Book 10A

© 2026 NeckPinch · www.neckpinch.com · All rights reserved.

Course 10Book 10A: Three-Manifolds and GeometrizationChapter 12

Curve Shortening and Minimal Discs

How loops shrink under curvature, how the discs they bound lose area, and Perelman's extinction estimate.

39 min read · Updated Oct 23, 2026

Read with Perelman's third preprint, "Finite extinction time for the solutions to the Ricci flow on certain three-manifolds" (2003), §1 and §2, which this chapter explains line by line, and with Morgan and Tian's Ricci Flow and the Poincaré Conjecture, chapter 18, §3–4 (extinction and the curve-shrinking flow) and chapter 19, §1. For the plane, Chou and Zhu's The Curve Shortening Problem is the standard monograph.

In this chapter · 8 sections
  1. 12.1Curves that shrink by their curvature
  2. 12.2The flow in a Riemannian manifold, with a moving metric
  3. 12.3Families of curves, and ramps
  4. 12.4Discs of least area
  5. 12.5Perelman's estimate
  6. 12.6Extinction
  7. 12.7History
  8. 12.8Exercises
  9. ↗Free resources

The last step of Perelman's proof of the Poincaré conjecture is a computation that fits in a few lines: the area of a minimal disc spanning a loop decreases at least at the rate 2π2\pi, when the metric moves by the Ricci flow and the loop moves by the curve-shortening flow. Everything else in the third preprint, and most of Morgan and Tian's chapter 18, is there to make that computation legitimate for whole families of loops, some of them badly behaved. This chapter prepares the computation and its ingredients: the curve-shortening flow in the plane and in a Riemannian manifold with a changing metric, the evolution of length and curvature, the trick of Altschuler and Grayson that keeps families of curves under control, minimal discs and their area, and finally Perelman's estimate and the extinction it forces.

It is the companion of 10A.11 Min–Max and Width. There the min–max objects were 2-spheres sweeping out the manifold, as in Colding and Minicozzi's argument; here they are loops and the discs they bound, as in Perelman's own. The two arguments share the essential mechanism, Gauss–Bonnet supplying a fixed negative rate, and differ in where the technical difficulties lie.

By the end of this chapter you will be able to:

  • derive the curve-shortening flow as the gradient flow of length, and compute the evolution of length, enclosed area and curvature in the plane;
  • write the flow in a Riemannian manifold whose metric moves by the Ricci flow, and derive the evolution of the length element;
  • explain why families of curves are a problem, and how Altschuler and Grayson's ramps in M×S1M\times S^1 solve it;
  • define the least area A(c,g)A(c, g) of a disc spanning a loop and Perelman's min–max invariant for families of loops;
  • prove Perelman's estimate dAdt≤−2π−12Rmin⁡A\frac{dA}{dt} \leq -2\pi - \frac12R_{\min}A for a smooth minimal disc, from the first variation of area with moving boundary, the traced Gauss equation and Gauss–Bonnet;
  • integrate the estimate with the lower bound on scalar curvature to obtain finite extinction.

Curves that shrink by their curvature

Let c:S1×[0,T)→R2c : S^1\times[0, T) \to \mathbb{R}^2 be a family of immersed closed curves, ct=c(⋅,t)c_t = c(\cdot, t), with arclength ss, unit tangent S=∂scS = \partial_sc and curvature vector H=∂sS=∂s2cH = \partial_sS = \partial_s^2c, of length k=∣H∣k = |H|. The curve-shortening flow is

∂tc=H.\partial_tc = H.

Each point moves towards its local centre of curvature at a speed equal to the curvature; a straight segment does not move, a tight bend moves fast. The flow was introduced by W. W. Mullins in 1956 as a model of the motion of grain boundaries in metals, and studied mathematically from the 1980s; 6A.10 Curve Shortening and the First Geometric Flows met it as the first geometric heat equation.

It is the gradient flow of length. For a variation cϵc_\epsilon of a closed curve with variation field V=∂ϵcV = \partial_\epsilon c, the first variation of length is

ddϵL(cϵ)=∫⟨∂sV,S⟩ ds=−∫⟨V,∂sS⟩ ds=−∫⟨V,H⟩ ds,\frac{d}{d\epsilon}L(c_\epsilon) = \int\langle\partial_sV, S\rangle\,ds = -\int\langle V, \partial_sS\rangle\,ds = -\int\langle V, H\rangle\,ds,

integrating by parts around the closed curve. So among velocities VV of fixed L2L^2 norm, V=HV = H decreases length fastest, and along the flow

dLdt=−∫k2 ds.\frac{dL}{dt} = -\int k^2\,ds.

The circle. A circle of radius rr has k=1rk = \frac1r and HH pointing to the centre, so it stays a circle with r′=−1rr' = -\frac1r: r(t)2=r02−2tr(t)^2 = r_0^2 - 2t, shrinking to a point at t=r022t = \frac{r_0^2}{2}. The same law (size)2=const−2t(\text{size})^2 = \text{const} - 2t governs the S2S^2 factor of the shrinking neck (11A.1 The Equation and Its First Solutions): both are self-similar shrinkers.

Enclosed area. For an embedded closed curve bounding a region of area A\mathcal A, oriented counterclockwise, the inward normal is ν\nu and H=ksνH = k_{\mathrm s}\nu with signed curvature ksk_{\mathrm s}. The area changes by the outward normal velocity integrated along the curve:

dAdt=∫⟨∂tc,−ν⟩ ds=∫⟨ksν,−ν⟩ ds=−∫ks ds=−2π,\frac{d\mathcal A}{dt} = \int\langle\partial_tc, -\nu\rangle\,ds = \int\langle k_{\mathrm s}\nu, -\nu\rangle\,ds = -\int k_{\mathrm s}\,ds = -2\pi,

by the theorem of turning tangents (8A.9 The Curvature of Surfaces): the total signed curvature of a simple closed curve is 2π2\pi. Every embedded curve loses area at exactly the rate 2π2\pi, whatever its shape, so it must disappear by time A(0)2π\frac{\mathcal A(0)}{2\pi}. This is the planar ancestor of Perelman's estimate, and the constant 2π2\pi is the same Gauss–Bonnet constant.

What happens before it disappears is the content of two famous theorems (statements). Michael Gage and Richard Hamilton (1986) proved that a convex curve stays convex and shrinks to a point, becoming round in shape; Matthew Grayson (1987) proved that an embedded curve becomes convex before it becomes singular. So embedded curves in the plane shrink to round points. Immersed curves with self-crossings can instead develop singularities in which a small loop collapses, a cusp-like pinch.

Curvature. In the plane the curvature evolves by

∂tk=∂s2k+k3,\partial_tk = \partial_s^2k + k^3,

a heat equation with a cubic reaction term (Exercise 12.5): diffusion along the curve, and growth where the curve is already bent. The reaction is what drives the curvature to infinity at a shrinking point, exactly as the reaction R2R^2 drives scalar curvature to infinity on a shrinking surface (11A.12 Ricci Flow on Surfaces).

The flow in a Riemannian manifold, with a moving metric

In Perelman's argument the ambient manifold is (M,g(t))(M, g(t)) with g(t)g(t) a Ricci flow, and the curves move by the curve-shortening flow of the current metric. Let c:S1×[t0,t1]→Mc : S^1\times[t_0, t_1] \to M, write X=∂xcX = \partial_xc for the velocity in the fixed parameter x∈S1x \in S^1, S=X∣X∣S = \frac{X}{|X|} the unit tangent, and

H=∇SS,H = \nabla_SS,

the curvature vector of ctc_t in (M,g(t))(M, g(t)), with k=∣H∣k = |H|. The flow is ∂tc=H\partial_tc = H. Then:

Proposition 12.1 The length element

Along the curve-shortening flow in (M,g(t))(M, g(t)) with ∂tg=−2Ric⁡\partial_tg = -2\operatorname{Ric},

∂t(g(X,X))=−2Ric⁡(X,X)−2k2g(X,X).\partial_t\big(g(X, X)\big) = -2\operatorname{Ric}(X, X) - 2k^2g(X, X).

Consequently the length satisfies dLdt=−∫(k2+Ric⁡(S,S)) ds\frac{dL}{dt} = -\int\big(k^2 + \operatorname{Ric}(S, S)\big)\,ds.

Proof. Two things change g(X,X)g(X, X): the metric, contributing (∂tg)(X,X)=−2Ric⁡(X,X)(\partial_tg)(X, X) = -2\operatorname{Ric}(X, X), and the curve, contributing 2g(∇∂tX,X)2g(\nabla_{\partial_t}X, X) (the derivative of g(X,X)g(X, X) along the map cc, with the metric frozen, 9A.2 Connections). Since ∂t\partial_t and ∂x\partial_x are coordinate fields on S1×[t0,t1]S^1\times[t_0, t_1], the symmetry lemma (9A.2 Connections) gives ∇∂tX=∇X∂tc=∇XH\nabla_{\partial_t}X = \nabla_X\partial_tc = \nabla_XH, and

g(∇XH,X)=X g(H,X)−g(H,∇XX).g(\nabla_XH, X) = X\,g(H, X) - g(H, \nabla_XX).

Now g(H,X)=∣X∣ g(∇SS,S)=0g(H, X) = |X|\,g(\nabla_SS, S) = 0, because SS has unit length. And ∇XX=∇∣X∣S(∣X∣S)=∣X∣2∇SS+(…)S\nabla_XX = \nabla_{|X|S}(|X|S) = |X|^2\nabla_SS + (\ldots)S, so g(H,∇XX)=∣X∣2k2g(H, \nabla_XX) = |X|^2k^2. Hence the curve contributes −2k2g(X,X)-2k^2g(X, X). For the length, ddt∫∣X∣ dx=∫∂tg(X,X)2∣X∣ dx=−∫(Ric⁡(S,S)+k2)∣X∣ dx\frac{d}{dt}\int|X|\,dx = \int\frac{\partial_tg(X, X)}{2|X|}\,dx = -\int(\operatorname{Ric}(S, S) + k^2)|X|\,dx.

So length decreases by curvature, as in the plane, and in addition the Ricci flow shrinks it where the Ricci curvature is positive (11A.2 How Curvature Evolves). Perelman records two further consequences in his §2.1 (statements, with the source of each term).

  • Curvature. ∂tk≤∂s2k+k3+C(k+1)\partial_tk \leq \partial_s^2k + k^3 + C(k + 1), where CC bounds the curvature of g(t)g(t) and its derivative: the planar equation plus error terms from the curvature of the ambient space and from the motion of the metric.
  • Total curvature. Θ=∫k ds\Theta = \int k\,ds satisfies dΘdt≤∫C(k+1) ds\frac{d\Theta}{dt} \leq \int C(k + 1)\,ds, and with dLdt≤∫(C−k2) ds\frac{dL}{dt} \leq \int(C - k^2)\,ds this shows that length and total curvature grow at most exponentially in tt; in a flat ambient space both would be nonincreasing.

Short-time existence holds for smoothly immersed initial curves, and the solution exists as long as the curvature stays bounded (Perelman cites Gage and Hamilton for this). If the curvature does not concentrate at some time, in the sense that each arc of length rr has total curvature at most a small ε\varepsilon, then the curvature and its derivatives are controlled for a time of order εr2\varepsilon r^2 afterwards (Perelman's §2.2, adapting Ecker and Huisken; statement). That is the local regularity the arguments use.

Families of curves, and ramps

Perelman's invariant is defined for families of loops, a 2-sphere's worth of them (10A.4 Homotopy Groups, Degree and the Hurewicz Theorem), and the flow must be applied to the whole family at once, continuously in the family parameter. Two difficulties appear.

  • A loop in the family need not be immersed. It can traverse an arc and come back along it, with zero velocity at the turning point. There is no curvature vector there, and no evident way to define the flow so that it depends continuously on the curve.
  • Even immersed curves can become singular, and different curves in a family can become singular at different times.

The solution, due to Steven Altschuler and Matthew Grayson (1992), is to add a dimension. Replace MM by M×Sλ1M\times S^1_\lambda, the product with a circle of small length λ\lambda, with the product metric g(t)+dθ2g(t) + d\theta^2 (still a Ricci flow, since the circle is flat), and replace each loop cc by a loop c^\hat c in the product that winds once around the circle factor and projects to cc: c^(x)=(c(x),λx)\hat c(x) = (c(x), \lambda x) for x∈[0,1)x \in [0, 1). Let UU be the unit vector field along the circle factor.

Definition 12.2 Ramps

A curve c^\hat c in M×Sλ1M\times S^1_\lambda is a ramp if u=g(S,U)>0u = g(S, U) > 0 everywhere along it: it always moves forward in the circle direction.

A ramp is automatically an embedded, immersed curve: it is a graph over the circle factor. And the lifted curve c^\hat c above is a ramp even when cc is not immersed, because its velocity always has the component λ\lambda along UU.

Proposition 12.3 Ramps stay ramps

Along the curve-shortening flow in (M×Sλ1,g(t)+dθ2)(M\times S^1_\lambda, g(t) + d\theta^2), u=g(S,U)u = g(S, U) satisfies

∂tu=∂s2u+(k2+Ric⁡(S,S))u.\partial_tu = \partial_s^2u + \big(k^2 + \operatorname{Ric}(S, S)\big)u.

Consequently, if Ric⁡≥−K\operatorname{Ric} \geq -K on the time interval, then min⁡u(t)≥e−K(t−t0)min⁡u(t0)\min u(t) \geq e^{-K(t - t_0)}\min u(t_0): a ramp remains a ramp, with uu bounded away from zero.

Proof. UU is parallel and Ric⁡(⋅,U)=0\operatorname{Ric}(\cdot, U) = 0 in the product. Differentiating u=g(S,U)u = g(S, U) in ss twice: ∂su=g(∇SS,U)=g(H,U)\partial_su = g(\nabla_SS, U) = g(H, U) and ∂s2u=g(∇SH,U)\partial_s^2u = g(\nabla_SH, U). In tt: g(t)g(t) changes only on the MM factor, UU is unchanged and orthogonal to it, and S=X∣X∣S = \frac{X}{|X|} gives ∂tS=∇∂tX∣X∣−∂t∣X∣∣X∣S\partial_tS = \frac{\nabla_{\partial_t}X}{|X|} - \frac{\partial_t|X|}{|X|}S, with ∇∂tX=∇XH=∣X∣∇SH\nabla_{\partial_t}X = \nabla_XH = |X|\nabla_SH and, by Proposition 12.1, ∂t∣X∣∣X∣=−Ric⁡(S,S)−k2\frac{\partial_t|X|}{|X|} = -\operatorname{Ric}(S, S) - k^2. So ∂tu=g(∇SH,U)+(k2+Ric⁡(S,S))u\partial_tu = g(\nabla_SH, U) + (k^2 + \operatorname{Ric}(S, S))u, plus a term from the metric acting on SS and UU, which vanishes because UU is orthogonal to the MM factor. This is the equation. At a minimum of uu along the curve, ∂s2u≥0\partial_s^2u \geq 0 and k2u≥0k^2u \geq 0 (when u>0u > 0), so ∂tmin⁡u≥−Kmin⁡u\partial_t\min u \geq -K\min u in the sense of forward difference quotients, and Gronwall gives the bound.

Combining this with the curvature inequality, Altschuler and Grayson estimate the ratio ku\frac ku by the maximum principle and conclude that the curvature of a ramp stays bounded: a ramp has no singularities, and the flow exists on the whole time interval, depending continuously on the initial curve. As λ→0\lambda \to 0, the projections of the ramps to MM approximate a "regularised" flow of the original family. Perelman's §3 and Morgan and Tian's chapter 18, §4 to §7, carry this out: the hard work is to show that in the limit the estimates for minimal discs survive, which needs control of minimal annuli between nearby ramps (their area grows at most exponentially, by a computation like the one below, Perelman's §2.4), and a lower bound on the lengths of curves bounding small annuli (§2.5).

Discs of least area

Let cc be a contractible loop in (M,g)(M, g). The Plateau problem asks for a disc of least area with boundary cc. Jesse Douglas and Tibor Radó solved it in R3\mathbb{R}^3 (1930–31), and Charles Morrey (1948) in Riemannian manifolds with bounded geometry: for a rectifiable Jordan curve cc there is a map of the disc, conformal and harmonic, of least area among discs spanning cc, and it is a minimal surface, smooth (even analytic) in the interior, immersed except at isolated branch points (statement; Robert Osserman and Robert Gulliver proved the absence of interior branch points for area minimisers in 3-manifolds). Following Perelman, define

A(c,g)=inf⁡{Area⁡(f):f:D2→M Lipschitz, f∣∂D2=c},A(c, g) = \inf\{\operatorname{Area}(f) : f : D^2 \to M\ \text{Lipschitz},\ f|_{\partial D^2} = c\},

the least area of a disc spanning cc. For a family Γ\Gamma of contractible loops let A(Γ,g)=sup⁡c∈ΓA(c,g)A(\Gamma, g) = \sup_{c \in \Gamma}A(c, g), and for a nontrivial homotopy class α\alpha of such families let

A(α,g)=inf⁡Γ∈αA(Γ,g).A(\alpha, g) = \inf_{\Gamma \in \alpha}A(\Gamma, g).

This is a min–max quantity of the same type as the width of 10A.11 Min–Max and Width. The relevant homotopy classes are elements of π2(ΛM,M)\pi_2(\Lambda M, M), where ΛM\Lambda M is the space of contractible loops and M⊂ΛMM \subset \Lambda M the constant loops; a class is nontrivial if its families cannot be deformed into families of constant loops. Perelman notes that such a class exists whenever MM is not aspherical, by a classical result of Jean-Pierre Serre on the homotopy of loop spaces; for MM with π2(M)=0\pi_2(M) = 0 and π3(M)≠0\pi_3(M) \neq 0 it is the class of 10A.4 Homotopy Groups, Degree and the Hurewicz Theorem, π2(ΛM)≅π3(M)\pi_2(\Lambda M) \cong \pi_3(M). Nontriviality makes A(α,g)A(\alpha, g) positive: if every loop of a family bounded a disc of tiny area, the family could be contracted through those discs.

Perelman's estimate

Theorem 12.4 The area of a minimal disc under the flow

Let g(t)g(t) be a Ricci flow on a closed 3-manifold, let ctc_t move by the curve-shortening flow of g(t)g(t), and suppose that at time tt the loop ctc_t is smooth and embedded and spans a smooth embedded minimal disc DD realising A(ct,g(t))A(c_t, g(t)). Then

ddtA(ct,g(t))≤−2π−12Rmin⁡(t) A(ct,g(t))\frac{d}{dt}A\big(c_t, g(t)\big) \leq -2\pi - \frac12R_{\min}(t)\,A\big(c_t, g(t)\big)

in the sense of the upper limit of forward difference quotients, where Rmin⁡(t)=min⁡MR(⋅,t)R_{\min}(t) = \min_MR(\cdot, t).

Proof. For small h>0h > 0, A(ct+h,g(t+h))≤Area⁡g(t+h)(Dh)A(c_{t+h}, g(t + h)) \leq \operatorname{Area}_{g(t+h)}(D_h) for any disc DhD_h spanning ct+hc_{t+h}. Take DhD_h to be DD deformed so that its boundary follows the curve-shortening flow: a family of maps fh:D2→Mf_h : D^2 \to M with f0f_0 parametrising DD and ∂hfh∣∂D2=H\partial_hf_h|_{\partial D^2} = H. So it is enough to compute the derivative of Area⁡g(t+h)(fh)\operatorname{Area}_{g(t+h)}(f_h) at h=0h = 0. It has two parts.

The metric changes. With the surface fixed, the area element changes by half the trace of ∂tg\partial_tg over the tangent plane (10A.11 Min–Max and Width): this contributes −∫Dtr⁡DRic⁡ dA-\int_D\operatorname{tr}_D\operatorname{Ric}\,dA, where tr⁡DRic⁡=Ric⁡(e1,e1)+Ric⁡(e2,e2)\operatorname{tr}_D\operatorname{Ric} = \operatorname{Ric}(e_1, e_1) + \operatorname{Ric}(e_2, e_2) for an orthonormal frame of TDTD.

The surface moves. With the metric fixed, the first variation of area for a surface with boundary is

ddhArea⁡(fh)=−∫D⟨H⃗D,V⟩ dA+∫∂D⟨V,η⟩ ds,\frac{d}{dh}\operatorname{Area}(f_h) = -\int_D\langle\vec H_D, V\rangle\,dA + \int_{\partial D}\langle V, \eta\rangle\,ds,

where VV is the variation field, H⃗D\vec H_D the mean curvature vector of DD, and η\eta the outward unit conormal along ∂D\partial D, tangent to DD and normal to ∂D\partial D (9A.8 Submanifolds and Minimal Surfaces did the case of closed surfaces; the boundary term comes from the divergence theorem applied to the tangential part of VV). DD is minimal, so H⃗D=0\vec H_D = 0, and on the boundary V=HV = H, the curvature vector of the curve. Its component along the inward conormal −η-\eta is the geodesic curvature kgk_g of ∂D\partial D as a curve in DD: ⟨H,−η⟩=kg\langle H, -\eta\rangle = k_g. So this part contributes −∫∂Dkg ds-\int_{\partial D}k_g\,ds.

The curvature identity. Let e1,e2e_1, e_2 span TDTD and ν\nu be the unit normal. Writing KijK_{ij} for ambient sectional curvatures, Ric⁡(e1,e1)=K12+K1ν\operatorname{Ric}(e_1, e_1) = K_{12} + K_{1\nu} and Ric⁡(e2,e2)=K12+K2ν\operatorname{Ric}(e_2, e_2) = K_{12} + K_{2\nu}, while R=2(K12+K1ν+K2ν)R = 2(K_{12} + K_{1\nu} + K_{2\nu}). Hence

tr⁡DRic⁡=12R+K12.\operatorname{tr}_D\operatorname{Ric} = \tfrac12R + K_{12}.

The Gauss equation (9A.8 Submanifolds and Minimal Surfaces) gives the intrinsic curvature of DD: KD=K12+det⁡II⁡K_D = K_{12} + \det\operatorname{II}, where det⁡II⁡\det\operatorname{II} is the determinant of the second fundamental form. A minimal surface has tr⁡II⁡=0\operatorname{tr}\operatorname{II} = 0, so the eigenvalues of II⁡\operatorname{II} are ±λ\pm\lambda and det⁡II⁡=−λ2≤0\det\operatorname{II} = -\lambda^2 \leq 0. Thus

−tr⁡DRic⁡=−12R−KD+det⁡II⁡≤−12R−KD.-\operatorname{tr}_D\operatorname{Ric} = -\tfrac12R - K_D + \det\operatorname{II} \leq -\tfrac12R - K_D.

Gauss–Bonnet. Adding the two parts,

ddh∣0Area⁡≤∫D(−12R−KD) dA−∫∂Dkg ds=−12∫DR dA−(∫DKD dA+∫∂Dkg ds)=−12∫DR dA−2π,\frac{d}{dh}\Big|_0\operatorname{Area} \leq \int_D\big(-\tfrac12R - K_D\big)\,dA - \int_{\partial D}k_g\,ds = -\frac12\int_DR\,dA - \Big(\int_DK_D\,dA + \int_{\partial D}k_g\,ds\Big) = -\frac12\int_DR\,dA - 2\pi,

by the Gauss–Bonnet theorem for a disc (8A.9 The Curvature of Surfaces), whose Euler characteristic is 11. Finally −12∫DR≤−12Rmin⁡Area⁡(D)-\frac12\int_DR \leq -\frac12R_{\min}\operatorname{Area}(D), and Area⁡(D)=A(ct,g(t))\operatorname{Area}(D) = A(c_t, g(t)).

The same inequality then holds for A(α,g(t))A(\alpha, g(t)), the min–max over families (Perelman's Lemma 1.2), provided the computation can be made for the loops near the maximum of a nearly optimal family. That is where the difficulties lie: the loops near the maximum need not be embedded, the minimal discs may have branch points (which only help: they contribute with a favourable sign in Gauss–Bonnet), and the flow of the family must be defined continuously. The ramps of the previous section handle the flow, and the estimates of Perelman's §3, expanded in Morgan and Tian's §18.5–18.7, handle the rest.

Extinction

The scalar curvature satisfies ∂tR=ΔR+2∣Ric⁡∣2≥ΔR+23R2\partial_tR = \Delta R + 2|\operatorname{Ric}|^2 \geq \Delta R + \frac23R^2 in dimension three, so by the maximum principle Rmin⁡(t)≥−32(t+C)R_{\min}(t) \geq -\frac{3}{2(t + C)} for a constant CC depending on the initial metric (11A.7 Maximum Principles under Ricci Flow for the maximum principle; the computation is the last exercise of 9B.6 Scalar Curvature and Topology). So −12Rmin⁡≤34(t+C)-\frac12R_{\min} \leq \frac{3}{4(t + C)} and, writing A(t)=A(α,g(t))A(t) = A(\alpha, g(t)),

dAdt≤−2π+34(t+C)A.\frac{dA}{dt} \leq -2\pi + \frac{3}{4(t + C)}A.

Perelman integrates this in one line. Since 34≤1\frac34 \leq 1, dAdt≤−2π+At+C\frac{dA}{dt} \leq -2\pi + \frac{A}{t + C}, and then A^=At+C\hat A = \frac{A}{t + C} satisfies

dA^dt=A′t+C−A(t+C)2≤−2πt+C.\frac{d\hat A}{dt} = \frac{A'}{t + C} - \frac{A}{(t + C)^2} \leq -\frac{2\pi}{t + C}.

The right side is not integrable at infinity, while A^≥0\hat A \geq 0; so the flow cannot exist for all time with α\alpha nontrivial. With the exact exponent one gets an explicit bound: ϕ(t)=(t+C)−3/4\phi(t) = (t + C)^{-3/4} gives ddt(ϕA)≤−2πϕ\frac{d}{dt}(\phi A) \leq -2\pi\phi, and ϕA\phi A would become negative once 8π((t+C)1/4−C1/4)>C−3/4A(0)8\pi\big((t + C)^{1/4} - C^{1/4}\big) > C^{-3/4}A(0).

Through surgery. At a surgery time, Perelman's construction gives maps from the pre-surgery manifold to the post-surgery one that are (1+ξ)(1 + \xi)-Lipschitz for any prescribed ξ>0\xi > 0 (for irreducible MM the surgeries are topologically trivial: one component is diffeomorphic to the old manifold and the others are spheres). Such maps do not increase areas of discs by more than the factor (1+ξ)2(1 + \xi)^2, so AA does not jump up, and the differential inequality persists across surgeries. In the general case (prime decomposition without aspherical factors) only finitely many surgeries are topologically nontrivial, by Kneser's finiteness theorem; after them every component satisfies the hypotheses, and the argument applies to each (Perelman's §1.5). The conclusion is Perelman's Theorem 1.1: for a closed orientable 3-manifold whose prime decomposition has no aspherical factors, the Ricci flow with surgery becomes extinct in finite time. For a simply connected MM that, with 10A.6 Necks, Caps and Their Topology, is the Poincaré conjecture.

Where this goes Where this is used

12C.3 Finite Extinction presents finite extinction for the flow with surgery, citing this chapter for the curve-shortening flow and the disc estimate, and 12C.5 The Poincaré Conjecture, Assembled assembles the proof of the Poincaré conjecture. Morgan and Tian's chapter 18 is the detailed reference.

History

W. W. Mullins introduced the curve-shortening flow in 1956, for grain boundaries. Gage and Hamilton proved that convex plane curves shrink to round points (1986), and Grayson that embedded ones become convex (1987); Grayson also studied the flow on surfaces (1989). Altschuler and Grayson introduced the ramp regularisation in "Shortening space curves and flow through singularities" (1992). Douglas and Radó solved the Plateau problem in 1930–31, Morrey in Riemannian manifolds in 1948. Perelman's third preprint, with the disc argument, appeared in July 2003; Morgan and Tian wrote it out in full in 2007, adding the arguments for two points that Perelman had stated briefly.

Recall Where we stand

The curve-shortening flow ∂tc=H\partial_tc = H is the gradient flow of length: L′=−∫k2 dsL' = -\int k^2\,ds, circles obey r2=r02−2tr^2 = r_0^2 - 2t, embedded plane curves lose area at exactly 2π2\pi and shrink to round points, and kt=kss+k3k_t = k_{ss} + k^3. In (M,g(t))(M, g(t)) with g(t)g(t) a Ricci flow, ∂tg(X,X)=−2Ric⁡(X,X)−2k2g(X,X)\partial_t g(X, X) = -2\operatorname{Ric}(X, X) - 2k^2g(X, X), so L′=−∫(k2+Ric⁡(S,S))L' = -\int(k^2 + \operatorname{Ric}(S, S)). Families of curves are regularised by lifting to ramps in M×Sλ1M\times S^1_\lambda, which stay ramps and never become singular. The least area A(c,g)A(c, g) of spanning discs, maximised over a family and minimised over a nontrivial class, is Perelman's invariant. For a minimal disc with boundary moving by curve shortening, A′=−∫Dtr⁡DRic⁡−∫∂DkgA' = -\int_D\operatorname{tr}_D\operatorname{Ric} - \int_{\partial D}k_g, and tr⁡DRic⁡=12R+KD−det⁡II⁡\operatorname{tr}_D\operatorname{Ric} = \frac12R + K_D - \det\operatorname{II} with det⁡II⁡≤0\det\operatorname{II} \leq 0, so Gauss–Bonnet gives A′≤−2π−12Rmin⁡AA' \leq -2\pi - \frac12R_{\min}A. With Rmin⁡≥−32(t+C)R_{\min} \geq -\frac{3}{2(t + C)} this forces extinction. Book 11A starts the Ricci flow itself.

Recall Book 10A in one paragraph

The zoo of closed 3-manifolds includes S3S^3 with its Hopf fibration, the 3-torus, S2×S1S^2\times S^1, lens spaces and the dodecahedral spaces (10A.1 A Zoo of Three-Manifolds). The finite rotation groups are Klein's five families, their binary lifts are the finite subgroups of S3S^3, and the spherical space forms S3/ΓS^3/\Gamma are the endpoints of the flow and, by elliptization, all closed 3-manifolds with finite π1\pi_1 (10A.2 Finite Rotation Groups and Spherical Space Forms). Every closed orientable 3-manifold has a Heegaard splitting, a balanced presentation of π1\pi_1, and a surgery description (10A.3 Building Three-Manifolds). Higher homotopy groups are computed on the universal cover; a closed 3-manifold with π2=0\pi_2 = 0 has finite π1\pi_1 and π3=Z\pi_3 = \mathbb{Z}, or is aspherical (10A.4 Homotopy Groups, Degree and the Hurewicz Theorem). Manifolds split along spheres into primes, and surgery along a sphere is undone by a connected sum (10A.5 The Prime Decomposition). Necks chain into tubes, caps have cores that are balls or punctured RP3\mathbb{RP}^3, and what necks and caps cover is a short list of manifolds (10A.6 Necks, Caps and Their Topology). Irreducible pieces split along tori (JSJ, 10A.7 Seifert Spaces and the JSJ Decomposition) and carry Thurston's eight geometries (10A.8 Thurston’s Eight Geometries); hyperbolic pieces are rigid and split into thick and thin parts (10A.9 Hyperbolic Three-Manifolds). Under the Ricci flow with surgery, spherical pieces become extinct, necks are cut, and for long-lived components the thick part is hyperbolic and the thin part a graph manifold (10A.10 Geometrization and Ricci Flow). Min–max widths of spheres (10A.11 Min–Max and Width) and Perelman's min–max areas of discs spanning loops (this chapter) decrease at a definite rate, forcing manifolds without aspherical summands, in particular simply connected ones, to become extinct.

Where this goes Into Book 11A

Every ingredient of the topology is now in place: the pieces (space forms, S2S^2-bundles, the products of surgery), how they fit together (connected sums, necks and caps), and the homotopy-theoretic invariants that drive extinction. Book 11A starts the flow ∂tg=−2Ric⁡\partial_tg = -2\operatorname{Ric}: why it is a heat equation, how to solve it for a short time, how curvature evolves, what the maximum principle preserves, and how Hamilton used all this in 1982 to prove that 3-manifolds with positive Ricci curvature are spherical space forms.

Exercises

Exercise 12.5 Curvature in the plane

For the curve-shortening flow in the plane, show that ∂t(ds)=−k2 ds\partial_t(ds) = -k^2\,ds, that ∂t\partial_t and ∂s\partial_s satisfy ∂t∂s=∂s∂t+k2∂s\partial_t\partial_s = \partial_s\partial_t + k^2\partial_s, and deduce ∂tk=∂s2k+k3\partial_tk = \partial_s^2k + k^3 for the signed curvature of a convex curve.

Solution

With ds=∣X∣ dxds = |X|\,dx, Proposition 12.1 with Ric⁡=0\operatorname{Ric} = 0 gives ∂t∣X∣=−k2∣X∣\partial_t|X| = -k^2|X|. Then ∂t∂s=∂t(∣X∣−1∂x)=k2∣X∣−1∂x+∣X∣−1∂x∂t=k2∂s+∂s∂t\partial_t\partial_s = \partial_t(|X|^{-1}\partial_x) = k^2|X|^{-1}\partial_x + |X|^{-1}\partial_x\partial_t = k^2\partial_s + \partial_s\partial_t. For a convex curve write S=(cos⁡θ,sin⁡θ)S = (\cos\theta, \sin\theta) with ∂sθ=k\partial_s\theta = k and H=kNH = kN, N=(−sin⁡θ,cos⁡θ)N = (-\sin\theta, \cos\theta). Then ∂tS=∂t∂sc=∂s∂tc+k2S=∂s(kN)+k2S=(∂sk)N−k2S+k2S=(∂sk)N\partial_tS = \partial_t\partial_sc = \partial_s\partial_tc + k^2S = \partial_s(kN) + k^2S = (\partial_sk)N - k^2S + k^2S = (\partial_sk)N, so ∂tθ=∂sk\partial_t\theta = \partial_sk. Finally ∂tk=∂t∂sθ=∂s∂tθ+k2∂sθ=∂s2k+k3\partial_tk = \partial_t\partial_s\theta = \partial_s\partial_t\theta + k^2\partial_s\theta = \partial_s^2k + k^3.

Exercise 12.6 Every embedded curve loses 2π2\pi

Let γt\gamma_t be embedded closed plane curves moving by curve shortening, bounding regions of area A(t)\mathcal A(t). Show A′=−2π\mathcal A' = -2\pi by writing A=12∮(x dy−y dx)\mathcal A = \frac12\oint(x\,dy - y\,dx) and differentiating, or by the normal-velocity argument. How long does a curve of area 1010 survive? Why does the argument fail for a figure-eight curve?

Solution

The region moves inward at normal speed ksk_{\mathrm s} (signed curvature with respect to the inward normal for a counterclockwise curve), so A′=−∮ks ds=−2π\mathcal A' = -\oint k_{\mathrm s}\,ds = -2\pi by the theorem of turning tangents. A curve of area 1010 survives until t=102π≈1.59t = \frac{10}{2\pi} \approx 1.59 (it stays embedded and becomes convex by Grayson's theorem, then shrinks to a point exactly then). For a figure-eight the total signed curvature is 00, not 2π2\pi (the two lobes turn in opposite directions), the "enclosed area" with signs is the difference of the lobes, and the curve is not embedded: the turning-tangents theorem does not apply. In fact a lobe can collapse first, producing a singularity before the whole curve disappears.

Exercise 12.7 A great circle on a shrinking sphere

On the round S3S^3 of curvature 11 at t=0t = 0 evolving by the Ricci flow, let cc be a great circle. Show that cc remains a closed geodesic of g(t)g(t), so it does not move under the curve-shortening flow, and check Proposition 12.1 by computing its length 2π1−4t2\pi\sqrt{1 - 4t} and the rate −∫Ric⁡(S,S) ds-\int\operatorname{Ric}(S, S)\,ds.

Solution

g(t)=(1−4t)g0g(t) = (1 - 4t)g_0 has the same geodesics as g0g_0 (Christoffel symbols are unchanged by constant scaling), so cc is a closed geodesic for all tt: H=0H = 0 and the curve stays put. Its length is 2π1−4t2\pi\sqrt{1 - 4t}, with derivative −4π1−4t-\frac{4\pi}{\sqrt{1 - 4t}}. On the other hand Ric⁡(g(t))=2g0=21−4tg(t)\operatorname{Ric}(g(t)) = 2g_0 = \frac{2}{1 - 4t}g(t), so Ric⁡(S,S)=21−4t\operatorname{Ric}(S, S) = \frac{2}{1 - 4t}, and −∫Ric⁡(S,S) ds=−21−4t⋅2π1−4t=−4π1−4t-\int\operatorname{Ric}(S, S)\,ds = -\frac{2}{1 - 4t}\cdot2\pi\sqrt{1 - 4t} = -\frac{4\pi}{\sqrt{1 - 4t}}. They agree, with k=0k = 0.

Exercise 12.8 The traced curvature of a surface

Prove the identity tr⁡DRic⁡=12R+KD−det⁡II⁡\operatorname{tr}_D\operatorname{Ric} = \frac12R + K_D - \det\operatorname{II} for any surface DD in a Riemannian 3-manifold, and deduce that for a minimal surface tr⁡DRic⁡≥12R+KD\operatorname{tr}_D\operatorname{Ric} \geq \frac12R + K_D. Compare with the traced Gauss equation Ric⁡(ν,ν)+∣II⁡∣2=12(R−RD+∣II⁡∣2)\operatorname{Ric}(\nu, \nu) + |\operatorname{II}|^2 = \frac12(R - R_D + |\operatorname{II}|^2) for minimal surfaces in 9A.8 Submanifolds and Minimal Surfaces.

Solution

As in the proof, tr⁡DRic⁡=2K12+K1ν+K2ν=R2+K12\operatorname{tr}_D\operatorname{Ric} = 2K_{12} + K_{1\nu} + K_{2\nu} = \frac R2 + K_{12}, and KD=K12+det⁡II⁡K_D = K_{12} + \det\operatorname{II}, so tr⁡DRic⁡=R2+KD−det⁡II⁡\operatorname{tr}_D\operatorname{Ric} = \frac R2 + K_D - \det\operatorname{II}. For a minimal surface det⁡II⁡=−λ2=−12∣II⁡∣2≤0\det\operatorname{II} = -\lambda^2 = -\frac12|\operatorname{II}|^2 \leq 0. Comparing: tr⁡DRic⁡=R−Ric⁡(ν,ν)\operatorname{tr}_D\operatorname{Ric} = R - \operatorname{Ric}(\nu, \nu), and the traced Gauss equation gives Ric⁡(ν,ν)=12(R−RD−∣II⁡∣2)\operatorname{Ric}(\nu, \nu) = \frac12(R - R_D - |\operatorname{II}|^2) with RD=2KDR_D = 2K_D, so R−Ric⁡(ν,ν)=12R+KD+12∣II⁡∣2=12R+KD−det⁡II⁡R - \operatorname{Ric}(\nu, \nu) = \frac12R + K_D + \frac12|\operatorname{II}|^2 = \frac12R + K_D - \det\operatorname{II}, the same identity.

Exercise 12.9 A ramp on a flat torus

On the flat product S11×Sλ1S^1_1\times S^1_\lambda (a torus), consider the curve c^(x)=(0,λx)\hat c(x) = (0, \lambda x), x∈[0,1]x \in [0, 1], the lift of a constant loop. Show that it is a ramp, a closed geodesic, and stationary under the flow. Then lift a non-immersed loop that runs from 00 to 12\frac12 and back on the first factor, c(x)=12(1−∣1−2x∣)c(x) = \frac12(1 - |1 - 2x|), and explain why c^\hat c is immersed though cc is not.

Solution

c^′=(0,λ)\hat c' = (0, \lambda), so S=US = U and u=1>0u = 1 > 0: a ramp. It is a straight line in the flat torus, hence a geodesic, with H=0H = 0, so it does not move. For the second loop, c^′(x)=(c′(x),λ)\hat c'(x) = (c'(x), \lambda) with c′(x)=±1c'(x) = \pm1 except at x=12x = \frac12, where cc turns back; but the second component λ\lambda never vanishes, so c^\hat c is immersed (indeed a ramp, u=λ1+λ2>0u = \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{1 + \lambda^2}} > 0 away from the corner, and it can be smoothed there). The circle direction gives every lifted curve a nonzero velocity, which is the whole point of the trick.

Exercise 12.10 Rehearsal: the extinction time

Suppose A(t)≥0A(t) \geq 0 satisfies A′≤−2π+34(t+1)AA' \leq -2\pi + \frac{3}{4(t + 1)}A with A(0)=A0A(0) = A_0. Find an explicit T(A0)T(A_0) such that AA cannot exist on [0,T][0, T]. Evaluate it for A0=4πA_0 = 4\pi, and compare with the extinction time 14\frac14 of the round unit sphere, on which minimal discs spanning great circles have area 2π2\pi.

Solution

With ϕ=(t+1)−3/4\phi = (t + 1)^{-3/4}, (ϕA)′≤−2π(t+1)−3/4(\phi A)' \leq -2\pi(t + 1)^{-3/4}, so ϕ(T)A(T)≤A0−8π((T+1)1/4−1)\phi(T)A(T) \leq A_0 - 8\pi\big((T + 1)^{1/4} - 1\big). This is negative once (T+1)1/4>1+A08π(T + 1)^{1/4} > 1 + \frac{A_0}{8\pi}, so T(A0)=(1+A08π)4−1T(A_0) = \big(1 + \frac{A_0}{8\pi}\big)^4 - 1 works. For A0=4πA_0 = 4\pi: T=(1.5)4−1=4.0625T = (1.5)^4 - 1 = 4.0625. The round sphere becomes extinct much sooner, at 14\frac14: the estimate uses only the universal bound on Rmin⁡R_{\min}, while on the sphere R=61−4tR = \frac{6}{1 - 4t} is large and positive, and for the hemisphere of area 2π(1−4t)2\pi(1 - 4t) the term −12Rmin⁡A=−6π-\frac12R_{\min}A = -6\pi, together with −2π-2\pi, gives exactly its rate of decrease, 8π8\pi. The universal estimate is crude but needs nothing about the metric.

Free resources for this chapter

Chosen for what this chapter covers, and all free to read. Links checked Oct 16, 2026.

© 2026 NeckPinch (www.neckpinch.com). All content in the guidebook (text, mathematics, figures and exercises) is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. No part may be copied, republished or redistributed without written permission.