Book 12A

© 2026 NeckPinch · www.neckpinch.com · All rights reserved.

Course 12Book 12A: Entropy and NoncollapsingChapter 8

Local Noncollapsing from the Reduced Volume

Perelman's §§7.3 and 8: noncollapsing that needs only local curvature control, the small-and-large-vector split, the maximum principle for the reduced distance, and the form that survives surgery.

41 min read · Updated Oct 23, 2026

Read Perelman I, §7.3 and §8 (Definition 8.1, Theorem 8.2, Lemma 8.3 and the maximum principle argument), with Morgan and Tian, chapter 8 (Theorem 8.1, Proposition 8.2, Claims 8.5–8.8 and Lemma 8.9; Theorem 8.10 for compact three-dimensional flows). Kleiner and Lott's notes treat §8 in their sections on "no local collapsing II". 12A.4 κ-Noncollapsing is the entropy version of the theorem, and 9B.3 Collapsing and Noncollapsing the Riemannian background on collapsing.

In this chapter · 7 sections
  1. 8.1Collapsing in a parabolic neighbourhood
  2. 8.2The small-scale upper bound
  3. 8.3Bounding the reduced distance from above
  4. 8.4Perelman's maximum principle argument
  5. 8.5The two routes compared
  6. 8.6History
  7. 8.7Exercises
  8. ↗Free resources

12A.4 κ-Noncollapsing proved that a Ricci flow on a closed manifold, over a finite time interval, is κ\kappa-noncollapsed at scales below any fixed ρ\rho, by comparing two values of the entropy μ\mu: a collapsed ball forces μ\mu to be very negative at small scale, while monotonicity bounds it from below by its value on the initial metric. That proof is global. The entropy is an integral over the whole manifold, and its monotonicity needs the flow to exist, smoothly, everywhere. A Ricci flow with surgery does not satisfy this: at each surgery time the manifold is cut and re-glued, and the entropy of the new manifold has no reason to be bounded by the old one. Perelman therefore proved a second noncollapsing theorem, in §7.3 and §8 of his first preprint, based on the reduced volume instead. It needs only local information: curvature bounds near the point in question and a lower volume bound for a ball at an earlier time at bounded distance. That is the form that can be carried across surgeries (12B.13 Ricci Flow with Surgery for All Time).

The proof has two halves, and they use the two results of 12A.7 Monotonicity of the Reduced Volume. If a ball is collapsed at scale rr, then the reduced volume based at its centre is small at τ=εr2\tau = \varepsilon r^2: the L\mathcal L-geodesics with small initial vectors stay inside the collapsed ball, which has little volume, and those with large initial vectors are suppressed by the Gaussian factor e−∣v∣2e^{-|v|^2} that bounds the integrand. On the other hand, if the reduced distance is bounded on some region of definite volume at a much earlier time, then the reduced volume at that earlier time is bounded below. Monotonicity forbids small-then-large. The second half requires an upper bound for ℓ\ell, and here the point where ℓ≤n2\ell \leq \frac n2 is used, together with a maximum principle argument for Lˉ=4τℓ\bar L = 4\tau\ell that Perelman carries out in §8.

By the end of this chapter you will be able to:

  • state Perelman's definition of κ\kappa-collapsing in terms of parabolic neighbourhoods, and explain why it differs from 12A.4 κ-Noncollapsing's;
  • state Morgan and Tian's general noncollapsing theorem for generalised Ricci flows, and prove it: the metric comparison and derivative bounds on the parabolic ball, the confinement of short L\mathcal L-geodesics, the bound on the small-vector part, the Gaussian bound on the large-vector part, and the conclusion;
  • prove Perelman's Lemma 8.3 on the evolution of distance under bounded Ricci curvature;
  • explain Perelman's Theorem 8.2 and its maximum principle proof, including the cut-off function φ\varphi and the role of (7.15);
  • deduce universal noncollapsing for compact three-dimensional flows with normalised initial metrics (Morgan–Tian, Theorem 8.10);
  • compare the entropy and reduced-volume routes and say which parts survive surgery.

Collapsing in a parabolic neighbourhood

Perelman's Definition 8.1 changes the hypothesis of 12A.4 κ-Noncollapsing in one respect. A Ricci flow is κ\kappa-collapsed at (x0,t0)(x_0, t_0) on the scale rr if

∣Rm⁡∣(x,t)≤r−2for all (x,t) with dt0(x,x0)<r, t0−r2≤t≤t0,|\operatorname{Rm}|(x, t) \leq r^{-2} \quad\text{for all } (x, t) \text{ with } d_{t_0}(x, x_0) < r,\ t_0 - r^2 \leq t \leq t_0,

and Vol⁡t0B(x0,r)<κrn\operatorname{Vol}_{t_0}B(x_0, r) < \kappa r^n. The curvature bound is now required on the whole backward parabolic neighbourhood P(x0,t0,r,−r2)=Bt0(x0,r)×[t0−r2,t0]P(x_0, t_0, r, -r^2) = B_{t_0}(x_0, r)\times[t_0 - r^2, t_0], not only at the time t0t_0. This is natural for the reduced volume, which looks backward in time from (x0,t0)(x_0, t_0); it is also slightly weaker than the entropy version (the hypothesis of collapsing is stronger, so the conclusion "not collapsed" is weaker), which Perelman notes. In the applications both are available, because the canonical neighbourhood estimates give curvature bounds on parabolic neighbourhoods anyway (12B.5 The Canonical Neighbourhood Theorem).

Morgan and Tian separate the theorem into a general statement about reduced volume, valid for generalised Ricci flows (space-times that are locally Ricci flows, which includes flows with surgery), and its applications. Throughout, the reduced volume is normalised as in 12A.5 Reduced Distance and Reduced Volume, with the factor (4πτ)−n/2(4\pi\tau)^{-n/2}, so that its value on flat space is 11; Morgan and Tian's has value (4π)n/2(4\pi)^{n/2} there, and their constants differ from these by that factor.

Theorem 8.1 Noncollapsing from the reduced volume (Morgan–Tian, Theorem 8.1)

Given τˉ0<∞\bar\tau_0 < \infty, l0<∞l_0 < \infty and V>0V > 0, there is κ>0\kappa > 0, depending also on nn, with the following property. Let xx be a point of a generalised Ricci flow at time TT, let 0<τ0≤τˉ00 < \tau_0 \leq \bar\tau_0 and 0<r≤τ00 < r \leq \sqrt{\tau_0}, and suppose:

  1. the ball B(x,T,r)B(x, T, r) has compact closure and the backward parabolic neighbourhood B(x,T,r)×[T−r2,T]B(x, T, r)\times[T - r^2, T] exists in the flow, with ∣Rm⁡∣≤r−2|\operatorname{Rm}| \leq r^{-2} on it;
  2. there is an open set W~\tilde W in the injectivity set U~(τ0)⊆TxM\tilde U(\tau_0) \subseteq T_xM such that every L\mathcal L-geodesic with initial vector in W~\tilde W has reduced length at most l0l_0 at τ0\tau_0, and the image W(τ0)=Lexp⁡τ0(W~)W(\tau_0) = \mathcal L\exp_{\tau_0}(\tilde W) has volume at least VV.

Then Vol⁡B(x,T,r)≥κrn\operatorname{Vol}B(x, T, r) \geq \kappa r^n.

The second hypothesis is the "large reduced volume at a large τ\tau" input. It implies at once

V~(W(τ0))=∫W(τ0)(4πτ0)−n/2e−ℓ dV≥(4πτˉ0)−n/2Ve−l0,\tilde V\big(W(\tau_0)\big) = \int_{W(\tau_0)}(4\pi\tau_0)^{-n/2}e^{-\ell}\,dV \geq (4\pi\bar\tau_0)^{-n/2}Ve^{-l_0},

and by the localised monotonicity of 12A.7 Monotonicity of the Reduced Volume (the sets W(τ)=Lexp⁡τ(W~)W(\tau) = \mathcal L\exp_\tau(\tilde W) are swept out by minimising geodesics, so the region they fill is closed under minimising geodesics), V~(W(τ))≥(4πτˉ0)−n/2Ve−l0\tilde V(W(\tau)) \geq (4\pi\bar\tau_0)^{-n/2}Ve^{-l_0} for every τ≤τ0\tau \leq \tau_0. The theorem follows from an upper bound at small τ\tau.

The small-scale upper bound

Write Vol⁡B(x,T,r)=εnrn\operatorname{Vol}B(x, T, r) = \varepsilon^nr^n, so that ε\varepsilon measures collapse, and set τ1=εr2\tau_1 = \varepsilon r^2. The claim to prove is:

Proposition 8.2 Reduced volume of a collapsed ball (Morgan–Tian, Proposition 8.2)

There is ε0>0\varepsilon_0 > 0, depending on nn and τˉ0\bar\tau_0, such that if ε≤ε0\varepsilon \leq \varepsilon_0, then V~(W(τ1))<3(4π)−n/2εn/2\tilde V(W(\tau_1)) < 3(4\pi)^{-n/2}\varepsilon^{n/2}.

Granting this, either ε>ε0\varepsilon > \varepsilon_0 or (4πτˉ0)−n/2Ve−l0<3(4π)−n/2εn/2(4\pi\bar\tau_0)^{-n/2}Ve^{-l_0} < 3(4\pi)^{-n/2}\varepsilon^{n/2}, that is εn/2>13τˉ0−n/2Ve−l0\varepsilon^{n/2} > \frac13\bar\tau_0^{-n/2}Ve^{-l_0}. In either case ε\varepsilon is bounded below, and κ=min⁡{ε0n,(13τˉ0−n/2Ve−l0)2}\kappa = \min\{\varepsilon_0^n, (\frac13\bar\tau_0^{-n/2}Ve^{-l_0})^2\} works. To prove the proposition, split the initial vectors at the scale 18ε−1/2\frac18\varepsilon^{-1/2}:

W~sm=W~∩{∣v∣≤18ε−1/2},W~lg=W~∖W~sm,\tilde W_{\mathrm{sm}} = \tilde W\cap\Big\{|v| \leq \tfrac18\varepsilon^{-1/2}\Big\}, \qquad \tilde W_{\mathrm{lg}} = \tilde W\setminus\tilde W_{\mathrm{sm}},

and bound the two contributions to V~(W(τ1))\tilde V(W(\tau_1)) separately by 2(4π)−n/2εn/22(4\pi)^{-n/2}\varepsilon^{n/2} and (4π)−n/2εn/2(4\pi)^{-n/2}\varepsilon^{n/2}.

Control on the parabolic ball. Rescale so that r=1r = 1: then ∣Rm⁡∣≤1|\operatorname{Rm}| \leq 1 on B(x,T,1)×[T−1,T]B(x, T, 1)\times[T - 1, T]. By Shi's estimates (11A.5 Shi's Derivative Estimates), ∣∇R∣≤C1|\nabla R| \leq C_1 on B(x,T,12)×[T−12,T]B(x, T, \frac12)\times[T - \frac12, T], for a universal C1C_1; scaling back, ∣∇R∣≤C1r−3|\nabla R| \leq C_1r^{-3}. Since ∣Ric⁡∣≤(n−1)r−2|\operatorname{Ric}| \leq (n - 1)r^{-2} and ∂tg=−2Ric⁡\partial_tg = -2\operatorname{Ric}, integrating in time gives

e−2(n−1)(T−t)/r2≤g(t)g(T)≤e2(n−1)(T−t)/r2,e^{-2(n-1)(T-t)/r^2} \leq \frac{g(t)}{g(T)} \leq e^{2(n-1)(T-t)/r^2},

so on [T−τ1,T][T - \tau_1, T] the metrics agree with g(T)g(T) up to a factor 1±Cε1 \pm C\varepsilon, and volumes of subsets of B(x,T,r)B(x, T, r) agree up to a factor between 0.90.9 and 1.11.1 for ε\varepsilon small (Morgan–Tian, Claims 8.5 and 8.8).

Short geodesics stay in the ball. The bounds on Ric⁡\operatorname{Ric} and ∇R\nabla R along a geodesic control how fast τX\sqrt\tau X can change: from the geodesic equation in the variable ss, ∣ddsA∣≤C(s2∣∇R∣+s∣Ric⁡∣∣A∣)\big|\frac{d}{ds}A\big| \leq C(s^2|\nabla R| + s|\operatorname{Ric}||A|), and a Gronwall argument gives (Morgan–Tian, Lemma 6.60 and Claim 8.6)

∣τ∣X(τ)∣g(T)−∣v∣∣≤2ε(1+∣v∣)\big|\sqrt\tau|X(\tau)|_{g(T)} - |v|\big| \leq 2\varepsilon(1 + |v|)

as long as the geodesic stays in B(x,T,r/2)B(x, T, r/2) and τ≤τ1\tau \leq \tau_1. For ∣v∣≤18ε−1/2|v| \leq \frac18\varepsilon^{-1/2} and ε\varepsilon small, this gives τ∣X∣≤14ε−1/2\sqrt\tau|X| \leq \frac14\varepsilon^{-1/2}, and then, until the first exit time τ′\tau',

dg(T)(γv(τ′),x)≤∫0τ′∣X∣ dτ≤14ε∫0τ′dττ=τ′2ε<εr22ε=r2.d_{g(T)}(\gamma_v(\tau'), x) \leq \int_0^{\tau'}|X|\,d\tau \leq \frac{1}{4\sqrt\varepsilon}\int_0^{\tau'}\frac{d\tau}{\sqrt\tau} = \frac{\sqrt{\tau'}}{2\sqrt\varepsilon} < \frac{\sqrt{\varepsilon r^2}}{2\sqrt\varepsilon} = \frac r2.

So there is no exit: geodesics with small initial vectors stay in B(x,T,r/2)B(x, T, r/2) up to time τ1\tau_1 (Morgan–Tian, Claim 8.7). This is where the scale ε−1/2\varepsilon^{-1/2} comes from: in time εr2\varepsilon r^2, an L\mathcal L-geodesic with initial vector vv travels a distance of about 2εr2∣v∣2\sqrt{\varepsilon r^2}|v|, which is less than r2\frac r2 when ∣v∣<14ε−1/2|v| < \frac14\varepsilon^{-1/2}.

The small-vector part. Along such geodesics R≥−n(n−1)r−2R \geq -n(n - 1)r^{-2}, so L≥−2n(n−1)3r2τ13/2L \geq -\frac{2n(n-1)}{3r^2}\tau_1^{3/2} and ℓ(q,τ1)≥−n(n−1)3ε\ell(q, \tau_1) \geq -\frac{n(n - 1)}{3}\varepsilon. The images lie in B(x,T,r/2)⊆B(x,T,r)B(x, T, r/2) \subseteq B(x, T, r), whose volume at time T−τ1T - \tau_1 is at most 1.1 εnrn1.1\,\varepsilon^nr^n. Hence

V~(Wsm(τ1))≤(4πεr2)−n/2en(n−1)ε/3⋅1.1 εnrn=(4π)−n/2⋅1.1 en(n−1)ε/3εn/2≤2(4π)−n/2εn/2\tilde V\big(W_{\mathrm{sm}}(\tau_1)\big) \leq (4\pi\varepsilon r^2)^{-n/2}e^{n(n-1)\varepsilon/3}\cdot1.1\,\varepsilon^nr^n = (4\pi)^{-n/2}\cdot1.1\,e^{n(n-1)\varepsilon/3}\varepsilon^{n/2} \leq 2(4\pi)^{-n/2}\varepsilon^{n/2}

for ε≤14n(n−1)\varepsilon \leq \frac{1}{4n(n - 1)}. The collapsed ball has too little volume to carry much reduced volume.

The large-vector part. Here no geometry is needed, only the monotonicity of the integrand: by 12A.7 Monotonicity of the Reduced Volume, on the injectivity set, (4πτ)−n/2e−ℓ~J≤(4π)−n/22ne−∣v∣2=π−n/2e−∣v∣2(4\pi\tau)^{-n/2}e^{-\tilde\ell}J \leq (4\pi)^{-n/2}2^ne^{-|v|^2} = \pi^{-n/2}e^{-|v|^2}. So

V~(Wlg(τ1))≤π−n/2∫∣v∣≥18ε−1/2e−∣v∣2 dv≤n2e−1/(64nε)\tilde V\big(W_{\mathrm{lg}}(\tau_1)\big) \leq \pi^{-n/2}\int_{|v|\geq\frac18\varepsilon^{-1/2}}e^{-|v|^2}\,dv \leq \frac n2e^{-1/(64n\varepsilon)}

(Exercise 8.6: compare the ball of radius aa with the inscribed cube of side 2an\frac{2a}{\sqrt n}, and use 1−(1−δ)n/2≤n2δ1 - (1 - \delta)^{n/2} \leq \frac n2\delta). For ε\varepsilon small this is less than (4π)−n/2εn/2(4\pi)^{-n/2}\varepsilon^{n/2}, because e−1/(64nε)e^{-1/(64n\varepsilon)} decays faster than any power. Adding the two parts proves Proposition 8.2, hence Theorem 8.1.

The structure is worth remembering: the reduced volume of a collapsed region is small at the scale of the collapse, because the Gaussian weight confines the integrand to L\mathcal L-geodesics that cannot leave the region in that time. Perelman's §7.3 says this in one paragraph; the constants above are Morgan and Tian's.

Bounding the reduced distance from above

To apply Theorem 8.1 one needs hypothesis 2: a region of definite volume at an earlier time on which ℓ\ell is bounded. Perelman's §7.3, for a flow on a closed manifold over [0,T][0, T] with base point at time tkt_k, gets it from min⁡ℓ≤n2\min\ell \leq \frac n2: at τ=tk−T2\tau = t_k - \frac T2 there is a point qkq_k with ℓ≤n2\ell \leq \frac n2, and concatenating the minimiser to qkq_k with short paths from qkq_k through the region [0,T2][0, \frac T2], where all geometric quantities are bounded by those of the initial metric, gives a uniform bound for ℓ\ell on a ball of definite volume at t=0t = 0. Morgan and Tian's Theorem 8.10 makes this precise in dimension three:

Theorem 8.3 Noncollapsing for normalised compact flows (Morgan–Tian, Theorem 8.10)

Given ω>0\omega > 0 and T0<∞T_0 < \infty, there is κ>0\kappa > 0 such that the following holds. Let (M3,g(t))(M^3, g(t)), 0≤t<T≤T00 \leq t < T \leq T_0, be a Ricci flow on a compact three-manifold with ∣Rm⁡∣≤1|\operatorname{Rm}| \leq 1 and Vol⁡B(p,0,1)≥ω\operatorname{Vol}B(p, 0, 1) \geq \omega for all pp at time 00. Then for every (p,t0)(p, t_0) and rr with r2≤t0r^2 \leq t_0: if ∣Rm⁡∣≤r−2|\operatorname{Rm}| \leq r^{-2} on B(p,t0,r)×[t0−r2,t0]B(p, t_0, r)\times[t_0 - r^2, t_0], then Vol⁡B(p,t0,r)≥κr3\operatorname{Vol}B(p, t_0, r) \geq \kappa r^3.

Proof. (Outline, following Morgan and Tian.) By parabolic rescaling one may assume t0≥1t_0 \geq 1 and r≤t0/2r \leq \sqrt{t_0}/2; the normalisation at time 00 survives rescaling with a different ω\omega, by Bishop–Gromov. A normalised initial metric has bounded curvature and noncollapsed balls for a definite time, t∈[0,2−4]t \in [0, 2^{-4}] (the short-time estimate of their Proposition 4.11: the curvature at most doubles), and over that time the metrics are uniformly equivalent. By the theorem min⁡ℓ≤n2\min\ell \leq \frac n2 of 12A.7 Monotonicity of the Reduced Volume there is a point q0q_0 at time 2−42^{-4} with ℓ≤32\ell \leq \frac32 (that is, n2\frac n2, n=3n = 3). Concatenating the minimiser to (q0,2−4)(q_0, 2^{-4}) with paths of bounded L\mathcal L-length from q0q_0 to the points of B(q0,0,1)B(q_0, 0, 1) in the time interval [2−5,2−4][2^{-5}, 2^{-4}] shows that ℓ≤C′\ell \leq C' on B(q0,0,1)B(q_0, 0, 1) at time 2−52^{-5}, a set of volume at least κ0>0\kappa_0 > 0, and the injectivity domain has full measure there. Now apply Theorem 8.1 with τ0=t0−2−5\tau_0 = t_0 - 2^{-5}, l0=C′l_0 = C', V=κ0V = \kappa_0.

Perelman's Theorem 8.2 is the local version, with no assumption on the whole initial manifold, only on one ball.

Theorem 8.4 No local collapsing II (Perelman I, Theorem 8.2)

For every A>0A > 0 there is κ=κ(A)>0\kappa = \kappa(A) > 0 with the following property. Let g(t)g(t), 0≤t≤r020 \leq t \leq r_0^2, be a smooth Ricci flow with ∣Rm⁡∣≤r0−2|\operatorname{Rm}| \leq r_0^{-2} on the set {(x,t):d0(x,x0)<r0}\{(x, t) : d_0(x, x_0) < r_0\}, and Vol⁡0B(x0,r0)≥A−1r0n\operatorname{Vol}_0B(x_0, r_0) \geq A^{-1}r_0^n. Then the flow is not κ\kappa-collapsed on scales less than r0r_0 at any point (x,r02)(x, r_0^2) with dr02(x,x0)≤Ar0d_{r_0^2}(x, x_0) \leq Ar_0.

The difference from Theorem 8.3 is that nothing is assumed outside the parabolic cylinder over B(x0,r0)B(x_0, r_0): the point xx may be far from x0x_0 (distance up to Ar0Ar_0), and the curvature between them is uncontrolled. The reduced distance from (x,r02)(x, r_0^2) must be bounded on the ball around x0x_0 at an earlier time without any curvature control along the way, and that is what the maximum principle argument does.

Perelman's maximum principle argument

Scale so that r0=1r_0 = 1 and d1(x,x0)=Ad_1(x, x_0) = A. The base point is (x,1)(x, 1) and τ=1−t\tau = 1 - t. The reduced volume at τ=1\tau = 1 (time 00) is bounded below if ℓ\ell is bounded on a ball around x0x_0 at time 00; by the curvature bounds on the cylinder over B(x0,1)B(x_0, 1), it suffices to bound ℓ\ell at time 12\frac12 at some point within distance 110\frac1{10} of x0x_0, and then concatenate. The tool for that is a lemma on distances.

Lemma 8.5 Distances under bounded Ricci curvature (Perelman I, Lemma 8.3)

Let g(t)g(t) be a Ricci flow and t0t_0 a time. (a) If Ric⁡(⋅,t0)≤(n−1)K\operatorname{Ric}(\cdot, t_0) \leq (n - 1)K on Bt0(x0,r0)B_{t_0}(x_0, r_0), then d(x,t)=dt(x,x0)d(x, t) = d_t(x, x_0) satisfies, at t=t0t = t_0 and outside Bt0(x0,r0)B_{t_0}(x_0, r_0),

∂td−Δd≥−(n−1)(23Kr0+r0−1)\partial_td - \Delta d \geq -(n - 1)\Big(\frac23Kr_0 + r_0^{-1}\Big)

in the barrier sense. (b) If Ric⁡(⋅,t0)≤(n−1)K\operatorname{Ric}(\cdot, t_0) \leq (n - 1)K on Bt0(x0,r0)∪Bt0(x1,r0)B_{t_0}(x_0, r_0)\cup B_{t_0}(x_1, r_0), then ddtdt(x0,x1)≥−2(n−1)(23Kr0+r0−1)\frac{d}{dt}d_t(x_0, x_1) \geq -2(n - 1)\big(\frac23Kr_0 + r_0^{-1}\big) at t=t0t = t_0.

Proof. (a) Let γ\gamma be a minimising g(t0)g(t_0)-geodesic from x0x_0 to xx, parameterised by arclength s∈[0,d]s \in [0, d], with unit tangent XX. Since ∂tg=−2Ric⁡\partial_tg = -2\operatorname{Ric}, the length changes by ∂td=−∫γRic⁡(X,X) ds\partial_td = -\int_\gamma\operatorname{Ric}(X, X)\,ds (first variation of length with respect to the metric). For the Laplacian, use the second variation of length along fields YkY_k, k=1,…,n−1k = 1, \dots, n - 1, that vanish at x0x_0, are orthonormal at xx together with XX, are parallel along γ\gamma beyond the point at distance r0r_0 from x0x_0, and grow linearly, Yk(s)=sr0Ek(s)Y_k(s) = \frac{s}{r_0}E_k(s) with EkE_k parallel, for s≤r0s \leq r_0. Then (the Laplacian comparison argument of 9B.1 Laplacian Comparison)

Δd≤∑kδYk2(length)=∫r0d−Ric⁡(X,X) ds+∫0r0(s2r02(−Ric⁡(X,X))+n−1r02)ds.\Delta d \leq \sum_k\delta^2_{Y_k}(\text{length}) = \int_{r_0}^d-\operatorname{Ric}(X, X)\,ds + \int_0^{r_0}\Big(\frac{s^2}{r_0^2}\big(-\operatorname{Ric}(X, X)\big) + \frac{n - 1}{r_0^2}\Big)ds.

Rewriting, Δd≤−∫γRic⁡(X,X)+∫0r0(Ric⁡(X,X)(1−s2r02)+n−1r02)ds\Delta d \leq -\int_\gamma\operatorname{Ric}(X, X) + \int_0^{r_0}\Big(\operatorname{Ric}(X, X)\big(1 - \frac{s^2}{r_0^2}\big) + \frac{n - 1}{r_0^2}\Big)ds. The first term is ∂td\partial_td. In the second, Ric⁡(X,X)≤(n−1)K\operatorname{Ric}(X, X) \leq (n - 1)K on the initial segment, and ∫0r0(1−s2r02)ds=23r0\int_0^{r_0}(1 - \frac{s^2}{r_0^2})ds = \frac23r_0. So Δd≤∂td+(n−1)(23Kr0+r0−1)\Delta d \leq \partial_td + (n - 1)(\frac23Kr_0 + r_0^{-1}). Where dd is not smooth, the same inequality holds for the smooth upper barrier given by the length of a nearby curve, as in Calabi's argument (12A.7 Monotonicity of the Reduced Volume). (b) Apply the same estimate at both ends of a minimising geodesic from x0x_0 to x1x_1.

The lemma says that bounded Ricci curvature near the endpoints is enough to control how fast distances can shrink and how negative ∂td−Δd\partial_td - \Delta d can be: the uncontrolled curvature in the middle of the geodesic enters ∂td\partial_td and Δd\Delta d with the same sign and cancels. It is used again in the canonical neighbourhood theorem (12B.5 The Canonical Neighbourhood Theorem).

The argument. Consider, for 12≤t≤1\frac12 \leq t \leq 1,

h(y,t)=φ(d(y,t)−A(2t−1))⋅(Lˉ(y,1−t)+2n+1),d(y,t)=dt(y,x0),h(y, t) = \varphi\big(d(y, t) - A(2t - 1)\big)\cdot\big(\bar L(y, 1 - t) + 2n + 1\big), \qquad d(y, t) = d_t(y, x_0),

where Lˉ=4τℓ\bar L = 4\tau\ell is the function of (7.15), and φ\varphi is a function of one variable equal to 11 on (−∞,120)(-\infty, \frac1{20}), increasing to +∞+\infty on (120,110)(\frac1{20}, \frac1{10}), and chosen so that

2(φ′)2φ−φ′′≥(2A+100n)φ′−C(A)φ.(8.1)\frac{2(\varphi')^2}{\varphi} - \varphi'' \geq (2A + 100n)\varphi' - C(A)\varphi. \tag{8.1}

The factor Lˉ+2n+1\bar L + 2n + 1 is at least 11 for t≥12t \geq \frac12, because of the lower bound for RR (hence for Lˉ\bar L) at the end of 12A.7 Monotonicity of the Reduced Volume. At t=1t = 1, the base time, h(x,1)=φ(A−A)(0+2n+1)=2n+1h(x, 1) = \varphi(A - A)(0 + 2n + 1) = 2n + 1, so min⁡h(⋅,1)≤2n+1\min h(\cdot, 1) \leq 2n + 1. At t=12t = \frac12 the shift A(2t−1)A(2t - 1) vanishes, so h(⋅,12)h(\cdot, \frac12) is infinite outside B1/2(x0,110)B_{1/2}(x_0, \frac1{10}), and its minimum is achieved at some yy with d(y,12)≤110d(y, \frac12) \leq \frac1{10}. Running backward from t=1t = 1 to t=12t = \frac12, the shift A(2t−1)A(2t - 1) moves the support of φ\varphi from around xx (where d=Ad = A) to around x0x_0, at speed 2A2A in dd: the cut-off slides from the base point to the target ball.

At a minimum point of hh, ∇h=0\nabla h = 0 gives φ∇Lˉ=−(Lˉ+2n+1)∇φ\varphi\nabla\bar L = -(\bar L + 2n + 1)\nabla\varphi, and substituting into the formula for □h=∂th−Δh\square h = \partial_th - \Delta h (Perelman's (8.2)–(8.4)) leaves

□h=(Lˉ+2n+1)(−φ′′+(∂td−Δd−2A)φ′+2(φ′)2φ)+φ(∂tLˉ−ΔLˉ).\square h = (\bar L + 2n + 1)\Big(-\varphi'' + (\partial_td - \Delta d - 2A)\varphi' + \frac{2(\varphi')^2}{\varphi}\Big) + \varphi\big(\partial_t\bar L - \Delta\bar L\big).

Where φ′≠0\varphi' \neq 0, d≥120d \geq \frac1{20}, and Lemma 8.3(a) with r0=120r_0 = \frac1{20}, K=1K = 1 (curvature at most 11 in B(x0,120)B(x_0, \frac1{20})) gives ∂td−Δd≥−100(n−1)\partial_td - \Delta d \geq -100(n - 1); (8.1) then bounds the bracket below by −C(A)-C(A). And in forward time, (7.15) reads ∂tLˉ−ΔLˉ≥−2n\partial_t\bar L - \Delta\bar L \geq -2n (since ∂τ=−∂t\partial_\tau = -\partial_t). So at a minimum point,

□h≥−C(A)(Lˉ+2n+1)φ−2nφ≥−(2n+C(A))h,\square h \geq -C(A)(\bar L + 2n + 1)\varphi - 2n\varphi \geq -(2n + C(A))h,

and the minimum of hh cannot decrease too fast as tt decreases: min⁡h(⋅,12)≤e(2n+C(A))/2(2n+1)\min h(\cdot, \frac12) \leq e^{(2n + C(A))/2}(2n + 1). At the minimising point yy, φ≥1\varphi \geq 1, so Lˉ(y,12)≤C′(A)\bar L(y, \frac12) \leq C'(A), and ℓ(y,12)≤C′′(A)\ell(y, \frac12) \leq C''(A) with d(y,12)≤110d(y, \frac12) \leq \frac1{10}. From (y,12)(y, \frac12), short paths through the controlled cylinder over B(x0,1)B(x_0, 1) reach every point of B0(x0,12)B_0(x_0, \frac12) at time 00 with bounded L\mathcal L-length, which has volume at least a constant depending on AA (by the volume hypothesis and Bishop–Gromov). So V~\tilde V at τ=1\tau = 1 is bounded below by a constant depending on AA, and Theorem 8.1 (or Perelman's §7.3 argument) gives the theorem.

The two routes compared

entropy route (12A.4 κ-Noncollapsing) reduced-volume route (this chapter)
monotone quantity μ(g,τ)\mu(g, \tau), an integral over the whole manifold V~(τ)\tilde V(\tau), based at one space-time point
hypothesis on the collapsed ball ∣Rm⁡∣≤r−2|\operatorname{Rm}| \leq r^{-2} at time t0t_0 ∣Rm⁡∣≤r−2|\operatorname{Rm}| \leq r^{-2} on the parabolic neighbourhood
input from the past μ(g(0),⋅)\mu(g(0), \cdot) bounded below: the whole initial metric ℓ\ell bounded on a ball of definite volume at an earlier time
tool for the input monotonicity of μ\mu min⁡ℓ≤n2\min\ell \leq \frac n2, Lemma 8.3, maximum principle for Lˉ\bar L
survives surgery? no: surgery changes the manifold globally yes, if the relevant L\mathcal L-geodesics avoid surgery regions
used for blow-up limits of smooth flows Ricci flow with surgery (12B.13 Ricci Flow with Surgery for All Time); κ\kappa-solutions (12B.1 κ-Solutions)

In the flow with surgery, Perelman proves noncollapsing at each stage by induction on the surgery intervals: assuming the flow up to the ii-th surgery is noncollapsed and has canonical neighbourhoods, he measures L\mathcal L-length only for admissible curves, those that stay in the region unaffected by surgery, and observes that the argument of this chapter goes through if every barely admissible curve (one on the boundary of the admissible set) has reduced length at least 32+κ′\frac32 + \kappa'; since that is not automatic, he adds an estimate showing that curves which come near a surgery region pick up a large L\mathcal L-length there, where the curvature is huge (Perelman II, Lemmas 5.2 and 5.3; Morgan–Tian, chapter 16). 12B.13 Ricci Flow with Surgery for All Time explains that induction.

In the world Analogy Hearing a collapse

The reduced volume works like an echo sounder. From a point of space-time, it sends out a fan of L\mathcal L-geodesics into the past and measures, with a Gaussian weight, how much room they find. If the space around the point is collapsed (thin in some direction at the scale rr), the fan finds little room at the time εr2\varepsilon r^2 in the past: the reading is small. If, far in the past, the fan reaches a region of definite size where it travels cheaply, the reading there is large. Monotonicity says the reading can only decrease as one looks further into the past. A collapse now and a roomy region then cannot both hold. The analogy breaks in an instructive place: an echo sounder needs the medium to be uniform, while the reduced volume works with no assumption on the curvature in between, because the flow equation itself supplies the comparison geometry.

Where this goes Where this goes

12A.9 Pseudolocality turns to the other half of §§9–10: Perelman's differential Harnack inequality for the conjugate heat kernel and pseudolocality, and 12A.10 The Proof of Pseudolocality proves pseudolocality. 12B.1 κ-Solutions uses the reduced volume, now with τ→∞\tau \to \infty, to produce the asymptotic soliton of a κ\kappa-solution and to prove that κ\kappa-solutions are noncollapsed with a universal κ\kappa. 12B.13 Ricci Flow with Surgery for All Time carries the reduced-volume noncollapsing across surgeries.

History

Perelman's §7.3 and §8 appeared in his first preprint (2002); Theorem 8.2 was the version he needed for surgery, and Lemma 8.3 refers to Hamilton's "Formation of singularities" (1995), §17, for part (b). Kleiner and Lott (2003–08), Morgan and Tian (2007) and Cao and Zhu (2006) wrote out the proofs; Morgan and Tian's Theorem 8.1 isolates the reduced-volume argument in a form valid for generalised Ricci flows. The use of the second variation of length with linearly growing fields to bound Δd\Delta d goes back to the Laplacian comparison theorem of Riemannian geometry.

Recall Where we stand

Perelman's local definition of collapsing requires curvature bounds on the backward parabolic neighbourhood. If such a ball is collapsed, Vol⁡=εnrn\operatorname{Vol} = \varepsilon^nr^n, then at τ1=εr2\tau_1 = \varepsilon r^2 the reduced volume based at its centre is less than 3(4π)−n/2εn/23(4\pi)^{-n/2}\varepsilon^{n/2}: L\mathcal L-geodesics with ∣v∣≤18ε−1/2|v| \leq \frac18\varepsilon^{-1/2} stay in the half ball (Shi's bound on ∇R\nabla R and Gronwall), which has small volume, and the rest are suppressed by the bound π−n/2e−∣v∣2\pi^{-n/2}e^{-|v|^2} on the integrand. If ℓ\ell is bounded by l0l_0 on a set of volume VV at τ0\tau_0, monotonicity bounds the reduced volume below, and ε\varepsilon is bounded below: Morgan and Tian's Theorem 8.1. The upper bound for ℓ\ell comes from min⁡ℓ≤n2\min\ell \leq \frac n2 (for normalised compact flows, Theorem 8.10) or, in Perelman's local Theorem 8.2, from a maximum principle for φ(d−A(2t−1))(Lˉ+2n+1)\varphi(d - A(2t - 1))(\bar L + 2n + 1), using Lemma 8.3: bounded Ricci curvature near the endpoints bounds ∂td−Δd\partial_td - \Delta d below. The reduced-volume route survives surgery; the entropy route does not. 12A.9 Pseudolocality turns to the Harnack inequality and pseudolocality.

Exercises

Exercise 8.6 The Gaussian tail

(a) Show that ∫∣v∣≤ae−∣v∣2dv≥(∫−a/na/ne−z2dz)n\int_{|v|\leq a}e^{-|v|^2}dv \geq \Big(\int_{-a/\sqrt n}^{a/\sqrt n}e^{-z^2}dz\Big)^n and that (∫−bbe−z2dz)2≥π(1−e−b2)\Big(\int_{-b}^be^{-z^2}dz\Big)^2 \geq \pi(1 - e^{-b^2}). (b) Deduce π−n/2∫∣v∣≥ae−∣v∣2dv≤1−(1−e−a2/n)n/2≤n2e−a2/n\pi^{-n/2}\int_{|v|\geq a}e^{-|v|^2}dv \leq 1 - (1 - e^{-a^2/n})^{n/2} \leq \frac n2e^{-a^2/n}. (c) With a=18ε−1/2a = \frac18\varepsilon^{-1/2}, get n2e−1/(64nε)\frac n2e^{-1/(64n\varepsilon)}.

Solution

(a) The cube [−a/n,a/n]n[-a/\sqrt n, a/\sqrt n]^n lies in the ball of radius aa, and the integral over the cube factorises. For the second inequality, (∫−bbe−z2)2=∫[−b,b]2e−∣w∣2≥∫∣w∣≤be−∣w∣2=π(1−e−b2)\big(\int_{-b}^be^{-z^2}\big)^2 = \int_{[-b,b]^2}e^{-|w|^2} \geq \int_{|w|\leq b}e^{-|w|^2} = \pi(1 - e^{-b^2}). (b) With b=a/nb = a/\sqrt n: ∫∣v∣≤ae−∣v∣2≥πn/2(1−e−a2/n)n/2\int_{|v|\leq a}e^{-|v|^2} \geq \pi^{n/2}(1 - e^{-a^2/n})^{n/2}, and the total is πn/2\pi^{n/2}, so the tail is at most πn/2(1−(1−δ)n/2)\pi^{n/2}\big(1 - (1 - \delta)^{n/2}\big) with δ=e−a2/n\delta = e^{-a^2/n}; and 1−(1−δ)m≤mδ1 - (1 - \delta)^m \leq m\delta for 0≤δ≤10 \leq \delta \leq 1 (Bernoulli, or the mean value theorem). (c) a2/n=164nεa^2/n = \frac{1}{64n\varepsilon}.

Exercise 8.7 The metrics on the parabolic ball

Suppose ∣Ric⁡∣≤(n−1)r−2|\operatorname{Ric}| \leq (n - 1)r^{-2} on B×[T−r2,T]B\times[T - r^2, T] under ∂tg=−2Ric⁡\partial_tg = -2\operatorname{Ric}. Show that for t∈[T−εr2,T]t \in [T - \varepsilon r^2, T] and any tangent vector ww, e−2(n−1)ε∣w∣g(T)2≤∣w∣g(t)2≤e2(n−1)ε∣w∣g(T)2e^{-2(n-1)\varepsilon}|w|^2_{g(T)} \leq |w|^2_{g(t)} \leq e^{2(n-1)\varepsilon}|w|^2_{g(T)}, and deduce that volumes change by a factor at most en(n−1)εe^{n(n-1)\varepsilon}.

Solution

∣∂tlog⁡∣w∣g(t)2∣=2∣Ric⁡(w,w)∣∣w∣2≤2(n−1)r−2\big|\partial_t\log|w|^2_{g(t)}\big| = \frac{2|\operatorname{Ric}(w, w)|}{|w|^2} \leq 2(n - 1)r^{-2}; integrating over an interval of length at most εr2\varepsilon r^2 gives ∣log⁡∣w∣g(t)2∣w∣g(T)2∣≤2(n−1)ε|\log\frac{|w|^2_{g(t)}}{|w|^2_{g(T)}}| \leq 2(n - 1)\varepsilon. The volume form is det⁡g\sqrt{\det g}, and ∂tlog⁡det⁡g=−R\partial_t\log\sqrt{\det g} = -R with ∣R∣≤n(n−1)r−2|R| \leq n(n - 1)r^{-2}, giving a factor at most en(n−1)εe^{n(n-1)\varepsilon}.

Exercise 8.8 How far a short geodesic travels

On static flat Rn\mathbb{R}^n, show that the L\mathcal L-geodesic with initial vector vv reaches distance 2τ∣v∣2\sqrt\tau|v| at time τ\tau, and that with τ=εr2\tau = \varepsilon r^2 it stays in the ball of radius r2\frac r2 exactly when ∣v∣≤14ε−1/2|v| \leq \frac14\varepsilon^{-1/2}. Why does the general proof use the smaller threshold 18ε−1/2\frac18\varepsilon^{-1/2}?

Solution

γv(τ)=2τv\gamma_v(\tau) = 2\sqrt\tau v, so ∣γv(εr2)∣=2εr∣v∣≤r2|\gamma_v(\varepsilon r^2)| = 2\sqrt\varepsilon r|v| \leq \frac r2 iff ∣v∣≤14ε−1/2|v| \leq \frac14\varepsilon^{-1/2}. In a curved flow τ∣X∣\sqrt\tau|X| is only approximately ∣v∣|v|, with error 2ε(1+∣v∣)2\varepsilon(1 + |v|), and the metrics g(t)g(t) and g(T)g(T) differ slightly; the margin from 14\frac14 to 18\frac18 absorbs these errors for small ε\varepsilon.

Exercise 8.9 A collapsed flat example

Let M=S1(δ)×R2M = S^1(\delta)\times\mathbb{R}^2 with the static flat metric (a circle of length 2πδ2\pi\delta). (a) Show that for r>πδr > \pi\delta, Vol⁡B(x,r)≤2πδ⋅πr2\operatorname{Vol}B(x, r) \leq 2\pi\delta\cdot\pi r^2, so the flow is κ\kappa-collapsed at scale rr once 2π2δ<κr2\pi^2\delta < \kappa r. (b) Explain why this does not contradict Theorem 8.4 or Theorem 8.3: which hypothesis fails? (c) Compute V~(τ)\tilde V(\tau) for this flow based at any point, and show V~(τ)→0\tilde V(\tau) \to 0 as τ→∞\tau \to \infty.

Solution

(a) The ball of radius rr lies in S1×(disc of radius r)S^1\times(\text{disc of radius } r), of volume 2πδ⋅πr22\pi\delta\cdot\pi r^2, and ∣Rm⁡∣=0≤r−2|\operatorname{Rm}| = 0 \leq r^{-2}, so it is κ\kappa-collapsed when 2π2δr2<κr32\pi^2\delta r^2 < \kappa r^3. (b) The volume hypothesis at the earlier time fails for r0≫δr_0 \gg \delta: Vol⁡B(x0,r0)≤2π2δr02\operatorname{Vol}B(x_0, r_0) \leq 2\pi^2\delta r_0^2, which is less than A−1r03A^{-1}r_0^3 unless A≥r0/(2π2δ)A \geq r_0/(2\pi^2\delta); noncollapsing propagates forward in time but cannot be created. Likewise the normalisation Vol⁡B(p,0,1)≥ω\operatorname{Vol}B(p, 0, 1) \geq \omega fails when δ\delta is small. (c) The universal cover is R3\mathbb{R}^3 and L\mathcal L-geodesics lift; ℓ(q,τ)=min⁡k∣q~−p~k∣24τ\ell(q, \tau) = \min_k\frac{|\tilde q - \tilde p_k|^2}{4\tau} over the lifts p~k\tilde p_k of the base point. So V~(τ)=∫fundamental domain(4πτ)−3/2e−ℓ\tilde V(\tau) = \int_{\text{fundamental domain}}(4\pi\tau)^{-3/2}e^{-\ell}, which for τ≫δ2\tau \gg \delta^2 is approximately (4πτ)−3/2⋅2πδ⋅4πτ=2πδ4πτ→0(4\pi\tau)^{-3/2}\cdot2\pi\delta\cdot4\pi\tau = \frac{2\pi\delta}{\sqrt{4\pi\tau}} \to 0: the reduced volume detects the collapse at large scales.

Exercise 8.10 Lemma 8.3 in flat space

On static flat Rn\mathbb{R}^n, compute ∂td−Δd\partial_td - \Delta d for d(x)=∣x−x0∣d(x) = |x - x_0| and check that it is at least −(n−1)r0−1-(n - 1)r_0^{-1} outside B(x0,r0)B(x_0, r_0), as Lemma 8.3(a) predicts with K=0K = 0. Is the bound sharp?

Solution

∂td=0\partial_td = 0 and Δd=n−1d\Delta d = \frac{n - 1}{d}, so ∂td−Δd=−n−1d≥−n−1r0\partial_td - \Delta d = -\frac{n - 1}{d} \geq -\frac{n - 1}{r_0} for d≥r0d \geq r_0, with equality on the sphere d=r0d = r_0. So it is sharp at d=r0d = r_0. The proof's choice of fields (linear on [0,r0][0, r_0], parallel beyond) is not optimal for d>r0d > r_0, where linear fields along the whole geodesic would give n−1d\frac{n - 1}{d}; the lemma uses the cruder fields because the curvature is controlled only on B(x0,r0)B(x_0, r_0).

Exercise 8.11 Scaling in Theorem 8.2

Show that if g(t)g(t), 0≤t≤r020 \leq t \leq r_0^2, satisfies the hypotheses of Theorem 8.4, then g~(t)=r0−2g(r02t)\tilde g(t) = r_0^{-2}g(r_0^2t), 0≤t≤10 \leq t \leq 1, satisfies them with r0=1r_0 = 1 and the same AA, and that κ\kappa-noncollapsing is scale invariant. This justifies setting r0=1r_0 = 1.

Solution

g~\tilde g is a Ricci flow; ∣Rm⁡~∣=r02∣Rm⁡∣≤1|\widetilde{\operatorname{Rm}}| = r_0^2|\operatorname{Rm}| \leq 1 where ∣Rm⁡∣≤r0−2|\operatorname{Rm}| \leq r_0^{-2}; distances scale by r0−1r_0^{-1}, so d~0(x,x0)<1\tilde d_0(x, x_0) < 1 iff d0(x,x0)<r0d_0(x, x_0) < r_0 and d~1(x,x0)≤A\tilde d_1(x, x_0) \leq A iff dr02(x,x0)≤Ar0d_{r_0^2}(x, x_0) \leq Ar_0; volumes scale by r0−nr_0^{-n}, so Vol⁡~B~(x0,1)≥A−1\widetilde{\operatorname{Vol}}\tilde B(x_0, 1) \geq A^{-1}. A ball B(x,r)B(x, r) with ∣Rm⁡∣≤r−2|\operatorname{Rm}| \leq r^{-2} and volume <κrn< \kappa r^n corresponds to B~(x,r/r0)\tilde B(x, r/r_0) with ∣Rm⁡~∣≤(r/r0)−2|\widetilde{\operatorname{Rm}}| \leq (r/r_0)^{-2} and volume <κ(r/r0)n< \kappa(r/r_0)^n.

Free resources for this chapter

Chosen for what this chapter covers, and all free to read. Links checked Oct 16, 2026.

© 2026 NeckPinch (www.neckpinch.com). All content in the guidebook (text, mathematics, figures and exercises) is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. No part may be copied, republished or redistributed without written permission.