© 2026 NeckPinch · www.neckpinch.com · All rights reserved.
Course 10Book 10A: Three-Manifolds and GeometrizationChapter 4
Homotopy Groups, Degree and the Hurewicz Theorem
Spheres mapped into manifolds: the algebraic topology that finite extinction runs on.
Read with Hatcher's Algebraic Topology, §4.1 (homotopy groups, Whitehead's theorem, cellular approximation) and §4.2 (the Hurewicz theorem, fibre bundles and their long exact sequence, the Hopf bundle), and with Milnor's Topology from the Differentiable Viewpoint for degree. Only statements are needed from Hatcher; this chapter proves what the Ricci flow arguments use.
In this chapter · 9 sections
- 4.1Higher homotopy groups
- 4.2Coverings do not see higher homotopy
- 4.3Maps between spheres
- 4.4The Hopf fibration computes π3(S2)\pi_3(S^2)π3(S2)
- 4.5The Hurewicz and Whitehead theorems
- 4.6The homotopy groups of closed 3-manifolds
- 4.7Spheres and loops in the extinction argument
- 4.8History
- 4.9Exercises
- ↗Free resources
The fundamental group detects loops that cannot be contracted. The Poincaré conjecture is a statement about , but its proof by the Ricci flow runs on spheres: 2-spheres that cannot be shrunk, and families of 2-spheres sweeping out a 3-manifold that cannot be pulled tight. Perelman's third preprint, and Morgan and Tian's chapter 18 which expands it, use and at every step. First they show that the flow with surgery kills : after a finite time every component has . Then they use a nonzero element of , represented as a 2-sphere's worth of loops, to define a min–max quantity that must become negative in finite time, so that the flow must become extinct.
This chapter builds exactly that algebraic topology, from the definitions. It proves what is short enough to prove: the higher homotopy groups are abelian; they are unchanged by coverings; maps from lower-dimensional spheres to higher-dimensional ones are null-homotopic; and degree classifies maps between spheres of equal dimension up to the point where it matters. It states, carefully, the deeper facts that are used: the long exact sequence of a fibration, the Hurewicz theorem and Whitehead's theorem. And it computes the groups that the finite extinction argument needs for every closed 3-manifold that arises.
By the end of this chapter you will be able to:
- define , prove that it is abelian for , and explain the action of ;
- prove that a covering induces isomorphisms on for , and compute of tori, lens spaces and ;
- prove that for with Sard's theorem, and relate to degree;
- compute and from the Hopf fibration;
- state the Hurewicz and Whitehead theorems and use them to compute and of closed 3-manifolds, and to recognise aspherical ones;
- explain how an element of becomes a sweepout by 2-spheres, or a 2-sphere's worth of loops, as in Colding–Minicozzi's and Perelman's arguments.
Higher homotopy groups
Let be a space with a base point , and . Write and for its boundary.
is the set of homotopy classes of maps , where homotopies are required to send to at all times. The product of and is the class of
Collapsing to a point turns into the sphere , so is equally the set of based homotopy classes of maps . For this is the fundamental group of 7A.4 The Fundamental Group, and the proofs that is well defined, associative, with identity the constant map and inverse , are the same as there: they only ever reparametrise the first coordinate. A map sending to induces homomorphisms by composition, and homotopic maps (through based maps) induce the same homomorphism. So homotopy equivalences induce isomorphisms.
For , is abelian.
Proof. Represent and by maps that are constant () outside small cubes: supported in a cube in the left half and in a cube in the right half, which is how looks after shrinking each into a smaller cube (a homotopy, since the region where the map is just grows). Because there is a second coordinate. Slide down in the -direction into the lower half of , then right past , then up; slide up, left and down, at the same time. At every moment the two cubes are disjoint, and the map is (rescaled) on one cube, (rescaled) on the other and elsewhere, so this is a based homotopy. At the end is on the left and on the right: .
For there is no room to move the loops past each other, and indeed need not be abelian. This picture also explains a fact used constantly below. A free homotopy of maps may move the base point, and following the base point along a loop changes a based class to a class : acts on . Free homotopy classes of maps correspond to orbits of this action. When is simply connected the action is trivial, and free and based classes are the same thing. Perelman's and Morgan–Tian's "nontrivial element of ", represented by any map in the free homotopy class, uses this.
Coverings do not see higher homotopy
Let be a covering map with . Then is an isomorphism for every .
Proof. Onto. A map lifts to with , by the lifting criterion (7A.7 Covering Spaces): is simply connected for and locally path-connected, so the condition holds trivially. Then . One-to-one. If is null-homotopic by a based homotopy , lift to starting at (homotopy lifting, 7A.7 Covering Spaces). The track of the base point, , lifts the constant path, so it is constant, and the end lifts a constant map, so it is constant (a connected set in a fibre, which is discrete). So is null-homotopic.
In particular, for the universal cover, for all : the higher homotopy groups of are those of a simply connected space. Examples:
- for , and for . More generally every closed hyperbolic or flat manifold, being covered by a contractible space (Cartan–Hadamard, 9A.7 Jacobi Fields and Curvature versus Topology), has for all .
- for every spherical space form (10A.2 Finite Rotation Groups and Spherical Space Forms) and .
- is covered by , which deformation retracts onto , so for .
- is double covered by (Exercise 4.13), so its universal cover is and .
So far we have reduced everything to simply connected spaces. To compute, we need the groups of spheres.
Maps between spheres
For , . More generally, if is a smooth manifold of dimension and is continuous, then is homotopic to a map that misses a point of .
Proof. First approximate by a smooth map homotopic to it: in a chart, average against a mollifier (or embed in , smooth there, and project back by a tubular neighbourhood retraction); a uniformly close map is homotopic to by the straight-line homotopy followed by the projection (8A.2 Partitions of Unity for the embedding). For a smooth map with , every point of is a critical value (the differential has rank at most ), so by Sard's theorem (7A.8 Smooth Topology) the image has measure zero, and misses some point . For , is homeomorphic to by stereographic projection, which is contractible, so is null-homotopic (by a based homotopy, if the base point is not , which can be arranged).
The proof is the smooth version of a general principle, cellular approximation: a map from a -dimensional complex into a space built from cells can be deformed into the cells of dimension at most . For our purposes the smooth version is enough.
Maps of the same dimension are measured by their degree (7A.8 Smooth Topology): for a smooth map, the number of preimages of a regular value counted with signs according to whether the differential preserves or reverses orientation. Degree is independent of the regular value and invariant under homotopy. Equivalently, acts on as multiplication by . The same definitions work for maps between any two closed, connected, oriented -manifolds , and on fundamental classes.
Two maps are homotopic if and only if they have the same degree. Consequently , the isomorphism being the degree, and the identity map is a generator.
That every integer occurs is easy: on , has degree , and suspending (extending a map of the equator to by coning towards the two poles) preserves degree, so every degree occurs on every . The difficult half is that degree is a complete invariant; Milnor's book proves it with framed cobordism.
For the Ricci flow, degree enters through degree-one maps. A closed oriented 3-manifold with finite fundamental group has universal cover a closed simply connected 3-manifold, and the covering has degree . If is simply connected, the next sections show that a generator of is a map of degree , and that such a map is a homotopy equivalence: a simply connected closed 3-manifold is a homotopy 3-sphere. The Poincaré conjecture is the statement that it is in fact diffeomorphic to .
The Hopf fibration computes
Maps between spheres of different dimensions can be essential when the target has the lower dimension. The first and most important example is the Hopf map of 10A.1 A Zoo of Three-Manifolds. It is a fibre bundle: every point of has a neighbourhood with compatibly with . Fibre bundles, like coverings (whose fibres are discrete), have a homotopy lifting property, and that gives the following tool.
Let be a fibre bundle with path-connected, with base points and . Then there are homomorphisms making the sequence
exact: the image of each map is the kernel of the next.
The map is defined by lifting: a map is lifted to , starting at on one face, and its restriction to the opposite face lands in the fibre , giving an element of . A covering is a fibre bundle with discrete fibre, and the sequence then reproduces Proposition 4.3.
For the Hopf fibration :
- and give , so , in agreement with the degree.
- and (the universal cover of is ) give , so
generated by the Hopf map itself.
The Hopf map is therefore an essential map from a sphere to a lower-dimensional one, a phenomenon with no analogue for . It is detected by the Hopf invariant: the preimages of two regular values are two circles in , and their linking number is a homotopy invariant, equal to for (two Hopf fibres are linked once, 10A.1 A Zoo of Three-Manifolds). The consequence for 3-manifolds: , so even , which has infinite fundamental group, has nonzero .
The Hurewicz and Whitehead theorems
Homology is computable, homotopy groups are not, in general. The bridge is a natural homomorphism, the Hurewicz map , sending to , the image of the fundamental class.
Let be a path-connected space (a CW complex, or a manifold) and . If for all , then for , and is an isomorphism. For , induces an isomorphism (7A.9 Homology in Brief).
A map between connected CW complexes that induces isomorphisms on all homotopy groups is a homotopy equivalence. In particular, a CW complex (for instance a manifold) with all homotopy groups trivial is contractible.
Two remarks about the hypotheses. Hurewicz needs the lower homotopy groups to vanish, not the lower homology groups; the converse direction holds only with added: a simply connected space whose homology vanishes below degree has below (the "homology Hurewicz" form, proved by induction from the theorem). Whitehead needs a map inducing the isomorphisms: two spaces with isomorphic homotopy groups need not be homotopy equivalent.
The homotopy groups of closed 3-manifolds
Now everything can be computed for the manifolds the flow meets. Let be a closed, connected, orientable 3-manifold.
- If is finite, then and . If moreover , is homotopy equivalent to .
- If is infinite and , then for all : is aspherical, its universal cover is contractible.
- If , then contains an embedded 2-sphere that is nonzero in (the sphere theorem, below).
Proof. 1. The universal cover is a closed simply connected 3-manifold (the covering has finitely many sheets, so is compact). As computed in 10A.3 Building Three-Manifolds from Poincaré duality, and . By Hurewicz with , ; then with , . By Proposition 4.3 the same holds for . If , ; a generator of is a map with , a map of degree . It induces isomorphisms on (degree one in dimension , and on both sides), so by the homology form of Whitehead's theorem for simply connected spaces (a map of simply connected CW complexes inducing isomorphisms on homology is a homotopy equivalence) is a homotopy equivalence.
2. The universal cover is now a noncompact 3-manifold (infinitely many sheets). A connected noncompact -manifold has , and for (statement; Hatcher, §3.3). is simply connected and ; by Hurewicz, ; then , and inductively all . By Whitehead is contractible, and for .
3. This is the content of the sphere theorem, stated next.
The dichotomy in part 2 is sharp: a closed 3-manifold with has either finite fundamental group, and then , or infinite fundamental group, and then every higher homotopy group vanishes. There is nothing in between. This is why the finite extinction argument needs a hypothesis on : on an aspherical manifold, such as a hyperbolic one or the 3-torus, there is no nonzero element of to define a min–max quantity with, and indeed the flow does not become extinct there (hyperbolic metrics expand forever, 10A.10 Geometrization and Ricci Flow).
If is an orientable 3-manifold with , then contains an embedded 2-sphere that represents a nonzero element of .
An embedded sphere that is nonzero in does not bound a ball (a sphere bounding a ball is contractible through the ball). So, combined with 10A.5 The Prime Decomposition: an irreducible orientable 3-manifold has , and a closed orientable 3-manifold with either has an summand or is a nontrivial connected sum. Conversely, a nontrivial connected sum of two manifolds with nontrivial fundamental groups has : in the universal cover the separating sphere lifts to spheres separating it into noncompact pieces. A sphere that separates a simply connected manifold into two noncompact pieces is not null-homologous: a proper line running from one noncompact piece to the other can be chosen to cross once, and the intersection number of a closed 2-cycle with a proper line is unchanged by adding boundaries, so it would be for a null-homologous . So is nonzero in of the cover, which is by Hurewicz. ( above is an example.)
Spheres and loops in the extinction argument
Morgan and Tian's Theorem 18.1 assumes that is a free product of finite groups and infinite cyclic groups; simply connected manifolds are the main case. The argument has two stages, and this chapter supplies the topology of each.
Stage 1: killing . For a metric and a nonzero class , let be the infimum of the energies (or areas) of maps in the free homotopy class . By Sacks and Uhlenbeck the infimum is attained by a minimal (harmonic) sphere, or a union of them, and the evolution of area of 10A.11 Min–Max and Width gives a differential inequality that forces to become negative in finite time unless the class dies. Surgery does not increase the quantity. So after finite time every component has .
Stage 2: using . Now every component has . Surgery only splits off connected summands (10A.5 The Prime Decomposition), so the fundamental group of each component is, like that of , a free product of finite and infinite cyclic groups. A compact 3-manifold whose fundamental group is a nontrivial free product, or infinite cyclic, contains a homotopically nontrivial embedded 2-sphere (this combines the sphere theorem with Kneser's conjecture, proved by Stallings; statement). As , neither can happen, so is a single finite group, and by Proposition 4.9 . This is the argument Morgan and Tian give at the start of their chapter 18. A nonzero element of can be presented in two ways, and the two approaches to finite extinction use one each.
- As a path of 2-spheres (Colding–Minicozzi). Write as with and collapsed to points (the suspension of ). A map is then a path of maps starting and ending at constant maps: a sweepout. Nontrivial elements of are nontrivial sweepouts, and the width of 10A.11 Min–Max and Width is the min–max of energy over them.
- As a 2-sphere of loops (Perelman). Write instead as the join, or think of a map that collapses and to the base point: it is the same as a map , a 2-sphere's worth of based loops. This adjunction gives . Perelman uses the free loop space of all loops, which fibres over (evaluate at the base point of the loop) with fibre and has a section (constant loops). The long exact sequence then splits:
and with this is . Each loop in a family representing a nonzero element of bounds discs (it is null-homotopic, since by now we may pass to the simply connected universal cover or note the loops are contractible), and Perelman's invariant is the infimum over families of the maximal area of least-area discs spanning the loops (10A.11 Min–Max and Width, 12C.3 Finite Extinction).
In both presentations, nontriviality is what prevents the families from being pulled tight to constants, and the min–max value is positive for that reason; the Ricci flow then forces it to decrease at a definite rate, which is impossible for all time.
10A.11 Min–Max and Width defines widths with sweepouts by spheres, and 12C.3 Finite Extinction carries out the two stages above for the flow with surgery. 10A.5 The Prime Decomposition uses the sphere theorem in the prime decomposition, and 12C.1 Reading Off the Topology reads off the topology at the end.
History
Witold Hurewicz introduced the higher homotopy groups in 1935 and proved the theorem named after him; Eduard Čech had defined them earlier, in 1932, but abandoned them when they turned out to be abelian. Heinz Hopf discovered the essential map in 1931 and proved the degree theorem in the 1920s. J. H. C. Whitehead proved his theorem in 1949. Christos Papakyriakopoulos proved the sphere theorem, with Dehn's lemma and the loop theorem, in 1957; J. H. C. Whitehead simplified part of the argument. The use of in finite extinction is from Perelman's third preprint (2003) and Colding and Minicozzi (2005).
is based homotopy classes of maps of spheres; it is abelian for (cubes slide past each other), acts on it, and for simply connected spaces free and based classes agree. Coverings induce isomorphisms on , , so higher homotopy is computed on the universal cover: tori, hyperbolic and flat manifolds have none, space forms have that of , and and that of . By Sard, for ; degree gives (Hopf); the Hopf fibration gives . Hurewicz identifies the first nonzero homotopy group of a simply connected space with homology, and Whitehead turns isomorphisms into homotopy equivalences. For closed 3-manifolds: finite gives and ; infinite with gives an aspherical manifold; gives an essential embedded sphere. Finite extinction kills and then uses , as a sweepout by spheres or a 2-sphere of loops. 10A.5 The Prime Decomposition cuts manifolds along spheres.
Exercises
Show that , and deduce and directly, without the universal cover.
Solution
A map is a pair of maps , , and a homotopy of such maps is a pair of homotopies, so based homotopy classes of maps into the product are pairs of classes; the product structure is componentwise. Then for , since ; so (degree) and (Hopf).
Show that every map and every map is null-homotopic, and deduce that every map has degree zero. Show, on the other hand, that the collapse map , crushing the complement of a small ball to a point, has degree one.
Solution
, since the universal cover is contractible (Proposition 4.3); so every based map is null-homotopic, and a free map is homotopic to a based one by moving its base point along a path. A null-homotopic map has the degree of a constant map, : the induced map on factors through . The collapse map , for a small ball , is a homeomorphism from onto its image away from one point, so a regular value inside the image of has exactly one preimage, at which preserves orientation: . So degree-one maps exist for every , while degree-one maps exist only for special .
Let be the involution of given by , with the unit circle in . Show that acts freely, and that the quotient is . (Hint: look at what happens over the two fixed points of .)
Solution
would need , impossible, so the action is free. The circle maps fixing ; the arc from to is a fundamental domain for . So the quotient is with identifications only over the endpoints: over , the sphere is divided by the antipodal map, and similarly over . A neighbourhood of in the quotient is with the antipodal identification at : this is the mapping cylinder of , which is minus a ball. So the quotient is two copies of minus a ball, joined along : . Its fundamental group is , infinite, and its universal cover is that of , namely .
Show that , and that the covering represents times a generator of . Conclude that the Hurewicz map is multiplication by , not an isomorphism, and say which hypothesis of the Hurewicz theorem fails.
Solution
, generated by the covering map (the lift of to the universal cover is the identity of , a generator). The covering has sheets and preserves orientation, so a regular value has preimages, all positive: , that is . So the Hurewicz map sends the generator to times the generator of . The theorem requires to conclude that is an isomorphism; here .
Let be simply connected. Show that two based maps that are freely homotopic are homotopic through based maps. (Hint: follow the base point along the free homotopy, and contract the resulting loop in .)
Solution
Let be a free homotopy from to and , a loop at . Since is simply connected, is null-homotopic rel endpoints by some from to the constant loop. The homotopy extension property of the pair , which holds because is a subcomplex, lets one deform so that its restriction to follows and ends constant, keeping the ends and fixed. The result is a based homotopy. Without simple connectivity the loop cannot be contracted, and is homotopic only to : this is the action of on .
Let , , send to . (a) Show that and are constant and that the resulting map is a homeomorphism, so the sweepout is nontrivial. (b) Show that the maximal area along the sweepout is , attained by the equatorial sphere at , a totally geodesic 2-sphere. (c) Under the Ricci flow , compute the rate at which the area of the equatorial sphere decreases, and compare with the inequality of 10A.11 Min–Max and Width.
Solution
(a) At and every goes to , the poles. For , determines (from the first coordinate) and (from the rest, divided by ), so the map from the suspension of is a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff one: a homeomorphism, of degree , hence nontrivial in . (b) is the sphere of latitude , a round 2-sphere of radius , with area , equality at , where it is the totally geodesic equator. (c) Lengths scale by and areas by : , so . The general inequality uses ; here , so the term adds to the from Gauss–Bonnet: , with equality because the equator has and is constant. (The inequality of 10A.11 Min–Max and Width drops the helpful term when and replaces it with the universal bound; it is far from sharp on the sphere.)
Free resources for this chapter
Chosen for what this chapter covers, and all free to read. Links checked Oct 16, 2026.
- Book Algebraic TopologyAllen Hatcher (Cambridge University Press, 2002; free edition on the author's site) · §4.1–4.2Homotopy groups, Whitehead's theorem, the Hurewicz theorem and the long exact sequence of a fibre bundle, with the Hopf bundle.
- Book Ricci Flow and the Poincaré ConjectureJohn Morgan and Gang Tian, arXiv (2006) · Chapter 18, §1How finite extinction uses pi_2 and then pi_3, and why the components have finite fundamental group.
© 2026 NeckPinch (www.neckpinch.com). All content in the guidebook (text, mathematics, figures and exercises) is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. No part may be copied, republished or redistributed without written permission.