is trivial: every loop can be shrunk to a point through loops.
The fundamental group of the circle
Let , , which wraps the line around the circle like a helix projected onto its axis (Figure 4.2). Each small arc of the circle has a preimage that is a disjoint union of copies of that arc, one in each interval ; this is what makes a covering map (7A.6 Covering Spaces).
- For every path and every , there is a unique path with and .
- Likewise every homotopy has a unique lift with a prescribed value at .
Proof. (1) By uniform continuity (2B.3 Compactness), divide into intervals so small that maps each into an arc of length less than half the circle. On such an arc, has continuous local inverses, one for each sheet of . Lift on the first interval using the inverse whose sheet contains , then on the next interval using the sheet containing the endpoint already reached, and so on. Uniqueness: two lifts with the same start differ by an integer-valued continuous function, which is constant on the connected (2B.4 Connectedness). (2) The same argument on a fine grid of small squares of .
For a loop at , let be its lift with , and define the winding number . Then is an isomorphism .
Proof. is an integer because . Well defined: a path homotopy from to lifts to ; the lift's right edge lies in the discrete set and is continuous, hence constant, so . Homomorphism: the lift of is followed by , which ends at . Onto: the loop has degree . Injective: if , the lift is a loop in , which is contractible by a straight-line homotopy ; then contracts .
For a loop in the punctured plane, , the winding number around is the degree of , and for piecewise smooth loops it equals , the integral of 5A.2 Cauchy’s Theorem and Its Consequences and the argument principle of 5A.3 Residues and Fourier Transforms: the integral measures the total change of the angle, which is times the change of the lift.
A dog on a leash walks around a lamppost and back to its owner. Whether the leash can be freed without unclipping is decided by the winding number of the dog's path around the post, measured relative to the owner: if it is zero, the dog can walk the leash free; if not, the leash is wrapped, and no amount of wandering that keeps the leash on the same side of the post will undo it. The same integer counts the turns of a garden hose around a tree and of a tether around a pillar.
Consequences
There is no continuous map with for all .
Proof. If there were, then with the inclusion, , so on . But maps into , since the disc is convex. The identity of cannot factor through the trivial group.
Every continuous map has a fixed point.
Proof. If for all , send each to the point where the ray from through leaves the disc. This is continuous and fixes the boundary circle: a retraction, which doesn't exist.
Stir a cup of coffee gently, without splashing, and let it settle. If the surface is idealised as a disc and the stirring as a continuous map of the disc to itself, Brouwer's theorem says some point of the surface ends up exactly where it started.
Real stirring is a three-dimensional, often turbulent flow, and the surface layer isn't moved by a single continuous map of a disc to itself: fluid moves between the surface and the depths, and "the same point of coffee" is not well defined at the molecular scale. The theorem applies to the idealisation, not to the cup. What the picture does convey correctly is that the fixed point is forced by topology alone, with no information about how the stirring was done.
The fundamental theorem of algebra, again. If had no root, then for each the loop in would be defined, and the family would be a homotopy from (constant, winding number ) to for large , which winds times because on the large circle (Exercise 4.12). So . This is the topological core of the complex-analytic proofs in 5A.2 Cauchy’s Theorem and Its Consequences and 5A.3 Residues and Fourier Transforms.
Products. , since a loop in a product is a pair of loops and a homotopy is a pair of homotopies. So , and the torus is not simply connected: the 2-dimensional Poincaré theorem's first test case (7A.3 Manifolds and Surfaces).
For , .
Proof. Let be a loop in . By uniform continuity, divide into intervals on each of which stays within an open hemisphere. Within an open hemisphere, homotope the piece of , keeping its endpoints, to the shortest great-circle arc between them (the hemisphere is homeomorphic to a convex set by projection, so a straight-line homotopy there works). The new loop is a finite union of great-circle arcs, a set of zero area in for , so it misses some point . But by stereographic projection (7A.2 Compactness and Compactification), which is contractible, so the loop can be shrunk to a point in .
In particular is simply connected: it satisfies the hypothesis of the Poincaré conjecture, which says it is the only closed three-manifold that does (7A.9 The Poincaré Conjecture, Precisely).
The fundamental group is the first of the homotopy groups , the classes of maps of the -sphere into . Perelman's finite-extinction argument for simply connected three-manifolds uses and : a simply connected closed three-manifold has non-trivial , so it contains a sphere of spheres that can't be shrunk, and the area of the best such family is forced to zero by the Ricci flow in finite time (12C.2 Finite Extinction). Sweepouts and their width are the subject of 10A.8 Min–Max and Width.
History
Henri Poincaré defined the fundamental group in Analysis Situs (1895), as the group of loops up to deformation, and used it to distinguish three-manifolds with the same homology (7A.8 Homology in Brief). Luitzen Brouwer proved his fixed point theorem in 1910–12 (in dimension 3 it had been proved by Piers Bohl in 1904). The winding number goes back to Gauss and Cauchy, as the change of the argument along a closed curve. Camille Jordan studied closed curves and their deformations in the 1860s.
Homotopy is continuous deformation; loops at a point up to path homotopy form the fundamental group , with concatenation as product. For path-connected spaces it is independent of the basepoint, it is functorial, and homotopy equivalent spaces have isomorphic fundamental groups; contractible spaces are simply connected. Lifting paths and homotopies through proves , the winding number. Hence the circle is not a retract of the disc, Brouwer's theorem holds in dimension , and polynomials have roots. , and is simply connected for . 7A.5 Computing π₁ computes fundamental groups of spaces built by gluing.
Exercises
Show that path homotopy is reflexive, symmetric (reverse the homotopy parameter) and transitive (run two homotopies one after the other, each at double speed in ). Where is continuity of the combined homotopy checked?
Show that is a well-defined isomorphism from to , with inverse . If is abelian, show doesn't depend on .
Find the winding number around of: (a) ; (b) ; (c) the boundary of the square traversed counterclockwise; (d) . (For (d), the winding number of a product is the sum.)
Solution
(a) : the modulus stays positive and the argument increases by . (b) : the loop stays in the half-plane , where the argument has a continuous branch. (c) . (d) , since winds once around .
Let with . (a) Show that for , the straight-line homotopy from to never passes through , so the two loops have the same winding number, . (b) Complete the argument in the text.
Solution
(a) for under the condition, so . (b) If has no zeros, for is a homotopy in from a constant loop to a loop of winding number , so , a contradiction.
Show that if is a retract of , then is injective. Use this to show that the circle is not a retract of the closed disc , but is a retract of the annulus .
Using the results of this chapter, decide which of the following closed three-manifolds are simply connected: ; ; ; the lens space (accept from 7A.6 Covering Spaces that ). Which of them could be counterexamples to the Poincaré conjecture, if it were false? (None of them: the ones that are simply connected are spheres. 7A.9 The Poincaré Conjecture, Precisely explains why the remaining candidate, the Poincaré homology sphere, isn't one either.)
Solution
: simply connected (Theorem 4.8). : . : . : for . Only is simply connected, and it is the sphere, so none is a counterexample.
© 2026 NeckPinch (www.neckpinch.com). All content in the guidebook (text, mathematics, figures and exercises) is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. No part may be copied, republished or redistributed without written permission.