© 2026 NeckPinch · www.neckpinch.com · All rights reserved.
Course 12Book 12A: Entropy and NoncollapsingChapter 8
Local Noncollapsing from the Reduced Volume
Perelman's §§7.3 and 8: noncollapsing that needs only local curvature control, the small-and-large-vector split, the maximum principle for the reduced distance, and the form that survives surgery.
Read Perelman I, §7.3 and §8 (Definition 8.1, Theorem 8.2, Lemma 8.3 and the maximum principle argument), with Morgan and Tian, chapter 8 (Theorem 8.1, Proposition 8.2, Claims 8.5–8.8 and Lemma 8.9; Theorem 8.10 for compact three-dimensional flows). Kleiner and Lott's notes treat §8 in their sections on "no local collapsing II". 12A.4 κ-Noncollapsing is the entropy version of the theorem, and 9B.3 Collapsing and Noncollapsing the Riemannian background on collapsing.
12A.4 κ-Noncollapsing proved that a Ricci flow on a closed manifold, over a finite time interval, is -noncollapsed at scales below any fixed , by comparing two values of the entropy : a collapsed ball forces to be very negative at small scale, while monotonicity bounds it from below by its value on the initial metric. That proof is global. The entropy is an integral over the whole manifold, and its monotonicity needs the flow to exist, smoothly, everywhere. A Ricci flow with surgery does not satisfy this: at each surgery time the manifold is cut and re-glued, and the entropy of the new manifold has no reason to be bounded by the old one. Perelman therefore proved a second noncollapsing theorem, in §7.3 and §8 of his first preprint, based on the reduced volume instead. It needs only local information: curvature bounds near the point in question and a lower volume bound for a ball at an earlier time at bounded distance. That is the form that can be carried across surgeries (12B.13 Ricci Flow with Surgery for All Time).
The proof has two halves, and they use the two results of 12A.7 Monotonicity of the Reduced Volume. If a ball is collapsed at scale , then the reduced volume based at its centre is small at : the -geodesics with small initial vectors stay inside the collapsed ball, which has little volume, and those with large initial vectors are suppressed by the Gaussian factor that bounds the integrand. On the other hand, if the reduced distance is bounded on some region of definite volume at a much earlier time, then the reduced volume at that earlier time is bounded below. Monotonicity forbids small-then-large. The second half requires an upper bound for , and here the point where is used, together with a maximum principle argument for that Perelman carries out in §8.
By the end of this chapter you will be able to:
- state Perelman's definition of -collapsing in terms of parabolic neighbourhoods, and explain why it differs from 12A.4 κ-Noncollapsing's;
- state Morgan and Tian's general noncollapsing theorem for generalised Ricci flows, and prove it: the metric comparison and derivative bounds on the parabolic ball, the confinement of short -geodesics, the bound on the small-vector part, the Gaussian bound on the large-vector part, and the conclusion;
- prove Perelman's Lemma 8.3 on the evolution of distance under bounded Ricci curvature;
- explain Perelman's Theorem 8.2 and its maximum principle proof, including the cut-off function and the role of (7.15);
- deduce universal noncollapsing for compact three-dimensional flows with normalised initial metrics (Morgan–Tian, Theorem 8.10);
- compare the entropy and reduced-volume routes and say which parts survive surgery.
Collapsing in a parabolic neighbourhood
Perelman's Definition 8.1 changes the hypothesis of 12A.4 κ-Noncollapsing in one respect. A Ricci flow is -collapsed at on the scale if
and . The curvature bound is now required on the whole backward parabolic neighbourhood , not only at the time . This is natural for the reduced volume, which looks backward in time from ; it is also slightly weaker than the entropy version (the hypothesis of collapsing is stronger, so the conclusion "not collapsed" is weaker), which Perelman notes. In the applications both are available, because the canonical neighbourhood estimates give curvature bounds on parabolic neighbourhoods anyway (12B.5 The Canonical Neighbourhood Theorem).
Morgan and Tian separate the theorem into a general statement about reduced volume, valid for generalised Ricci flows (space-times that are locally Ricci flows, which includes flows with surgery), and its applications. Throughout, the reduced volume is normalised as in 12A.5 Reduced Distance and Reduced Volume, with the factor , so that its value on flat space is ; Morgan and Tian's has value there, and their constants differ from these by that factor.
Given , and , there is , depending also on , with the following property. Let be a point of a generalised Ricci flow at time , let and , and suppose:
- the ball has compact closure and the backward parabolic neighbourhood exists in the flow, with on it;
- there is an open set in the injectivity set such that every -geodesic with initial vector in has reduced length at most at , and the image has volume at least .
Then .
The second hypothesis is the "large reduced volume at a large " input. It implies at once
and by the localised monotonicity of 12A.7 Monotonicity of the Reduced Volume (the sets are swept out by minimising geodesics, so the region they fill is closed under minimising geodesics), for every . The theorem follows from an upper bound at small .
The small-scale upper bound
Write , so that measures collapse, and set . The claim to prove is:
There is , depending on and , such that if , then .
Granting this, either or , that is . In either case is bounded below, and works. To prove the proposition, split the initial vectors at the scale :
and bound the two contributions to separately by and .
Control on the parabolic ball. Rescale so that : then on . By Shi's estimates (11A.5 Shi's Derivative Estimates), on , for a universal ; scaling back, . Since and , integrating in time gives
so on the metrics agree with up to a factor , and volumes of subsets of agree up to a factor between and for small (Morgan–Tian, Claims 8.5 and 8.8).
Short geodesics stay in the ball. The bounds on and along a geodesic control how fast can change: from the geodesic equation in the variable , , and a Gronwall argument gives (Morgan–Tian, Lemma 6.60 and Claim 8.6)
as long as the geodesic stays in and . For and small, this gives , and then, until the first exit time ,
So there is no exit: geodesics with small initial vectors stay in up to time (Morgan–Tian, Claim 8.7). This is where the scale comes from: in time , an -geodesic with initial vector travels a distance of about , which is less than when .
The small-vector part. Along such geodesics , so and . The images lie in , whose volume at time is at most . Hence
for . The collapsed ball has too little volume to carry much reduced volume.
The large-vector part. Here no geometry is needed, only the monotonicity of the integrand: by 12A.7 Monotonicity of the Reduced Volume, on the injectivity set, . So
(Exercise 8.6: compare the ball of radius with the inscribed cube of side , and use ). For small this is less than , because decays faster than any power. Adding the two parts proves Proposition 8.2, hence Theorem 8.1.
The structure is worth remembering: the reduced volume of a collapsed region is small at the scale of the collapse, because the Gaussian weight confines the integrand to -geodesics that cannot leave the region in that time. Perelman's §7.3 says this in one paragraph; the constants above are Morgan and Tian's.
Bounding the reduced distance from above
To apply Theorem 8.1 one needs hypothesis 2: a region of definite volume at an earlier time on which is bounded. Perelman's §7.3, for a flow on a closed manifold over with base point at time , gets it from : at there is a point with , and concatenating the minimiser to with short paths from through the region , where all geometric quantities are bounded by those of the initial metric, gives a uniform bound for on a ball of definite volume at . Morgan and Tian's Theorem 8.10 makes this precise in dimension three:
Given and , there is such that the following holds. Let , , be a Ricci flow on a compact three-manifold with and for all at time . Then for every and with : if on , then .
Proof. (Outline, following Morgan and Tian.) By parabolic rescaling one may assume and ; the normalisation at time survives rescaling with a different , by Bishop–Gromov. A normalised initial metric has bounded curvature and noncollapsed balls for a definite time, (the short-time estimate of their Proposition 4.11: the curvature at most doubles), and over that time the metrics are uniformly equivalent. By the theorem of 12A.7 Monotonicity of the Reduced Volume there is a point at time with (that is, , ). Concatenating the minimiser to with paths of bounded -length from to the points of in the time interval shows that on at time , a set of volume at least , and the injectivity domain has full measure there. Now apply Theorem 8.1 with , , .
Perelman's Theorem 8.2 is the local version, with no assumption on the whole initial manifold, only on one ball.
For every there is with the following property. Let , , be a smooth Ricci flow with on the set , and . Then the flow is not -collapsed on scales less than at any point with .
The difference from Theorem 8.3 is that nothing is assumed outside the parabolic cylinder over : the point may be far from (distance up to ), and the curvature between them is uncontrolled. The reduced distance from must be bounded on the ball around at an earlier time without any curvature control along the way, and that is what the maximum principle argument does.
Perelman's maximum principle argument
Scale so that and . The base point is and . The reduced volume at (time ) is bounded below if is bounded on a ball around at time ; by the curvature bounds on the cylinder over , it suffices to bound at time at some point within distance of , and then concatenate. The tool for that is a lemma on distances.
Let be a Ricci flow and a time. (a) If on , then satisfies, at and outside ,
in the barrier sense. (b) If on , then at .
Proof. (a) Let be a minimising -geodesic from to , parameterised by arclength , with unit tangent . Since , the length changes by (first variation of length with respect to the metric). For the Laplacian, use the second variation of length along fields , , that vanish at , are orthonormal at together with , are parallel along beyond the point at distance from , and grow linearly, with parallel, for . Then (the Laplacian comparison argument of 9B.1 Laplacian Comparison)
Rewriting, . The first term is . In the second, on the initial segment, and . So . Where is not smooth, the same inequality holds for the smooth upper barrier given by the length of a nearby curve, as in Calabi's argument (12A.7 Monotonicity of the Reduced Volume). (b) Apply the same estimate at both ends of a minimising geodesic from to .
The lemma says that bounded Ricci curvature near the endpoints is enough to control how fast distances can shrink and how negative can be: the uncontrolled curvature in the middle of the geodesic enters and with the same sign and cancels. It is used again in the canonical neighbourhood theorem (12B.5 The Canonical Neighbourhood Theorem).
The argument. Consider, for ,
where is the function of (7.15), and is a function of one variable equal to on , increasing to on , and chosen so that
The factor is at least for , because of the lower bound for (hence for ) at the end of 12A.7 Monotonicity of the Reduced Volume. At , the base time, , so . At the shift vanishes, so is infinite outside , and its minimum is achieved at some with . Running backward from to , the shift moves the support of from around (where ) to around , at speed in : the cut-off slides from the base point to the target ball.
At a minimum point of , gives , and substituting into the formula for (Perelman's (8.2)–(8.4)) leaves
Where , , and Lemma 8.3(a) with , (curvature at most in ) gives ; (8.1) then bounds the bracket below by . And in forward time, (7.15) reads (since ). So at a minimum point,
and the minimum of cannot decrease too fast as decreases: . At the minimising point , , so , and with . From , short paths through the controlled cylinder over reach every point of at time with bounded -length, which has volume at least a constant depending on (by the volume hypothesis and Bishop–Gromov). So at is bounded below by a constant depending on , and Theorem 8.1 (or Perelman's §7.3 argument) gives the theorem.
The two routes compared
| entropy route (12A.4 κ-Noncollapsing) | reduced-volume route (this chapter) | |
|---|---|---|
| monotone quantity | , an integral over the whole manifold | , based at one space-time point |
| hypothesis on the collapsed ball | at time | on the parabolic neighbourhood |
| input from the past | bounded below: the whole initial metric | bounded on a ball of definite volume at an earlier time |
| tool for the input | monotonicity of | , Lemma 8.3, maximum principle for |
| survives surgery? | no: surgery changes the manifold globally | yes, if the relevant -geodesics avoid surgery regions |
| used for | blow-up limits of smooth flows | Ricci flow with surgery (12B.13 Ricci Flow with Surgery for All Time); -solutions (12B.1 κ-Solutions) |
In the flow with surgery, Perelman proves noncollapsing at each stage by induction on the surgery intervals: assuming the flow up to the -th surgery is noncollapsed and has canonical neighbourhoods, he measures -length only for admissible curves, those that stay in the region unaffected by surgery, and observes that the argument of this chapter goes through if every barely admissible curve (one on the boundary of the admissible set) has reduced length at least ; since that is not automatic, he adds an estimate showing that curves which come near a surgery region pick up a large -length there, where the curvature is huge (Perelman II, Lemmas 5.2 and 5.3; Morgan–Tian, chapter 16). 12B.13 Ricci Flow with Surgery for All Time explains that induction.
The reduced volume works like an echo sounder. From a point of space-time, it sends out a fan of -geodesics into the past and measures, with a Gaussian weight, how much room they find. If the space around the point is collapsed (thin in some direction at the scale ), the fan finds little room at the time in the past: the reading is small. If, far in the past, the fan reaches a region of definite size where it travels cheaply, the reading there is large. Monotonicity says the reading can only decrease as one looks further into the past. A collapse now and a roomy region then cannot both hold. The analogy breaks in an instructive place: an echo sounder needs the medium to be uniform, while the reduced volume works with no assumption on the curvature in between, because the flow equation itself supplies the comparison geometry.
12A.9 Pseudolocality turns to the other half of §§9–10: Perelman's differential Harnack inequality for the conjugate heat kernel and pseudolocality, and 12A.10 The Proof of Pseudolocality proves pseudolocality. 12B.1 κ-Solutions uses the reduced volume, now with , to produce the asymptotic soliton of a -solution and to prove that -solutions are noncollapsed with a universal . 12B.13 Ricci Flow with Surgery for All Time carries the reduced-volume noncollapsing across surgeries.
History
Perelman's §7.3 and §8 appeared in his first preprint (2002); Theorem 8.2 was the version he needed for surgery, and Lemma 8.3 refers to Hamilton's "Formation of singularities" (1995), §17, for part (b). Kleiner and Lott (2003–08), Morgan and Tian (2007) and Cao and Zhu (2006) wrote out the proofs; Morgan and Tian's Theorem 8.1 isolates the reduced-volume argument in a form valid for generalised Ricci flows. The use of the second variation of length with linearly growing fields to bound goes back to the Laplacian comparison theorem of Riemannian geometry.
Perelman's local definition of collapsing requires curvature bounds on the backward parabolic neighbourhood. If such a ball is collapsed, , then at the reduced volume based at its centre is less than : -geodesics with stay in the half ball (Shi's bound on and Gronwall), which has small volume, and the rest are suppressed by the bound on the integrand. If is bounded by on a set of volume at , monotonicity bounds the reduced volume below, and is bounded below: Morgan and Tian's Theorem 8.1. The upper bound for comes from (for normalised compact flows, Theorem 8.10) or, in Perelman's local Theorem 8.2, from a maximum principle for , using Lemma 8.3: bounded Ricci curvature near the endpoints bounds below. The reduced-volume route survives surgery; the entropy route does not. 12A.9 Pseudolocality turns to the Harnack inequality and pseudolocality.
Exercises
(a) Show that and that . (b) Deduce . (c) With , get .
Solution
(a) The cube lies in the ball of radius , and the integral over the cube factorises. For the second inequality, . (b) With : , and the total is , so the tail is at most with ; and for (Bernoulli, or the mean value theorem). (c) .
Suppose on under . Show that for and any tangent vector , , and deduce that volumes change by a factor at most .
Solution
; integrating over an interval of length at most gives . The volume form is , and with , giving a factor at most .
On static flat , show that the -geodesic with initial vector reaches distance at time , and that with it stays in the ball of radius exactly when . Why does the general proof use the smaller threshold ?
Solution
, so iff . In a curved flow is only approximately , with error , and the metrics and differ slightly; the margin from to absorbs these errors for small .
Let with the static flat metric (a circle of length ). (a) Show that for , , so the flow is -collapsed at scale once . (b) Explain why this does not contradict Theorem 8.4 or Theorem 8.3: which hypothesis fails? (c) Compute for this flow based at any point, and show as .
Solution
(a) The ball of radius lies in , of volume , and , so it is -collapsed when . (b) The volume hypothesis at the earlier time fails for : , which is less than unless ; noncollapsing propagates forward in time but cannot be created. Likewise the normalisation fails when is small. (c) The universal cover is and -geodesics lift; over the lifts of the base point. So , which for is approximately : the reduced volume detects the collapse at large scales.
On static flat , compute for and check that it is at least outside , as Lemma 8.3(a) predicts with . Is the bound sharp?
Solution
and , so for , with equality on the sphere . So it is sharp at . The proof's choice of fields (linear on , parallel beyond) is not optimal for , where linear fields along the whole geodesic would give ; the lemma uses the cruder fields because the curvature is controlled only on .
Show that if , , satisfies the hypotheses of Theorem 8.4, then , , satisfies them with and the same , and that -noncollapsing is scale invariant. This justifies setting .
Solution
is a Ricci flow; where ; distances scale by , so iff and iff ; volumes scale by , so . A ball with and volume corresponds to with and volume .
Free resources for this chapter
Chosen for what this chapter covers, and all free to read. Links checked Oct 16, 2026.
- Notes Notes on Perelman’s papersBruce Kleiner and John Lott, arXiv (2006) · §§26–28No local collapsing II, the length distortion estimates of Lemma 8.3 and the propagation of noncollapsing.
- Paper The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applicationsG. Perelman, arXiv:math/0211159 · §§7.3, 8Definition 8.1, Theorem 8.2 and Lemma 8.3.
© 2026 NeckPinch (www.neckpinch.com). All content in the guidebook (text, mathematics, figures and exercises) is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. No part may be copied, republished or redistributed without written permission.