Book 11B

© 2026 NeckPinch · www.neckpinch.com · All rights reserved.

Course 11Book 11B: Solitons, Compactness and SingularitiesChapter 6

Rotationally Symmetric Flows and the Standard Solution

The neckpinch in equations: warped products under the flow, what the maximum principle forces, and the standard solution that surgery glues in.

28 min read · Updated Oct 23, 2026

Read with Angenent and Knopf's "An example of neckpinching in Ricci flow on Sn+1S^{n+1}" (Mathematical Research Letters, 2004) for the equations and the first maximum principle estimates, and with Morgan and Tian's Ricci Flow and the Poincaré Conjecture, chapter 12 (the standard solution: Definition 12.1, Lemma 12.2 and Theorem 12.5) and Perelman's second preprint, §2.

In this chapter · 7 sections
  1. 6.1Warped products and their curvature
  2. 6.2The flow
  3. 6.3What the maximum principle says
  4. 6.4The neckpinch theorem
  5. 6.5The standard solution
  6. 6.6History
  7. 6.7Exercises
  8. ↗Free resources

Symmetry turns the Ricci flow into something one can almost solve. For a metric invariant under the rotations of SnS^n, the whole geometry is two functions of one space variable and time, and the flow is a pair of nonlinear heat equations in one dimension. In this setting one can see exactly why necks pinch, how fast, and what a singularity looks like up close; and the same setting gives the standard solution, the rotationally symmetric flow on R3\mathbb{R}^3 that Perelman glues into the manifold at every surgery.

11B.5 Singularities met the neckpinch through its equations and a computed example. This chapter derives the equations completely, proves the basic estimates with the maximum principle in one space dimension (the gradient bound ∣ψs∣≤1|\psi_s| \leq 1, the rate at which a neck can shrink, and the bound ψmin⁡2≤2(n−1)(T−t)\psi_{\min}^2 \leq 2(n - 1)(T - t) at a pinch), describes Angenent and Knopf's theorem and the degenerate neckpinch, and then turns to the standard solution: its initial metric, its curvature, and the properties that Morgan and Tian's Theorem 12.5 lists, which are exactly what surgery needs.

By the end of this chapter you will be able to:

  • write a rotationally symmetric metric as a warped product, compute its curvatures, and state the conditions for smoothness at the poles;
  • derive the Ricci flow as a system for the warping function and the length element, including the commutator of ∂t\partial_t and ∂s\partial_s;
  • prove with the maximum principle that ∣ψs∣≤1|\psi_s| \leq 1 is preserved, that a neck cannot shrink faster than the cylinder, and that at a neckpinch ψmin⁡2≤2(n−1)(T−t)\psi_{\min}^2 \leq 2(n - 1)(T - t);
  • state Angenent and Knopf's neckpinch theorem and describe the degenerate neckpinch;
  • construct a standard initial metric, verify its curvature, and state the properties of the standard solution used in surgery.

Warped products and their curvature

Let MM be (a,b)×Sn(a, b)\times S^n, possibly closed off at one or both ends, with a metric

g=φ(x)2dx2+ψ(x)2gSn,g = \varphi(x)^2dx^2 + \psi(x)^2g_{S^n},

φ,ψ>0\varphi, \psi > 0, gSng_{S^n} the round unit metric. With arclength ss along the xx-direction, ds=φ dxds = \varphi\,dx and ∂s=1φ∂x\partial_s = \frac1\varphi\partial_x, the metric is ds2+ψ(s)2gSnds^2 + \psi(s)^2g_{S^n}, the warped product of 9A.5 Computing Curvature, and its curvature is:

  • planes containing ∂s\partial_s ("radial" planes) have sectional curvature K0=−ψssψK_0 = -\frac{\psi_{ss}}{\psi};
  • planes tangent to the spheres {x}×Sn\{x\}\times S^n have K1=1−ψs2ψ2K_1 = \frac{1 - \psi_s^2}{\psi^2};
  • the Ricci tensor is diagonal, with Ric⁡(∂s,∂s)=nK0=−nψssψ\operatorname{Ric}(\partial_s, \partial_s) = nK_0 = -n\frac{\psi_{ss}}{\psi} and, on unit vectors ee tangent to the spheres, Ric⁡(e,e)=K0+(n−1)K1=−ψssψ+(n−1)1−ψs2ψ2\operatorname{Ric}(e, e) = K_0 + (n - 1)K_1 = -\frac{\psi_{ss}}{\psi} + (n - 1)\frac{1 - \psi_s^2}{\psi^2}.

These are the formulas of 9A.5 Computing Curvature with φ\varphi there renamed ψ\psi. Examples: the round unit Sn+1S^{n+1} is ψ=sin⁡s\psi = \sin s, s∈(0,π)s \in (0, \pi), with K0=K1=1K_0 = K_1 = 1; the cylinder Sn(ρ)×RS^n(\rho)\times\mathbb{R} is ψ=ρ\psi = \rho, with K0=0K_0 = 0 and K1=1ρ2K_1 = \frac{1}{\rho^2}; flat Rn+1\mathbb{R}^{n+1} is ψ=s\psi = s.

Smoothness at a pole. If the metric closes off at x=ax = a, where ψ→0\psi \to 0, it extends smoothly over the added point exactly when, measured from the pole, ψ\psi is an odd function of the distance ss with ψs=1\psi_s = 1 at the pole (no cone angle) and φ\varphi is even (9A.1 Riemannian Metrics and Model Spaces, warped products at the axis). On Sn+1S^{n+1} there are two poles, at s=0s = 0 and at s=ℓs = \ell, the total length, with ψs=1\psi_s = 1 and ψs=−1\psi_s = -1 there.

The flow

The Ricci flow preserves the rotational symmetry (isometries are preserved, 11A.13 Homogeneous Flows), so g(t)=φ(x,t)2dx2+ψ(x,t)2gSng(t) = \varphi(x, t)^2dx^2 + \psi(x, t)^2g_{S^n} with the same coordinate xx. Comparing ∂tg=−2Ric⁡\partial_tg = -2\operatorname{Ric} component by component:

∂t(φ2)=−2φ2Ric⁡(∂s,∂s) ⟹ ∂tφ=nψssψφ,\partial_t(\varphi^2) = -2\varphi^2\operatorname{Ric}(\partial_s, \partial_s) \ \Longrightarrow\ \partial_t\varphi = n\frac{\psi_{ss}}{\psi}\varphi,
∂t(ψ2)=−2ψ2Ric⁡(e,e) ⟹ ∂tψ=ψss−(n−1)1−ψs2ψ.\partial_t(\psi^2) = -2\psi^2\operatorname{Ric}(e, e) \ \Longrightarrow\ \partial_t\psi = \psi_{ss} - (n - 1)\frac{1 - \psi_s^2}{\psi}.

Here ∂t\partial_t is at fixed xx, and ψs\psi_s, ψss\psi_{ss} are derivatives in arclength at the current time. Since ∂s=φ−1∂x\partial_s = \varphi^{-1}\partial_x and ∂t(φ−1)=−nψssψφ−1\partial_t(\varphi^{-1}) = -n\frac{\psi_{ss}}{\psi}\varphi^{-1}, the two derivatives do not commute:

[∂t,∂s]=−nψssψ∂s.[\partial_t, \partial_s] = -n\frac{\psi_{ss}}{\psi}\partial_s.

The equation for ψ\psi is a heat equation in ss, with the reaction −(n−1)1−ψs2ψ-(n - 1)\frac{1 - \psi_s^2}{\psi} that shrinks the spheres. For the cylinder, ψt=−n−1ψ\psi_t = -\frac{n - 1}{\psi}, so ψ2=ρ02−2(n−1)t\psi^2 = \rho_0^2 - 2(n - 1)t, the shrinking neck.

What the maximum principle says

In one space dimension the maximum principle can be applied to ψ\psi, to its derivatives and to combinations of them, and each application says something geometric.

Proposition 6.1 The gradient bound

Along a rotationally symmetric Ricci flow on Sn+1S^{n+1}, ψs\psi_s satisfies

∂tψs=ψsss+(n−2)ψsψssψ+(n−1)(1−ψs2)ψsψ2.\partial_t\psi_s = \psi_{sss} + (n - 2)\frac{\psi_s\psi_{ss}}{\psi} + (n - 1)\frac{(1 - \psi_s^2)\psi_s}{\psi^2}.

Consequently, if ∣ψs∣≤1|\psi_s| \leq 1 at t=0t = 0, then ∣ψs∣≤1|\psi_s| \leq 1 for all tt; equivalently, the tangential curvature K1K_1 stays nonnegative.

Proof. Differentiate the equation for ψ\psi in ss, using the commutator: ∂tψs=∂s(∂tψ)+[∂t,∂s]ψ=∂s(ψss−(n−1)1−ψs2ψ)−nψssψψs\partial_t\psi_s = \partial_s(\partial_t\psi) + [\partial_t, \partial_s]\psi = \partial_s\big(\psi_{ss} - (n - 1)\frac{1 - \psi_s^2}{\psi}\big) - n\frac{\psi_{ss}}{\psi}\psi_s. Now ∂s1−ψs2ψ=−2ψsψssψ−(1−ψs2)ψsψ2\partial_s\frac{1 - \psi_s^2}{\psi} = -\frac{2\psi_s\psi_{ss}}{\psi} - \frac{(1 - \psi_s^2)\psi_s}{\psi^2}. Collecting the terms in ψsψssψ\frac{\psi_s\psi_{ss}}{\psi}: 2(n−1)−n=n−22(n - 1) - n = n - 2. This is the equation.

For the bound, let m(t)=max⁡ψs(⋅,t)m(t) = \max\psi_s(\cdot, t) over the sphere (minus the poles, where ψs=±1\psi_s = \pm1). Suppose m>1m > 1 at some time; at an interior point where the maximum mm is attained, ψss=0\psi_{ss} = 0 and ψsss≤0\psi_{sss} \leq 0, so ∂tψs≤(n−1)(1−m2)mψ2<0\partial_t\psi_s \leq (n - 1)\frac{(1 - m^2)m}{\psi^2} < 0. So mm decreases wherever it exceeds 11 (by Hamilton's trick, 9B.7 The Heat Equation on a Manifold), and it cannot cross 11 from below either: with the usual perturbation (m−εetm - \varepsilon e^{t}) one shows m≤1m \leq 1 for all time if m(0)≤1m(0) \leq 1. The minimum is handled the same way. At the poles ψs=±1\psi_s = \pm1, so the bound holds there by smoothness.

So the spheres of symmetry never become "too steep": the profile stays a graph with slope at most 11, and the tangential curvature 1−ψs2ψ2\frac{1 - \psi_s^2}{\psi^2} is nonnegative. (Angenent and Knopf work with initial metrics satisfying this, together with positive scalar curvature.)

Proposition 6.2 How fast a neck can shrink

Let ψmin⁡(t)\psi_{\min}(t) be the value of ψ\psi at a local minimum (a neck) in the interior. Then, in the sense of forward difference quotients, ddtψmin⁡≥−n−1ψmin⁡\frac{d}{dt}\psi_{\min} \geq -\frac{n - 1}{\psi_{\min}}, so

ψmin⁡(t)2≥ψmin⁡(t0)2−2(n−1)(t−t0).\psi_{\min}(t)^2 \geq \psi_{\min}(t_0)^2 - 2(n - 1)(t - t_0).

If the neck pinches at time TT, that is ψmin⁡(t)→0\psi_{\min}(t) \to 0 as t→Tt \to T, then ψmin⁡(t)2≤2(n−1)(T−t)\psi_{\min}(t)^2 \leq 2(n - 1)(T - t) for all t<Tt < T.

Proof. At a local minimum of ψ(⋅,t)\psi(\cdot, t), ψs=0\psi_s = 0 and ψss≥0\psi_{ss} \geq 0, so ∂tψ=ψss−n−1ψ≥−n−1ψ\partial_t\psi = \psi_{ss} - \frac{n - 1}{\psi} \geq -\frac{n - 1}{\psi}; the forward difference quotient bound for the minimum follows (Hamilton's trick, for the minimum over a neighbourhood of the neck that contains no other local minima). Then ddtψmin⁡2≥−2(n−1)\frac{d}{dt}\psi_{\min}^2 \geq -2(n - 1), which integrates to the first inequality. For the second: if ψmin⁡(t)2>2(n−1)(T−t)\psi_{\min}(t)^2 > 2(n - 1)(T - t) for some tt, the first inequality would give ψmin⁡(T)2≥ψmin⁡(t)2−2(n−1)(T−t)>0\psi_{\min}(T)^2 \geq \psi_{\min}(t)^2 - 2(n - 1)(T - t) > 0, so the neck would not pinch at TT.

So a neck cannot shrink faster than the round cylinder of the same radius, and the cylinder is the extreme case: ψmin⁡2≤2(n−1)(T−t)\psi_{\min}^2 \leq 2(n - 1)(T - t), with equality for the cylinder itself. The curvature at the neck is then at least K1=1ψmin⁡2≥12(n−1)(T−t)K_1 = \frac{1}{\psi_{\min}^2} \geq \frac{1}{2(n - 1)(T - t)}, the rate of a Type I singularity (11B.5 Singularities).

The neckpinch theorem

Theorem 6.3 Angenent–Knopf (2004; statement)

For n≥2n \geq 2 there is an open set of rotationally symmetric metrics on Sn+1S^{n+1}, of the dumbbell shape (two large bulbs joined by a thin neck), with positive scalar curvature and ∣ψs∣≤1|\psi_s| \leq 1, for which the Ricci flow develops a singularity at a finite time TT in which only the neck pinches: ψmin⁡(t)→0\psi_{\min}(t) \to 0 while ψ\psi stays bounded below away from a neighbourhood of the neck. The singularity is of Type I, with

ψmin⁡(t)=2(n−1)(T−t) (1+o(1)),\psi_{\min}(t) = \sqrt{2(n - 1)(T - t)}\,(1 + o(1)),

and the blow-up limit at the neck is the shrinking round cylinder Sn×RS^n\times\mathbb{R}.

The proof works in rescaled variables adapted to the expected cylinder: u=ψ2(n−1)(T−t)u = \frac{\psi}{\sqrt{2(n - 1)(T - t)}} as a function of σ=sT−t\sigma = \frac{s}{\sqrt{T - t}} and τ=−log⁡(T−t)\tau = -\log(T - t). The cylinder becomes the stationary solution u≡1u \equiv 1, and the task is to show that u→1u \to 1 on regions ∣σ∣≤C|\sigma| \leq C, using barriers (sub- and supersolutions) built from the linearised equation around 11, whose structure resembles the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck operator of a Gaussian. The radial curvature K0=−ψssψK_0 = -\frac{\psi_{ss}}{\psi} is shown to be small compared with K1K_1 near the neck, so that the neck becomes cylindrical. In later work Angenent and Knopf, and Angenent, Isenberg and Knopf, gave precise asymptotics of the profile near the pinch.

The degenerate neckpinch. If the neck is moved towards one bulb and that bulb is made small, the bulb and the neck can pinch together: the singularity forms at a pole, at the tip of a shrinking cap, rather than in the middle of a neck. Gu and Zhu (2008) proved that such Type II singularities occur for suitable rotationally symmetric initial data; Angenent, Isenberg and Knopf (2015) analysed them in detail, showing that the rescaled limit at the tip, with Hamilton's Type II point picking (11B.5 Singularities), is the Bryant soliton (11B.1 Ricci Solitons). In three dimensions such caps are among the κ\kappa-solutions of Perelman's classification.

The standard solution

At a surgery, Perelman cuts a thin neck along a central sphere and glues in a cap on each side. The cap is not arbitrary: it is a piece of a fixed rotationally symmetric metric on R3\mathbb{R}^3, rescaled, and the flow from that metric, the standard solution, must be well understood, because just after surgery the manifold near the cap looks like it.

Definition 6.4 Standard initial metric (Morgan–Tian, Definition 12.1)

A standard initial metric is a metric g0g_0 on R3\mathbb{R}^3 that is complete, has nonnegative sectional curvature, is invariant under the standard action of SO(3)SO(3), coincides outside a compact ball with the product (S2,h0)×(R+,ds2)(S^2, h_0)\times(\mathbb{R}_+, ds^2) of the round sphere of scalar curvature 11 with a half-line, and has constant sectional curvature 14\frac14 near the origin, the tip.

Proposition 6.5 Standard initial metrics exist

Let f:[0,∞)→[0,∞)f : [0, \infty) \to [0, \infty) be smooth on (0,∞)(0, \infty), positive there, concave (f′′≤0f'' \leq 0), equal to 4s−s2\sqrt{4s - s^2} for ss near 00 and equal to 2\sqrt2 for ss large. The hypersurface of revolution Σ={(x0,x′)∈R×R3:x0≥0, ∣x′∣=f(x0)}\Sigma = \{(x_0, x') \in \mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}^3 : x_0 \geq 0,\ |x'| = f(x_0)\} in R4\mathbb{R}^4, with the induced metric, is a standard initial metric. Such ff exist.

Proof. Near the tip. For ss near 00, f(s)2+(s−2)2=4f(s)^2 + (s - 2)^2 = 4: the profile is an arc of the circle of radius 22 centred at (2,0)(2, 0), so a neighbourhood of the tip of Σ\Sigma is a neighbourhood of a pole of the round 3-sphere of radius 22, with constant curvature 14\frac14; in particular Σ\Sigma is smooth there. At infinity. Where f=2f = \sqrt2, Σ\Sigma is the product of the round 2-sphere of radius 2\sqrt2 (scalar curvature 11) with a half-line. Curvature. For a hypersurface of revolution ∣x′∣=f(x0)|x'| = f(x_0) in R4\mathbb{R}^4, the principal curvatures are 1f1+f′2\frac{1}{f\sqrt{1 + f'^2}} (twice, along the 2-spheres of revolution) and −f′′(1+f′2)3/2\frac{-f''}{(1 + f'^2)^{3/2}} (along the profile), up to a common sign. By the Gauss equation (9A.8 Submanifolds and Minimal Surfaces) the sectional curvatures are products of principal curvatures: on the planes tangent to the orbits, 1f2(1+f′2)\frac{1}{f^2(1 + f'^2)}; on planes containing the profile direction, −f′′f(1+f′2)2\frac{-f''}{f(1 + f'^2)^2}. Both are nonnegative when f′′≤0f'' \leq 0. Symmetry and completeness are evident, and Σ\Sigma is diffeomorphic to R3\mathbb{R}^3 by an SO(3)SO(3)-equivariant diffeomorphism. Existence of ff. The derivative of 4s−s2\sqrt{4s - s^2} is h(s)=2−s4s−s2h(s) = \frac{2 - s}{\sqrt{4s - s^2}}, positive and decreasing on (0,2)(0, 2), integrable at 00. Multiply hh by a smooth nonincreasing cut-off λ(s−s0)\lambda(s - s_0) that equals 11 for s≤s0s \leq s_0 and 00 for s≥s0+12s \geq s_0 + \frac12, and choose s0∈(0,32)s_0 \in (0, \frac32) so that ∫0∞h(σ)λ(σ−s0) dσ=2\int_0^\infty h(\sigma)\lambda(\sigma - s_0)\,d\sigma = \sqrt2 (possible by continuity, since the integral is less than 2\sqrt2 for s0=0s_0 = 0 and greater for s0=32s_0 = \frac32). Then f(s)=∫0shλf(s) = \int_0^sh\lambda has f′=hλ≥0f' = h\lambda \geq 0 nonincreasing, so f′′≤0f'' \leq 0, with the required behaviour at both ends.

The choice of the tip curvature 14\frac14 is a normalisation; what matters is that the cap has positive curvature and joins the cylinder of scalar curvature 11 smoothly with nonnegative curvature, so that gluing it in does not destroy the pinching estimates.

Theorem 6.6 The standard solution (Morgan–Tian, Theorem 12.5; statement)

Let g0g_0 be a standard initial metric. There is a Ricci flow g(t)g(t) on R3\mathbb{R}^3 with g(0)=g0g(0) = g_0, complete with bounded curvature on each compact time interval (a standard solution), and:

  1. it is unique among such flows;
  2. its maximal time is T=1T = 1;
  3. for 0<t<10 < t < 1, g(t)g(t) is complete with strictly positive curvature;
  4. it is SO(3)SO(3)-invariant;
  5. far out, on any [0,t0][0, t_0] with t0<1t_0 < 1, it is ε\varepsilon-close to the shrinking cylinder S2×RS^2\times\mathbb{R} whose sphere has scalar curvature 11−t\frac{1}{1 - t};
  6. it is κ\kappa-noncollapsed on scales less than some r>0r > 0.

Most of these follow from what Books 11A and 11B have proved. The flow exists by Shi's theorem (11A.9 Flows on Complete Manifolds); the symmetry is preserved by uniqueness; positive curvature follows from nonnegative curvature by the strong maximum principle (11A.8 The Strong Maximum Principle and Splitting): the metric is not flat, and it does not split, because near the tip it has positive curvature in all directions. Far out the metric is the cylinder, which becomes extinct at t=1t = 1 (its scalar curvature 11−t\frac{1}{1 - t} blows up there), and a comparison argument shows the whole solution lives exactly that long. Uniqueness is the hard part: Morgan and Tian prove it by solving the harmonic map heat flow in this rotationally symmetric, noncompact setting and passing to the Ricci–DeTurck flow (their §12.4–12.6), following the strategy of 11A.4 Short-Time Existence and Uniqueness. They also prove (Theorem 12.32) that every point of the standard solution has a canonical neighbourhood of the kinds described in 10A.6 Necks, Caps and Their Topology, which is what lets the canonical neighbourhood assumption survive a surgery.

How the standard solution enters surgery. At a surgery, a strong δ\delta-neck of scale hh is cut along its central sphere; the neck, rescaled by h−2h^{-2}, is close to S2×(−δ−1,δ−1)S^2\times(-\delta^{-1}, \delta^{-1}), and a ball around the tip of the standard initial metric, rescaled by h2h^2, is glued onto the cut, with a partition of unity in the overlap and a slight bending of the metric (Hamilton's idea) to keep the curvature pinched toward positive. For a while after surgery, the region near the cap evolves like a rescaled standard solution, by stability of the flow, and the properties above become properties of the flow with surgery (12B.9 Surgery, 12B.13 Ricci Flow with Surgery for All Time).

Where this goes Where symmetry is used

12B.9 Surgery uses the standard solution to perform surgery; 12B.13 Ricci Flow with Surgery for All Time uses its canonical neighbourhoods to show that the canonical neighbourhood assumption holds after surgery, and its finite lifespan T=1T = 1 to bound how long a surgery cap can survive. Rotationally symmetric necks are the models in 10A.6 Necks, Caps and Their Topology.

History

Rotationally symmetric Ricci flows were studied by Ivey (1994) and by Miles Simon (2000), who proved neckpinching for a class of metrics. Angenent and Knopf proved the precise neckpinch theorem in 2004, and with Isenberg analysed the asymptotics and the degenerate neckpinch in the following decade; Gu and Zhu proved that Type II singularities occur in 2008. Perelman introduced the standard solution in §2 of his second preprint (2003), asserting its properties briefly; Morgan and Tian's chapter 12 proves them, including uniqueness, and Chen and Zhu proved uniqueness more generally.

Recall Where we stand

A rotationally symmetric metric is φ2dx2+ψ2gSn\varphi^2dx^2 + \psi^2g_{S^n}, with radial curvature −ψssψ-\frac{\psi_{ss}}{\psi} and tangential curvature 1−ψs2ψ2\frac{1 - \psi_s^2}{\psi^2}, smooth at a pole when ψs=±1\psi_s = \pm1 there. The flow is ∂tφ=nψssψφ\partial_t\varphi = n\frac{\psi_{ss}}{\psi}\varphi, ∂tψ=ψss−(n−1)1−ψs2ψ\partial_t\psi = \psi_{ss} - (n - 1)\frac{1 - \psi_s^2}{\psi}, with [∂t,∂s]=−nψssψ∂s[\partial_t, \partial_s] = -n\frac{\psi_{ss}}{\psi}\partial_s. The maximum principle keeps ∣ψs∣≤1|\psi_s| \leq 1, prevents a neck from shrinking faster than the cylinder, and gives ψmin⁡2≤2(n−1)(T−t)\psi_{\min}^2 \leq 2(n - 1)(T - t) at a pinch: Type I. Angenent and Knopf proved that dumbbells pinch at the neck with cylinder blow-ups; degenerate neckpinches give Type II singularities modelled on the Bryant soliton. The standard solution on R3\mathbb{R}^3, from a capped cylinder with tip curvature 14\frac14, is unique, positively curved, lives for time 11, looks like a shrinking neck far out, and is what surgery glues in. 11B.7 Hamilton’s Program in 2002 summarises Hamilton's program in 2002.

Exercises

Exercise 6.7 The round sphere as a warped product

For ψ=rsin⁡sr\psi = r\sin\frac sr on (0,πr)(0, \pi r), compute K0K_0 and K1K_1 and check the poles. Then show that under the flow the profile stays of this form with r(t)2=r02−2ntr(t)^2 = r_0^2 - 2nt, and verify the equation for ψ\psi.

Solution

ψs=cos⁡sr\psi_s = \cos\frac sr and ψss=−1rsin⁡sr\psi_{ss} = -\frac1r\sin\frac sr, so K0=1r2K_0 = \frac{1}{r^2} and K1=1−cos⁡2(s/r)r2sin⁡2(s/r)=1r2K_1 = \frac{1 - \cos^2(s/r)}{r^2\sin^2(s/r)} = \frac{1}{r^2}. At s=0s = 0 and s=πrs = \pi r, ψ=0\psi = 0 and ψs=±1\psi_s = \pm1: smooth poles. The round Sn+1(r)S^{n+1}(r) has Ric⁡=nr2g\operatorname{Ric} = \frac{n}{r^2}g, so r2r^2 decreases at rate 2n2n. In the equation for ψ\psi, at fixed xx (that is, fixed angle sr\frac sr), ∂tψ=r′sin⁡sr\partial_t\psi = r'\sin\frac sr and r′=−nrr' = -\frac nr; while ψss−(n−1)1−ψs2ψ=−1rsin⁡sr−n−1rsin⁡sr=−nrsin⁡sr\psi_{ss} - (n - 1)\frac{1 - \psi_s^2}{\psi} = -\frac1r\sin\frac sr - \frac{n - 1}{r}\sin\frac sr = -\frac nr\sin\frac sr. They agree.

Exercise 6.8 The commutator

Derive [∂t,∂s]=−nψssψ∂s[\partial_t, \partial_s] = -n\frac{\psi_{ss}}{\psi}\partial_s from ∂s=φ−1∂x\partial_s = \varphi^{-1}\partial_x and the equation for φ\varphi, and interpret it: the flow stretches or shrinks the ss-direction where the radial Ricci curvature is negative or positive.

Solution

∂t∂s=∂t(φ−1∂x)=−φ−2(∂tφ)∂x+φ−1∂x∂t=−nψssψ∂s+∂s∂t\partial_t\partial_s = \partial_t(\varphi^{-1}\partial_x) = -\varphi^{-2}(\partial_t\varphi)\partial_x + \varphi^{-1}\partial_x\partial_t = -n\frac{\psi_{ss}}{\psi}\partial_s + \partial_s\partial_t, using ∂tφ=nψssψφ\partial_t\varphi = n\frac{\psi_{ss}}{\psi}\varphi and that ∂t\partial_t, ∂x\partial_x commute. Lengths in the ss-direction change at the rate ∂tlog⁡φ=nψssψ=−Ric⁡(∂s,∂s)\partial_t\log\varphi = n\frac{\psi_{ss}}{\psi} = -\operatorname{Ric}(\partial_s, \partial_s): they shrink where the radial Ricci curvature is positive (where the profile is concave) and grow where it is negative (where it is convex, as at a neck).

Exercise 6.9 Why the slope bound matters

Show that if ∣ψs∣>1|\psi_s| > 1 somewhere, the tangential curvature K1K_1 is negative there, and give an example of a smooth rotationally symmetric metric with a region where ∣ψs∣>1|\psi_s| > 1 (think of a sphere with a flared, trumpet-like region). Why do Angenent and Knopf assume ∣ψs∣≤1|\psi_s| \leq 1?

Solution

K1=1−ψs2ψ2<0K_1 = \frac{1 - \psi_s^2}{\psi^2} < 0 when ∣ψs∣>1|\psi_s| > 1. A profile that rises steeply, faster than 45°45° in the (s,ψ)(s, \psi) picture, as in a trumpet's bell, has this property; such a region can be put on a sphere between two caps with ψs=±1\psi_s = \pm1. The slope bound gives K1≥0K_1 \geq 0, which with the preserved positivity of scalar curvature controls the reaction terms; it is preserved by Proposition 6.1, so it is a natural class to work in, and it makes the neck's curvature dominated by the tangential direction.

Exercise 6.10 The tip of the standard metric

Check that f(s)=4s−s2f(s) = \sqrt{4s - s^2} near 00 gives, by the curvature formulas of Proposition 6.5, sectional curvature 14\frac14 in all directions, and that f=2f = \sqrt2 gives curvatures 12\frac12 and 00.

Solution

f2=4s−s2f^2 = 4s - s^2, 2ff′=4−2s2ff' = 4 - 2s, so f′=2−sff' = \frac{2 - s}{f} and 1+f′2=f2+(2−s)2f2=4f21 + f'^2 = \frac{f^2 + (2 - s)^2}{f^2} = \frac{4}{f^2}. The orbital curvature is 1f2(1+f′2)=14\frac{1}{f^2(1 + f'^2)} = \frac14. Differentiating ff′=2−sff' = 2 - s: f′2+ff′′=−1f'^2 + ff'' = -1, so f′′=−1+f′2f=−4f3f'' = -\frac{1 + f'^2}{f} = -\frac{4}{f^3}, and the profile curvature is −f′′f(1+f′2)2=4/f3f⋅16/f4=14\frac{-f''}{f(1 + f'^2)^2} = \frac{4/f^3}{f\cdot16/f^4} = \frac14. Where f=2f = \sqrt2, f′=f′′=0f' = f'' = 0: orbital curvature 12\frac12, profile curvature 00, the cylinder of scalar curvature 2⋅12=12\cdot\frac12 = 1.

Exercise 6.11 Rehearsal: why the standard solution lives for time 11

Far out the standard initial metric is the cylinder S2(2)×RS^2(\sqrt2)\times\mathbb{R}. Show that the cylinder's flow becomes singular at t=1t = 1, and explain, using Proposition 6.2-type reasoning and positive curvature, why the standard solution cannot live longer than the cylinder (one direction of T=1T = 1). (The other direction, that it lives as long, uses the closeness to the cylinder far out and is part of Morgan and Tian's proof.)

Solution

For S2(ρ)×RS^2(\rho)\times\mathbb{R} in dimension three, n=2n = 2 and ρ2=2−2t\rho^2 = 2 - 2t, so the cylinder pinches at t=1t = 1, where its scalar curvature 11−t\frac{1}{1 - t} blows up. The standard solution is asymptotic to this cylinder at infinity on every interval [0,t0][0, t_0], t0<1t_0 < 1 (property 5); its scalar curvature far out is therefore at least about 11−t\frac{1}{1 - t}, which tends to infinity as t→1t \to 1. A complete flow with bounded curvature on [0,t0][0, t_0] for every t0<1t_0 < 1 but curvature unbounded as t→1t \to 1 cannot be continued past t=1t = 1 as a flow of bounded curvature. So the maximal time is at most 11. (Morgan and Tian's Corollary 12.8 records T≤1T \leq 1 in this way.)

Free resources for this chapter

Chosen for what this chapter covers, and all free to read. Links checked Oct 16, 2026.

© 2026 NeckPinch (www.neckpinch.com). All content in the guidebook (text, mathematics, figures and exercises) is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. No part may be copied, republished or redistributed without written permission.